The documentation on these was out of sync with the implementation. Also
the declaration of inputs was repeated when it is already part of the
ArithmeticCastOp definition.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105934
This patch is in a series of patches to provide builtins for compatibility
with the XL compiler. This patch adds the builtins and instrisics for compare
and multiply related operations.
Reviewed By: nemanjai, #powerpc
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102875
Adds zero-preserving unary operators from std. Also adds xor.
Performs minor refactoring to remove "zero" node, and pushed
the irregular logic for negi (not support in std) into one place.
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105928
This is a follow up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D104080, and ca3bdb57fa (diff-e64a48fabe31db213a631fdc5f2acb51bdddf3f16a8fb2928784f4c579229585). The implementation of call graph profile was changed from a black box section to relocation approach. This was done to be compatible with post processing tools like strip/objcopy, and llvm equivalent. When they are invoked on object file before the final linking step with this new approach the symbol indices correctness is preserved.
The GNU binutils tools change the REL section to RELA section, unlike llvm tools. For example when strip -S is run on the ELF object files, as an intermediate step before linking. To preserve compatibility this patch extends implementation in LLD and ELFDumper to support both REL and RELA sections for call graph profile.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105217
Redefined FPBits.h and LongDoubleBitsX86 so its implementation works for the Windows
and Linux platform while maintaining a packed memory alignment of the precision floating
point numbers. For its size in memory to be the same as the data type of the float point number.
This change was necessary because the previous attribute((packed)) specification in the struct was not working
for Windows like it was for Linux and consequently static_asserts in the FPBits.h file were failing.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, sivachandra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105561
The current compile options function hardcodes the -fpie and
-ffreestanding flags, which don't exist on Windows. This patch sets the
compilation flags conditionally based on the OS specifics.
Reviewed By: sivachandra, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105643
This is split from D105216, but the code is hoisted much earlier into the path where we can actually get a zero stride flowing through. Some fairly simple proofs handle the cases which show up in practice. The only test changes are the cases where we really do need a non-zero divider to produce the right result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105921
Defined constant that express the number of bits for exponent in single and double precision. Added bit masks values and other properties for quad precision floating point numbers that specifically targets architectures defined in PlatfromDefs.h. The exponentWidth values were added to be used in LongDoubleBitsX86.h where the implementation to set the exponent component uses this and the bitWidth value. The need occurred because of the 80-bit quad precision implementation.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105153
This patch is a followup patch to https://reviews.llvm.org/D105760 which adds this relocation. This handles the relocation in lld.
The s_branch family of instruction does the following:
PC = PC + signext(simm * 4) + 4
so we we do the opposite on the target address before writing it in the instruction stream.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105761
Make sure getMinusSCEV() didn't return a pointer. The following check
would never succeed if it was a pointer, anyway, but calling
getMulExpr() on a pointer SCEV now asserts.
Split off from D105216 to simplify review. Rewritten with a lambda to be easier to follow. Comments clarified.
Sorry for no test case, this is tricky to exercise with the current structure of the code. It's about to be hit more frequently in a follow up patch, and the change itself is simple.
Add tests for D105088, as well as an option to disable the
(generally) unsound inttoptr of ptrtoint optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105771
This will make it easier to update these tests as we add support for generating
more SIMD loads and stores with custom alignments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105862
[NFC] This patch adds features for pwr7, pwr8, and pwr9 that can be
used for semachecking builtin functions that are only valid for certain
versions of ppc.
Reviewed By: nemanjai, #powerpc
Authored By: Quinn Pham <Quinn.Pham@ibm.com>
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105501
Otherwise, if someone specifies a valid AMD arch, we may end up triggering an
assertion on unexpected arch later on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105295
This patch simplifies the way we deal with (dis)equalities.
Due to the symmetry between constraint handler and range inferrer,
we can have very similar implementations of logic handling
questions about (dis)equality and assumptions involving (dis)equality.
It also helps us to remove one more visitor, and removes uncertainty
that we got all the right places to put `trackNE` and `trackEQ`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105693
The new component is a symmetric response to SymbolicRangeInferrer.
