This transform came up in D62414, but we should deal with it first.
We have LLVM intrinsics that correspond exactly to libm calls (unlike
most libm calls, these libm calls never set errno).
This holds without any fast-math-flags, so we should always canonicalize
to those intrinsics directly for better optimization.
Currently, we convert to fcmp+select only when we have FMF (nnan) because
fcmp+select does not preserve the semantics of the call in the general case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63214
llvm-svn: 364714
This is a minimal start to correcting a problem most directly discussed in PR38086:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
We have been hacking around a limitation for FP select patterns by using the
fast-math-flags on the condition of the select rather than the select itself.
This patch just allows FMF to appear with the 'select' opcode. No changes are
needed to "FPMathOperator" because it already includes select-of-FP because
that definition is based on the (return) value type.
Once we have this ability, we can start correcting and adding IR transforms
to use the FMF on a 'select' instruction. The instcombine and vectorizer test
diffs only show that the IRBuilder change is behaving as expected by applying
an FMF guard value to 'select'.
For reference:
rL241901 - allowed FMF with fcmp
rL255555 - allowed FMF with FP calls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61917
llvm-svn: 361401
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
The scalar cases are handled in instcombine's internal
reassociation pass for FP ops, but it misses the vector types.
These patterns are similar to what was handled in InstSimplify in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL339171https://reviews.llvm.org/rL339174https://reviews.llvm.org/rL339176
...but we can't use instsimplify on these because we require negation
of the original operand.
llvm-svn: 339263
Two cleanups:
1. As noted in D45453, we had tests that don't need FMF that were misplaced in the 'fast-math.ll' test file.
2. This removes the final uses of dyn_castFNegVal, so that can be deleted. We use 'match' now.
llvm-svn: 330126
These simplifications were previously enabled only with isFast(), but that
is more restrictive than required. Since r317488, FMF has 'reassoc' to
control these cases at a finer level.
llvm-svn: 330089
This replaces a large chunk of code that was looking for compound
patterns that include these sub-patterns. Existing tests ensure that
all of the previous examples are still folded as expected.
We still need to loosen the FMF check.
llvm-svn: 328502
There are at least 3 problems:
1. We're distributing across large patterns, but fail to do that for the minimal patterns.
2. We're not checking uses, so we may create more instructions than we eliminate.
3. We should be able to do these transforms with less than full 'fast' fmuls.
llvm-svn: 328152
Summary: I noticed in the select folding code that we copied fast math flags, but did not do the same for the similar handling in phi nodes. This patch fixes that to do the same thing as select
Reviewers: spatel, davide, majnemer, hfinkel
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31690
llvm-svn: 299838
fabs(x * x) is not generally safe to assume x is positive if x is a NaN.
This is also less general than it could be, so this will be replaced
with a transformation on the intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 291359
This is a continuation of adding FMF to call instructions:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL255555
The intent of the patch is to preserve the current behavior of the transform except
that we use the sqrt instruction's 'fast' attribute as a trigger rather than the
function-level attribute.
But this raises a bug noted by the new FIXME comment.
In order to do this transform:
sqrt((x * x) * y) ---> fabs(x) * sqrt(y)
...we need all of the sqrt, the first fmul, and the second fmul to be 'fast'.
If any of those ops is strict, we should bail out.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15937
llvm-svn: 257400
This patch adds optional fast-math-flags (the same that apply to fmul/fadd/fsub/fdiv/frem/fcmp)
to call instructions in IR. Follow-up patches would use these flags in LibCallSimplifier, add
support to clang, and extend FMF to the DAG for calls.
Motivating example:
%y = fmul fast float %x, %x
%z = tail call float @sqrtf(float %y)
We'd like to be able to optimize sqrt(x*x) into fabs(x). We do this today using a function-wide
attribute for unsafe-math, but we really want to trigger on the instructions themselves:
%z = tail call fast float @sqrtf(float %y)
because in an LTO build it's possible that calls with fast semantics have been inlined into a
function with non-fast semantics.
The code changes and tests are based on the recent commits that added "notail":
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL252368
and added FMF to fcmp:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL241901
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14707
llvm-svn: 255555
If we can ignore NaNs, fmin/fmax libcalls can become compare and select
(this is what we turn std::min / std::max into).
This IR should then be optimized in the backend to whatever is best for
any given target. Eg, x86 can use minss/maxss instructions.
This should solve PR24314:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24314
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11866
llvm-svn: 245187
isNormalFp and isFiniteNonZeroFp should not assume vector operands can not be constant expressions.
Patch by Pawel Jurek <pawel.jurek@intel.com>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8053
llvm-svn: 231359
Backends recognize (-0.0 - X) as the canonical form for fneg
and produce better code. Eg, ppc64 with 0.0:
lis r2, ha16(LCPI0_0)
lfs f0, lo16(LCPI0_0)(r2)
fsubs f1, f0, f1
blr
vs. -0.0:
fneg f1, f1
blr
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6723
llvm-svn: 224583
If a square root call has an FP multiplication argument that can be reassociated,
then we can hoist a repeated factor out of the square root call and into a fabs().
