In working on a module mangling problem I noticed a few cleanups to the mangler.
1) Use 'if (auto x = ...' idiom in a couple of places.
2) I noticed both 'isFileContext' and 'isNamespace || isTranslationUnit'
synonyms. Let's use the former.
3) The control flow in the seqId mangling was misordered. Let's channel Count
von Count. Also fix the inconsistent bracing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117799
This reverts commit cc56c66f27.
Fixed a bad assertion, the target of a UsingShadowDecl must not have
*local* qualifiers, but it can be a typedef whose underlying type is qualified.
Currently there's no way to find the UsingDecl that a typeloc found its
underlying type through. Compare to DeclRefExpr::getFoundDecl().
Design decisions:
- a sugar type, as there are many contexts this type of use may appear in
- UsingType is a leaf like TypedefType, the underlying type has no TypeLoc
- not unified with UnresolvedUsingType: a single name is appealing,
but being sometimes-sugar is often fiddly.
- not unified with TypedefType: the UsingShadowDecl is not a TypedefNameDecl or
even a TypeDecl, and users think of these differently.
- does not cover other rarer aliases like objc @compatibility_alias,
in order to be have a concrete API that's easy to understand.
- implicitly desugared by the hasDeclaration ASTMatcher, to avoid
breaking existing patterns and following the precedent of ElaboratedType.
Scope:
- This does not cover types associated with template names introduced by
using declarations. A future patch should introduce a sugar TemplateName
variant for this. (CTAD deduced types fall under this)
- There are enough AST matchers to fix the in-tree clang-tidy tests and
probably any other matchers, though more may be useful later.
Caveats:
- This changes a fairly common pattern in the AST people may depend on matching.
Previously, typeLoc(loc(recordType())) matched whether a struct was
referred to by its original scope or introduced via using-decl.
Now, the using-decl case is not matched, and needs a separate matcher.
This is similar to the case of typedefs but nevertheless both adds
complexity and breaks existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:
* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.
I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
[NFC] This patch fixes URLs containing "master". Old URLs were either broken or
redirecting to the new URL.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113186
Unfortunately I've not found a way to exercise this code that doesn't
crash elsewhere yet, due to unrelated bugs in how Sema incorrectly
instantiates lambdas in function template signatures.
Distinct lambda expressions are always considered non-equivalent, so two
token-for-token identical function declarations whose signatures involve
lambda-expressions declare distinct functions.
After significant problems in our downstream with the previous
implementation, the SYCL standard has opted to make using macros/etc to
change kernel-naming-lambdas in any way UB (even passively). As a
result, we are able to just emit the itanium mangling.
However, this DOES require a little work in the CXXABI, as the microsoft
and itanium mangler use different numbering schemes for lambdas. This
patch adds a pair of mangling contexts that use the normal 'itanium'
mangling strategy to fill in the "DeviceManglingNumber" used previously
by CUDA.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110281
Currently, we have no front-end type for ppc_fp128 type in IR. PowerPC
target generates ppc_fp128 type from long double now, but there's option
(-mabi=(ieee|ibm)longdouble) to control it and we're going to do
transition from IBM extended double-double ppc_fp128 to IEEE fp128 in
the future.
This patch adds type __ibm128 which always represents ppc_fp128 in IR,
as what GCC did for that type. Without this type in Clang, compilation
will fail if compiling against future version of libstdcxx (which uses
__ibm128 in headers).
Although all operations in backend for __ibm128 is done by software,
only PowerPC enables support for it.
There's something not implemented in this commit, which can be done in
future ones:
- Literal suffix for __ibm128 type. w/W is suitable as GCC documented.
- __attribute__((mode(IF))) should be for __ibm128.
- Complex __ibm128 type.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93377
This change is intended as initial setup. The plan is to add
more semantic checks later. I plan to update the documentation
as more semantic checks are added (instead of documenting the
details up front). Most of the code closely mirrors that for
the Swift calling convention. Three places are marked as
[FIXME: swiftasynccc]; those will be addressed once the
corresponding convention is introduced in LLVM.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95561
This fixes a gap in the `overloadable` attribute support (K&R declared
functions would get mangled symbol names, but that name wouldn't be
represented in the debug info linkage name field for the function) and
in -funique-internal-linkage-names (this came up in review discussion on
D98799) where K&R static declarations would not get the uniqued linkage
names.
The original version of this was reverted, and @rjmcall provided some
advice to architect a new solution. This is that solution.
This implements a builtin to provide a unique name that is stable across
compilations of this TU for the purposes of implementing the library
component of the unnamed kernel feature of SYCL. It does this by
running the Itanium mangler with a few modifications.
Because it is somewhat common to wrap non-kernel-related lambdas in
macros that aren't present on the device (such as for logging), this
uniquely generates an ID for all lambdas involved in the naming of a
kernel. It uses the lambda-mangling number to do this, except replaces
this with its own number (starting at 10000 for readabililty reasons)
for lambdas used to name a kernel.
