It's a new API for custom RTTI in Apple IOKit/DriverKit framework that is
similar to OSDynamicCast() that's already supported, but crashes instead of
returning null (and therefore causing UB when the cast fails unexpectedly).
Kind of like cast_or_null<> as opposed to dyn_cast_or_null<> in LLVM's RTTI.
Historically, RetainCountChecker was responsible for modeling OSDynamicCast.
This is simply an extension of the same functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63117
llvm-svn: 363891
Use getAPIntValue() in a few more places. Most of the time getZExtValue() is fine, but occasionally there's fuzzed code or someone decides to create i65536 or something.....
llvm-svn: 363887
Simple little utility which takes a opt logfile generated with "opt -print-before-all -print-module-scope -o /dev/null <args> 2&>1", and splits into a series of individual "chunk-X.ll" files. The intended purpose is to help automate one step in failure reduction.
The imagined workflow is:
New crasher bug reported against clang or other frontend
Frontend run with -emit-llvm equivalent and manually confirmed that opt -O2 <emit.ll> crashes
Run this splitter script
Manually map pass name to invocation command (next on the to automate list)
Run bugpoint on last chunk file + manual command
I chose to dump every chunk rather than only the last since miscompile debugging frequently requires either manual step by step reduction, or cross feeding IR into different compiler versions. Not an immediate target, but there may be applications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63461
llvm-svn: 363884
Teach IndVarSimply's LinearFunctionTestReplace transform to handle multiple exit loops. LFTR does two key things 1) it rewrites (all) exit tests in terms of a common IV potentially eliminating one in the process and 2) it moves any offset/indexing/f(i) style logic out of the loop.
This turns out to actually be pretty easy to implement. SCEV already has all the information we need to know what the backedge taken count is for each individual exit. (We use that when computing the BE taken count for the loop as a whole.) We basically just need to iterate through the exiting blocks and apply the existing logic with the exit specific BE taken count. (The previously landed NFC makes this super obvious.)
I chose to go ahead and apply this to all loop exits instead of only latch exits as originally proposed. After reviewing other passes, the only case I could find where LFTR form was harmful was LoopPredication. I've fixed the latch case, and guards aren't LFTRed anyways. We'll have some more work to do on the way towards widenable_conditions, but that's easily deferred.
I do want to note that I added one bit after the review. When running tests, I saw a new failure (no idea why didn't see previously) which pointed out LFTR can rewrite a constant condition back to a loop varying one. This was theoretically possible with a single exit, but the zero case covered it in practice. With multiple exits, we saw this happening in practice for the eliminate-comparison.ll test case because we'd compute a ExitCount for one of the exits which was guaranteed to never actually be reached. Since LFTR ran after simplifyAndExtend, we'd immediately turn around and undo the simplication work we'd just done. The solution seemed obvious, so I didn't bother with another round of review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62625
llvm-svn: 363883
Summary:
These fields are unused and have been since their inception, from what
I can tell.
Reviewers: compnerd, JDevlieghere, davide, labath
Subscribers: kubamracek, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63357
llvm-svn: 363881
Summary:
This is unfortunately needed for correctness, if we are to extend the tolerance of the update API to the way simple loop unswitch is doing cloning.
In simple loop unswitch (as opposed to loop unswitch), not all blocks are cloned. This can create unreachable cloned blocks (no predecessor), which are later cleaned up.
In MemorySSA, the APIs for supporting these kind of updates (clone + update exit blocks), make certain assumption on the integrity of the CFG. When cloning, if something was not cloned, it's values in MemorySSA default to LiveOnEntry. When updating exit blocks, it is safe to assume that we can first insert phis in the blocks merging two clones, then add additional phis in the IDF of the blocks that received phis. This no longer holds true if one of the clones being merged comes from an unreachable block. We'd conservatively need to add all phis before filling in their incoming definitions. In practice this restriction can be relaxed if we clean up trivial phis after the first round of insertion.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63354
llvm-svn: 363880
Summary:
When computing IDF for insert updates, ensure we use the snapshot CFG offered by GraphDiff.
Caught by D63389.
Reviewers: kuhar, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits, Szelethus
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63443
llvm-svn: 363879
This is a NFC refactor move of CodegenNameGeneratorImpl from clang::Index to
clang:AST (and rename to ASTNameGenerator). The purpose is to make the
highlevel mangling code more reusable inside of clang (say in places like clang
FrontendAction). This does not affect anything in CodegenNameGenerator, except
that CodegenNameGenerator will now use ASTNameGenerator (in AST).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63535
llvm-svn: 363878
The def instruction for the vreg may not match, because it may be
folding through a reg_sequence. The assert was overly conservative and
not necessary. It's not actually important if DefMI really defined the
register, because the fold that will be done cares about the def of
the value that will be folded.
For some reason copies aren't making it through the reg_sequence,
although they should.
llvm-svn: 363876
(Recommit of r363293 which was reverted when a dependent patch was.)
As pointed out by Nikita in D62625, BackedgeTakenCount is generally used to refer to the backedge taken count of the loop. A conditional backedge taken count - one which only applies if a particular exit is taken - is called a ExitCount in SCEV code, so be consistent here.
llvm-svn: 363875
Turns out that we can save an instruction by folding the right shift into
the compare.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63568
llvm-svn: 363874
Mostly unused parameter, unused local typedefs and shadowed declarations.
This massaging it necessary if we want to be able to run the tests under
the libc++ lit configuration.
llvm-svn: 363872
This reapplies r363678, using the correct chain for the CopyToReg for
v0. glueCopyToM0 counterintuitively changes the operands of the
original node.
llvm-svn: 363870
Reword the ScalarEvolution::getExitCount comment in the same terminology as used by getBackedgeTakenCount since they're equivelent for single exit loops. Also, strengthen the comment to indicate exiting on the exact iteration specified is guaranteed. Several transforms implicitly rely on this; and the actual implementation checks for it (via dominating latch checks). So, spell out the guarantee in the comment.
llvm-svn: 363867
Summary:
Changes:
- add an ast matcher for deductiong guide.
- allow isExplicit matcher for deductiong guide.
- add hasExplicitSpecifier matcher which give access to the expression of the explicit specifier if present.
Reviewers: klimek, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61552
llvm-svn: 363855
This is an exception to the rule that we should prefer xmm ops to ymm ops.
As shown in PR42305:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42305
...the store folding opportunity with vextractf128 may result in better
perf by reducing the instruction count.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63517
llvm-svn: 363853
r363780 fixes extreme memory growth by using a new std::vector every loop iteration, but causes runtime to go up (and occasionally timeout in certain situations) because of constructor cost every loop iteration. Fix this by moving the constructor back out, but clearing contents in the loop.
Also apply this to the AArch64 features test case, which seems to use the same pattern.
llvm-svn: 363851
- CodeGen/flatten.c will fail under new PM becausec the new PM AlwaysInliner
seems to intentionally inline functions but not call sites marked with
alwaysinline (D23299)
- Tests that check remarks happen to check them for the inliner which is not
turned on at O0. These tests just check that remarks work, but we can make
separate tests for the new PM with -O1 so we can turn on the inliner and
check the remarks with minimal changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62225
llvm-svn: 363846
Artem Dergachev