to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The "Procedure Call Procedure Call Standard for the ARM® Architecture"
(https://static.docs.arm.com/ihi0042/f/IHI0042F_aapcs.pdf), specifies that
composite types are passed according to their "natural alignment", i.e. the
alignment before alignment adjustment on the entire composite is applied.
The same applies for AArch64 ABI.
Clang, however, used the adjusted alignment.
GCC already implements the ABI correctly. With this patch Clang becomes
compatible with GCC and passes such arguments in accordance with AAPCS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46013
llvm-svn: 338279
The layout_version attribute is pretty straightforward: use the layout
rules from version XYZ of MSVC when used like
struct __declspec(layout_version(XYZ)) S {};
The empty_bases attribute is more interesting. It tries to get the C++
empty base optimization to fire more often by tweaking the MSVC ABI
rules in subtle ways:
1. Disable the leading and trailing zero-sized object flags if a class
is marked __declspec(empty_bases) and is empty.
This means that given:
struct __declspec(empty_bases) A {};
struct __declspec(empty_bases) B {};
struct C : A, B {};
'C' will have size 1 and nvsize 0 despite not being annotated
__declspec(empty_bases).
2. When laying out virtual or non-virtual bases, disable the injection
of padding between classes if the most derived class is marked
__declspec(empty_bases).
This means that given:
struct A {};
struct B {};
struct __declspec(empty_bases) C : A, B {};
'C' will have size 1 and nvsize 0.
3. When calculating the offset of a non-virtual base, choose offset zero
if the most derived class is marked __declspec(empty_bases) and the
base is empty _and_ has an nvsize of 0.
Because of the ABI rules, this does not mean that empty bases
reliably get placed at offset 0!
For example:
struct A {};
struct B {};
struct __declspec(empty_bases) C : A, B { virtual ~C(); };
'C' will be pointer sized to account for the vfptr at offset 0.
'A' and 'B' will _not_ be at offset 0 despite being empty!
Instead, they will be located right after the vfptr.
This occurs due to the interaction betweeen non-virtual base layout
and virtual function pointer injection: injection occurs after the
nv-bases and shifts them down by the size of a pointer.
llvm-svn: 270457
instead of before. The wrong order had no effect since Deallocate()
does nothing right now, but we may replace allocator in the future.
llvm-svn: 209567
This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The
most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the
fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest
for the first base/field after the vbptr.
llvm-svn: 198818
Adds padding between bases or virtual bases in an attempt to avoid
aliasing of zero-sized sub-objects. The approach used by the ABI adds
two more bits of state. Detailed comments are in the code. Test cases
included.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2258
llvm-svn: 196602
__declspec(align())
This patch implements required alignment in a way that makes
__declspec(align()) and #pragma pack play correctly together. In the
MS-ABI, __declspec(align()) is a hard rule and cannot be overridden by
#pragma pack. This cases each record to have two interesting alignments
"preferred alignment" (which matches Itanium's concept of alignment) and
"required alignment" which is an alignment that must never be violated,
even in the case of #pragma pack. This patch introduces the concept of
Required Alignment to the record builder and tracks/uses it
appropriately. Test cases are included.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2283
llvm-svn: 196549
Chandler Carruth