llvm-project

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Stephen Lin	4362261b00	CHECK-LABEL-ify some code gen tests to improve diagnostic experience when tests fail. llvm-svn: 188447	2013-08-15 06:47:53 +00:00
Eli Friedman	a7c9411818	Silly typo in test for r134770. llvm-svn: 134774	2011-07-08 23:57:18 +00:00
Eli Friedman	3346582bca	Change -mno-mmx to be more compatible with gcc. Specifically, -mno-mmx should not imply -mno-sse. Note that because we don't usually touch the MMX registers anyway, all -mno-mmx needs to do is tweak the x86-32 calling convention a little for vectors that look like MMX vectors, and prevent the definition of __MMX__. clang doesn't actually stop the user from using MMX inline asm operands or MMX builtins in -mno-mmx mode; as a QOI issue, it would be nice to diagnose, but I doubt it really matters much. <rdar://problem/9694837> llvm-svn: 134770	2011-07-08 23:31:17 +00:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Stephen Lin

4362261b00

CHECK-LABEL-ify some code gen tests to improve diagnostic experience when tests fail.

llvm-svn: 188447

2013-08-15 06:47:53 +00:00

Eli Friedman

a7c9411818

Silly typo in test for r134770.

llvm-svn: 134774

2011-07-08 23:57:18 +00:00

Eli Friedman

3346582bca

Change -mno-mmx to be more compatible with gcc. Specifically, -mno-mmx should not imply -mno-sse.

Note that because we don't usually touch the MMX registers anyway, all -mno-mmx needs to do is tweak the x86-32 calling convention a little for vectors that look like MMX vectors, and prevent the definition of __MMX__.

clang doesn't actually stop the user from using MMX inline asm operands or MMX builtins in -mno-mmx mode; as a QOI issue, it would be nice to diagnose, but I doubt it really matters much.

<rdar://problem/9694837>

llvm-svn: 134770

2011-07-08 23:31:17 +00:00

3 Commits