Summary:
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46128. The checker does not
yet comprehend constraints involving multiple symbols, so it's possible
to calculate a VLA size that's negative or 0. A LIT is added to catch
regressions, and this change simply bails if a VLA size of 0 or less is
calculated.
Reviewers: balazske, NoQ, martong, baloghadamsoftware, Szelethus, gamesh411
Reviewed By: balazske, NoQ, Szelethus
Subscribers: xazax.hun, szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, donat.nagy, Charusso, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits, dkrupp
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80903
The checker currently supports only a whitelist of block-enumeration
methods which are known to internally clear an autorelease pool.
Extend this checker to detect writes within the scope of explicit
@autoreleasepool statements.
rdar://25301111
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81072
Idiomatic objc using ARC will generate this expression regularly due to
NSError out-param passing. Providing an implementation for this
expression allows the analyzer to explore many more codepaths in ARC
projects.
The current implementation is not perfect but the differences are hopefully
subtle enough to not cause much problems.
rdar://63918914
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81071
In the added testfile, the from argument was recognized as
&Element{SymRegion{reg_$0<long * global_a>},-1 S64b,long}
instead of
reg_$0<long * global_a>.
This patch implements matrix index expressions
(matrix[RowIdx][ColumnIdx]).
It does so by introducing a new MatrixSubscriptExpr(Base, RowIdx, ColumnIdx).
MatrixSubscriptExprs are built in 2 steps in ActOnMatrixSubscriptExpr. First,
if the base of a subscript is of matrix type, we create a incomplete
MatrixSubscriptExpr(base, idx, nullptr). Second, if the base is an incomplete
MatrixSubscriptExpr, we create a complete
MatrixSubscriptExpr(base->getBase(), base->getRowIdx(), idx)
Similar to vector elements, it is not possible to take the address of
a MatrixSubscriptExpr.
For CodeGen, a new MatrixElt type is added to LValue, which is very
similar to VectorElt. The only difference is that we may need to cast
the type of the base from an array to a vector type when accessing it.
Reviewers: rjmccall, anemet, Bigcheese, rsmith, martong
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76791
Summary:
In this patch I am trying to get rid of the `Irrelevant` types from the
signatures of the functions from the standard C library. For that I've
introduced `lookupType()` to be able to lookup arbitrary types in the global
scope. This makes it possible to define the signatures precisely.
Note 1) `fread`'s signature is now fixed to have the proper `FILE *restrict`
type when C99 is the language.
Note 2) There are still existing `Irrelevant` types, but they are all from
POSIX. I am planning to address those together with the missing POSIX functions
(in D79433).
Reviewers: xazax.hun, NoQ, Szelethus, balazske
Subscribers: whisperity, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gamesh411, Charusso, steakhal, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80016
Summary:
Once we found a matching FunctionDecl for the given summary then we
validate the given constraints against that FunctionDecl. E.g. we
validate that a NotNull constraint is applied only on arguments that
have pointer types.
This is needed because when we matched the signature of the summary we
were working with incomplete function types, i.e. some intricate type
could have been marked as `Irrelevant` in the signature.
Reviewers: NoQ, Szelethus, balazske
Subscribers: whisperity, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gamesh411, Charusso, steakhal, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77658
Summary:
Further develop the buffer size argumentum constraint so it can handle sizes
that we can get by multiplying two variables.
Reviewers: Szelethus, NoQ, steakhal
Subscribers: whisperity, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gamesh411, Charusso, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77148
Summary:
Introducing a new argument constraint to confine buffer sizes. It is typical in
C APIs that a parameter represents a buffer and another param holds the size of
the buffer (or the size of the data we want to handle from the buffer).
Reviewers: NoQ, Szelethus, Charusso, steakhal
Subscribers: whisperity, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gamesh411, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77066
Summary:
New logic tries to narrow possible result values of the remainder operation
based on its operands and their ranges. It also tries to be conservative
with negative operands because according to the standard the sign of
the result is implementation-defined.
rdar://problem/44978988
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80117
Summary:
Previously the current solver started reasoning about bitwise AND
expressions only when one of the operands is a constant. However,
very similar logic could be applied to ranges. This commit addresses
this shortcoming. Additionally, it refines how we deal with negative
operands.
rdar://problem/54359410
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79434
Summary:
Previously the current solver started reasoning about bitwise OR
expressions only when one of the operands is a constant. However,
very similar logic could be applied to ranges. This commit addresses
this shortcoming. Additionally, it refines how we deal with negative
operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79336
Summary:
This change introduces a new component to unite all of the reasoning
we have about operations on ranges in the analyzer's solver.
