This is a follow up to 4f3f4d6722
("sanitizer_common: fix __sanitizer_get_module_and_offset_for_pc signature mismatch")
which fixes a similar problem for msan build.
I am getting the following error compiling a unit test for code that
uses sanitizer_common headers and googletest transitively includes
sanitizer interface headers:
In file included from third_party/gwp_sanitizers/singlestep_test.cpp:3:
In file included from sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h:19:
sanitizer_interface_internal.h:41:5: error: typedef redefinition with different types
('struct __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments' vs 'struct __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments')
} __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments;
common_interface_defs.h:39:3: note: previous definition is here
} __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments;
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119546
Similar to 60cc1d3218 for NetBSD, add aliases and interceptors for the
following pthread related functions:
- pthread_cond_init(3)
- pthread_cond_destroy(3)
- pthread_cond_signal(3)
- pthread_cond_broadcast(3)
- pthread_cond_wait(3)
- pthread_mutex_init(3)
- pthread_mutex_destroy(3)
- pthread_mutex_lock(3)
- pthread_mutex_trylock(3)
- pthread_mutex_unlock(3)
- pthread_rwlock_init(3)
- pthread_rwlock_destroy(3)
- pthread_rwlock_rdlock(3)
- pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock(3)
- pthread_rwlock_wrlock(3)
- pthread_rwlock_trywrlock(3)
- pthread_rwlock_unlock(3)
- pthread_once(3)
- pthread_sigmask(3)
In FreeBSD's libc, a number of internal aliases of the pthread functions
are invoked, typically with an additional prefixed underscore, e.g.
_pthread_cond_init() and so on.
ThreadSanitizer needs to intercept these aliases too, otherwise some
false positive reports about data races might be produced.
Reviewed By: dvyukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119034
In glibc before 2.33, include/sys/stat.h defines fstat/fstat64 to
`__fxstat/__fxstat64` and provides `__fxstat/__fxstat64` in libc_nonshared.a.
The symbols are glibc specific and not needed on other systems.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118423
When using the in-tree libc++, we should be using the full path to
ensure that we're using the right library and not accidentally pick up
the system library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118200
`_vfork` moved from libsystem_kernel.dylib to libsystem_c.dylib as part
of the below changes. The iOS simulator does not actually have
libsystem_kernel.dylib of its own, it only has the host Mac's. The
umbrella-nature of Libsystem makes this movement transparent to
everyone; except the simulator! So when we "back deploy", i.e., use the
current version of TSan with an older simulator runtime then this symbol
is now missing, when we run on the latest OS (but an older simulator
runtime).
Note we use `SANITIZER_IOS` because usage of vfork is forbidden on iOS
and the API is completely unavailable on watchOS and tvOS, even if this
problem is specific to the iOS simulator.
Caused by:
rdar://74818691 (Shim vfork() to fork syscall on iOS)
rdar://76762076 (Shim vfork() to fork syscall on macOS)
Radar-Id: rdar://8634734
These tests are now green:
```
Trace.MultiPart
Trace.RestoreAccess
Trace.RestoreMutexLock
TraceAlloc.FinishedThreadReuse
TraceAlloc.FinishedThreadReuse2
TraceAlloc.SingleThread
```
rdar://82107856
Currently we use very common names for macros like ACQUIRE/RELEASE,
which cause conflicts with system headers.
Prefix all macros with SANITIZER_ to avoid conflicts.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116652
This reverts commit 640beb38e7.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
The new tsan runtime has 2x more compact shadow.
Adjust shadow ranges accordingly.
Depends on D112603.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113751
If there are multiple processes, it's hard to understand
what output comes from what process.
VReport prepends pid to the output. Use it.
Depends on D113982.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113983
Update now after long operations so that we don't use
stale value in subsequent computations.
Depends on D113981.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113982
Creating threads after a multi-threaded fork is semi-supported,
we don't give particular guarantees, but we try to not fail
on simple cases and we have die_after_fork=0 flag that enables
not dying on creation of threads after a multi-threaded fork.
This flag is used in the wild:
23c052e3e3/SConstruct (L3599)
fork_multithreaded.cpp test started hanging in debug mode
after the recent "tsan: fix deadlock during race reporting" commit,
which added proactive ThreadRegistryLock check in SlotLock.
But the test broke earlier after "tsan: remove quadratic behavior in pthread_join"
commit which made tracking of alive threads based on pthread_t stricter
(CHECK-fail on 2 threads with the same pthread_t, or joining a non-existent thread).
When we start a thread after a multi-threaded fork, the new pthread_t
can actually match one of existing values (for threads that don't exist anymore).
Thread creation started CHECK-failing on this, but the test simply
ignored this CHECK failure in the child thread and "passed".
