name.
If the host code is compiled with the debug info, while the target
without, there is a problem that the compiler is unable to find the
debug wrapper. Patch fixes this problem by emitting special name for the
debug version of the code.
llvm-svn: 310511
Converting a _Complex type to a real one simply discards the imaginary part.
This can easily lead to loss of information so for safety (and GCC
compatibility) this patch disallows that when the conversion would be implicit.
The one exception is bool, which actually compares both real and imaginary
parts and so is safe.
llvm-svn: 310427
Arguments, passed to the outlined function, must have correct address
space info for proper Debug info support. Patch sets global address
space for arguments that are mapped and passed by reference.
Also, cuda-gdb does not handle reference types correctly, so reference
arguments are represented as pointers.
llvm-svn: 310387
Arguments, passed to the outlined function, must have correct address
space info for proper Debug info support. Patch sets global address
space for arguments that are mapped and passed by reference.
Also, cuda-gdb does not handle reference types correctly, so reference
arguments are represented as pointers.
llvm-svn: 310377
Arguments, passed to the outlined function, must have correct address
space info for proper Debug info support. Patch sets global address
space for arguments that are mapped and passed by reference.
Also, cuda-gdb does not handle reference types correctly, so reference
arguments are represented as pointers.
llvm-svn: 310360
Arguments, passed to the outlined function, must have correct address
space info for proper Debug info support. Patch sets global address
space for arguments that are mapped and passed by reference.
Also, cuda-gdb does not handle reference types correctly, so reference
arguments are represented as pointers.
llvm-svn: 310104
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
When an omp for loop is canceled the constructed objects are being destructed
twice.
It looks like the desired code is:
{
Obj o;
If (cancelled) branch-through-cleanups to cancel.exit.
}
[cleanups]
cancel.exit:
__kmpc_for_static_fini
br cancel.cont (*)
cancel.cont:
__kmpc_barrier
return
The problem seems to be the branch to cancel.cont is currently also going
through the cleanups calling them again. This change just does a direct branch
instead.
Patch By: michael.p.rice@intel.com
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35854
llvm-svn: 309288
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
If the member declaration is captured in the OMPCapturedExprDecl, we may
loose data-sharing attribute info for this declaration. Patch fixes this
bug.
llvm-svn: 308629
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
If taskloop directive has no associated nogroup clause, it must emitted
inside implicit taskgroup block. Runtime supports it, but we need to
generate implicit taskgroup block explicitly to support future
reductions codegen.
llvm-svn: 307822
Added checks for the reduction clauses in the taskloop directives:
1. Only addressable items must be used in reduction clauses.
2. Reduction clauses cannot be used with nogroup clauses.
llvm-svn: 307693
Combined directives like 'target parallel' have two captured statements.
Sema has to check the right one from the right direction.
Previously, Sema::IsOpenMPCapturedByRef would return false for mapped
scalars on combined directives. This results in a wrong signature of
the outlined function which triggers an assertion:
void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::FunctionType *, llvm::Value *, ArrayRef<llvm::Value *>, ArrayRef<OperandBundleDef>, const llvm::Twine &): Assertion `(i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Args[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"' failed.
Fixes PR30975 (and PR31985). New function was taken from clang-ykt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34888
llvm-svn: 306956
Currently, if the some of the parameters are captured by value, this
argument is converted to uintptr_t type and thus we loosing the debug
info about real type of the argument (captured variable):
```
void @.outlined_function.(uintptr %par);
...
%a = alloca i32
%a.casted = alloca uintptr
%cast = bitcast uintptr* %a.casted to i32*
%a.val = load i32, i32 *%a
store i32 %a.val, i32 *%cast
%a.casted.val = load uintptr, uintptr* %a.casted
call void @.outlined_function.(uintptr %a.casted.val)
...
```
To resolve this problem, in debug mode a speciall external wrapper
function is generated, that calls the outlined function with the correct
parameters types:
```
void @.wrapper.(uintptr %par) {
%a = alloca i32
%cast = bitcast i32* %a to uintptr*
store uintptr %par, uintptr *%cast
%a.val = load i32, i32* %a
call void @.outlined_function.(i32 %a)
ret void
}
void @.outlined_function.(i32 %par);
...
%a = alloca i32
%a.casted = alloca uintptr
%cast = bitcast uintptr* %a.casted to i32*
%a.val = load i32, i32 *%a
store i32 %a.val, i32 *%cast
%a.casted.val = load uintptr, uintptr* %a.casted
call void @.wrapper.(uintptr %a.casted.val)
...
```
llvm-svn: 306697
According to OpenMP 5.0 at least one 'map' or 'use_device_ptr' clause
must be specified for 'target data' construct. Patch adds support for
this feature.
llvm-svn: 304216
Alexey Bataev