Commit Graph

24 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mehdi Amini f9dc2b7079 Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.

This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.

To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.

1) For passes, you need to override the method:

virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry &registry) const {}

and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.

2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.

3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:

  mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
  registry.insert<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
  registry.insert<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();

Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:

  mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);

4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
2020-08-19 01:19:03 +00:00
Mehdi Amini e75bc5c791 Revert "Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context"
This reverts commit d14cf45735.
The build is broken with GCC-5.
2020-08-19 01:19:03 +00:00
Mehdi Amini d14cf45735 Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.

This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.

To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.

1) For passes, you need to override the method:

virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry &registry) const {}

and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.

2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.

3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:

  mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
  registry.insert<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
  registry.insert<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();

Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:

  mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);

4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
2020-08-18 23:23:56 +00:00
Mehdi Amini d84fe55e0d Revert "Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context"
This reverts commit e1de2b7550.
Broke a build bot.
2020-08-18 22:16:34 +00:00
Mehdi Amini e1de2b7550 Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.

This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.

To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.

1) For passes, you need to override the method:

virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry &registry) const {}

and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.

2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.

3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:

  mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
  mlir::registerDialect<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
  mlir::registerDialect<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();

Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:

  mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);

4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
2020-08-18 21:14:39 +00:00
Mehdi Amini 25ee851746 Revert "Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context"
This reverts commit 2056393387.

Build is broken on a few bots
2020-08-15 09:21:47 +00:00
Mehdi Amini 2056393387 Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from (Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into the Context when starting a pipeline.

This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial, the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others (linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the optimization pipeline enabled.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
2020-08-15 08:07:31 +00:00
Mehdi Amini ba92dadf05 Revert "Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context"
This was landed by accident, will reland with the right comments
addressed from the reviews.
Also revert dependent build fixes.
2020-08-15 07:35:10 +00:00
Mehdi Amini ebf521e784 Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from (Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into the Context when starting a pipeline.

This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial, the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others (linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the optimization pipeline enabled.
2020-08-14 09:40:27 +00:00
Nicolas Vasilache eae76faeea [mlir][Linalg] Retire C++ MatmulOp in favor of a linalg-ods-gen'd op.
Summary:
This revision replaces MatmulOp, now that DRR rules have been dropped.
This revision also fixes minor parsing bugs and a plugs a few holes to get e2e paths working (e.g. library call emission).

During the replacement the i32 version had to be dropped because only the EDSC operators +, *, etc support type inference.

Deciding on a type-polymorphic behavior, and implementing it, is left for future work.

Reviewers: aartbik

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, shauheen, antiagainst, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, stephenneuendorffer, Joonsoo, grosul1, frgossen, Kayjukh, jurahul, msifontes

Tags: #mlir

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81935
2020-06-16 10:46:35 -04:00
Kirill Bobyrev 9b72b47ed6 Revert "[mlir][Linalg] Retire C++ MatmulOp in favor of a linalg-ods-gen'd op."
This reverts commit 8c6c49f293.

As discussed offline, this patch breaks internal builds and tests so I'm
reverting it for now.
2020-06-16 11:02:28 +02:00
Nicolas Vasilache 8c6c49f293 [mlir][Linalg] Retire C++ MatmulOp in favor of a linalg-ods-gen'd op.
This revision replaces MatmulOp, now that DRR rules have been dropped.
This revision also fixes minor parsing bugs and a plugs a few holes to get e2e paths working (e.g. library call emission).

During the replacement the i32 version had to be dropped because only the EDSC operators +, *, etc support type inference.

Deciding on a type-polymorphic behavior, and implementing it, is left for future work.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79762
2020-06-15 18:14:15 -04:00
Alexander Belyaev e9ac792748 [mlir] Fix some of the warnings in MLIR code.
Summary:
* extra ';' in the following files:
    mlir/lib/Dialect/Linalg/Transforms/Transforms.cpp
    mlir/lib/Dialect/Shape/IR/Shape.cpp

* base class ‘mlir::ConvertVectorToSCFBase<ConvertVectorToSCFPass>’
  should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Wextra] in
    mlir/lib/Conversion/VectorToSCF/VectorToSCF.cpp

* warning: ‘bool Expression::operator==(const Expression&) const’
  defined but not used [-Wunused-function] in
    mlir/tools/mlir-linalg-ods-gen/mlir-linalg-ods-gen.cpp

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81673
2020-06-11 22:18:32 +02:00
Stephen Neuendorffer 5469f434bb [MLIR] Reapply: Adjust libMLIR building to more closely follow libClang
This reverts commit ab1ca6e60f.
2020-05-04 20:47:57 -07:00
Stephen Neuendorffer ab1ca6e60f Revert "[MLIR] Adjust libMLIR building to more closely follow libClang"
This reverts commit 4f0f436749.

