This reverts commit cc56c66f27.
Fixed a bad assertion, the target of a UsingShadowDecl must not have
*local* qualifiers, but it can be a typedef whose underlying type is qualified.
Currently there's no way to find the UsingDecl that a typeloc found its
underlying type through. Compare to DeclRefExpr::getFoundDecl().
Design decisions:
- a sugar type, as there are many contexts this type of use may appear in
- UsingType is a leaf like TypedefType, the underlying type has no TypeLoc
- not unified with UnresolvedUsingType: a single name is appealing,
but being sometimes-sugar is often fiddly.
- not unified with TypedefType: the UsingShadowDecl is not a TypedefNameDecl or
even a TypeDecl, and users think of these differently.
- does not cover other rarer aliases like objc @compatibility_alias,
in order to be have a concrete API that's easy to understand.
- implicitly desugared by the hasDeclaration ASTMatcher, to avoid
breaking existing patterns and following the precedent of ElaboratedType.
Scope:
- This does not cover types associated with template names introduced by
using declarations. A future patch should introduce a sugar TemplateName
variant for this. (CTAD deduced types fall under this)
- There are enough AST matchers to fix the in-tree clang-tidy tests and
probably any other matchers, though more may be useful later.
Caveats:
- This changes a fairly common pattern in the AST people may depend on matching.
Previously, typeLoc(loc(recordType())) matched whether a struct was
referred to by its original scope or introduced via using-decl.
Now, the using-decl case is not matched, and needs a separate matcher.
This is similar to the case of typedefs but nevertheless both adds
complexity and breaks existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251
This contributes follow-up work from https://reviews.llvm.org/D112491, which
allows for increased control over the matching of lambda captures. This also
updates the documentation for the `lambdaCapture` matcher.
Reviewed By: ymandel, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113575
This provides better support for `LambdaCapture`s by making them first-
class and allowing them to be bindable. In addition, this implements several
`LambdaCapture`-related matchers. This does not update how lambdas are
traversed. As a result, something like trying to match `lambdaCapture()` by
itself will not work - it must be used as an inner matcher.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112491
This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.
There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:
struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator
this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
The new matcher additionally covers blocks and Objective-C methods.
This matcher actually makes sure that the statement truly belongs
to that declaration's body. forFunction() incorrectly reported that
a statement in a nested block belonged to the surrounding function.
forFunction() is now deprecated due to the above footgun, in favor of
forCallable(functionDecl()) when only functions need to be considered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102213
Required for capturing base specifier in matchers:
`cxxRecordDecl(hasDirectBase(cxxBaseSpecifier().bind("base")))`
Reviewed By: steveire, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69218
Summary: Try to enable the support for C++20 coroutine keywords for AST
Matchers.
Reviewers: sammccall, njames93, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96316
Add the `fixedPointLiteral`, `hasAnyBody` and `templateArgumentLoc` to the dynamic matcher registry.
Reviewed By: steveire
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98556
This is a simple utility which allows matching on binaryOperator and
cxxOperatorCallExpr. It can also be extended to support
cxxRewrittenBinaryOperator.
Add generic support for MapAnyOfMatchers to auto-marshalling functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94129
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain GenericSelectionExpr
nodes (this is _Generic from C11). This is needed, for example, for
CTU analysis of C code that makes use of _Generic, like the Linux
kernel.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter. Additionally, this change adds support for structural
equivalence of _Generic in the AST.
Reviewed By: martong, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92600
The analysis for const-ness of local variables required a view generally useful
matchers that are extracted into its own patch.
They are decompositionDecl and forEachArgumentWithParamType, that works
for calls through function pointers as well.
This is a reupload of https://reviews.llvm.org/D72505, that already landed,
but had to be reverted due to a GCC crash on powerpc
(https://reviews.llvm.org/rG4c48ea68e491cb42f1b5d43ffba89f6a7f0dadc4)
Because this took a long time to adress, i decided to redo this patch and
have a clean workflow.
I try to coordinate with someone that has a PPC to apply this patch and
test for the crash. If everything is fine, I intend to just commit.
If the crash is still happening, i hope to at least find the cause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87588
There are already matchers for type template parameters and non-type template
parameters, but somehow no matcher exists for template template parameters
and I need it to write unit tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85536
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
This implements the default(firstprivate) clause as defined in OpenMP
Technical Report 8 (2.22.4).
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75591
Adds a matcher called `hasDirectBase` for matching the `CXXBaseSpecifier` of a class that directly derives from another class.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81552
Added new Macros `AST(_POLYMORPHIC)_MATCHER_REGEX(_OVERLOAD)` that define a matchers that take a regular expression string and optionally regular expression flags. This lets users match against nodes while ignoring the case without having to manually use `[Aa]` or `[A-Fa-f]` in their regex. The other point this addresses is in the current state, matchers that use regular expressions have to compile them for each node they try to match on, Now the regular expression is compiled once when you define the matcher and used for every node that it tries to match against. If there is an error while compiling the regular expression an error will be logged to stderr showing the bad regex string and the reason it couldn't be compiled. The old behaviour of this was down to the Matcher implementation and some would assert, whereas others just would never match. Support for this has been added to the documentation script as well. Support for this has been added to dynamic matchers ensuring functionality is the same between the 2 use cases.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82706
Summary: Adds a matcher called `hasOperands` for `BinaryOperator`'s when you need to match both sides but the order isn't important, usually on commutative operators.
Reviewers: klimek, aaron.ballman, gribozavr2, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80054
Summary: Adds support for using the ofKind in clang-query and other dynamic matcher use cases
Reviewers: klimek, aaron.ballman, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77791
Summary:
Acts on `BinaryOperator` and `UnaryOperator` and functions the same as `anyOf(hasOperatorName(...), hasOperatorName(...), ...)`
Documentation generation isn't perfect but I feel that the python doc script needs updating for that
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, gribozavr2
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, gribozavr2
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75040
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
The analysis for const-ness of local variables required a view generally useful
matchers that are extracted into its own patch.
They are `decompositionDecl` and `forEachArgumentWithParamType`, that works
for calls through function pointers as well.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72505
Evgeny Shulgin