We attempted to use the UnaryTransformType's UnderlyingType instead of
it's BaseType. This is not correct for dependent UnaryTransformType
because the have no underlying type.
This fixes PR28045.
llvm-svn: 272079
Using declarations which are aliases to struct types have their name
used as the struct type's name for linkage purposes. Otherwise, make
sure to give an anonymous struct defined inside a using declaration a
mangling number to disambiguate it from other anonymous structs in the
same context.
This fixes PR22809.
llvm-svn: 231909
We attempted to be compatible with GCC's buggy mangling for templates
with a declaration for a template argument.
However, we weren't completely successful in copying their bug in cases
like:
char foo;
template <char &C> decltype(C) f() { return foo; };
template char &f<foo>();
Instead, just follow the ABI specification. This fixes PR22621.
llvm-svn: 229644
Our mangling of <destructor-name> wasn't quite right: we'd introduce
mangling substitutions where one shouldn't be possible. We also didn't
correctly handle the case where the destroyed type was not dependent but
still a TemplateSpecializationType.
N.B. There isn't a mangling for a template-template parameter showing up
as the destroyed type. We do the 'obvious' thing and mangle the index
of the parameter.
llvm-svn: 229615
We had two bugs:
- We were missing the "on" prefix for unresolved operators.
- We didn't handle the mangling of destructors at all.
This fixes PR22584.
llvm-svn: 229255
Template template parameters weren't added to the list of substitutions.
This would make the substitution map contain inaccurate mappings,
leading to Clang violating the Itanium ABI and breaking compatibility
with GCC.
This fixes PR21351.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5959
llvm-svn: 220588
Because references must be initialized using some evaluated expression, they
must point to something, and a callee can assume the reference parameter is
dereferenceable. Taking advantage of a new attribute just added to LLVM, mark
them as such.
Because dereferenceability in addrspace(0) implies nonnull in the backend, we
don't need both attributes. However, we need to know the size of the object to
use the dereferenceable attribute, so for incomplete types we still emit only
nonnull.
llvm-svn: 213386
cxx-abi-dev came up with a way to disambiguate between different
keywords used in elaborated type specifiers.
This resolves certain collisions during mangling.
llvm-svn: 205943
With this patch we output the in the order
C2
C1
D2
D1
D0
Which means that a destructor or constructor that call another is output after
the callee. This is a bit easier to read IHMO and a tiny bit more efficient
as we don't put a decl in DeferredDeclsToEmit.
llvm-svn: 196784
If the sole distinction between two declarations is that one has a
__restrict qualifier then we should not consider it to be an overload.
Instead, we will consider it as an incompatible redeclaration which is
similar to how MSVC, ICC and GCC would handle it.
This fixes PR17786.
N.B. We must not mangle in __restrict into method qualifiers becase we
don't allow overloading between such declarations anymore. To do
otherwise would be a violation of the Itanium ABI.
llvm-svn: 193964
The Itanium mangler couldn't cope with mangling an IndirectFieldDecl.
Instead, mangle the field the IndirectFieldDecl refers to.
Further, give IndirectFieldDecl no linkage just like FieldDecl.
N.B. Decl.cpp:getLVForNamespaceScopeDecl tried to calculate linkage for
data members of anonymous structs/unions. However, this seems
impossible so turn it into an assertion.
llvm-svn: 193269
variable from being the function to being the enclosing namespace scope (in
C++) or the TU (in C). This allows us to fix a selection of related issues
where we would build incorrect redeclaration chains for such declarations, and
fail to notice type mismatches.
Such declarations are put into a new IdentifierNamespace, IDNS_LocalExtern,
which is only found when searching scopes, and not found when searching
DeclContexts. Such a declaration is only made visible in its DeclContext if
there are no non-LocalExtern declarations.
llvm-svn: 191064
Summary:
We would not perform substitution at an appropriate point, allowing strange
results to appear. We would accepts things that we shouldn't or mangle things incorrectly. Note that this hasn't fixed the other cases like
template-template parameters or non-type template parameters.
Reviewers: doug.gregor, rjmccall, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1507
llvm-svn: 189540
Compute mangling numbers for externally visible local variables and tags.
Change the mangler to consistently use discriminators where necessary.