This seems to show some compile dependence problems, and also breaks flang.
2020-05-04 12:40:12 -07:00
Valentin Churavy 4f0f436749 [MLIR] Adjust libMLIR building to more closely follow libClang
- Exports MLIR targets to be used out-of-tree.
- mimicks `add_clang_library` and `add_flang_library`.
- Fixes libMLIR.so

After https://reviews.llvm.org/D77515 libMLIR.so was no longer containing
any object files. We originally had a cludge there that made it work with
the static initalizers and when switchting away from that to the way the
clang shlib does it, I noticed that MLIR doesn't create a `obj.{name}` target,
and doesn't export it's targets to `lib/cmake/mlir`.

This is due to MLIR using `add_llvm_library` under the hood, which adds
the target to `llvmexports`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78773

[MLIR] Fix libMLIR.so and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB

Primarily, this patch moves all mlir references to LLVM libraries into
either LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or LINK_COMPONENTS.  This enables magic in
the llvm cmake files to automatically replace reference to LLVM components
with references to libLLVM.so when necessary.  Among other things, this
completes fixing libMLIR.so, which has been broken for some configurations
since D77515.

Unlike previously, the pattern is now that mlir libraries should almost
always use add_mlir_library.  Previously, some libraries still used
add_llvm_library.  However, this confuses the export of targets for use
out of tree because libraries specified with add_llvm_library are exported
by LLVM.  Instead users which don't need/can't be linked into libMLIR.so
can specify EXCLUDE_FROM_LIBMLIR

A common error mode is linking with LLVM libraries outside of LINK_COMPONENTS.
This almost always results in symbol confusion or multiply defined options
in LLVM when the same object file is included as a static library and
as part of libLLVM.so.  To catch these errors more directly, there's now
mlir_check_all_link_libraries.

To simplify usage of add_mlir_library, we assume that all mlir
libraries depend on LLVMSupport, so it's not necessary to separately specify
it.

tested with:
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB + LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB.

By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79067

[MLIR] Move from using target_link_libraries to LINK_LIBS

This allows us to correctly generate dependencies for derived targets,
such as targets which are created for object libraries.

By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79243

Three commits have been squashed to avoid intermediate build breakage.
2020-05-04 11:40:46 -07:00
Nicolas Vasilache 3bdd7fcc34 [mlir][Linalg] Add support to lower named ops to loops.
This revision adds support to allow named ops to lower to loops.
Linalg.batch_matmul successfully lowers to loops and to LLVM.

In the process, this test also activates linalg to affine loops.
However padded convolutions to not lower to affine.load atm so this revision overrides the type of underlying load / store operation.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79135
2020-04-30 13:45:17 -04:00
Alex Zinenko bb1d976feb [mlir][flang] use OpBuilder& instead of Builder* in <Op>::build methods
As we start defining more complex Ops, we increasingly see the need for
Ops-with-regions to be able to construct Ops within their regions in
their ::build methods. However, these methods only have access to
Builder, and not OpBuilder. Creating a local instance of OpBuilder
inside ::build and using it fails to trigger the operation creation
hooks in derived builders (e.g., ConversionPatternRewriter). In this
case, we risk breaking the logic of the derived builder. At the same
time, OpBuilder::create, which is by far the largest user of ::build
already passes "this" as the first argument, so an OpBuilder instance is
already available.

Update all ::build methods in all Ops in MLIR and Flang to take
"OpBuilder &" instead of "Builder *". Note the change from pointer and
to reference to comply with the common style in MLIR, this also ensures
all other users must change their ::build methods.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78713
2020-04-28 10:42:08 +02:00
Nicolas Vasilache 367229e100 [mlir][EDSC] Retire ValueHandle
The EDSC discussion [thread](https://llvm.discourse.group/t/evolving-builder-apis-based-on-lessons-learned-from-edsc/879) points out that ValueHandle has become an unnecessary level of abstraction since MLIR switch from `Value *` to `Value` everywhere.

This revision removes this level of indirection.
2020-04-23 11:01:16 -04:00
Nicolas Vasilache 538ac26f25 [mlir][Linalg] Create a named batch_matmul op and pipe it through.
This revision is the first in a set of improvements that aim at allowing
more generalized named Linalg op generation from a mathematical
specification.

This revision allows creating a new op and checks that the parser,
printer and verifier are hooked up properly.

