This is useful for targets like R600, which only support GT, GE, NE, and EQ
condition codes as it removes the need to handle unsupported condition
codes in target specific code.
There are no tests with this commit, but R600 has been updated to take
advantage of this new feature, so its existing selectcc tests are now
testing the swapped operands path.
llvm-svn: 191601
Occasionally DAGCombiner can spot that a SETCC operation is completely
redundant and reduce it to "all true" or "all false". If this happens to a
vector, the value produced has to take account of what a normal comparison
would have produced, which may be an all-1s bitmask.
The fix in SelectionDAG.cpp is tested, however, as far as I can see the code in
TargetLowering.cpp is possibly unreachable and almost certainly irrelevant when
triggered so there are no tests. However, I believe it's still clearly the
right change and may save someone else some hassle if it suddenly becomes
reachable. So I'm doing it anyway.
llvm-svn: 190147
Previously the asserts were only checking that RHS and LHS were the same type and had the same element type as the result. All downstream code for ISD::VECTOR_SHUFFLE requires the types to be the same.
Also removed one unnecessary check of matched element counts that was present in the code.
llvm-svn: 188051
This virtual function can be implemented by targets to specify the type
to use for the index operand of INSERT_VECTOR_ELT, EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT,
INSERT_SUBVECTOR, EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR. The default implementation returns
the result from TargetLowering::getPointerTy()
The previous code was using TargetLowering::getPointerTy() for vector
indices, because this is guaranteed to be legal on all targets. However,
using TargetLowering::getPointerTy() can be a problem for targets with
pointer sizes that differ across address spaces. On such targets,
when vectors need to be loaded or stored to an address space other than the
default 'zero' address space (which is the address space assumed by
TargetLowering::getPointerTy()), having an index that
is a different size than the pointer can lead to inefficient
pointer calculations, (e.g. 64-bit adds for a 32-bit address space).
There is no intended functionality change with this patch.
llvm-svn: 187748
- ISD::SHL/SRL/SRA must have either both scalar or both vector operands
but TLI.getShiftAmountTy() so far only return scalar type. As a
result, backend logic assuming that breaks.
- Rename the original TLI.getShiftAmountTy() to
TLI.getScalarShiftAmountTy() and re-define TLI.getShiftAmountTy() to
return target-specificed scalar type or the same vector type as the
1st operand.
- Fix most TICG logic assuming TLI.getShiftAmountTy() a simple scalar
type.
llvm-svn: 176364
memory intrinsics in the SDAG builder.
When alignment is zero, the lang ref says that *no* alignment
assumptions can be made. This is the exact opposite of the internal API
contracts of the DAG where alignment 0 indicates that the alignment can
be made to be anything desired.
There is another, more explicit alignment that is better suited for the
role of "no alignment at all": an alignment of 1. Map the intrinsic
alignment to this early so that we don't end up generating aligned DAGs.
It is really terrifying that we've never seen this before, but we
suddenly started generating a large number of alignment 0 memcpys due to
the new code to do memcpy-based copying of POD class members. That patch
contains a bug that rounds bitfield alignments down when they are the
first field. This can in turn produce zero alignments.
This fixes weird crashes I've seen in library users of LLVM on 32-bit
hosts, etc.
llvm-svn: 176022
This required disabling a PowerPC optimization that did the following:
input:
x = BUILD_VECTOR <i32 16, i32 16, i32 16, i32 16>
lowered to:
tmp = BUILD_VECTOR <i32 8, i32 8, i32 8, i32 8>
x = ADD tmp, tmp
The add now gets folded immediately and we're back at the BUILD_VECTOR we
started from. I don't see a way to fix this currently so I left it disabled
for now.
Fix some trivially foldable X86 tests too.
llvm-svn: 174325
Previously we tried to infer it from the bit width size, with an added
IsIEEE argument for the PPC/IEEE 128-bit case, which had a default
value. This default value allowed bugs to creep in, where it was
inappropriate.
llvm-svn: 173138
The optimization handles esoteric cases but adds a lot of complexity both to the X86 backend and to other backends.
This optimization disables an important canonicalization of chains of SEXT nodes and makes SEXT and ZEXT asymmetrical.