In the simplest case, this:
y = sqrt(x * x);
becomes this:
y = fabs(x);
This patch relies on an earlier optimization in instcombine or reassociate to put the
multiplication tree into a canonical form, so we don't have to search over
every permutation of the multiplication tree.
Because there are no IR-level FastMathFlags for intrinsics (PR21290), we have to
use function-level attributes to do this optimization. This needs to be fixed
for both the intrinsics and in the backend.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5787
llvm-svn: 219944
If "C1/X" were having multiple uses, the only benefit of this
transformation is to potentially shorten critical path. But it is at the
cost of instroducing additional div.
The additional div may or may not incur cost depending on how div is
implemented. If it is implemented using Newton–Raphson iteration, it dosen't
seem to incur any cost (FIXME). However, if the div blocks the entire
pipeline, that sounds to be pretty expensive. Let CodeGen to take care
this transformation.
This patch sees 6% on a benchmark.
rdar://15032743
llvm-svn: 191037
This update was done with the following bash script:
find test/Transforms -name "*.ll" | \
while read NAME; do
echo "$NAME"
if ! grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc" $NAME; then
TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
cp $NAME $TEMP
sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
while read FUNC; do
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\):\( *\)@$FUNC\([( ]*\)\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3@$FUNC(/g" $TEMP
done
mv $TEMP $NAME
fi
done
llvm-svn: 186268
The problem is that the code mistakenly took for granted that following constructor
is able to create an APFloat from a *SIGNED* integer:
APFloat::APFloat(const fltSemantics &ourSemantics, integerPart value)
rdar://13486998
llvm-svn: 177906
Rules include:
1)1 x*y +/- x*z => x*(y +/- z)
(the order of operands dosen't matter)
2) y/x +/- z/x => (y +/- z)/x
The transformation is disabled if the new add/sub expr "y +/- z" is a
denormal/naz/inifinity.
rdar://12911472
llvm-svn: 177088
The instcombine recognized pattern looks like:
a = b * c
d = a +/- Cst
or
a = b * c
d = Cst +/- a
When creating the new operands for fadd or fsub instruction following the related fmul, the first operand was created with the second original operand (M0 was created with C1) and the second with the first (M1 with Opnd0).
The fix consists in creating the new operands with the appropriate original operand, i.e., M0 with Opnd0 and M1 with C1.
llvm-svn: 176300
some optimization opportunities (in the enclosing supper-expressions).
rule 1. (-0.0 - X ) * Y => -0.0 - (X * Y)
if expression "-0.0 - X" has only one reference.
rule 2. (0.0 - X ) * Y => -0.0 - (X * Y)
if expression "0.0 - X" has only one reference, and
the instruction is marked "noSignedZero".
2. Eliminate negation (The compiler was already able to handle these
opt if the 0.0s are replaced with -0.0.)
rule 3: (0.0 - X) * (0.0 - Y) => X * Y
rule 4: (0.0 - X) * C => X * -C
if the expr is flagged "noSignedZero".
3.
Rule 5: (X*Y) * X => (X*X) * Y
if X!=Y and the expression is flagged with "UnsafeAlgebra".
The purpose of this transformation is two-fold:
a) to form a power expression (of X).
b) potentially shorten the critical path: After transformation, the
latency of the instruction Y is amortized by the expression of X*X,
and therefore Y is in a "less critical" position compared to what it
was before the transformation.
4. Remove the InstCombine code about simplifiying "X * select".
The reasons are following:
a) The "select" is somewhat architecture-dependent, therefore the
higher level optimizers are not able to precisely predict if
the simplification really yields any performance improvement
or not.
b) The "select" operator is bit complicate, and tends to obscure
optimization opportunities. It is btter to keep it as low as
possible in expr tree, and let CodeGen to tackle the optimization.
llvm-svn: 172551
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C_A: reassociation is allowed
C_R: reciprocal of a constant C is appropriate, which means
- 1/C is exact, or
- reciprocal is allowed and 1/C is neither a special value nor a denormal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
rule1: (X/C1) / C2 => X / (C2*C1) (if C_A)
=> X * (1/(C2*C1)) (if C_A && C_R)
rule 2: X*C1 / C2 => X * (C1/C2) if C_A
rule 3: (X/Y)/Z = > X/(Y*Z) (if C_A && at least one of Y and Z is symbolic value)
rule 4: Z/(X/Y) = > (Z*Y)/X (similar to rule3)
rule 5: C1/(X*C2) => (C1/C2) / X (if C_A)
rule 6: C1/(X/C2) => (C1*C2) / X (if C_A)
rule 7: C1/(C2/X) => (C1/C2) * X (if C_A)
llvm-svn: 172488
Sanjay Patel