When building with Clang 11 on Windows, silence the following:
[432/5643] Building C object projects\compiler-rt\lib\profile\CMakeFiles\clang_rt.profile-x86_64.dir\GCDAProfiling.c.obj
F:\aganea\llvm-project\compiler-rt\lib\profile\GCDAProfiling.c(464,13): warning: comparison of integers of different signs: 'uint32_t' (aka 'unsigned int') and 'int' [-Wsign-compare]
if (val != (gcov_version >= 90 ? GCOV_TAG_OBJECT_SUMMARY
~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
Summary:
According the mmap man page (https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/mmap.2.html) is only required to precisely control updates, so we can safely remove it.
Since gcda files are dumped just before to call exec** functions, dump need to be fast.
On my computer, Firefox built with --coverage needs ~1min40 to display something and in removing msync it needs ~8s.
Reviewers: void
Subscribers: #sanitizers, marco-c, sylvestre.ledru
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81060
This reverts commit 01cdab0b33.
It was causing the instrprof-darwin-exports.c test to fail.
```
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"_flush_fn_list", referenced from:
-exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
```
GCC r187297 (2012-05) introduced `__gcov_dump` and `__gcov_reset`.
`__gcov_flush = __gcov_dump + __gcov_reset`
The resolution to https://gcc.gnu.org/PR93623 ("No need to dump gcdas when forking" target GCC 11.0) removed the unuseful and undocumented __gcov_flush.
Close PR38064.
Reviewed By: calixte, serge-sans-paille
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83149
atexit registered functions run earlier so `__attribute__((destructor))`
annotated functions cannot be tracked.
Set a priority of 100 (compatible with GCC 7 onwards) to track
destructors and destructors whose priorities are greater than 100.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7970
Reviewed By: calixte, marco-c
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82253
Fixes PR45673
The commit 9180c14fe4 (D76206) resolved only a part of the problem
of concurrent .gcda file creation. It ensured that only one process
creates the file but did not ensure that the process locks the
file first. If not, the process which created the file may clobber
the contents written by a process which locked the file first.
This is the cause of PR45673.
This commit prevents the clobbering by revising the assumption
that a process which creates the file locks the file first.
Regardless of file creation, a process which locked the file first
uses fwrite (new_file==1) and other processes use mmap (new_file==0).
I also tried to keep the creation/first-lock process same by using
mkstemp/link/unlink but the code gets long. This commit is more
simple.
Note: You may be confused with other changes which try to resolve
concurrent file access. My understanding is (may not be correct):
D76206: Resolve race of .gcda file creation (but not lock)
This one: Resolve race of .gcda file creation and lock
D54599: Same as D76206 but abandoned?
D70910: Resolve race of multi-threaded counter flushing
D74953: Resolve counter sharing between parent/children processes
D78477: Revision of D74953
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79556
In a big-endian .gcda file, the first four bytes are "gcda" instead of "adcg".
All 32-bit values are in big-endian.
With this change, libclang_rt.profile can hopefully produce gcov
compatible output.
D49132 is partially correct. For 64-bit values, the lower 32-bit part comes
before the higher 32-bit part (in a little-endian manner).
For 32-bit values, libgcov reads/writes 32-bit values in native endianness.
gcov 9 (r264462) started to use GCOV_TAG_OBJECT_SUMMARY. Before,
GCOV_TAG_PROGRAM_SUMMARY was used.
libclang_rt.profile should emit just one tag according to the version.
Another bug introduced by rL194499 is that the wrong runcount field was
selected.
Fix the two bugs so that gcov can correctly decode "Runs:" from
libclang_rt.profile produced .gcda files, and llvm-cov gcov can
correctly decode "Runs:" from libgcov produced .gcda files.
Defaulting to -Xclang -coverage-version='407*' makes .gcno/.gcda
compatible with gcov [4.7,8)
In addition, delete clang::CodeGenOptionsBase::CoverageExtraChecksum and GCOVOptions::UseCfgChecksum.
We can infer the information from the version.
With this change, .gcda files produced by `clang --coverage a.o` linked executable can be read by gcov 4.7~7.
We don't need other -Xclang -coverage* options.
There may be a mismatching version warning, though.
(Note, GCC r173147 "split checksum into cfg checksum and line checksum"
made gcov 4.7 incompatible with previous versions.)
rL144865 incorrectly wrote function names for GCOV_TAG_FUNCTION
(this might be part of the reasons the header says
"We emit files in a corrupt version of GCOV's "gcda" file format").
rL176173 and rL177475 realized the problem and introduced -coverage-no-function-names-in-data
to work around the issue. (However, the description is wrong.
libgcov never writes function names, even before GCC 4.2).
In reality, the linker command line has to look like:
clang --coverage -Xclang -coverage-version='407*' -Xclang -coverage-cfg-checksum -Xclang -coverage-no-function-names-in-data
Failing to pass -coverage-no-function-names-in-data can make gcov 4.7~7
either produce wrong results (for one gcov-4.9 program, I see "No executable lines")
or segfault (gcov-7).
(gcov-8 uses an incompatible format.)
This patch deletes -coverage-no-function-names-in-data and the related
function names support from libclang_rt.profile
Summary:
When forking in several threads, the counters were written out in using the same global static variables (see GCDAProfiling.c): that leads to crashes.
So when there is a fork, the counters are resetted in the child process and they will be dumped at exit using the interprocess file locking.
When there is an exec, the counters are written out and in case of failures they're resetted.