In many cases, we might conclude that the range for a symbolic operation
is much more narrow than the type implies. While reasoning about
runtime conditions (especially in loops), we need to support more and
more of those little pieces of logic. The new component mostly plays
a role of an organizer for those, and allows us to focus on the actual
reasoning about ranges and not dispatching manually on the types of the
nested symbolic expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79232
Summary:
SymIntExpr, IntSymExpr, and SymSymExpr share a big portion of logic
that used to be duplicated across all three classes. New
implementation also adds an easy way of introducing another type of
operands into the mix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79156
Summary:
CompoundLiteralRegions have been properly modeled before, but
'getBindingForElement` was not changed to accommodate this change
properly.
rdar://problem/46144644
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78990
Summary:
According to the standard, after a `wread` or `fwrite` call the file position
becomes "indeterminate". It is assumable that a next read or write causes
undefined behavior, so a (fatal error) warning is added for this case.
The indeterminate position can be cleared by some operations, for example
`fseek` or `freopen`, not with `clearerr`.
Reviewers: Szelethus, baloghadamsoftware, martong, NoQ, xazax.hun, dcoughlin
Reviewed By: Szelethus
Subscribers: rnkovacs, NoQ, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gamesh411, Charusso, martong, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80018
IE throws errors while using key and mouse navigation through the error path tips.
querySelectorAll method returns NodeList. NodeList belongs to browser API. IE doesn't have forEach among NodeList's methods. At the same time Array is a JavaScript object and can be used instead. The fix is in the converting NodeList into Array and keeps using forEach method as before.
Checked in IE11, Chrome and Opera.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80444
If you remember the mail [1] I sent out about how I envision the future of the
already existing checkers to look dependencywise, one my main points was that no
checker that emits diagnostics should be a dependency. This is more problematic
for some checkers (ahem, RetainCount [2]) more than for others, like this one.
The MallocChecker family is a mostly big monolithic modeling class some small
reporting checkers that only come to action when we are constructing a warning
message, after the actual bug was detected. The implication of this is that
NewDeleteChecker doesn't really do anything to depend on, so this change was
relatively simple.
The only thing that complicates this change is that FreeMemAux (MallocCheckers
method that models general memory deallocation) returns after calling a bug
reporting method, regardless whether the report was ever emitted (which may not
always happen, for instance, if the checker responsible for the report isn't
enabled). This return unfortunately happens before cleaning up the maps in the
GDM keeping track of the state of symbols (whether they are released, whether
that release was successful, etc). What this means is that upon disabling some
checkers, we would never clean up the map and that could've lead to false
positives, e.g.:
error: 'warning' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File clang/test/Analysis/NewDelete-intersections.mm Line 66: Potential leak of memory pointed to by 'p'
File clang/test/Analysis/NewDelete-intersections.mm Line 73: Potential leak of memory pointed to by 'p'
File clang/test/Analysis/NewDelete-intersections.mm Line 77: Potential leak of memory pointed to by 'p'
error: 'warning' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File clang/test/Analysis/NewDelete-checker-test.cpp Line 111: Undefined or garbage value returned to caller
File clang/test/Analysis/NewDelete-checker-test.cpp Line 200: Potential leak of memory pointed to by 'p'
error: 'warning' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp Line 137: Potential leak of memory pointed to by 'x'
There two possible approaches I had in mind:
Make bug reporting methods of MallocChecker returns whether they succeeded, and
proceed with the rest of FreeMemAux if not,
Halt execution with a sink node upon failure. I decided to go with this, as
described in the code.
As you can see from the removed/changed test files, before the big checker
dependency effort landed, there were tests to check for all the weird
configurations of enabled/disabled checkers and their messy interactions, I
largely repurposed these.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-August/063070.html
[2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-August/063205.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77474
Similarly to other patches of mine, I'm trying to uniformize the checker
interface so that dependency checkers don't emit diagnostics. The checker that
made me most anxious so far was definitely RetainCount, because it is definitely
impacted by backward compatibility concerns, and implements a checker hierarchy
that is a lot different to other examples of similar size. Also, I don't have
authority, nor expertise regarding ObjC related code, so I welcome any
objection/discussion!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78099
The `SubEngine` interface is an interface with only one implementation
`EpxrEngine`. Adding other implementations are difficult and very
unlikely in the near future. Currently, if anything from `ExprEngine` is
to be exposed to other classes it is moved to `SubEngine` which
restricts the alternative implementations. The virtual methods are have
a slight perofrmance impact. Furthermore, instead of the `LLVM`-style
inheritance a native inheritance is used here, which renders `LLVM`
functions like e.g. `cast<T>()` unusable here. This patch removes this
interface and allows usage of `ExprEngine` directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80548
As per http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-August/063215.html, lets get rid of this option.
It presents 2 issues that have bugged me for years now:
* OSObject is NOT a boolean option. It in fact has 3 states:
* osx.OSObjectRetainCount is enabled but OSObject it set to false: RetainCount
regards the option as disabled.