While the latter is the unified component, which answers all the
questions what does the solver knows about a particular symbolic
expression, assignor associates new constraints (aka "assumes")
with symbolic expressions and can imply additional knowledge that
the solver can extract and use later on.
- Why do we need it and why is SymbolicRangeInferrer not enough?
As it is noted before, the inferrer only helps us to get the most
precise range information based on the existing knowledge and on the
mathematical foundations of different operations that symbolic
expressions actually represent. It doesn't introduce new constraints.
The assignor, on the other hand, can impose constraints on other
symbols using the same domain knowledge.
- But for some expressions, SymbolicRangeInferrer looks into constraints
for similar expressions, why can't we do that for all the cases?
That's correct! But in order to do something like this, we should
have a finite number of possible "similar expressions".
Let's say we are asked about `$a - $b` and we know something about
`$b - $a`. The inferrer can invert this expression and check
constraints for `$b - $a`. This is simple!
But let's say we are asked about `$a` and we know that `$a * $b != 0`.
In this situation, we can imply that `$a != 0`, but the inferrer shouldn't
try every possible symbolic expression `X` to check if `$a * X` or
`X * $a` is constrained to non-zero.
With the assignor mechanism, we can catch this implication right at
the moment we associate `$a * $b` with non-zero range, and set similar
constraints for `$a` and `$b` as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105692
We don't really have optimizations for division with a constant
LHS. If we don't use a W instruction we end up needing to sign
or zero extend the RHS to use the 64-bit instruction.
I had to sign_extend i32 constants on the LHS instead of using
any_extend which becomes zero_extend. If we don't do this, constants
that were originally negative become harder to materialize. I think
this problem exists for more of our W instruction cases. For example
(i32 (shl -1, X)), but we don't have lit tests. I'll work on that
as a follow up.
I also left a FIXME for enabling W instruction for RHS constants
under -Oz.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105769
This patch adds a function that checks whether or not the frame index
is aligned when the computed addressing mode is an aligned D-Form (DS, or DQ-Form).
If the frame index appears to be unaligned, within these two modes, reset
the mode to X-Form in order to fall back to selection X-Form loads.
A test case is added to ensure that the test emits X-Form loads and not DQ-Form
loads since the frame index is not aligned within the test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105661
Standalone build for OpenMP runtime using GCC is giving -Wcomment
warnings where a backslash newline is encountered in the // style
comment. This switches the // style for /* style to silence the
warnings.
After taking C++98 implicit moves out in D104500,
we put it back in, but now in a new form which preserves
compatibility with pure C++98 programs, while at the same time
giving almost all the goodies from P1825.
* We use the exact same rules as C++20 with regards to which
id-expressions are move eligible. The previous
incarnation would only benefit from the proper subset which is
copy ellidable. This means we can implicit move, in addition:
* Parameters.
* RValue references.
* Exception variables.
* Variables with higher-than-natural required alignment.
* Objects with different type from the function return type.
* We preserve the two-overload resolution, with one small tweak to the
first one: If we either pick a (possibly converting) constructor which
does not take an rvalue reference, or a user conversion operator which
is not ref-qualified, we abort into the second overload resolution.
This gives C++98 almost all the implicit move patterns which we had created test
cases for, while at the same time preserving the meaning of these
three patterns, which are found in pure C++98 programs:
* Classes with both const and non-const copy constructors, but no move
constructors, continue to have their non-const copy constructor
selected.
* We continue to reject as ambiguous the following pattern:
```
struct A { A(B &); };
struct B { operator A(); };
A foo(B x) { return x; }
```
* We continue to pick the copy constructor in the following pattern:
```
class AutoPtrRef { };
struct AutoPtr {
AutoPtr(AutoPtr &);
AutoPtr();
AutoPtr(AutoPtrRef);
operator AutoPtrRef();
};
AutoPtr test_auto_ptr() {
AutoPtr p;
return p;
}
```
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105756
Applied clang-format to all files. Discarded BottleneckAnalysis.h
80-column width violation since it contains an example of report.
Caught some typos and minor style details.
Reviewed By: andreadb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105900
Vitaly Buka