Adding a conversion pattern for the parallel Operation. This will
help the conversion of parallel operation with standard dialect to
parallel operation with llvm dialect. The type conversion of the block
arguments in a parallel region are controlled by the pattern for the
parallel Operation. Without this pattern, a parallel Operation with
block arguments cannot be converted from standard to LLVM dialect.
Other OpenMP operations without regions are marked as legal. When
translation of OpenMP operations with regions are added then patterns
for these operations can also be added.
Also uses all the standard to llvm patterns. Patterns of other dialects
can be added later if needed.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86273
When dealing with dialects that will results in function calls to
external libraries, it is important to be able to handle maps as some
dialects may require mapped data. Before this patch, the detection of
whether normalization can apply or not, operations are compared to an
explicit list of operations (`alloc`, `dealloc`, `return`) or to the
presence of specific operation interfaces (`AffineReadOpInterface`,
`AffineWriteOpInterface`, `AffineDMAStartOp`, or `AffineDMAWaitOp`).
This patch add a trait, `MemRefsNormalizable` to determine if an
operation can have its `memrefs` normalized.
This trait can be used in turn by dialects to assert that such
operations are compatible with normalization of `memrefs` with
nontrivial memory layout specification. An example is given in the
literal tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86236
This patch introduces a hook to encode descriptor set
and binding number into `spv.globalVariable`'s symbolic name. This
allows to preserve this information, and at the same time legalize
the global variable for the conversion to LLVM dialect.
This is required for `mlir-spirv-cpu-runner` to convert kernel
arguments into LLVM.
Also, a couple of some nits added:
- removed unused comment
- changed to a capital letter in the comment
Reviewed By: mravishankar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86515
This makes OpPassManager more of a "container" of passes and not responsible to drive the execution.
As such we also make it constructible publicly, which will allow to build arbitrary pipeline decoupled from the execution. We'll make use of this facility to expose "dynamic pipeline" in the future.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86391
This patch adds an optional name to SPIR-V module.
This will help with lowering from GPU dialect (so that we
can pass the kernel module name) and will be more naturally
aligned with `GPUModuleOp`/`ModuleOp`.
Reviewed By: mravishankar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86386
The PDL Interpreter dialect provides a lower level abstraction compared to the PDL dialect, and is targeted towards low level optimization and interpreter code generation. The dialect operations encapsulates low-level pattern match and rewrite "primitives", such as navigating the IR (Operation::getOperand), creating new operations (OpBuilder::create), etc. Many of the operations within this dialect also fuse branching control flow with some form of a predicate comparison operation. This type of fusion reduces the amount of work that an interpreter must do when executing.
An example of this representation is shown below:
```mlir
// The following high level PDL pattern:
pdl.pattern : benefit(1) {
%resultType = pdl.type
%inputOperand = pdl.input
%root, %results = pdl.operation "foo.op"(%inputOperand) -> %resultType
pdl.rewrite %root {
pdl.replace %root with (%inputOperand)
}
}
// May be represented in the interpreter dialect as follows:
module {
func @matcher(%arg0: !pdl.operation) {
pdl_interp.check_operation_name of %arg0 is "foo.op" -> ^bb2, ^bb1
^bb1:
pdl_interp.return
^bb2:
pdl_interp.check_operand_count of %arg0 is 1 -> ^bb3, ^bb1
^bb3:
pdl_interp.check_result_count of %arg0 is 1 -> ^bb4, ^bb1
^bb4:
%0 = pdl_interp.get_operand 0 of %arg0
pdl_interp.is_not_null %0 : !pdl.value -> ^bb5, ^bb1
^bb5:
%1 = pdl_interp.get_result 0 of %arg0
pdl_interp.is_not_null %1 : !pdl.value -> ^bb6, ^bb1
^bb6:
pdl_interp.record_match @rewriters::@rewriter(%0, %arg0 : !pdl.value, !pdl.operation) : benefit(1), loc([%arg0]), root("foo.op") -> ^bb1
}
module @rewriters {
func @rewriter(%arg0: !pdl.value, %arg1: !pdl.operation) {
pdl_interp.replace %arg1 with(%arg0)
pdl_interp.return
}
}
}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84579
This assertion does not achieve what it meant to do originally, as it
would fire only when applied to an unregistered operation, which is a
fairly rare circumstance (it needs a dialect or context allowing
unregistered operation in the input in the first place).
Instead we relax it to only fire when it should have matched but didn't
because of the misconfiguration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86588
Provides fast, generic way of setting a mask up to a certain
point. Potential use cases that may benefit are create_mask
and transfer_read/write operations in the vector dialect.
