So far, we've only handled special cases of PatFrag like ImmLeaf. This patch
adds support for the remaining cases using similar mechanisms.
Like most C++ code from SelectionDAG, GISel and DAGISel expect to operate on
different types and representations and as such the code is not compatible
between the two. It's therefore necessary to add an alternative implementation
in the GISelPredicateCode field.
The target test for this feature could easily be done with IntImmLeaf and this
would save on a little boilerplate. The reason I've chosen to implement this
using PatFrag.GISelPredicateCode and not IntImmLeaf is because I was unable to
find a rule that was blocked solely by lack of support for PatFrag predicates. I
found that the ones I investigated as being likely candidates for the test
were further blocked by other things.
llvm-svn: 334871
Modify ExpandStrictFPOp(...) to handle nodes that have scalar
operands.
Also, add a Strict FMA test and do some other light cleanup in the
Strict FP code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48149
llvm-svn: 334863
Summary: This patch originated from D46562 and is a proper subset, with some issues addressed.
Reviewers: spatel, hfinkel, wristow, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: wdng, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47954
llvm-svn: 334862
Enables using the high and high-adjusted symbol modifiers on thread local
storage modifers in powerpc assembly. Needed to be able to support 64 bit
thread-pointer and dynamic-thread-pointer access sequences.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47754
llvm-svn: 334856
Add support for the "@high" and "@higha" symbol modifiers in powerpc64 assembly.
The modifiers represent accessing the segment consiting of bits 16-31 of a
64-bit address/offset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47729
llvm-svn: 334855
redundant-vf2-cost.ll is X86 specific. Moved from
test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/redundant-vf2-cost.ll to
test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/redundant-vf2-cost.ll
llvm-svn: 334854
Added a Generic x86 cpu set of resource tests to allow us to check all ISAs.
We currently use SandyBridge as our generic CPU model, but it's better if we actually duplicate these tests for if/when we change the model, it also means we don't end up polluting the SandyBridge folder with tests for ISAs it doesn't support.
llvm-svn: 334853
An earlier commit prevented folds from the peephole pass by checking for IMPLICIT_DEF. But later in the pipeline IMPLICIT_DEF just becomes and Undef flag on the input register so we need to check for that case too.
llvm-svn: 334848
When coalescing a small register into a subregister of a larger register,
if the larger register is rematerialized, the function updateRegDefUses
can add an <undef> flag to the rematerialized definition (since it's
treating it as only definining the coalesced subregister). While with that
assumption doing so is not incorrect, make sure to remove the flag later
on after the call to updateRegDefUses.
llvm-svn: 334845
Summary:
When iterating users of a multiply in processUMulZExtIdiom, the
call to setOperand in the truncation case may replace the use
being visited; make sure the iterator has been advanced before
doing that replacement.
Reviewers: majnemer, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48192
llvm-svn: 334844
This is a minor fix for LV cost model, where the cost for VF=2 was
computed twice when the vectorization of the loop was forced without
specifying a VF.
Reviewers: xusx595, hsaito, fhahn, mkuper
Reviewed By: hsaito, xusx595
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48048
llvm-svn: 334840
Increment/decrement scalar register by (scaled) element count given by
predicate pattern, e.g. 'incw x0, all, mul #4'.
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, SjoerdMeijer, samparker, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47713
llvm-svn: 334838
Try to access pieces 4 bytes at a time. This helps
various hasOneUse extract_vector_elt combines, such
as load width reductions.
Avoids test regressions in a future commit.
llvm-svn: 334836
Summary:
While that is indeed a quite interesting summary stat,
there are cases where it does not really add anything
other than consuming extra lines.
Declutters the output of D48190.
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, craig.topper
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48209
llvm-svn: 334833
Summary:
There does not seem to be any other tests for this.
Split off from D47676.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, courbet, andreadb
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48190
llvm-svn: 334832
This is r334704 (which was reverted in r334732) with a fix for
types like x86_fp80. We need to use getTypeAllocSizeInBits and
not getTypeStoreSizeInBits to avoid dropping debug info for
such types.
Original commit msg:
> Summary:
> Do not convert a DbgDeclare to DbgValue if the store
> instruction only refer to a fragment of the variable
> described by the DbgDeclare.
>
> Problem was seen when for example having an alloca for an
> array or struct, and there were stores to individual elements.
> In the past we inserted a DbgValue intrinsics for each store,
> just as if the store wrote the whole variable.
>
> When handling store instructions we insert a DbgValue that
> indicates that the variable is "undefined", as we do not know
> which part of the variable that is updated by the store.
>
> When ConvertDebugDeclareToDebugValue is used with a load/phi
> instruction we assert that the referenced value is large enough
> to cover the whole variable. Afaict this should be true for all
> scenarios where those methods are used on trunk. If the assert
> blows in the future I guess we could simply skip to insert a
> dbg.value instruction.
>
> In the future I think we should examine which part of the variable
> that is accessed, and add a DbgValue instrinsic with an appropriate
> DW_OP_LLVM_fragment expression.
>
> Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, rnk
>
> Reviewed By: aprantl
>
> Subscribers: JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
>
> Tags: #debug-info
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48024
llvm-svn: 334830
Summary:
We already do it for splat constants, but not just values.
