correct getNumArguments
StringifiedArguments is allocated (resized) based on the size the
getNumArguments function. However, this function ACTUALLY currently
returns the amount of total UnexpArgTokens which is minimum the same as
the new implementation of getNumMacroArguments, since empty/omitted arguments
result in 1 UnexpArgToken, and included ones at minimum include 2
(1 for the arg itself, 1 for eof).
This patch renames the otherwise unused getNumArguments to be more clear
that it is the number of arguments that the Macro expects, and thus the maximum
number that can be stringified. This patch also replaces the explicit memset
(which results in value instantiation of the new tokens, PLUS clearing the
memory) with brace initialization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32046
llvm-svn: 305425
NSString is loaded from the DWARF, which doesn't have the concept of protocols.
When this is used with the NSMutableDictionary type from Objective-C modules,
this produces errors of the form
error: cannot initialize a parameter of type 'id<NSCopying> _Nonnull' with an rvalue of type 'NSString *'
We're aware of these problems and have an internal bug report filed
(<rdar://problem/32777981>)
llvm-svn: 305424
In r304074 we introduce a patch to accept results from side effect free
functions into SCEV modeling. This causes rejection of cases where the
call is happening outside the SCoP. This patch checks if the call is
outside the Region and treats the results as a parameter (SCEVType::PARAM)
to the SCoP instead of returning SCEVType::INVALID.
Patch by Sameer Abu Asal.
llvm-svn: 305423
The current name (addModulePath) and return value
(ModulePathStringTableTy::iterator) is a little confusing. This
API adds a module, not just a path. And the iterator is basically
just an implementation detail of the summary index. Address
both of those issues by renaming to addModule and introducing a
ModuleSummaryIndex::ModuleInfo type that the function returns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34124
llvm-svn: 305422
Instead use target_link_libraries directly. Thanks to
Juergen Ributzka for the suggestion, which fixes an issue
when llvm is configured with no targets.
llvm-svn: 305421
Summary:
At present, `-profile-guided-section-prefix` is a `cl::Optional` option, which means it demands to be passed exactly zero or one times. Our build system makes it pretty tricky to guarantee this. We often accidentally pass the flag more than once (but always with the same "false" value) which results in an error, after which compilation fails:
```
clang (LLVM option parsing): for the -profile-guided-section-prefix option: may only occur zero or one times!
```
While we work on improving our build system, it also seems reasonable just to allow `-profile-guided-section-prefix` to be passed more than once, by to `cl::ZeroOrMore`. Quoting [[ http://llvm.org/docs/CommandLine.html#controlling-the-number-of-occurrences-required-and-allowed | the documentation ]]:
> The cl::ZeroOrMore modifier ... indicates that your program will allow the option to be specified zero or more times.
> ...
> If an option is specified multiple times for an option of the cl::opt class, only the last value will be retained.
Reviewers: danielcdh
Reviewed By: danielcdh
Subscribers: twoh, david2050, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34219
llvm-svn: 305413
This way we end up not looking at PHI args already removed.
MemSSA now goes through the updater so we can prune
it to avoid having redundant MemoryPHI arguments, but that
doesn't quite work for the general case.
Discussed with Daniel Berlin, fixes PR33406.
llvm-svn: 305409
Summary:
This broke thread_local_quarantine_pthread_join.cc on some architectures, due
to the overhead of the stashed regions. Reverting while figuring out the best
way to deal with it.
Reviewers: alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34213
llvm-svn: 305404
Add checking for the second parameter of altivec conversion builtin to make sure
it is compile-time constant int.
This patch fixes PR33212: PPC vec_cst useless at -O0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34092
llvm-svn: 305401
There's an early out that's trying to detect when we don't know any bits that make up the legal range of a shift. The code subtracts one from BitWidth which creates a mask in the lower bits for power of 2 bit widths. This is then ANDed with the known bits to see if any of those bits are known. If the bit width isn't a power of 2 this creates a non-sensical mask.
This patch corrects this by rounding up to a power of 2 before doing the subtract and mask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34165
llvm-svn: 305400
We know that shuffle masks are power-of-2 sizes, but there's no way (?) for LLVM to know that,
so hack combineX86ShufflesRecursively() to be much faster by replacing div/rem with shift/mask.
This makes the motivating compile-time bug in PR32037 ( https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32037 )
about 9% faster overall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34174
llvm-svn: 305398
Many times unit tests for different libraries would like to use
the same helper functions for checking common types of errors.
This patch adds a common library with helpers for testing things
in Support, and introduces helpers in here for integrating the
llvm::Error and llvm::Expected<T> classes with gtest and gmock.
Normally, we would just be able to write:
EXPECT_THAT(someFunction(), succeeded());
but due to some quirks in llvm::Error's move semantics, gmock
doesn't make this easy, so two macros EXPECT_THAT_ERROR() and
EXPECT_THAT_EXPECTED() are introduced to gloss over the difficulties.
Consider this an exception, and possibly only temporary as we
look for ways to improve this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33059
llvm-svn: 305395
Newlib 2.5 added the locale management functions, so it should not
include __nop_local_mgmt.h. This change adds proper guard around that
include statement.
