As described on PR31712, we miss a variety of legalization combines because we lower these to X86ISD::VSEXT/VZEXT despite them having the same functionality. This patch makes 128-bit (SSE41) SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_IN_REG ops legal, adds the necessary tablegen plumbing and uses a helper 'getExtendInVec' to decide when to use SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_IN_REG or VSEXT/VZEXT.
We're missing a couple of shuffle combines that will be added in a future patch for review.
Later patches can then support the AVX2 cases as a mixture of SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND and SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_IN_REG, and then finally deal with the AVX512 cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30549
llvm-svn: 296985
Summary:
This teaches getNode to simplify extracting from Undef. This is similar to what is done for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. It also adds support for extracting from CONCAT_VECTOR when we can reuse one of the inputs to the concat. These seem like simple non-target specific optimizations.
For X86 we currently handle undef in extractSubvector, but not all EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR creations go through there.
Ultimately, my motivation here is to simplify extractSubvector and remove custom lowering for EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR since we don't do anything but handle undef and BUILD_VECTOR optimizations, but those should be DAG combines.
Reviewers: RKSimon, delena
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29000
llvm-svn: 292876
Summary: The one tricky thing about this is that the sign/zero_extend_inreg uses v64i8 as an input type which isn't legal without BWI support. Though the vpmovsxbq and vpmovzxbq instructions themselves don't require BWI. To support this we need to add custom lowering for ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG with v64i8 input. This can mostly reuse the existing sign extend code with a couple checks for sign extend vs zero extend added.
Reviewers: delena, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25594
llvm-svn: 285053
Previously we were extending to copying the whole ZMM register. The register allocator shouldn't use XMM16-31 or YMM16-31 in this configuration as the instructions to spill them aren't available.
llvm-svn: 280648
Most often as not this is what it started out as, the extraction is zero-cost on AVX and the PMOVZX/PMOVSX folding logic is based around 128-bit loads.
llvm-svn: 270858
Improve vector extension of vectors on hardware without dedicated VSEXT/VZEXT instructions.
We already convert these to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG but can further improve this by using the legalizer instead of prematurely splitting into legal vectors in the combine as this only properly helps for lowering to VSEXT/VZEXT.
Removes a lot of unnecessary any_extend + mask pattern - (Fix for PR25718).
Reapplied with a fix for PR26953 (missing vector widening legalization).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17932
llvm-svn: 264062
We were being too aggressive in trying to combine a shuffle into a blend-with-zero pattern, often resulting in a endless loop of contrasting combines
This patch stops the combine if we already have a blend in place (means we miss some domain corrections)
llvm-svn: 263717
Improve vector extension of vectors on hardware without dedicated VSEXT/VZEXT instructions.
We already convert these to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG but can further improve this by using the legalizer instead of prematurely splitting into legal vectors in the combine as this only properly helps for lowering to VSEXT/VZEXT.
Removes a lot of unnecessary any_extend + mask pattern - (Fix for PR25718).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17932
llvm-svn: 263303
Generalise the existing SIGN_EXTEND to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG combine to support zero extension as well and get rid of a lot of unnecessary ANY_EXTEND + mask patterns.
Reapplied with a fix for PR26870 (avoid premature use of TargetConstant in ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG expansion).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17691
llvm-svn: 263159
Generalise the existing SIGN_EXTEND to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG combine to support zero extension as well and get rid of a lot of unnecessary ANY_EXTEND + mask patterns.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17691
llvm-svn: 262599
Part 2 of 2
This patch add support for combining target shuffles into blends-with-zero.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17483
llvm-svn: 261745
AVX1 doesn't support the shuffling of 256-bit integer vectors. For 32/64-bit elements we get around this by shuffling as float/double but for 8/16-bit elements (assuming they can't widen) we currently just split, shuffle as 128-bit vectors and concatenate the results back.
This patch adds the ability to lower using the bit-mask patterns before defaulting to the splitting behaviour. In some cases this ends up matching what AVX2 would do anyhow or what AVX1 does on the split vectors.