Tweak the scheme we use to number decls which are not externally visible
to avoid unnecessary discriminators in common cases now that we request
them more consistently.
Fixes <rdar://problem/14204721>.
llvm-svn: 185986
This corrects the mangling and linkage of classes (& their member functions) in
cases like this:
struct foo {
struct {
void func() { ... }
} x;
};
we were accidentally giving this nested unnamed struct 'no' linkage where it
should've had the linkage of the outer class. The mangling was incorrecty too,
mangling as TU-wide unnamed type mangling of $_X rather than class-scoped
mangling of UtX_.
This also fixes -Wunused-member-function which would incorrectly diagnose
'func' as unused due to it having no linkage & thus appearing to be TU-local
when in fact it might be correctly used in another TU.
Similar mangling should be applied to function local classes in similar cases
but I've deferred that for a subsequent patch.
Review/discussion by Richard Smith, John McCall, & especially Eli Friedman.
llvm-svn: 167906
mangling of floating-point literals. I just went ahead and
reimplemented toString() here; if someone wants to generalize
the library routine to do this, or feels strongly that we should
be post-processing, please feel free.
llvm-svn: 149256
values and non-type template arguments of integral and enumeration types.
This change causes some legal C++98 code to no longer compile in C++11 mode, by
enforcing the C++11 rule that narrowing integral conversions are not permitted
in the final implicit conversion sequence for the above cases.
llvm-svn: 148439
dependent. This covers an odd class of types such as
int (&)[sizeof(sizeof(T() + T()))];
which involve template parameters but, because of some trick typically
involving a form of expression that is never type-dependent, resolve
down to a non-dependent type. Such types need to be mangled
essentially as they were written in the source code (involving
template parameters), rather than via their canonical type.
In general, instantiation-dependent types should be mangled as
they were written in the source. However, since we can't do that now
without non-trivial refactoring of the AST (see the new FIXME), I've
gone for this partial solution: only use the as-written-in-the-source
mangling for these strange types that are instantiation-dependent but
not dependent. This provides better compatibility with previous
incarnations of Clang and with GCC. In the future, we'd like to get
this right.
Fixes <rdar://problem/9663282>.
llvm-svn: 134984
type/expression/template argument/etc. is instantiation-dependent if
it somehow involves a template parameter, even if it doesn't meet the
requirements for the more common kinds of dependence (dependent type,
type-dependent expression, value-dependent expression).
When we see an instantiation-dependent type, we know we always need to
perform substitution into that instantiation-dependent type. This
keeps us from short-circuiting evaluation in places where we
shouldn't, and lets us properly implement C++0x [temp.type]p2.
In theory, this would also allow us to properly mangle
instantiation-dependent-but-not-dependent decltype types per the
Itanium C++ ABI, but we aren't quite there because we still mangle
based on the canonical type in cases like, e.g.,
template<unsigned> struct A { };
template<typename T>
void f(A<sizeof(sizeof(decltype(T() + T())))>) { }
template void f<int>(A<sizeof(sizeof(int))>);
and therefore get the wrong answer.
llvm-svn: 134225
if they match that production, i.e. if they're template type parameters
or decltypes (or, as an obvious case not yet described in the ABI document,
if they're template template parameters applied to template arguments).
llvm-svn: 130824
Patch authored by John Wiegley.
These type traits are used for parsing code that employs certain features of
the Embarcadero C++ compiler. Several of these constructs are also desired by
libc++, according to its project pages (such as __is_standard_layout).
llvm-svn: 130342
I've sent off an email requesting clarification on a few things that
I wasn't sure how to handle.
This also necessitated making prefixes and unresolved-prefixes get
mangled separately.
llvm-svn: 130083
APInt::toString doesn't do those, but it's easy to postprocess that output,
and that's probably better than adding another knob to that method.
llvm-svn: 130081
they don't collide with file-scope extern functions from the same
translation unit. This is basically a matter of applying the same
logic to FunctionDecls as we were previously applying to VarDecls.
llvm-svn: 128072
mangleCallExpression. Also, operator names with unknown arity should
be mangled as binary operators; this is actually covered by an oddly-
positioned sentence in the ABI document. Fixes PR7891.
llvm-svn: 111395
David Majnemer