This opened up a few design points that will be addressed in the future:
1. A named linalg op has a static region builder instead of an
explicitly parsed region. This is not currently compatible with
assemblyFormat so a custom parser / printer are needed.
2. The convention for structured ops and tensor return values needs to
evolve to allow tensor-land and buffer land specifications to agree
3. ReferenceIndexingMaps and referenceIterators will need to become
static to allow building attributes at parse time.
4. Error messages will be improved once we have 3. and we pretty print
in custom form.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78327
2020-04-21 12:09:46 -04:00
River Riddle 92f1562f3d [mlir][NFC] Remove the STLExtras.h header file now that it has been merged into LLVM.
Now that no more utilities exist within, this file can be deleted.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78079
2020-04-14 15:14:41 -07:00
River Riddle 2f21a57966 [llvm][STLExtras] Move the algorithm `interleave*` methods from MLIR to LLVM
These have proved incredibly useful for interleaving values between a range w.r.t to streams. After this revision, the mlir/Support/STLExtras.h is empty. A followup revision will remove it from the tree.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78067
2020-04-14 15:14:40 -07:00
River Riddle 2e8188ff48 [mlir][NFC] Mark a debug only variable as (void) to avoid unused warning 2020-04-13 00:48:17 -07:00
Nicolas Vasilache 882ba48474 [mlir][Linalg] Create a tool to generate named Linalg ops from a Tensor Comprehensions-like specification.
Summary:

This revision adds a tool that generates the ODS and C++ implementation for "named" Linalg ops according to the [RFC discussion](https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-declarative-named-ops-in-the-linalg-dialect/745).

While the mechanisms and language aspects are by no means set in stone, this revision allows connecting the pieces end-to-end from a mathematical-like specification.

Some implementation details and short-term decisions taken for the purpose of bootstrapping and that are not set in stone include:

    1. using a "[Tensor Comprehension](https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04730)-inspired" syntax
    2. implicit and eager discovery of dims and symbols when parsing
    3. using EDSC ops to specify the computation (e.g. std_addf, std_mul_f, ...)

A followup revision will connect this tool to tablegen mechanisms and allow the emission of named Linalg ops that automatically lower to various loop forms and run end to end.

For the following "Tensor Comprehension-inspired" string:

```
    def batch_matmul(A: f32(Batch, M, K), B: f32(K, N)) -> (C: f32(Batch, M, N)) {
      C(b, m, n) = std_addf<k>(std_mulf(A(b, m, k), B(k, n)));
    }
```

With -gen-ods-decl=1, this emits (modulo formatting):

```
      def batch_matmulOp : LinalgNamedStructured_Op<"batch_matmul", [
        NInputs<2>,
        NOutputs<1>,
        NamedStructuredOpTraits]> {
          let arguments = (ins Variadic<LinalgOperand>:$views);
          let results = (outs Variadic<AnyRankedTensor>:$output_tensors);
          let extraClassDeclaration = [{
            llvm::Optional<SmallVector<StringRef, 8>> referenceIterators();
            llvm::Optional<SmallVector<AffineMap, 8>> referenceIndexingMaps();
            void regionBuilder(ArrayRef<BlockArgument> args);
          }];
          let hasFolder = 1;
      }
```

With -gen-ods-impl, this emits (modulo formatting):

```
      llvm::Optional<SmallVector<StringRef, 8>> batch_matmul::referenceIterators() {
          return SmallVector<StringRef, 8>{ getParallelIteratorTypeName(),
                                            getParallelIteratorTypeName(),
                                            getParallelIteratorTypeName(),
                                            getReductionIteratorTypeName() };
      }
      llvm::Optional<SmallVector<AffineMap, 8>> batch_matmul::referenceIndexingMaps()
      {
        MLIRContext *context = getContext();
        AffineExpr d0, d1, d2, d3;
        bindDims(context, d0, d1, d2, d3);
        return SmallVector<AffineMap, 8>{
            AffineMap::get(4, 0, {d0, d1, d3}),
            AffineMap::get(4, 0, {d3, d2}),
            AffineMap::get(4, 0, {d0, d1, d2}) };
      }
      void batch_matmul::regionBuilder(ArrayRef<BlockArgument> args) {
        using namespace edsc;
        using namespace intrinsics;
        ValueHandle _0(args[0]), _1(args[1]), _2(args[2]);

        ValueHandle _4 = std_mulf(_0, _1);
        ValueHandle _5 = std_addf(_2, _4);
        (linalg_yield(ValueRange{ _5 }));
      }
```

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77067
2020-04-10 13:59:25 -04:00