Part 1 of 2
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17292
llvm-svn: 261081
The combineX86ShufflesRecursively only supports unary shuffles, but was missing the opportunity to combine binary shuffles with a zero / undef second input.
This patch resolves target shuffle inputs, converting the shuffle mask elements to SM_SentinelUndef/SM_SentinelZero where possible. It then resolves the updated mask to check if we have created a faux unary shuffle.
Additionally, we now attempt to recursively call combineX86ShufflesRecursively for all input operands (we used to just recurse for unary integer shuffles and unary unpacks) - it safely returns early if its not a target shuffle.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16683
llvm-svn: 260063
First step towards making better use of AVX's implicit zeroing of the upper half of a 256-bit vector by instructions that only act on the lower 128-bit vector - discussed on D14151.
As well as the fact that 128-bit shuffle instructions are generally more capable, this can be performant for older CPUs with 128-bit ALUs (e.g. Jaguar, Sandy Bridge) that must treat 256-bit vectors as multiple micro-ops.
Moved the similar subvector extraction shuffle combines from PerformShuffleCombine256 to lowerVectorShuffle as well.
Note: I've avoided combining shuffles that reference elements from the upper halves of the input vectors - this may be reviewed in future work as well (AVX1 would probably always gain, but AVX2 does have some cross-lane shuffle instructions).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15477
llvm-svn: 256332
autogenerated.
Also update existing test cases which appear to be generated by it and
weren't modified (other than addition of the header) by rerunning it.
llvm-svn: 253917
Fix for D12561 - we weren't correctly ensuring that the base element for extension was moved to start on a boundary suitable for UNPCKL/H
llvm-svn: 248536
This patch generalizes the lowering of shuffles as zero extensions to allow extensions that don't start from the first element. It now recognises extensions starting anywhere in the lower 128-bits or at the start of any higher 128-bit lane.
The motivation was to reduce the number of high cost pshufb calls, but it also improves the SSE2 case as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12561
llvm-svn: 248250
For cases where we TRUNCATE and then ZERO_EXTEND to a larger size (often from vector legalization), see if we can mask the source data and then ZERO_EXTEND (instead of after a ANY_EXTEND). This can help avoid having to generate a larger mask, and possibly applying it to several sub-vectors.
(zext (truncate x)) -> (zext (and(x, m))
Includes a minor patch to SystemZ to better recognise 8/16-bit zero extension patterns from RISBG bit-extraction code.
This is the first of a number of minor patches to help improve the conversion of byte masks to clear mask shuffles.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11764
llvm-svn: 245160
The XformToShuffleWithZero method currently checks AND masks at the per-lane level for all-one and all-zero constants and attempts to convert them to legal shuffle clear masks.
This patch generalises XformToShuffleWithZero, splitting and checking the sub-lanes of the constants down to the byte level to see if any legal shuffle clear masks are possible. This allows a lot of masks (often from legalization or truncation) to be folded into existing shuffle patterns and removes a lot of constant mask loading.
There are a few examples of poor shuffle lowering that are exposed by this patch that will be cleaned up in future patches (e.g. merging shuffles that are separated by bitcasts, x86 legalized v8i8 zero extension uses PMOVZX+AND+AND instead of AND+PMOVZX, etc.)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11518
llvm-svn: 243831
VPAND is a lot faster than VPSHUFB and VPBLENDVB - this patch ensures we attempt to lower to a basic bitmask before lowering to the slower byte shuffle/blend instructions.
Split off from D11518.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11541
llvm-svn: 243395
For some history here see the commit messages of r199797 and r169060.
The original intent was to fix cases like:
%EAX<def> = COPY %ECX<kill>, %RAX<imp-def>
%RCX<def> = COPY %RAX<kill>
where simply removing the copies would have RCX undefined as in terms of
machine operands only the ECX part of it is defined. The machine
verifier would complain about this so 169060 changed such COPY
instructions into KILL instructions so some super-register imp-defs
would be preserved. In r199797 it was finally decided to always do this
regardless of super-register defs.
But this is wrong, consider:
R1 = COPY R0
...
R0 = COPY R1
getting changed to:
R1 = KILL R0
...