Also, undef cases are mostly non-functional.
The original commit was reverted because
it broke tests for amdgpu backend, which i didn't check.
Now, the backed was updated to recognize these new
patterns, so we are good.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37603https://rise4fun.com/Alive/cplX
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, mareko, bogner, rampitec, nhaehnle, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel, rampitec, nhaehnle
Subscribers: wdng, nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47980
llvm-svn: 334818
Summary: The same pattern as D48010, but this one is IR-canonical as of D47428.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, bogner, tstellar, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48012
llvm-svn: 334817
Summary:
As a followup for D48007.
Since we already handle `x << (bitwidth - y) >> (bitwidth - y)` pattern,
which does not have ub for both the edge cases (`y == 0`, `y == bitwidth`),
i think also handling a pattern that is ub for `y == bitwidth` should be fine.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, bogner, tstellar, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48010
llvm-svn: 334816
Summary:
D47980 will canonicalize the `x << (32 - y) >> (32 - y)`,
which is the pattern the AMDGPU expects to `x & (-1 >> (32 - y))`,
which is not recognized by AMDGPU.
Thus, it needs to be recognized, too.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, bogner, tstellar, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48007
llvm-svn: 334815
I think this covers most of the unmasked vector instructions. We're still missing a lot of the masked instructions.
There are some test changes here because of the new folding support. I don't think these particular cases should be folded because it creates an undef register dependency. I think the changes introduced in r334175 are not handling stack folding. They're only blocking the peephole pass.
llvm-svn: 334800
IEEE 754 defines the expected result on overflow. As far as I know,
hardware implementations (of f16), and compiler-rt (__floatuntisf)
correctly return +-Inf on overflow. And I can't think of any useful
transform that would take advantage of overflow being undefined here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47807
llvm-svn: 334777
Summary:
Here we relax the old constraint which utilized unsafe with the TargetOption flag HonorSignDependentRoundingFPMathOption, with the assertion that unsafe is no longer needed or never was required for correctness on FDIV/FMUL.
Reviewers: spatel, hfinkel, wristow, arsenm, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: efriedma, wdng, tpr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48057
llvm-svn: 334769
In particular, when asked to print a MemoryAccess, we'll now print where
defs are optimized to, and we'll print optimized access types.
This patch also introduces an operator<< to make printing AliasResults
easier.
Patch by Juneyoung Lee!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47860
llvm-svn: 334760
isVectorClearMaskLegal() is the TLI hook used by the generic
DAGCombiner::XformToShuffleWithZero().
We've grown to accomodate/expect this transform to shuffle
(disabling it more generally results in many regressions).
So I'm narrowly excluding the 256-bit types that clearly
are not worthwhile for AVX1.
I think in most cases we are able to recover by converting
the shuffle back into 'and' ops, but the cases in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37749
...show that there are cracks.
llvm-svn: 334759
This is r334750 (which was reverted in r334754) with a fix for an
uninitialized variable that was caught by msan.
Original commit message:
> If a copy bundle happens to involve overlapping registers, we can end
> up with emitting the copies in an order that ends up clobbering some
> of the subregisters. Since instructions in the copy bundle
> semantically happen at the same time, this is incorrect and we need to
> make sure we order the copies such that this doesn't happen.
llvm-svn: 334756
Summary: A FMF constraint is added to FADD with unsafe still available as the fallback
Reviewers: spatel, wristow, arsenm, hfinkel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48180
llvm-svn: 334753
WebAssembly doesn't support more than one function per section
and we rely on function sections being unique. This change ignores
the section provided by the function to avoid two functions being
in the same section.
Without this change the object writer produces the following
error for this test:
LLVM ERROR: section already has a defining function: baz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48178
llvm-svn: 334752
If a copy bundle happens to involve overlapping registers, we can end
up with emitting the copies in an order that ends up clobbering some
of the subregisters. Since instructions in the copy bundle
semantically happen at the same time, this is incorrect and we need to
make sure we order the copies such that this doesn't happen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48154
llvm-svn: 334750
On x86-64, a write to register EAX implicitly clears the upper half or RAX.
128-bit AVX instructions clear the upper 128-bit of the YMM register that
aliases the XMM definition register.
llvm-mca doesn't know about register writes that implicitly clear the upper
portion of an aliasing super-register. This issue will be fixed in a future patch.
llvm-svn: 334742
Summary:
Specifically, we transform
zext(2^K * (trunc X to iN)) to iM ->
2^K * (zext(trunc X to i{N-K}) to iM)<nuw>
This is helpful because pulling the 2^K out of the zext allows further
optimizations.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, timshen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48158
llvm-svn: 334737
Summary:
Previously we would do this simplification only if it did not introduce
any new truncs (excepting new truncs which replace other cast ops).
This change weakens this condition: If the number of truncs stays the
same, but we're able to transform trunc(X + Y) to X + trunc(Y), that's
still simpler, and it may open up additional transformations.
While we're here, also clean up some duplicated code.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48160
llvm-svn: 334736
This test checks that a physical register is correctly allocated for the partial
write to register BX.
The ADD instruction has to wait for the write to RBX (and BX) before being
executed.
llvm-svn: 334730
Daniel Sanders