Summary:
Added option -gline-directives-only to support emission of the debug directives
only. It behaves very similar to -gline-tables-only, except that it sets
llvm debug info emission kind to
llvm::DICompileUnit::DebugDirectivesOnly.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: aprantl, fedor.sergeev, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51177
llvm-svn: 341212
Summary: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25132 added discriminator even add -g0. This leads to test fail which is addressed in thie patch.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25133
llvm-svn: 283564
With this change, most 'g' options are rejected by CompilerInvocation.
They remain only as Driver options. The new way to request debug info
from cc1 is with "-debug-info-kind={line-tables-only|limited|standalone}"
and "-dwarf-version={2|3|4}". In the absence of a command-line option
to specify Dwarf version, the Toolchain decides it, rather than placing
Toolchain-specific logic in CompilerInvocation.
Also fix a bug in the Windows compatibility argument parsing
in which the "rightmost argument wins" principle failed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13221
llvm-svn: 249655
Several tests wouldn't pass when executed on an armv7a_pc_linux triple
due to the non-default arm_aapcs calling convention produced on the
function definitions in the IR output. Account for this with the
application of a little regex.
Patch by Ying Yi.
llvm-svn: 240971
LLVM r236120 renamed debug info IR constructs to use a `DI` prefix, now
that the `DIDescriptor` hierarchy has been gone for about a week. This
commit was generated using the rename-md-di-nodes.sh upgrade script
attached to PR23080, followed by running clang-format-diff.py on the
`lib/` portion of the patch.
llvm-svn: 236121
Matches the existing code for scalar default arguments. Complex default
arguments probably need the same handling too (test/fix to that coming
next).
llvm-svn: 228588
Now if you break on a dtor and go 'up' in your debugger (or you get an
asan failure in a dtor) during an exception unwind, you'll have more
context. Instead of all dtors appearing to be called from the '}' of the
function, they'll be attributed to the end of the scope of the variable,
the same as the non-exceptional dtor call.
This doesn't /quite/ remove all uses of CurEHLocation (which might be
nice to remove, for a few reasons) - it's still used to choose the
location for some other work in the landing pad. It'd be nice to
attribute that code to the same location as the exception calls within
the block and to remove CurEHLocation.
llvm-svn: 228181
To handle default arguments in C++ in the debug info, we disable code
updating the debug location during the emission of default arguments.
This code was buggy in the case of default arguments which, themselves,
have default arguments - the inner default argument would re-enable
debug info when it was finished, but before the outer default argument
was finished.
This was already a bug, but got worse (because a crasher instead of just
a quality bug) with the recent improvements to debug info line quality
because... The ApplyDebugLocation scoped device would find the debug
info disabled and not save any debug location. But then in
~ApplyDebugLocation it would find the debug info had been enabled and
would then apply the no-location. Then the outer function call would be
emitted without any location. That's bad.
Arguably we could /also/ fix the ApplyDebugLocation to assert on this
situation (where debug info was disabled in the ctor and enabled in the
dtor, or the other way around) but this is at least the necessary fix
regardless.
(also, I imagine this disabling behavior might need to be in-place for
CGExprComplex and CGExprAgg too, maybe... ?)
And I seem to recall seeing some weird default arg stepping behavior
recently which might be related to this too... I'll have to look into
it.
llvm-svn: 228053
This is half a fix for a GDB test suite failure that expects to start at
'a' in the following code:
void func(int a)
if (a
&&
b)
...
But instead, without this change, the comparison was assigned to '&&'
(well, worse actually - because there was a chained 'a && b && c' and it
was assigned to the second '&&' because of a recursive application of
this bug) and then the load folded into the comparison so breaking on
the function started at '&&' instead of 'a'.
The other part of this needs to be fixed in LLVM where it's ignoring the
location of the icmp and instead using the location of the branch
instruction.
The fix to the conditional operator is actually a no-op currently,
because the conditional operator's location coincides with 'a' (the
start of the conditional expression) but should probably be '?' instead.
See the FIXME in the test case that mentions the ARCMigration tool
failures when I tried to make that change.
llvm-svn: 227356
This causes things like assignment to refer to the '=' rather than the
LHS when attributing the store instruction, for example.
There were essentially 3 options for this:
* The beginning of an expression (this was the behavior prior to this
commit). This meant that stepping through subexpressions would bounce
around from subexpressions back to the start of the outer expression,
etc. (eg: x + y + z would go x, y, x, z, x (the repeated 'x's would be
where the actual addition occurred)).
* The end of an expression. This seems to be what GCC does /mostly/, and
certainly this for function calls. This has the advantage that
progress is always 'forwards' (never jumping backwards - except for
independent subexpressions if they're evaluated in interesting orders,
etc). "x + y + z" would go "x y z" with the additions occurring at y
and z after the respective loads.
The problem with this is that the user would still have to think
fairly hard about precedence to realize which subexpression is being
evaluated or which operator overload is being called in, say, an asan
backtrace.
* The preferred location or 'exprloc'. In this case you get sort of what
you'd expect, though it's a bit confusing in its own way due to going
'backwards'. In this case the locations would be: "x y + z +" in
lovely postfix arithmetic order. But this does mean that if the op+
were an operator overload, say, and in a backtrace, the backtrace will
point to the exact '+' that's being called, not to the end of one of
its operands.
