By definition copies across register banks are not coalescable. Still, it may be
possible to get rid of such a copy when the value is available in another
register of the same register file.
Consider the following example, where capital and lower letters denote different
register file:
b = copy A <-- cross-bank copy
...
C = copy b <-- cross-bank copy
This could have been optimized this way:
b = copy A <-- cross-bank copy
...
C = copy A <-- same-bank copy
Note: b and C's definitions may be in different basic blocks.
This patch adds a peephole optimization that looks through a chain of copies
leading to a cross-bank copy and reuses a source that is on the same register
file if available.
This solution could also be used to get rid of some copies (e.g., A could have
been used instead of C). However, we do not do so because:
- It may over constrain the coloring of the source register for coalescing.
- The register allocator may not be able to find a nice split point for the
longer live-range, leading to more spill.
<rdar://problem/14742333>
llvm-svn: 190713
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Increment the MBB iterator at the top of the loop to properly handle the
current (and previous) instructions getting erased.
This fixes PR13625.
llvm-svn: 162099
Select instructions pick one of two virtual registers based on a
condition, like x86 cmov. On targets like ARM that support predication,
selects can sometimes be eliminated by predicating the instruction
defining one of the operands.
Teach PeepholeOptimizer to recognize select instructions, and ask the
target to optimize them.
llvm-svn: 162059
Add more comments and use early returns to reduce nesting in isLoadFoldable.
Also disable folding for V_SET0 to avoid introducing a const pool entry and
a const pool load.
rdar://10554090 and rdar://11873276
llvm-svn: 161207
Machine CSE and other optimizations can remove instructions so folding
is possible at peephole while not possible at ISel.
This patch is a rework of r160919 and was tested on clang self-host on my local
machine.
rdar://10554090 and rdar://11873276
llvm-svn: 161152
Machine CSE and other optimizations can remove instructions so folding
is possible at peephole while not possible at ISel.
rdar://10554090 and rdar://11873276
llvm-svn: 160919
The PPC::EXTSW instruction preserves the low 32 bits of its input, just
like some of the x86 instructions. Use it to reduce register pressure
when the low 32 bits have multiple uses.
This requires a small change to PeepholeOptimizer since EXTSW takes a
64-bit input register.
This is related to PR5997.
llvm-svn: 158743
The commit is intended to fix rdar://11540023.
It is implemented as part of peephole optimization. We can actually implement
this in the SelectionDAG lowering phase.
llvm-svn: 158122
This patch will optimize the following
movq %rdi, %rax
subq %rsi, %rax
cmovsq %rsi, %rdi
movq %rdi, %rax
to
cmpq %rsi, %rdi
cmovsq %rsi, %rdi
movq %rdi, %rax
Perform this optimization if the actual result of SUB is not used.
rdar: 11540023
llvm-svn: 157755
This patch will optimize the following cases:
sub r1, r3 | sub r1, imm
cmp r3, r1 or cmp r1, r3 | cmp r1, imm
bge L1
TO
subs r1, r3
bge L1 or ble L1
If the branch instruction can use flag from "sub", then we can replace
"sub" with "subs" and eliminate the "cmp" instruction.
rdar: 10734411
llvm-svn: 156599
This patch will optimize the following cases:
sub r1, r3 | sub r1, imm
cmp r3, r1 or cmp r1, r3 | cmp r1, imm
bge L1
TO
subs r1, r3
bge L1 or ble L1
If the branch instruction can use flag from "sub", then we can replace
"sub" with "subs" and eliminate the "cmp" instruction.
rdar: 10734411
llvm-svn: 156550
uses of the vreg, since the old kills may no longer be valid. This was causing
-verify-machineinstrs to complain about uses after kills, and could potentially
have been causing subtle register allocation issues, but I haven't come across a
test case yet.
llvm-svn: 151425
Moving toward a uniform style of pass definition to allow easier target configuration.
Globally declare Pass ID.
Globally declare pass initializer.
Use INITIALIZE_PASS consistently.
Add a call to the initializer from CodeGen.cpp.
Remove redundant "createPass" functions and "getPassName" methods.
While cleaning up declarations, cleaned up comments (sorry for large diff).
llvm-svn: 150100
generator to it. For non-bundle instructions, these behave exactly the same
as the MC layer API.
For properties like mayLoad / mayStore, look into the bundle and if any of the
bundled instructions has the property it would return true.