Additionally, this implements itself as constexpr with a slight catch:
if a name would be invalidated by the use of this lambda in a later
kernel invocation, it is diagnosed as an error (see the Sema tests).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103112
Default address space (applies when no explicit address space was
specified) maps to generic (4) address space.
Added SYCL named address spaces `sycl_global`, `sycl_local` and
`sycl_private` defined as sub-sets of the default address space.
Static variables without address space now reside in global address
space when compile for SPIR target, unless they have an explicit address
space qualifier in source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89909
(PR49478)
As ArrayType::ArrayType mentioned in clang/lib/AST/Type.cpp, a
DependentSizedArrayType might not have size expression because it it
used as the type of a dependent array of unknown bound with a dependent
braced initializer.
Thus, I add a check when mangling array of that type.
This should fix https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49478
Reviewed By: Richard Smith - zygoloid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99407
C functions may be declared and defined in different prototypes like below. This patch unifies the checks for mangling names in symbol linkage name emission and debug linkage name emission so that the two names are consistent.
static int go(int);
static int go(a) int a;
{
return a;
}
Test Plan:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98799
D96109 added support for unique internal linkage names for both internal
linkage functions and global variables. There was a lot of discussion on how to
get the demangling right for functions but I completely missed the point that
demanglers do not support suffixes for global vars. For example:
$ c++filt _ZL3foo
foo
$ c++filt _ZL3foo.uniq.123
_ZL3foo.uniq.123
The demangling for functions works as expected.
I am not sure of the impact of this. I don't understand how debuggers and other
tools depend on the correctness of global variable demangling so I am
pre-emptively disabling it until we can get the demangling support added.
Importantly, uniquefying global variables is not needed right now as we do not
do profile attribution to global vars based on sampling. It was added for
completeness and so this feature is not exactly missed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98392
The option -funique-internal-linkage-names was added in D73307 and D78243 as a
LLVM early pass to insert a unique suffix to internal linkage functions and
vars. The unique suffix was the hash of the module path. However, we found
that this can be done more cleanly in clang early and the fixes that need to
be done later can be completely avoided. The fixes in particular are trying
to modify the DW_AT_linkage_name and finding the right place to insert the
pass.
This patch ressurects the original implementation proposed in D73307 which
was reviewed and then ditched in favor of the pass based approach.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96109
Add the types for the RISC-V V extension builtins.
These types will be used by the RISC-V V intrinsics which require
types of the form <vscale x 1 x i64>(LMUL=1 element size=64) or
<vscale x 4 x i32>(LMUL=2 element size=32), etc. The vector_size
attribute does not work for us as it doesn't create a scalable
vector type. We want these types to be opaque and have no operators
defined for them. We want them to be sizeless. This makes them
similar to the ARM SVE builtin types. But we will have quite a bit
more types. This patch adds around 60. Later patches will add
another 230 or so types representing tuples of these types similar
to the x2/x3/x4 types in ARM SVE. But with extra complexity that
these types are combined with the LMUL concept that is unique to
RISCV.
For more background see this RFC
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-October/145850.html
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <roger.ferrer@bsc.es>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92715
- The failures are all cc1-based tests due to the missing `-aux-triple` options,
which is always prepared by the driver in CUDA/HIP compilation.
- Add extra check on the missing aux-targetinfo to prevent crashing.
[hip][cuda] Enable extended lambda support on Windows.
- On Windows, extended lambda has extra issues due to the numbering
schemes are different between the host compilation (Microsoft C++ ABI)
and the device compilation (Itanium C++ ABI. Additional device side
lambda number is required per lambda for the host compilation to
correctly mangle the device-side lambda name.
- A hybrid numbering context `MSHIPNumberingContext` is introduced to
number a lambda for both host- and device-compilations.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69322
This reverts commit 4874ff0241.
- On Windows, extended lambda has extra issues due to the numbering
schemes are different between the host compilation (Microsoft C++ ABI)
and the device compilation (Itanium C++ ABI. Additional device side
lambda number is required per lambda for the host compilation to
correctly mangle the device-side lambda name.
- A hybrid numbering context `MSHIPNumberingContext` is introduced to
number a lambda for both host- and device-compilations.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69322
with fix to test case and stringrefs.
Currently (for codeview) lambdas have a string like `<lambda_0>` in
their mangled name, and don't have any display name. This change uses the
`<lambda_0>` as the display name, which helps distinguish between lambdas
in -gline-tables-only, since there are no linkage names there.
It also changes how we display lambda names; previously we used
`<unnamed-tag>`; now it will show `<lambda_0>`.
I added a function to the mangling context code to create this string;
for Itanium it just returns an empty string.
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48432
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95187
This reverts 9b21d4b943
Currently (for codeview) lambdas have a string like `<lambda_0>` in
their mangled name, and don't have any display name. This change uses the
`<lambda_0>` as the display name, which helps distinguish between lambdas
in -gline-tables-only, since there are no linkage names there.