Reviewed By: bkramer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86501
* Generic mlir.ir.Attribute class.
* First standard attribute (mlir.ir.StringAttr), following the same pattern as generic vs standard types.
* NamedAttribute class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86250
This will allow out-of-tree translation to register the dialects they expect
to see in their input, on the model of getDependentDialects() for passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86409
Refactor the way the reduction tree pass works in the MLIR Reduce tool by introducing a set of utilities that facilitate the implementation of new Reducer classes to be used in the passes.
This will allow for the fast implementation of general transformations to operate on all mlir modules as well as custom transformations for different dialects.
These utilities allow for the implementation of Reducer classes by simply defining a method that indexes the operations/blocks/regions to be transformed and a method to perform the deletion or transfomration based on the indexes.
Create the transformSpace class member in the ReductionNode class to keep track of the indexes that have already been transformed or deleted at a current level.
Delete the FunctionReducer class and replace it with the OpReducer class to reflect this new API while performing the same transformation and allowing the instantiation of a reduction pass for different types of operations at the module's highest hierarchichal level.
Modify the SinglePath Traversal method to reflect the use of the new API.
Reviewed: jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85591
Add a folder to the affine.parallel op so that loop bounds expressions are canonicalized.
Additionally, a new AffineParallelNormalizePass is added to adjust affine.parallel ops so that the lower bound is always 0 and the upper bound always represents a range with a step size of 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84998
This patch adds the capability to perform constraint redundancy checks for `FlatAffineConstraints` using `Simplex`, via a new member function `FlatAffineConstraints::removeRedundantConstraints`. The pre-existing redundancy detection algorithm runs a full rational emptiness check for each inequality separately for checking redundancy. Leveraging the existing `Simplex` infrastructure, in this patch we have an algorithm for redundancy checks that can check each constraint by performing pivots on the tableau, which provides an alternative to running Fourier-Motzkin elimination for each constraint separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84935
- This utility to merge a block anywhere into another one can help inline single
block regions into other blocks.
- Modified patterns test to use the new function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86251
Add the unsigned complements to the existing FPToSI and SIToFP operations in the
standard dialect, with one-to-one lowerings to the corresponding LLVM operations.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85557
PDL presents a high level abstraction for the rewrite pattern infrastructure available in MLIR. This abstraction allows for representing patterns transforming MLIR, as MLIR. This allows for applying all of the benefits that the general MLIR infrastructure provides, to the infrastructure itself. This means that pattern matching can be more easily verified for correctness, targeted by frontends, and optimized.
PDL abstracts over various different aspects of patterns and core MLIR data structures. Patterns are specified via a `pdl.pattern` operation. These operations contain a region body for the "matcher" code, and terminate with a `pdl.rewrite` that either dispatches to an external rewriter or contains a region for the rewrite specified via `pdl`. The types of values in `pdl` are handle types to MLIR C++ types, with `!pdl.attribute`, `!pdl.operation`, and `!pdl.type` directly mapping to `mlir::Attribute`, `mlir::Operation*`, and `mlir::Value` respectively.
An example pattern is shown below:
```mlir
// pdl.pattern contains metadata similarly to a `RewritePattern`.
pdl.pattern : benefit(1) {
// External input operand values are specified via `pdl.input` operations.
// Result types are constrainted via `pdl.type` operations.
%resultType = pdl.type
%inputOperand = pdl.input
%root, %results = pdl.operation "foo.op"(%inputOperand) -> %resultType
pdl.rewrite(%root) {
pdl.replace %root with (%inputOperand)
}
}
```
This is a culmination of the work originally discussed here: https://groups.google.com/a/tensorflow.org/g/mlir/c/j_bn74ByxlQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84578
Provide C API for MLIR standard attributes. Since standard attributes live
under lib/IR in core MLIR, place the C APIs in the IR library as well (standard
ops will go in a separate library).
Affine map and integer set attributes are only exposed as placeholder types
with IsA support due to the lack of C APIs for the corresponding types.
Integer and floating point attribute APIs expecting APInt and APFloat are not
exposed pending decision on how to support APInt and APFloat.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86143
* The binding for Type is trivial and should be non-controversial.
* The way that I define the IntegerType should serve as a pattern for what I want to do next.
* I propose defining the rest of the standard types in this fashion and then generalizing for dialect types as necessary.
* Essentially, creating/accessing a concrete Type (vs interacting with the string form) is done by "casting" to the concrete type (i.e. IntegerType can be constructed with a Type and will throw if the cast is illegal).