Reviewers: jfb, vsk, marco-c, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: marco-c, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: llvm-commits, serge-sans-paille, dmajor, cfe-commits, hiraditya, dexonsmith, #sanitizers, marco-c, sylvestre.ledru
Tags: #sanitizers, #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78477
The intent of the `llvm_gcda_start_file` function is that only
one process create the .gcda file and initialize it to be updated
by other processes later.
Before this change, if multiple processes are started simultaneously,
some of them may initialize the file because both the first and
second `open` calls may succeed in a race condition and `new_file`
becomes 1 in those processes. This leads incorrect coverage counter
values. This often happens in MPI (Message Passing Interface) programs.
The test program added in this change is a simple reproducer.
This change ensures only one process creates/initializes the file by
using the `O_EXCL` flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76206
See discussion on PR44792.
This reverts commit 02ce9d8ef5.
It also reverts the follow-up commits
8f46269f0 "[profile] Don't dump counters when forking and don't reset when calling exec** functions"
62c7d8402 "[profile] gcov_mutex must be static"
Summary:
There is no need to write out gcdas when forking because we can just reset the counters in the parent process.
Let say a counter is N before the fork, then fork and this counter is set to 0 in the child process.
In the parent process, the counter is incremented by P and in the child process it's incremented by C.
When dump is ran at exit, parent process will dump N+P for the given counter and the child process will dump 0+C, so when the gcdas are merged the resulting counter will be N+P+C.
About exec** functions, since the current process is replaced by an another one there is no need to reset the counters but just write out the gcdas since the counters are definitely lost.
To avoid to have lists in a bad state, we just lock them during the fork and the flush (if called explicitely) and lock them when an element is added.
Reviewers: marco-c
Reviewed By: marco-c
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, sylvestre.ledru
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74953
Summary:
Counters can be flushed in a multi-threaded context for example when the process is forked in different threads (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/GCOVProfiling.cpp#L632-L663).
In order to avoid pretty bad things, a critical section is needed around the flush.
We had a lot of crashes in this code in Firefox CI when we switched to clang for linux ccov builds and those crashes disappeared with this patch.
Reviewers: marco-c, froydnj, dmajor, davidxl, vsk
Reviewed By: marco-c, dmajor
Subscribers: ahatanak, froydnj, dmajor, dberris, jfb, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, sylvestre.ledru
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70910
Summary:
Counters can be flushed in a multi-threaded context for example when the process is forked in different threads (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/GCOVProfiling.cpp#L632-L663).
In order to avoid pretty bad things, a critical section is needed around the flush.
We had a lot of crashes in this code in Firefox CI when we switched to clang for linux ccov builds and those crashes disappeared with this patch.
Reviewers: marco-c, froydnj, dmajor, davidxl
Reviewed By: marco-c, dmajor
Subscribers: froydnj, dmajor, dberris, jfb, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, sylvestre.ledru
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70910
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This ports the profiling runtime on Fuchsia and enables the
instrumentation. Unlike on other platforms, Fuchsia doesn't use
files to dump the instrumentation data since on Fuchsia, filesystem
may not be accessible to the instrumented process. We instead use
the data sink to pass the profiling data to the system the same
sanitizer runtimes do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47208
llvm-svn: 337881
Summary:
The write buffer contains signed chars, which means the shift operations caused values such as the arc tag value (0x01a10000) to be read incorrectly (0xffa10000).
This fixes a regression from https://reviews.llvm.org/D49132.
Reviewers: uweigand, davidxl
Reviewed By: uweigand
Subscribers: llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49161
llvm-svn: 336775
Two fixes required to handle big-endian systems:
- 64-bit counter values are stored in a mixed-endian format in the
gcov files: a 32-bit low-part followed by a 32-bit high part. Note that
this is already implemented correctly on the LLVM side, see
GCOVBuffer::readInt64.
- The tag values (e.g. arcs tag, object summary tag, ...) are aways
written as the same sequence of bytes independent of byte order. But
when *reading* them back in, the code reads them as 32-bit values in
host byte order. For the comparisons to work correctly, this should
instead always read them as little-endian values.
Fixes PR 38121.
Reviewed By: marco-c
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49132
llvm-svn: 336693
Summary:
This will make the behavior of __gcov_flush match the GCC behavior.
I would like to rename __gcov_flush to __llvm_gcov_flush (in case of programs linking to libraries built with different compilers), but I guess we can't for compatibility reasons.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: samsonov, vitalybuka, pcc, kcc, junbuml, glider, fhahn, eugenis, dvyukov, davidxl, srhines, chh, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48538
llvm-svn: 336365
__gcov_flush is hidden.
For applications to dump profiling data of selected .so files,
they can use dlsym to find and call llvm_gcov_flush in each .so file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45454
llvm-svn: 336019
This includes a few nice bits of refactoring (e.g splitting out the
exclusive locking code into a common utility).
Hopefully the Windows support is fixed now.
Patch by Rainer Orth!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40944
llvm-svn: 320731
This includes a few nice bits of refactoring (e.g splitting out the
exclusive locking code into a common utility).
Patch by Rainer Orth!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40944
llvm-svn: 320726
Summary:
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34922.
Apparently, the mode in **fdopen** gets simply ignored and Windows only cares about the mode of the original **open**.
I have verified this both with the simple case from bug 34922 and with a full Firefox build.
Reviewers: zturner
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38984
llvm-svn: 316048
The buildbots have shown that -Wstrict-prototypes behaves differently in GCC
and Clang so we should keep it disabled until Clang follows GCC's behaviour
llvm-svn: 312246
Clang 5 supports -Wstrict-prototypes. We should use it to catch any C
declarations that declare a non-prototype function.
rdar://33705313
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36669
llvm-svn: 312240
Alexandre Ganea