It also changes how we display lambda names; previously we used
`<unnamed-tag>`; now it will show `<lambda_0>`.
I added a function to the mangling context code to create this string;
for Itanium it just returns an empty string.
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48432
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95187
The Clang enable_if extension is mangled as an <extended-qualifier>,
which is supposed to contain <template-args>. However, we were
unconditionally emitting X/E around its arguments, neglecting the fact
that <expr-primary> should be emitted directly without the surrounding
X/E.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95488
Previously, we were emitting an extraneous X .. E in <template-arg>
around an <expr-primary> if the template argument was constructed from
an expression (rather than an already-evaluated literal value). In
such a case, we would then e.g. emit 'XLi0EE' instead of 'Li0E'.
We had one special-case for DeclRefExpr expressions, in particular, to
omit them the mangled-name without the surrounding X/E. However,
unfortunately, that special case also triggered for ParmVarDecl (a
subtype of VarDecl), and _incorrectly_ emitted 'L_Z .. E' instead of
the proper 'Xfp_E'.
This change causes mangleExpression itself to be responsible for
emitting X/E around non-primary expressions, which removes the
special-case, and corrects both these problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95487
The two operations have acted differently since Clang 8, but were
unfortunately mangled the same. The new mangling uses new "vendor
extended expression" syntax proposed in
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/112
GCC had the same mangling problem, https://gcc.gnu.org/PR88115, and
will hopefully be switching to the same mangling as implemented here.
Additionally, fix the mangling of `__uuidof` to use the new extension
syntax, instead of its previous nonstandard special-case.
Adjusts the demangler accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93922
Combined with 'da98651 - Revert "DR2064:
decltype(E) is only a dependent', this change (5a391d3) caused verifier
errors when building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/1168494#c1 for a
reproducer.
Additionally it reverts changes that were dependent on this one, see
below.
> Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer
> to dependent declarations.
>
> Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
> function as being instantiation-dependent.
>
> This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
> declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
> Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
> instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
> of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
> dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
> treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
> involving such dependent declarations.
>
> This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
> imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
> early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
> when handling the template.
>
> Previously committed as 8c1f2d15b8, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted.
This reverts commit 5a391d38ac.
It also restores clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp to its state before
da986511fb.
Revert "[c++20] P1907R1: Support for generalized non-type template arguments of scalar type."
> Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
> following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
>
> 7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
> ed13d8c667 by me
> 95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
> 430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
This reverts commit 4b574008ae.
Revert "[msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay"
> [msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay
> applied to an array the same as the array itself.
>
> This follows MS ABI, and corrects a regression from the implementation
> of generalized non-type template parameters, where we "forgot" how to
> mangle this case.
This reverts commit 18e093faf7.
if E is merely instantiation-dependent."
This change leaves us unable to distinguish between different function
templates that differ in only instantiation-dependent ways, for example
template<typename T> decltype(int(T())) f();
template<typename T> decltype(int(T(0))) f();
We'll need substantially better support for types that are
instantiation-dependent but not dependent before we can go ahead with
this change.
This reverts commit e3065ce238.
Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
ed13d8c667 by me
95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
the nested-name-specifier when determining whether a qualified type is
instantiation-dependent.
Previously reverted in 25a02c3d1a due to
causing us to reject some code. It turns out that the rejected code was
ill-formed (no diagnostic required).
if E is merely instantiation-dependent.
Previously reverted in 34e72a146111dd986889a0f0ec8767b2ca6b2913;
re-committed with a fix to an issue that caused name mangling to assert.
This patch enables the Clang type __vector_pair and its associated LLVM
intrinsics even when MMA is disabled. With this patch, the type is now controlled
by the PPC paired-vector-memops option. The builtins and intrinsics will be
renamed to drop the mma prefix in another patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91819
For the Itanium ABI, this implements the mangling rule suggested in
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/47, namely mangling
such template arguments as being cast to the parameter type in the case
where the template name is overloadable. This can cause a mangling
change for rare cases, where
* the template argument declaration is converted from its declared type
to the type of the template parameter, and
* the template parameter either has a deduced type or is a parameter of
a function template.
However, such changes are necessary to avoid mangling collisions. The
ABI changes can be reversed with -fclang-abi-compat=11 or earlier.
Re-commit with a fix for a couple of regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91488
For the Itanium ABI, this implements the mangling rule suggested in
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/47, namely mangling
such template arguments as being cast to the parameter type in the case
where the template name is overloadable. This can cause a mangling
change for rare cases, where
* the template argument declaration is converted from its declared type
to the type of the template parameter, and
* the template parameter either has a deduced type or is a parameter of
a function template.
However, such changes are necessary to avoid mangling collisions. The
ABI changes can be reversed with -fclang-abi-compat=11 or earlier.
Re-commit with a fix for the regression introduced last time: don't
expect parameters and arguments to line up inside an <unresolved-name>
mangling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91488
Nathan Sidwell