CFI instructions that set appropriate cfa offset and cfa register are now
inserted in emitEpilogue() in X86FrameLowering.
Majority of the changes in this patch:
1. Ensure that CFI instructions do not affect code generation.
2. Enable maintaining correct information about cfa offset and cfa register
in a function when basic blocks are reordered, merged, split, duplicated.
These changes are target independent and described below.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
1. are duplicable
2. are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
3. can be compared as equal
Add information to each MachineBasicBlock about cfa offset and cfa register
that are valid at its entry and exit (incoming and outgoing CFI info). Add
support for updating this information when basic blocks are merged, split,
duplicated, created. Add a verification pass (CFIInfoVerifier) that checks
that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match incoming
values of their successors.
Incoming and outgoing CFI information is used by a late pass
(CFIInstrInserter) that corrects CFA calculation rule for a basic block if
needed. That means that additional CFI instructions get inserted at basic
block beginning to correct the rule for calculating CFA. Having CFI
instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA calculation rule
for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic block reordering,
or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the blocks have wrong
cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block above them.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18046
llvm-svn: 306529
We currently generate BUILD_VECTOR as a tree of UNPCKL shuffles of the same type:
e.g. for v4f32:
Step 1: unpcklps 0, 2 ==> X: <?, ?, 2, 0>
: unpcklps 1, 3 ==> Y: <?, ?, 3, 1>
Step 2: unpcklps X, Y ==> <3, 2, 1, 0>
The issue is because we are not placing sequential vector elements together early enough, we fail to recognise many combinable patterns - consecutive scalar loads, extractions etc.
Instead, this patch unpacks progressively larger sequential vector elements together:
e.g. for v4f32:
Step 1: unpcklps 0, 2 ==> X: <?, ?, 1, 0>
: unpcklps 1, 3 ==> Y: <?, ?, 3, 2>
Step 2: unpcklpd X, Y ==> <3, 2, 1, 0>
This does mean that we are creating UNPCKL shuffle of different value types, but the relevant combines that benefit from this are quite capable of handling the additional BITCASTs that are now included in the shuffle tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33864
llvm-svn: 304688
The extending load possibility was missed in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL304072
We might want to handle this cases as a follow-up, but bailing out for now
to avoid miscompiling.
llvm-svn: 304153
It can be costly to transfer from the gprs to the xmm registers and can prevent loads merging.
This patch splits vXi16/vXi32/vXi64 BUILD_VECTORS that use the same operand in multiple elements into a BUILD_VECTOR with only a single insertion of each of those elements and then performs an unary shuffle to duplicate the values.
There are a couple of minor regressions this patch unearths due to some missing MOVDDUP/BROADCAST folds that I will address in a future patch.
Note: Now that vector shuffle lowering and combining is pretty good we should be reusing that instead of duplicating so much in LowerBUILD_VECTOR - this is the first of several patches to address this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31373
llvm-svn: 299387
Up until now, vpmovm2 instruction described its destination operand size
by the source operand size. This patch adds new pattern for the vpmovm2
instruction. The node describes new expansion of the destination (from
{128|256} to 512).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30654
llvm-svn: 298586
VZEROUPPER should not be issued on Knights Landing (KNL), but on Skylake-avx512 it should be.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29874
llvm-svn: 296859
Choosing a "cfi" name makes the intend a bit clearer in an assembly dump
and more importantly the assembly dumps are slightly more stable as the
numbers don't move around anymore when unrelated code calls
createTempSymbol() more or less often.
As they are temp labels the name doesn't influence the generated object
code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27244
llvm-svn: 288290
Bit-shifts by a whole number of bytes can be represented as a shuffle mask suitable for combining.
Added a 'getFauxShuffleMask' function to allow us to create shuffle masks from other suitable operations.
llvm-svn: 288040
Summary: The one tricky thing about this is that the sign/zero_extend_inreg uses v64i8 as an input type which isn't legal without BWI support. Though the vpmovsxbq and vpmovzxbq instructions themselves don't require BWI. To support this we need to add custom lowering for ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG with v64i8 input. This can mostly reuse the existing sign extend code with a couple checks for sign extend vs zero extend added.
Reviewers: delena, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25594
llvm-svn: 285053
Previously we were extending to copying the whole ZMM register. The register allocator shouldn't use XMM16-31 or YMM16-31 in this configuration as the instructions to spill them aren't available.
llvm-svn: 280648
An identity COPY like this:
%AL = COPY %AL, %EAX<imp-def>
has no semantic effect, but encodes liveness information: Further users
of %EAX only depend on this instruction even though it does not define
the full register.