Disabling the canonicalization of consecutive SEXT nodes into a single node disables other DAG optimizations that assume
that there is only one SEXT node. The AVX mask optimizations is one example. Additionally this optimization does not update the cost model.
llvm-svn: 172968
pass into the SelectionDAG itself rather than snooping on the
implementation of that pass as exposed by the TargetMachine. This
removes the last direct client of the ScalarTargetTransformInfo class
outside of the TTI pass implementation.
llvm-svn: 171625
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
utils/sort_includes.py script.
Most of these are updating the new R600 target and fixing up a few
regressions that have creeped in since the last time I sorted the
includes.
llvm-svn: 171362
directly.
This is in preparation for removing the use of the 'Attribute' class as a
collection of attributes. That will shift to the AttributeSet class instead.
llvm-svn: 171253
mention the inline memcpy / memset expansion code is a mess?
This patch split the ZeroOrLdSrc argument into two: IsMemset and ZeroMemset.
The first indicates whether it is expanding a memset or a memcpy / memmove.
The later is whether the memset is a memset of zero. It's totally possible
(likely even) that targets may want to do different things for memcpy and
memset of zero.
llvm-svn: 169959
Also added more comments to explain why it is generally ok to return true.
- Rename getOptimalMemOpType argument IsZeroVal to ZeroOrLdSrc. It's meant to
be true for loaded source (memcpy) or zero constants (memset). The poor name
choice is probably some kind of legacy issue.
llvm-svn: 169954
ScalarTargetTransformInfo::getIntImmCost() instead. "Legal" is a poorly defined
term for something like integer immediate materialization. It is always possible
to materialize an integer immediate. Whether to use it for memcpy expansion is
more a "cost" conceern.
llvm-svn: 169929
1. Teach it to use overlapping unaligned load / store to copy / set the trailing
bytes. e.g. On 86, use two pairs of movups / movaps for 17 - 31 byte copies.
2. Use f64 for memcpy / memset on targets where i64 is not legal but f64 is. e.g.
x86 and ARM.
3. When memcpy from a constant string, do *not* replace the load with a constant
if it's not possible to materialize an integer immediate with a single
instruction (required a new target hook: TLI.isIntImmLegal()).
4. Use unaligned load / stores more aggressively if target hooks indicates they
are "fast".
5. Update ARM target hooks to use unaligned load / stores. e.g. vld1.8 / vst1.8.
Also increase the threshold to something reasonable (8 for memset, 4 pairs
for memcpy).
This significantly improves Dhrystone, up to 50% on ARM iOS devices.
rdar://12760078
llvm-svn: 169791
understand target implementation of any_extend / extload, just generate
zero_extend in place of any_extend for liveouts when the target knows the
zero_extend will be implicit (e.g. ARM ldrb / ldrh) or folded (e.g. x86 movz).
rdar://12771555
llvm-svn: 169536
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
r165941: Resubmit the changes to llvm core to update the functions to
support different pointer sizes on a per address space basis.
Despite this commit log, this change primarily changed stuff outside of
VMCore, and those changes do not carry any tests for correctness (or
even plausibility), and we have consistently found questionable or flat
out incorrect cases in these changes. Most of them are probably correct,
but we need to devise a system that makes it more clear when we have
handled the address space concerns correctly, and ideally each pass that
gets updated would receive an accompanying test case that exercises that
pass specificaly w.r.t. alternate address spaces.
However, from this commit, I have retained the new C API entry points.
Those were an orthogonal change that probably should have been split
apart, but they seem entirely good.
In several places the changes were very obvious cleanups with no actual
multiple address space code added; these I have not reverted when
I spotted them.
In a few other places there were merge conflicts due to a cleaner
solution being implemented later, often not using address spaces at all.
In those cases, I've preserved the new code which isn't address space
dependent.
This is part of my ongoing effort to clean out the partial address space
code which carries high risk and low test coverage, and not likely to be
finished before the 3.2 release looms closer. Duncan and I would both
like to see the above issues addressed before we return to these
changes.
llvm-svn: 167222
Rafael Espindola