Summary:
This teaches 512-bit shuffles to detect unused halfs in order to reduce shuffle size.
We may need to refine the 512-bit exit point. I couldn't remember if we had good cross lane shuffles for 8/16 bit with AVX-512 or not.
I believe this is step towards being able to handle D36454 without a special case.
From here we need to improve our ability to combine extract_subvector with insert_subvector and other extract_subvectors. And we need to support narrowing binary operations where we don't demand all elements. This may be improvements to DAGCombiner::narrowExtractedVectorBinOp(by recognizing an insert_subvector in addition to concat) or we may need a target specific combiner.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, delena, jbhateja
Reviewed By: RKSimon, jbhateja
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36601
llvm-svn: 310724
These were taking priority over the aligned load instructions since there is no vmovda8/16. I don't think there is really a difference between aligned and unaligned on newer cpus so I don't think it matters which instructions we use.
But with this change we reduce the size of the isel table a little and we allow the aligned information to pass through to the evex->vec pass and produce the same output has avx/avx2 in some cases.
I also generally dislike patterns rooted in a bitcast which these were.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35977
llvm-svn: 309589
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 304371
This also reverts follow-ups r303292 and r303298.
It broke some Chromium tests under MSan, and apparently also internal
tests at Google.
llvm-svn: 303369
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
VZEROUPPER should not be issued on Knights Landing (KNL), but on Skylake-avx512 it should be.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29874
llvm-svn: 296859
If AVX512 is disabled, the registers should already be marked reserved. Pattern predicates and register classes on instructions should take care of most of the rest. Loads/stores and physical register copies for XMM16-31 and YMM16-31 without VLX have already been taken care of.
I'm a little unclear why this changed the register allocation of the SSE2 run of the sad.ll test, but the registers selected appear to be valid after this change.
llvm-svn: 282835
Up until now, we only had code to match PSADBW patterns that look like what
comes out of the loop vectorizer - a partial reduction inside the loop body
that gets fed into a horizontal operation in a different basic block.
This adds support for straight-line patterns, like those generated by the
SLP vectorizer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22889
llvm-svn: 277219
512-bit VPSLLDQ/VPSRLDQ can only be used for avx512bw targets so lowerVectorShuffleAsShift had to be adjusted to include the subtarget
llvm-svn: 272300
When the index is known to be constant 0, insert directly into the the low half,
instead of spilling, performing the insert in-memory, and reloading.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20763
llvm-svn: 271428
It would be better to check the valid/expected size of the immediate operand, but this is
generally better than what we print right now.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20385
llvm-svn: 271114
Craig Topper