Replace the COPY with a KILL instruction in those cases to maintain this
liveness information. (This reverts a small part of r238588 but this
time adds a comment explaining why a KILL instruction is useful).
llvm-svn: 274952
The script now replace '.LCPI888_8' style asm symbols with the {{\.LCPI.*}} re pattern - this helps stop hardcoded symbols in 32-bit x86 tests changing with every edit of the file
Refreshed some tests to demonstrate the new check
llvm-svn: 272488
If all a BUILD_VECTOR's source elements are the same bit (AND/XOR/OR) operation type and each has one constant operand, lower to a pair of BUILD_VECTOR and just apply the bit operation to the vectors.
The constant operands will form a constant vector meaning that we still only have a single BUILD_VECTOR to lower and we will have replaced all the scalarized operations with a single SSE equivalent.
Its not in our interest to start make a general purpose vectorizer from this, but I'm seeing enough of these scalar bit operations from the later legalization/scalarization stages to support them at least.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18492
llvm-svn: 264666
On AVX2 target we are poorly legalizing SIGN_EXTEND ops for which the input's legalized type doesn't have the same number of elements as the destination, resulting in an ANY_EXTEND followed by a SIGN_EXTEND_INREG.
This patch uses the existing SIGN_EXTEND -> SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG combine to extend the input to the size of the result and using SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16994
llvm-svn: 260210
The combineX86ShufflesRecursively only supports unary shuffles, but was missing the opportunity to combine binary shuffles with a zero / undef second input.
This patch resolves target shuffle inputs, converting the shuffle mask elements to SM_SentinelUndef/SM_SentinelZero where possible. It then resolves the updated mask to check if we have created a faux unary shuffle.
Additionally, we now attempt to recursively call combineX86ShufflesRecursively for all input operands (we used to just recurse for unary integer shuffles and unary unpacks) - it safely returns early if its not a target shuffle.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16683
llvm-svn: 260063
This folds (ashr (shl a, [56,48,32,24,16]), SarConst)
into (shl, (sext (a), [56,48,32,24,16] - SarConst))
or into (lshr, (sext (a), SarConst - [56,48,32,24,16]))
depending on sign of (SarConst - [56,48,32,24,16])
sexts in X86 are MOVs.
The MOVs have the same code size as above SHIFTs (only SHIFT by 1 has lower code size).
However the MOVs have 2 advantages to SHIFTs on x86:
1. MOVs can write to a register that differs from source.
2. MOVs accept memory operands.
This fixes PR24373.
Patch by: evgeny.v.stupachenko@intel.com
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13161
llvm-svn: 255761
Caller saved regs differ between SysV and Win64. Use the tail call available set to scavenge from.
Refactor register info to create new helper to get at tail call GPRs. Added a new test case for windows. Fixed up a number of X64 tests since now RCX is preferred over RDX on SysV.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14878
llvm-svn: 253927
autogenerated.
Also update existing test cases which appear to be generated by it and
weren't modified (other than addition of the header) by rerunning it.
llvm-svn: 253917
This patch is enabling combining UNPCKL with vector_shuffle that moves the upper
half of a vector into the lower half, into a UNPCKH instruction. For example:
t2: v16i8 = vector_shuffle<8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u> t1, undef:v16i8
t3: v16i8 = X86ISD::UNPCKL undef:v16i8, t2
will be combined to:
t3: v16i8 = X86ISD::UNPCKH undef:v16i8, t1
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14399
llvm-svn: 253067
This patch generalizes the lowering of shuffles as zero extensions to allow extensions that don't start from the first element. It now recognises extensions starting anywhere in the lower 128-bits or at the start of any higher 128-bit lane.
The motivation was to reduce the number of high cost pshufb calls, but it also improves the SSE2 case as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12561
llvm-svn: 248250
This patch adds support for sign extension for sub 128-bit vectors, such as to v2i32. It concatenates with UNDEF subvectors up to 128-bits, performs the sign extension (i.e. as v4i32) and then extracts the target subvector.
Patch 1/2 of D10589 - the second patch covers the conversion of v2i8/v2i16 to v2f64.
llvm-svn: 241323
This patch improves support for sign extension of the lower lanes of vectors of integers by making use of the SSE41 pmovsx* sign extension instructions where possible, and optimizing the sign extension by shifts on pre-SSE41 targets (avoiding the use of i64 arithmetic shifts which require scalarization).