But after "tsan: fix deadlock during race reporting" the test started hanging dead,
because CHECK failures recursively lock thread registry.
Fix this purging all alive threads from thread registry on fork.
Also the thread registry mutex somehow lost the internal deadlock detector id
and was excluded from deadlock detection. If it would have the id, the CHECK
wouldn't hang because of the nested CHECK failure due to the deadlock.
But then again the test would have silently ignore this error as well
and the bugs wouldn't have been noticed.
Add the deadlock detector id to the thread registry mutex.
Also extend the test to check more cases and detect more bugs.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116091
If we miss both close of a file descriptor and a subsequent open
if the same file descriptor number, we report false positives
between operations on the old and on the new descriptors.
There are lots of ways to create new file descriptors, but for closing
there is mostly close call. So we try to handle at least it.
However, if the close happens in an ignored library, we miss it
and start reporting false positives.
Handle closing of file descriptors always, even in ignored libraries
(as we do for malloc/free and other critical functions).
But don't imitate memory accesses on close for ignored libraries.
FdClose checks validity of the fd (fd >= 0) itself,
so remove the excessive checks in the callers.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116095
We used to use u64 as mutex id because it was some
tricky identifier built from address and reuse count.
Now it's just the mutex index in the report (0, 1, 2...),
so use int to represent it.
Depends on D112603.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113980
These callbacks are used for SSE vector accesses.
In some computational programs these accesses dominate.
Currently we do 2 uninlined 8-byte accesses to handle them.
Inline and optimize them similarly to unaligned accesses.
This reduces the vector access benchmark time from 8 to 3 seconds.
Depends on D112603.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114594
There is a small chance that the slot may be not queued in TraceSwitchPart.
This can happen if the slot has kEpochLast epoch and another thread
in FindSlotAndLock discovered that it's exhausted and removed it from
the slot queue. kEpochLast can happen in 2 cases: (1) if TraceSwitchPart
was called with the slot locked and epoch already at kEpochLast,
or (2) if we've acquired a new slot in SlotLock in the beginning
of the function and the slot was at kEpochLast - 1, so after increment
in SlotAttachAndLock it become kEpochLast.
If this happens we crash on ctx->slot_queue.Remove(thr->slot).
Skip the requeueing if the slot is not queued.
The slot is exhausted, so it must not be ctx->slot_queue.
The existing stress test triggers this with very small probability.
I am not sure how to make this condition more likely to be triggered,
it evaded lots of testing.
Depends on D116040.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116041
SlotPairLocker calls SlotLock under ctx->multi_slot_mtx.
SlotLock can invoke global reset DoReset if we are out of slots/epochs.
But DoReset locks ctx->multi_slot_mtx as well, which leads to deadlock.
Resolve the deadlock by removing SlotPairLocker/multi_slot_mtx
and only lock one slot for which we will do RestoreStack.
We need to lock that slot because RestoreStack accesses the slot journal.
But it's unclear why we need to lock the current slot.
Initially I did it just to be on the safer side (but at that time
we dit not lock the second slot, so it was easy just to lock the current slot).
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116040
Previously we would crash in the TSan runtime if the user program passes
a pointer to `malloc_size()` that doesn't point into app memory.
In these cases, `malloc_size()` should return 0.
For ASan, we fixed a similar issue here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D15008
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/86213149
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115947
In the new TSan runtime refactoring this line was changed:
```
ProtectRange(MetaShadowEnd(), TraceMemBeg());
-->
ProtectRange(MetaShadowEnd(), HeapMemBeg());
```
But for `MappingAppleAarch64` the app heap comes before the shadow,
resulting in:
```
CHECK failed: tsan_platform_posix.cpp:83 "((beg)) <= ((end))" (0xe00000000, 0x200000000)
```
rdar://86521924
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115834
This change switches tsan to the new runtime which features:
- 2x smaller shadow memory (2x of app memory)
- faster fully vectorized race detection
- small fixed-size vector clocks (512b)
- fast vectorized vector clock operations
- unlimited number of alive threads/goroutimes
Depends on D112602.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112603
This change switches tsan to the new runtime which features:
- 2x smaller shadow memory (2x of app memory)
- faster fully vectorized race detection
- small fixed-size vector clocks (512b)
- fast vectorized vector clock operations
- unlimited number of alive threads/goroutimes
Depends on D112602.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112603
Fork the current version of tsan runtime before commiting
rewrite of the runtime (D112603). The old runtime can be
enabled with TSAN_USE_OLD_RUNTIME option.
This is a temporal measure for emergencies and is required
for Chromium rollout (for context see http://crbug.com/1275581).
The old runtime is supposed to be deleted soon.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115223
That way, the build rules are closer to the source files they describe.