* This deviates from some of our previous discussions about global objects but I think produces a usable API and we should go this way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86179
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.
To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.
1) For passes, you need to override the method:
virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry ®istry) const {}
and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.
2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.
3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:
mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
registry.insert<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
registry.insert<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();
Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:
mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);
4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.
To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.
1) For passes, you need to override the method:
virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry ®istry) const {}
and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.
2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.
3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:
mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
registry.insert<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
registry.insert<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();
Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:
mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);
4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
This greatly simplifies a large portion of the underlying infrastructure, allows for lookups of singleton classes to be much more efficient and always thread-safe(no locking). As a result of this, the dialect symbol registry has been removed as it is no longer necessary.
For users broken by this change, an alert was sent out(https://llvm.discourse.group/t/removing-kinds-from-attributes-and-types) that helps prevent a majority of the breakage surface area. All that should be necessary, if the advice in that alert was followed, is removing the kind passed to the ::get methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86121
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.
To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.
1) For passes, you need to override the method:
virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry ®istry) const {}
and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.
2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.
3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:
mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
mlir::registerDialect<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
mlir::registerDialect<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();
Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:
mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);
4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
LinalgDistribution options to allow more general distributions.
Changing the signature of the callback to send in the ranges for all
the parallel loops and expect a vector with the Value to use for the
processor-id and number-of-processors for each of the parallel loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86095
There should be an equivalent std.floor op to std.ceil. This includes
matching lowerings for SPIRV, NVVM, ROCDL, and LLVM.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85940
Create a reduction pass that accepts an optimization pass as argument
and only replaces the golden module in the pipeline if the output of the
optimization pass is smaller than the input and still exhibits the
interesting behavior.
Add a -test-pass option to test individual passes in the MLIR Reduce
tool.
Reviewed By: jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84783
Provide C API for MLIR standard types. Since standard types live under lib/IR
in core MLIR, place the C APIs in the IR library as well (standard ops will go
into a separate library). This also defines a placeholder for affine maps that
are necessary to construct a memref, but are not yet exposed to the C API.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86094
This function is available on llvm::Type and has been used by some clients of
the LLVM dialect before the transition. Implement the MLIR counterpart.
Reviewed By: schweitz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85847
- Add variants of getAnalysis() and friends that operate on a specific derived
operation types.
- Add OpPassManager::getAnalysis() to always call the base getAnalysis() with OpT.
- With this, an OperationPass can call getAnalysis<> using an analysis type that
is generic (works on Operation *) or specific to the OpT for the pass. Anything
else will fail to compile.
- Extend AnalysisManager unit test to test this, and add a new PassManager unit
test to test this functionality in the context of an OperationPass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84897
Legacy implementation of the LLVM dialect in MLIR contained an instance of
llvm::Module as it was required to parse LLVM IR types. The access to the data
layout of this module was exposed to the users for convenience, but in practice
this layout has always been the default one obtained by parsing an empty layout
description string. Current implementation of the dialect no longer relies on
wrapping LLVM IR types, but it kept an instance of DataLayout for
compatibility. This effectively forces a single data layout to be used across
all modules in a given MLIR context, which is not desirable. Remove DataLayout
from the LLVM dialect and attach it as a module attribute instead. Since MLIR
does not yet have support for data layouts, use the LLVM DataLayout in string
form with verification inside MLIR. Introduce the layout when converting a
module to the LLVM dialect and keep the default "" description for
compatibility.
This approach should be replaced with a proper MLIR-based data layout when it
becomes available, but provides an immediate solution to compiling modules with
different layouts, e.g. for GPUs.
This removes the need for LLVMDialectImpl, which is also removed.
Depends On D85650
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85652
This will help refactoring some of the tools to prepare for the explicit registration of
Dialects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86023
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from (Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial, the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others (linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the optimization pipeline enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
Explicitly declare ReductionTreeBase base class in ReductionTreePass copy constructor.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85983
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from (Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial, the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others (linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the optimization pipeline enabled.
Masked loading/storing in various forms can be optimized
into simpler memory operations when the mask is all true
or all false. Note that the backend does similar optimizations
but doing this early may expose more opportunities for further
optimizations. This further prepares progressively lowering
transfer read and write into 1-D memory operations.
Reviewed By: ThomasRaoux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85769
This revision removes all of the lingering usages of Type::getKind. A consequence of this is that FloatType is now split into 4 derived types that represent each of the possible float types(BFloat16Type, Float16Type, Float32Type, and Float64Type). Other than this split, this revision is NFC.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85566
Kiran Chandramohan