* sx.OSObjectRetainCount is enabled and OSObject it set to true: RetainCount
regards the option as enabled.
* osx.OSObjectRetainCount is disabled: RetainCount regards the option as
disabled.
* The hack involves directly modifying AnalyzerOptions::ConfigTable, which
shouldn't even be public in the first place.
This still isn't really ideal, because it would be better to preserve the option
and remove the checker (we want visible checkers to be associated with
diagnostics, and hidden options like this one to be associated with changing how
the modeling is done), but backwards compatibility is an issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78097
Summary:
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41588
RangeSet Negate function shall handle unsigned ranges as well as signed ones.
RangeSet getRangeForMinusSymbol function shall use wider variety of ranges, not only concrete value ranges.
RangeSet Intersect functions shall not produce assertions.
Changes:
Improved safety of RangeSet::Intersect function. Added isEmpty() check to prevent an assertion.
Added support of handling unsigned ranges to RangeSet::Negate and RangeSet::getRangeForMinusSymbol.
Extended RangeSet::getRangeForMinusSymbol to return not only range sets with single value [n,n], but with wide ranges [n,m].
Added unit test for Negate function.
Added regression tests for unsigned values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77802
When loop counter is a function parameter "isPossiblyEscaped" will not find
the variable declaration which lead to hitting "llvm_unreachable".
Parameters of reference type should be escaped like global variables;
otherwise treat them as unescaped.
Patch by Abbas Sabra!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80171
iAs listed in the summary D77846, we have 5 different categories of bugs we're
checking for in CallAndMessage. I think the documentation placed in the code
explains my thought process behind my decisions quite well.
A non-obvious change I had here is removing the entry for
CallAndMessageUnInitRefArg. In fact, I removed the CheckerNameRef typed field
back in D77845 (it was dead code), so that checker didn't really exist in any
meaningful way anyways.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77866
The patch aims to use CallEvents interface in a more principled manner, and also
to highlight what this checker really does. It in fact checks for 5 different
kinds of errors (from checkPreCall, that is):
* Invalid function pointer related errors
* Call of methods from an invalid C++ this object
* Function calls with incorrect amount of parameters
* Invalid arguments for operator delete
* Pass of uninitialized values to pass-by-value parameters
In a previous patch I complained that this checker is responsible for emitting
a lot of different diagnostics all under core.CallAndMessage's name, and this
patch shows where we could start to assign different diagnostics to different
entities.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77846
Summary:
Stream functions `fread` and `fwrite` are evaluated
and preconditions checked.
A new bug type is added for a (non fatal) warning if `fread`
is called in EOF state.
Reviewers: Szelethus, NoQ, dcoughlin, baloghadamsoftware, martong, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: Szelethus
Subscribers: rnkovacs, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gamesh411, Charusso, martong, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80015
Exactly what it says on the tin! This is clearly not the end of the road in this
direction, the parameters could be merged far more with the use of CallEvent or
a better value type in the CallDescriptionMap, but this was shockingly difficult
enough on its own. I expect that simplifying the file further will be far easier
moving forward.
The end goal is to research how we could create a more mature checker
interaction infrastructure for more complicated C++ modeling, and I'm pretty
sure that being able successfully split up our giants is the first step in this
direction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75432
The title and the included test file sums everything up -- the only thing I'm
mildly afraid of is whether anyone actually depends on the weird behavior of
HTMLDiagnostics pretending to be TextDiagnostics if an output directory is not
supplied. If it is, I guess we would need to resort to tiptoeing around the
compatibility flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76510
Party based on this thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-February/064754.html.
This patch merges two of CXXAllocatorCall's parameters, so that we are able to
supply a CallEvent object to check::NewAllocatorCall (see the description of
D75430 to see why this would be great).
One of the things mentioned by @NoQ was the following:
I think at this point we might actually do a good job sorting out this
check::NewAllocator issue because we have a "separate" "Environment" to hold
the other SVal, which is "objects under construction"! - so we should probably
simply teach CXXAllocatorCall to extract the value from the
objects-under-construction trait of the program state and we're good.
I had MallocChecker in my crosshair for now, so I admittedly threw together
something as a proof of concept. Now that I know that this effort is worth
pursuing though, I'll happily look for a solution better then demonstrated in
this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75431
The following series of patches has something similar in mind with D77474, with
the same goal to finally end incorrect checker names for good. Despite
CallAndMessage not suffering from this particular issue, it is a dependency for
many other checkers, which is problematic, because we don't really want
dependencies to also emit diagnostics (reasoning for this is also more detailed
in D77474).
CallAndMessage also has another problem, namely that it is responsible for a lot
of reports. You'll soon learn that this isn't really easy to solve for
compatibility reasons, but that is the topic of followup patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77845
Balázs Kéri