For properties like isPredicable, only return true if *all* of the bundled
instructions have the property.
For properties like canFoldAsLoad, isCompare, conservatively return false for
bundles.
llvm-svn: 146026
sink them into MC layer.
- Added MCInstrInfo, which captures the tablegen generated static data. Chang
TargetInstrInfo so it's based off MCInstrInfo.
llvm-svn: 134021
v2 = bitcast v1
...
v3 = bitcast v2
...
= v3
=>
v2 = bitcast v1
...
= v1
if v1 and v3 are of in the same register class.
bitcast between i32 and fp (and others) are often not nops since they
are in different register classes. These bitcast instructions are often
left because they are in different basic blocks and cannot be
eliminated by dag combine.
rdar://9104514
llvm-svn: 127668
Instead encode llvm IR level property "HasSideEffects" in an operand (shared
with IsAlignStack). Added MachineInstrs::hasUnmodeledSideEffects() to check
the operand when the instruction is an INLINEASM.
This allows memory instructions to be moved around INLINEASM instructions.
llvm-svn: 123044
and xor. The 32-bit move immediates can be hoisted out of loops by machine
LICM but the isel hacks were preventing them.
Instead, let peephole optimization pass recognize registers that are defined by
immediates and the ARM target hook will fold the immediates in.
Other changes include 1) do not fold and / xor into cmp to isel TST / TEQ
instructions if there are multiple uses. This happens when the 'and' is live
out, machine sink would have sinked the computation and that ends up pessimizing
code. The peephole pass would recognize situations where the 'and' can be
toggled to define CPSR and eliminate the comparison anyway.
2) Move peephole pass to after machine LICM, sink, and CSE to avoid blocking
important optimizations.
rdar://8663787, rdar://8241368
llvm-svn: 119548
at more than those which define CPSR. You can have this situation:
(1) subs ...
(2) sub r6, r5, r4
(3) movge ...
(4) cmp r6, 0
(5) movge ...
We cannot convert (2) to "subs" because (3) is using the CPSR set by
(1). There's an analogous situation here:
(1) sub r1, r2, r3
(2) sub r4, r5, r6
(3) cmp r4, ...
(5) movge ...
(6) cmp r1, ...
(7) movge ...
We cannot convert (1) to "subs" because of the intervening use of CPSR.
llvm-svn: 117950
looks like is happening:
Without the peephole optimizer:
(1) sub r6, r6, #32
orr r12, r12, lr, lsl r9
orr r2, r2, r3, lsl r10
(x) cmp r6, #0
ldr r9, LCPI2_10
ldr r10, LCPI2_11
(2) sub r8, r8, #32
(a) movge r12, lr, lsr r6
(y) cmp r8, #0
LPC2_10:
ldr lr, [pc, r10]
(b) movge r2, r3, lsr r8
With the peephole optimizer:
ldr r9, LCPI2_10
ldr r10, LCPI2_11
(1*) subs r6, r6, #32
(2*) subs r8, r8, #32
(a*) movge r12, lr, lsr r6
(b*) movge r2, r3, lsr r8
(1) is used by (x) for the conditional move at (a). (2) is used by (y) for the
conditional move at (b). After the peephole optimizer, these the flags resulting
from (1*) are ignored and only the flags from (2*) are considered for both
conditional moves.
llvm-svn: 117876
must be called in the pass's constructor. This function uses static dependency declarations to recursively initialize
the pass's dependencies.
Clients that only create passes through the createFooPass() APIs will require no changes. Clients that want to use the
CommandLine options for passes will need to manually call the appropriate initialization functions in PassInitialization.h
before parsing commandline arguments.
I have tested this with all standard configurations of clang and llvm-gcc on Darwin. It is possible that there are problems
with the static dependencies that will only be visible with non-standard options. If you encounter any crash in pass
registration/creation, please send the testcase to me directly.
llvm-svn: 116820
perform initialization without static constructors AND without explicit initialization
by the client. For the moment, passes are required to initialize both their
(potential) dependencies and any passes they preserve. I hope to be able to relax
the latter requirement in the future.
llvm-svn: 116334
into OptimizeCompareInstr.
This necessitates the passing of CmpValue around,
so widen the virtual functions to accomodate.
No functionality changes.
llvm-svn: 114428
Quentin Colombet