(actually the operator overload case doesn't work yet for other reasons,
but that's being fixed - but this at least gets scalar/complex
assignments and other plain operators right)
llvm-svn: 227027
This was causing some trouble for otherwise dead code removed in r225085
(reverted in r225361). The location being set for function arguments was
leaking out to the call which wasn't setting its own location (so a
quality bug turned into a crasher with r225085). Fix this so r225085 can
be recommitted.
llvm-svn: 226382
Emitting inlinable calls without debug locations (in functions with
debug info, to functions with debug info) is problematic for debug info
when inlining occurs. Test specifically that we don't do that in this
case - thus the test isn't simply "don't crash", it's "include debug
location for this call" (granted it's the wrong location - fix for that
is coming)
llvm-svn: 226337
Several pieces of code were relying on implicit debug location setting
which usually lead to incorrect line information anyway. So I've fixed
those (in r225955 and r225845) separately which should pave the way for
this commit to be cleanly reapplied.
The reason these implicit dependencies resulted in crashes with this
patch is that the debug location would no longer implicitly leak from
one place to another, but be set back to invalid. Once a call with
no/invalid location was emitted, if that call was ever inlined it could
produce invalid debugloc chains and assert during LLVM's codegen.
There may be further cases of such bugs in this patch - they're hard to
flush out with regression testing, so I'll keep an eye out for reports
and investigate/fix them ASAP if they come up.
Original commit message:
Reapply "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling"
Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns
this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the
crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling
changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of
the more general solution).
Recommitted in r224941 and reverted in r224970 after it caused a crash
when building compiler-rt. Looks to be due to this change zeroing out
the debug location when emitting default arguments (which were meant to
inherit their outer expression's location) thus creating call
instructions without locations - these create problems for inlining and
must not be created. That is fixed and tested in this version of the
change.
Original commit message:
This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many
places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to
several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for
subexpressions.
This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the
SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting
was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end
of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope
than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The
drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally
CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current
SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm
going to tackle removing that just now.
I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll
investigate that as it comes up.
Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug
in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for
statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one
statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and
two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one
statement.
I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would
help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each
statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the
lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some
problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers.
llvm-svn: 225956
Without setting the CurEHLocation these cleanups would be attributed to
whatever the last active debug line location was (the 'fn' call in the
included test cases). By setting CurEHLocation correctly the line
information is improved/corrected.
This quality bug turned into a crasher with r225000 when, instead of
allowing the last location to persist, it would be zero'd out. This
could lead to a function call (such as the dtor) being made without a
debug location - if that call was subsequently inlined (and the caller
and callee had debug info, just not the call instruction) the inliner
would violate important constraints about the debug location chains by
not updating the inlined instructions to chain up to the callee
locations.
So, by fixing this bug, I am addressing the assertion failures
introduced by r225000 and should be able to recommit that patch with
impunity...
llvm-svn: 225955
This reverts commit r225000, r225021, r225083, r225086, r225090.
The root change (r225000) still has several issues where it's caused
calls to be emitted without debug locations. This causes assertion
failures if/when those calls are inlined.
I'll work up some test cases and fixes before recommitting this.
llvm-svn: 225555
The optimization (that appears to have been here since the earliest
implementation (r50848) & has become more complicated over the years) to
avoid recreating the debugloc if it would be the same was out of date
because ApplyDebugLocation was not re-updating the CurLoc/PrevLoc. This
optimization doesn't look terribly beneficial/necessary, so I'm removing
it - if it turns up in benchmarks, I'm happy to reconsider/reimplement
this with justification, but for now it just seems to add
complexity/problems.
llvm-svn: 225083
Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns
this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the
crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling
changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of
the more general solution).
Recommitted in r224941 and reverted in r224970 after it caused a crash
when building compiler-rt. Looks to be due to this change zeroing out
the debug location when emitting default arguments (which were meant to
inherit their outer expression's location) thus creating call
instructions without locations - these create problems for inlining and
must not be created. That is fixed and tested in this version of the
change.
Original commit message:
This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many
places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to
several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for
subexpressions.
This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the
SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting
was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end
of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope
than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The
drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally
CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current
SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm
going to tackle removing that just now.
I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll
investigate that as it comes up.
Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug
in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for
statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one
statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and
two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one
statement.
I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would
help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each
statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the
lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some
problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers.
llvm-svn: 225000
Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns
this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the
crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling
changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of
the more general solution).
Original commit message:
This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many
places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to
several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for
subexpressions.
This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the
SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting
was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end
of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope
than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The
drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally
CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current
SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm
going to tackle removing that just now.
I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll
investigate that as it comes up.
Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug
in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for
statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one
statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and
two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one
statement.
I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would
help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each
statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the
lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some
problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers.
llvm-svn: 224941
This actually came up as a break in UBSan tests (look for a follow-up
commit to this one to see the UBSan test fallout) when I tried a broader
fix to location information.
I have some other ideas about how to do that broader change & will keep
looking into it.
llvm-svn: 224221
This particularly helps the fidelity of ASan reports (which can occur
even in these examples - if, for example, one uses placement new over a
buffer of insufficient size - now ASan will correctly identify which
member's initialization went over the end of the buffer).
This doesn't cover all types of members - more coming.
llvm-svn: 223726
Alexey Bataev