R0 = KILL R1
It now looks like R0 dies at the first KILL and won't be alive until the
second KILL, while in reality R0 is alive and must not change in this
part of the program.
As this only happens after register allocation there is not much code
still performing liveness queries so the issue was not noticed. In fact
I didn't manage to create a testcase for this, without unrelated changes
I am working on at the moment.
The fix is simple: As of r223896 the MachineVerifier allows reads from
partially defined registers, so the whole transforming COPY->KILL thing
is not necessary anymore. This patch also changes a similar (but more
benign case as the def and src are the same register) case in the
VirtRegRewriter.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10117
llvm-svn: 238588
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
llvm-svn: 230794
Author: Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>
Date: Mon Feb 23 23:04:28 2015 +0000
Fix based on post-commit comment on D7816 & rL230177 - BUILD_VECTOR operand truncation was using the the BV's output scalar type instead of the input type.
and
Author: Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>
Date: Sun Feb 22 18:17:28 2015 +0000
[DagCombiner] Generalized BuildVector Vector Concatenation
The CONCAT_VECTORS combiner pass can transform the concat of two BUILD_VECTOR nodes into a single BUILD_VECTOR node.
This patch generalises this to support any number of BUILD_VECTOR nodes, and also permits UNDEF nodes to be included as well.
This was noticed as AVX vec128 -> vec256 canonicalization sometimes creates a CONCAT_VECTOR with a real vec128 lower and an vec128 UNDEF upper.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7816
as the root cause of PR22678 which is causing an assertion inside the DAG combiner.
I'll follow up to the main thread as well.
llvm-svn: 230358
The CONCAT_VECTORS combiner pass can transform the concat of two BUILD_VECTOR nodes into a single BUILD_VECTOR node.
This patch generalises this to support any number of BUILD_VECTOR nodes, and also permits UNDEF nodes to be included as well.
This was noticed as AVX vec128 -> vec256 canonicalization sometimes creates a CONCAT_VECTOR with a real vec128 lower and an vec128 UNDEF upper.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7816
llvm-svn: 230177
Vector zext tends to get legalized into a vector anyext, represented as a vector shuffle with an undef vector + a bitcast, that gets ANDed with a mask that zeroes the undef elements.
Combine this into an explicit shuffle with a zero vector instead. This allows shuffle lowering to match it as a zext, instead of matching it as an anyext and emitting an explicit AND.
This combine only covers a subset of the cases, but it's a start.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7666
llvm-svn: 229480
The combine that forms extloads used to be disabled on vector types,
because "None of the supported targets knows how to perform load and
sign extend on vectors in one instruction."
That's not entirely true, since at least SSE4.1 X86 knows how to do
those sextloads/zextloads (with PMOVS/ZX).
But there are several aspects to getting this right.
First, vector extloads are controlled by a profitability callback.
For instance, on ARM, several instructions have folded extload forms,
so it's not always beneficial to create an extload node (and trying to
match extloads is a whole 'nother can of worms).
The interesting optimization enables folding of s/zextloads to illegal
(splittable) vector types, expanding them into smaller legal extloads.
It's not ideal (it introduces some legalization-like behavior in the
combine) but it's better than the obvious alternative: form illegal
extloads, and later try to split them up. If you do that, you might
generate extloads that can't be split up, but have a valid ext+load
expansion. At vector-op legalization time, it's too late to generate
this kind of code, so you end up forced to scalarize. It's better to
just avoid creating egregiously illegal nodes.
This optimization is enabled unconditionally on X86.
Note that the splitting combine is happy with "custom" extloads. As
is, this bypasses the actual custom lowering, and just unrolls the
extload. But from what I've seen, this is still much better than the
current custom lowering, which does some kind of unrolling at the end
anyway (see for instance load_sext_4i8_to_4i64 on SSE2, and the added
FIXME).
Also note that the existing combine that forms extloads is now also
enabled on legal vectors. This doesn't have a big effect on X86
(because sext+load is usually combined to sext_inreg+aextload).
On ARM it fires on some rare occasions; that's for a separate commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6904
llvm-svn: 228325
Igor Breger