No intended behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115155
We call UnmapShadow before the actual munmap, at that point we don't yet
know if the provided address/size are sane. We can't call UnmapShadow
after the actual munmap becuase at that point the memory range can
already be reused for something else, so we can't rely on the munmap
return value to understand is the values are sane.
While calling munmap with insane values (non-canonical address, negative
size, etc) is an error, the kernel won't crash. We must also try to not
crash as the failure mode is very confusing (paging fault inside of the
runtime on some derived shadow address).
Such invalid arguments are observed on Chromium tests:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1275581
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114944
The added test demonstrates loading a dynamic library with static TLS.
Such static TLS is a hack that allows a dynamic library to have faster TLS,
but it can be loaded only iff all threads happened to allocate some excess
of static TLS space for whatever reason. If it's not the case loading fails with:
dlopen: cannot load any more object with static TLS
We used to produce a false positive because dlopen will write into TLS
of all existing threads to initialize/zero TLS region for the loaded library.
And this appears to be racing with initialization of TLS in the thread
since we model a write into the whole static TLS region (we don't what part
of it is currently unused):
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=2317365)
Write of size 1 at 0x7f1fa9bfcdd7 by main thread:
0 memset
1 init_one_static_tls
2 __pthread_init_static_tls
[[ this is where main calls dlopen ]]
3 main
Previous write of size 8 at 0x7f1fa9bfcdd0 by thread T1:
0 __tsan_tls_initialization
Fix this by ignoring accesses during dlopen.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114953
We would like to use TLS to store the ThreadState object (or at least a
reference ot it), but on Darwin accessing TLS via __thread or manually
by using pthread_key_* is problematic, because there are several places
where interceptors are called when TLS is not accessible (early process
startup, thread cleanup, ...).
Previously, we used a "poor man's TLS" implementation, where we use the
shadow memory of the pointer returned by pthread_self() to store a
pointer to the ThreadState object.
The problem with that was that certain operations can populate shadow
bytes unbeknownst to TSan, and we later interpret these non-zero bytes
as the pointer to our ThreadState object and crash on when dereferencing
the pointer.
This patch changes the storage location of our reference to the
ThreadState object to "real" TLS. We make this work by artificially
keeping this reference alive in the pthread_key destructor by resetting
the key value with pthread_setspecific().
This change also fixes the issue were the ThreadState object is
re-allocated after DestroyThreadState() because intercepted functions
can still get called on the terminating thread after the
THREAD_TERMINATE event.
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/72010355
Reviewed By: dvyukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110236
Sometimes stacks for at_exit callbacks don't include any of the user functions/files.
For example, a race with a global std container destructor will only contain
the container type name and our at_exit_wrapper function. No signs what global variable
this is.
Remember and include in reports the function that installed the at_exit callback.
This should give glues as to what variable is being destroyed.
Depends on D114606.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114607
This change switches tsan to the new runtime which features:
- 2x smaller shadow memory (2x of app memory)
- faster fully vectorized race detection
- small fixed-size vector clocks (512b)
- fast vectorized vector clock operations
- unlimited number of alive threads/goroutimes
Depends on D112602.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112603
Linux/fork_deadlock.cpp currently hangs in debug mode in the following stack.
Disable memory access handling in OnUserAlloc/Free around fork.
1 0x000000000042c54b in __sanitizer::internal_sched_yield () at sanitizer_linux.cpp:452
2 0x000000000042da15 in __sanitizer::StaticSpinMutex::LockSlow (this=0x57ef02 <__sanitizer::internal_allocator_cache_mu>) at sanitizer_mutex.cpp:24
3 0x0000000000423927 in __sanitizer::StaticSpinMutex::Lock (this=0x57ef02 <__sanitizer::internal_allocator_cache_mu>) at sanitizer_mutex.h:32
4 0x000000000042354c in __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::StaticSpinMutex>::GenericScopedLock (this=this@entry=0x7ffcabfca0b8, mu=0x1) at sanitizer_mutex.h:367
5 0x0000000000423653 in __sanitizer::RawInternalAlloc (size=size@entry=72, cache=cache@entry=0x0, alignment=8, alignment@entry=0) at sanitizer_allocator.cpp:52