It converts SIGN_EXTEND nodes to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG where necessary, that more closely matches the pmovsx* instruction than the default approach of using SIGN_EXTEND_INREG which splits the operation (into an ANY_EXTEND lowered to a shuffle followed by shifts) making instruction matching difficult during lowering. Necessary support for SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG has been added to the DAGCombiner.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9848
llvm-svn: 237885
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
llvm-svn: 230794
The combine that forms extloads used to be disabled on vector types,
because "None of the supported targets knows how to perform load and
sign extend on vectors in one instruction."
That's not entirely true, since at least SSE4.1 X86 knows how to do
those sextloads/zextloads (with PMOVS/ZX).
But there are several aspects to getting this right.
First, vector extloads are controlled by a profitability callback.
For instance, on ARM, several instructions have folded extload forms,
so it's not always beneficial to create an extload node (and trying to
match extloads is a whole 'nother can of worms).
The interesting optimization enables folding of s/zextloads to illegal
(splittable) vector types, expanding them into smaller legal extloads.
It's not ideal (it introduces some legalization-like behavior in the
combine) but it's better than the obvious alternative: form illegal
extloads, and later try to split them up. If you do that, you might
generate extloads that can't be split up, but have a valid ext+load
expansion. At vector-op legalization time, it's too late to generate
this kind of code, so you end up forced to scalarize. It's better to
just avoid creating egregiously illegal nodes.
This optimization is enabled unconditionally on X86.
Note that the splitting combine is happy with "custom" extloads. As
is, this bypasses the actual custom lowering, and just unrolls the
extload. But from what I've seen, this is still much better than the
current custom lowering, which does some kind of unrolling at the end
anyway (see for instance load_sext_4i8_to_4i64 on SSE2, and the added
FIXME).
Also note that the existing combine that forms extloads is now also
enabled on legal vectors. This doesn't have a big effect on X86
(because sext+load is usually combined to sext_inreg+aextload).
On ARM it fires on some rare occasions; that's for a separate commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6904
llvm-svn: 228325
Update the entire regression test suite for the new shuffles. Remove
most of the old testing which was devoted to the old shuffle lowering
path and is no longer relevant really. Also remove a few other random
tests that only really exercised shuffles and only incidently or without
any interesting aspects to them.
Benchmarking that I have done shows a few small regressions with this on
LNT, zero measurable regressions on real, large applications, and for
several benchmarks where the loop vectorizer fires in the hot path it
shows 5% to 40% improvements for SSE2 and SSE3 code running on Sandy
Bridge machines. Running on AMD machines shows even more dramatic
improvements.
When using newer ISA vector extensions the gains are much more modest,
but the code is still better on the whole. There are a few regressions
being tracked (PR21137, PR21138, PR21139) but by and large this is
expected to be a win for x86 generated code performance.
It is also more correct than the code it replaces. I have fuzz tested
this extensively with ISA extensions up through AVX2 and found no
crashes or miscompiles (yet...). The old lowering had a few miscompiles
and crashers after a somewhat smaller amount of fuzz testing.
There is one significant area where the new code path lags behind and
that is in AVX-512 support. However, there was *extremely little*
support for that already and so this isn't a significant step backwards
and the new framework will probably make it easier to implement lowering
that uses the full power of AVX-512's table-based shuffle+blend (IMO).
Many thanks to Quentin, Andrea, Robert, and others for benchmarking
assistance. Thanks to Adam and others for help with AVX-512. Thanks to
Hal, Eric, and *many* others for answering my incessant questions about
how the backend actually works. =]
I will leave the old code path in the tree until the 3 PRs above are at
least resolved to folks' satisfaction. Then I will rip it (and 1000s of
lines of code) out. =] I don't expect this flag to stay around for very
long. It may not survive next week.
llvm-svn: 219046
a bare-metal triple and have nice BB labels, etc.
No significant change here, just tidying up to have a consistent set of
OS-agnostic vector functionality here.
llvm-svn: 218854
test file.
This old test had a bunch of functions that were never even checked. =/
The only thing it really did was to make sure that we did something
reasonable in 32-bit mode with SSE4.1. Adding another run line to the
main vector-sext.ll test seems a better way to do that.
llvm-svn: 218810
Daniel Jasper