For newlib 2.4, some releases contain these functions and some don't,
and they all have the same version numbers. This patch will work
properly with the initial "2.4.0" release which does not include these
functions and require __nop_local_mgmt.h.
This has been tested against newlib 2.2 and 2.5, and also sanity
checks against other different version numbers.
Patch by Martin J. O'Riordan and Walter Lee
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32146
llvm-svn: 305394
This was originally reverted because of some non-deterministic
failures on certain buildbots. Luckily ASAN eventually caught
this as a stack-use-after-scope, so the fix is included in
this patch.
llvm-svn: 305393
Summary:
It seems -flto must be either "thin" or "full". I think the use of
containValue is just a typo.
Reviewers: ruiu, tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34055
llvm-svn: 305392
Summary:
The reasoning behind this change is explained in D33454, which unfortunately
broke the Windows version (due to the platform not supporting partial unmapping
of a memory region).
This new approach changes `MmapAlignedOrDie` to allow for the specification of
a `padding_chunk`. If non-null, and the initial allocation is aligned, this
padding chunk will hold the address of the extra memory (of `alignment` bytes).
This allows `AllocateRegion` to get 2 regions if the memory is aligned
properly, and thus help reduce fragmentation (and saves on unmapping
operations). As with the initial D33454, we use a stash in the 32-bit Primary
to hold those extra regions and return them on the fast-path.
The Windows version of `MmapAlignedOrDie` will always return a 0
`padding_chunk` if one was requested.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, dvyukov, kcc
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34152
llvm-svn: 305391
This reverts commit 3a204faa093c681a1e96c5e0622f50649b761ee0.
I've upset a buildbot which runs the address sanitizer:
ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope
lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp:2690
That Twine variable is used illegally.
llvm-svn: 305390
For multiprecision arithmetic on MIPS, rather than using ISD::ADDE / ISD::ADDC,
get SelectionDAG to break down the operation into ISD::ADDs and ISD::SETCCs.
For MIPS, only the DSP ASE has a carry flag, so in the general case it is not
useful to directly support ISD::{ADDE, ADDC, SUBE, SUBC} nodes.
Also improve the generation code in such cases for targets with
TargetLoweringBase::ZeroOrOneBooleanContent by directly using the result of the
comparison node rather than using it in selects. Similarly for ISD::SUBE /
ISD::SUBC.
Address optimization breakage by moving the generation of MIPS specific integer
multiply-accumulate nodes to before legalization.
This revolves PR32713 and PR33424.
Thanks to Simonas Kazlauskas and Pirama Arumuga Nainar for reporting the issue!
Reviewers: slthakur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33494
llvm-svn: 305389
The ARM backend asserts against constant pool lowering when it generates
execute-only code in order to prevent the generation of constant pools in
the text section. It appears that target independent optimizations might
generate DAG nodes that represent constant pools. By lowering such nodes
as global addresses we don't violate the semantics of execute-only code
and also it is guaranteed that execute-only behaves correct with the
position-independent addressing modes that support execute-only code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33773
llvm-svn: 305387
Summary:
This patch is part of 3 patches that together form a single patch, but must be introduced in stages in order not to break things.
The way that LLVM interprets DW_OP_plus in DIExpression nodes is basically that of the DW_OP_plus_uconst operator since LLVM expects an unsigned constant operand. This unnecessarily restricts the DW_OP_plus operator, preventing it from being used to describe the evaluation of runtime values on the expression stack. These patches try to align the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus with that of the DWARF definition, which pops two elements off the expression stack, performs the operation and pushes the result back on the stack.
This is done in three stages:
• The first patch (LLVM) adds support for DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The second patch (Clang) contains changes all its uses from DW_OP_plus to DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The third patch (LLVM) changes the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus to be in line with its DWARF meaning. This patch includes the bitcode upgrade from legacy DIExpressions.
Patch by Sander de Smalen.
Reviewers: echristo, pcc, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: fhahn, javed.absar, aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33894
llvm-svn: 305386
Summary:
Add CompactNamespaces option, to pack namespace declarations on the
same line (somewhat similar to C++17 nested namespace definition).
With this option, consecutive namespace declarations are kept on the
same line:
namespace foo { namespace bar {
...
}} // namespace foo::bar
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: kimgr, cfe-commits, klimek
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32480
llvm-svn: 305384
The step count depends on code generated by compiler (GCC/Clang).
It will also vary for different MIPS arch variant. Hence skipping these test for MIPS.
Subscribers: jaydeep, bhushan, lldb-commits, slthakur
llvm-svn: 305383
This patch fixes two systemic machine verifier errors in the long
branch pass. The first is the incorrect basic block successors
and the second was the incorrect construction of several jump
instructions.
This partially resolves PR27458 and the associated PR32146.
Reviewers: slthakur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33378
llvm-svn: 305382
While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered
as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to
incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785:
```
template<typename T> struct Somewhat {
void internal() const {}
friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {}
};
void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); }
```
When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type
of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It
instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for
redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration
of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet.
To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers
a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set.
This change fixes PR14785.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375
llvm-svn: 305379
Clang does not accept regparm attribute on these platforms.
Fortunately, the default calling convention passes arguments
in registers any way
Subscribers: jaydeep, bhushan, lldb-commits, slthakur
llvm-svn: 305378
Erich Keane