6 0x00000000004235e9 in __sanitizer::InternalAlloc (size=size@entry=72, cache=0x1, cache@entry=0x0, alignment=4, alignment@entry=0) at sanitizer_allocator.cpp:86
7 0x000000000043aa15 in __sanitizer::SymbolizedStack::New (addr=4802655) at sanitizer_symbolizer.cpp:45
8 0x000000000043b353 in __sanitizer::Symbolizer::SymbolizePC (this=0x7f578b77a028, addr=4802655) at sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cpp:90
9 0x0000000000439dbe in __sanitizer::(anonymous namespace)::StackTraceTextPrinter::ProcessAddressFrames (this=this@entry=0x7ffcabfca208, pc=4802655) at sanitizer_stacktrace_libcdep.cpp:36
10 0x0000000000439c89 in __sanitizer::StackTrace::PrintTo (this=this@entry=0x7ffcabfca2a0, output=output@entry=0x7ffcabfca260) at sanitizer_stacktrace_libcdep.cpp:109
11 0x0000000000439fe0 in __sanitizer::StackTrace::Print (this=0x18) at sanitizer_stacktrace_libcdep.cpp:132
12 0x0000000000495359 in __sanitizer::PrintMutexPC (pc=4802656) at tsan_rtl.cpp:774
13 0x000000000042e0e4 in __sanitizer::InternalDeadlockDetector::Lock (this=0x7f578b1ca740, type=type@entry=2, pc=pc@entry=4371612) at sanitizer_mutex.cpp:177
14 0x000000000042df65 in __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::LockImpl (this=<optimized out>, pc=4) at sanitizer_mutex.cpp:218
15 0x000000000042bc95 in __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::Lock (this=0x600001000000) at sanitizer_mutex.h:127
16 __sanitizer::Mutex::Lock (this=0x600001000000) at sanitizer_mutex.h:165
17 0x000000000042b49c in __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock (this=this@entry=0x7ffcabfca370, mu=0x1) at sanitizer_mutex.h:367
18 0x000000000049504f in __tsan::TraceSwitch (thr=0x7f578b1ca980) at tsan_rtl.cpp:656
19 0x000000000049523e in __tsan_trace_switch () at tsan_rtl.cpp:683
20 0x0000000000499862 in __tsan::TraceAddEvent (thr=0x7f578b1ca980, fs=..., typ=__tsan::EventTypeMop, addr=4499472) at tsan_rtl.h:624
21 __tsan::MemoryAccessRange (thr=0x7f578b1ca980, pc=4499472, addr=135257110102784, size=size@entry=16, is_write=true) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:563
22 0x000000000049853a in __tsan::MemoryRangeFreed (thr=thr@entry=0x7f578b1ca980, pc=pc@entry=4499472, addr=addr@entry=135257110102784, size=16) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:487
23 0x000000000048f6bf in __tsan::OnUserFree (thr=thr@entry=0x7f578b1ca980, pc=pc@entry=4499472, p=p@entry=135257110102784, write=true) at tsan_mman.cpp:260
24 0x000000000048f61f in __tsan::user_free (thr=thr@entry=0x7f578b1ca980, pc=4499472, p=p@entry=0x7b0400004300, signal=true) at tsan_mman.cpp:213
25 0x000000000044a820 in __interceptor_free (p=0x7b0400004300) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:708
26 0x00000000004ad599 in alloc_free_blocks () at fork_deadlock.cpp:25
27 __tsan_test_only_on_fork () at fork_deadlock.cpp:32
28 0x0000000000494870 in __tsan::ForkBefore (thr=0x7f578b1ca980, pc=pc@entry=4904437) at tsan_rtl.cpp:510
29 0x000000000046fcb4 in syscall_pre_fork (pc=1) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:2577
30 0x000000000046fc9b in __sanitizer_syscall_pre_impl_fork () at sanitizer_common_syscalls.inc:3094
31 0x00000000004ad5f5 in myfork () at syscall.h:9
32 main () at fork_deadlock.cpp:46
Depends on D114595.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114597
We currently use a wrong value for heap block
(only works for C++, but not for Java).
Use the correct value (we already computed it before, just forgot to use).
Depends on D114593.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114595
Now that we lock the internal allocator around fork,
it's possible it will create additional deadlocks.
Add a fake mutex that substitutes the internal allocator
for the purposes of deadlock detection.
Depends on D114531.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114532
There is a small chance that the internal allocator is locked
during fork and then the new process is created with locked
internal allocator and any attempts to use it will deadlock.
For example, if detected a suppressed race in the parent during fork
and then another suppressed race after the fork.
This becomes much more likely with the new tsan runtime
as it uses the internal allocator for more things.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114531
This change switches tsan to the new runtime which features:
- 2x smaller shadow memory (2x of app memory)
- faster fully vectorized race detection
- small fixed-size vector clocks (512b)
- fast vectorized vector clock operations
- unlimited number of alive threads/goroutimes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112603
This change switches tsan to the new runtime which features:
- 2x smaller shadow memory (2x of app memory)
- faster fully vectorized race detection
- small fixed-size vector clocks (512b)
- fast vectorized vector clock operations
- unlimited number of alive threads/goroutimes
Depends on D112602.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112603
Fangrui Song