Summary:
This will also be added to the LTO API, right now this will
bring ThinLTO on par with Monolithic LTO on Darwin.
Reviewers: anemet
Subscribers: tejohnson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26886
llvm-svn: 287450
Summary:
This makes it explicit that ownership is taken. Also replace all `new`
with make_unique<> at call sites.
Reviewers: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26884
llvm-svn: 287449
It is used to drive this from the clang driver via -mllvm.
Same option name is used as in opt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26832
llvm-svn: 287356
Summary:
Split ReaderWriter.h which contains the APIs into both the BitReader and
BitWriter libraries into BitcodeReader.h and BitcodeWriter.h.
This is to address Chandler's concern about sharing the same API header
between multiple libraries (BitReader and BitWriter). That concern is
why we create a single bitcode library in our downstream build of clang,
which led to r286297 being reverted as it added a dependency that
created a cycle only when there is a single bitcode library (not two as
in upstream).
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: dlj, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26502
llvm-svn: 286566
We need to use the overload of Mangler::getNameWithPrefix that takes a
GlobalValue in order to mangle in the stdcall stack byte count for Windows
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25529
llvm-svn: 284040
* UpdateCompilerUsed() -> updateCompilerUsed()
* ThinLTO doesn't use the API so we can remove the include
* Clean up unused #include <functional> from the header
* Rename #ifdef guard comment to be correct.
llvm-svn: 273461
This is indeed a much cleaner approach (thanks to Daniel Berlin
for pointing out), and also David/Sean for review.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21454
llvm-svn: 273032
Daniel Berlin expressed some real concerns about the port and proposed
and alternative approach. I'll revert this for now while working on a
new patch, which I hope to put up for review shortly. Sorry for the churn.
llvm-svn: 272925
Nearly all the changes to this pass have been done while maintaining and
updating other parts of LLVM. LLVM has had another pass, SROA, which
has superseded ScalarReplAggregates for quite some time.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21316
llvm-svn: 272737
The need for all these Lookup* functions is just because of calls to
getAnalysis inside methods (i.e. not at the top level) of the
runOnFunction method. They should be straightforward to clean up when
the old PM is gone.
llvm-svn: 272615
Below are my super rough notes when porting. They can probably serve as
a basic guide for porting other passes to the new PM. As I port more
passes I'll expand and generalize this and make a proper
docs/HowToPortToNewPassManager.rst document. There is also missing
documentation for general concepts and API's in the new PM which will
require some documentation.
Once there is proper documentation in place we can put up a list of
passes that have to be ported and game-ify/crowdsource the rest of the
porting (at least of the middle end; the backend is still unclear).
I will however be taking personal responsibility for ensuring that the
LLD/ELF LTO pipeline is ported in a timely fashion. The remaining passes
to be ported are (do something like
`git grep "<the string in the bullet point below>"` to find the pass):
General Scalar:
[ ] Simplify the CFG
[ ] Jump Threading
[ ] MemCpy Optimization
[ ] Promote Memory to Register
[ ] MergedLoadStoreMotion
[ ] Lazy Value Information Analysis
General IPO:
[ ] Dead Argument Elimination
[ ] Deduce function attributes in RPO
Loop stuff / vectorization stuff:
[ ] Alignment from assumptions
[ ] Canonicalize natural loops
[ ] Delete dead loops
[ ] Loop Access Analysis
[ ] Loop Invariant Code Motion
[ ] Loop Vectorization
[ ] SLP Vectorizer
[ ] Unroll loops
Devirtualization / CFI:
[ ] Cross-DSO CFI
[ ] Whole program devirtualization
[ ] Lower bitset metadata
CGSCC passes:
[ ] Function Integration/Inlining
[ ] Remove unused exception handling info
[ ] Promote 'by reference' arguments to scalars
Please let me know if you are interested in working on any of the passes
in the above list (e.g. reply to the post-commit thread for this patch).
I'll probably be tackling "General Scalar" and "General IPO" first FWIW.
Steps as I port "Deduce function attributes in RPO"
---------------------------------------------------
(note: if you are doing any work based on these notes, please leave a
note in the post-commit review thread for this commit with any
improvements / suggestions / incompleteness you ran into!)
Note: "Deduce function attributes in RPO" is a module pass.
1. Do preparatory refactoring.
Do preparatory factoring. In this case all I had to do was to pull out a static helper (r272503).
(TODO: give more advice here e.g. if pass holds state or something)
2. Rename the old pass class.
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.cpp
Rename class ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrs -> ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsLegacyPass
in preparation for adding a class ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrs as the pass in the new PM.
(edit: actually wait what? The new class name will be
ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass, so it doesn't conflict. So this step is
sort of useless churn).
llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
llvm/lib/LTO/LTOCodeGenerator.cpp
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/IPO.cpp
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.cpp
Rename initializeReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass -> initializeReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsLegacyPassPass
(note that the "PassPass" thing falls out of `s/ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrs/ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsLegacyPass/`)
Note that the INITIALIZE_PASS macro is what creates this identifier name, so renaming the class requires this renaming too.
Note that createReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass does not need to be
renamed since its name is not generated from the class name.
3. Add the new PM pass class.
In the new PM all passes need to have their
declaration in a header somewhere, so you will often need to add a header.
In this case
llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.h is already there because
PostOrderFunctionAttrsPass was already ported.
The file-level comment from the .cpp file can be used as the file-level
comment for the new header. You may want to tweak the wording slightly
from "this file implements" to "this file provides" or similar.
Add declaration for the new PM pass in this header:
class ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass
: public PassInfoMixin<ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass> {
public:
PreservedAnalyses run(Module &M, AnalysisManager<Module> &AM);
};
Its name should end with `Pass` for consistency (note that this doesn't
collide with the names of most old PM passes). E.g. call it
`<name of the old PM pass>Pass`.
Also, move the doxygen comment from the old PM pass to the declaration of
this class in the header.
Also, include the declaration for the new PM class
`llvm/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.h` at the top of the file (in this case,
it was already done when the other pass in this file was ported).
Now define the `run` method for the new class.
The main things here are:
a) Use AM.getResult<...>(M) to get results instead of `getAnalysis<...>()`
b) If the old PM pass would have returned "false" (i.e. `Changed ==
false`), then you should return PreservedAnalyses::all();
c) In the old PM getAnalysisUsage method, observe the calls
`AU.addPreserved<...>();`.
In the case `Changed == true`, for each preserved analysis you should do
call `PA.preserve<...>()` on a PreservedAnalyses object and return it.
E.g.:
PreservedAnalyses PA;
PA.preserve<CallGraphAnalysis>();
return PA;
Note that calls to skipModule/skipFunction are not supported in the new PM
currently, so optnone and optimization bisect support do not work. You can
just drop those calls for now.
4. Add the pass to the new PM pass registry to make it available in opt.
In llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp add a #include for your header.
`#include "llvm/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.h"`
In this case there is already an include (from when
PostOrderFunctionAttrsPass was ported).
Add your pass to llvm/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def
In this case, I added
`MODULE_PASS("rpo-functionattrs", ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass())`
The string is from the `INITIALIZE_PASS*` macros used in the old pass
manager.
Then choose a test that uses the pass and use the new PM `-passes=...` to
run it.
E.g. in this case there is a test that does:
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -functionattrs -rpo-functionattrs -S | FileCheck %s
I have added the line:
; RUN: opt < %s -aa-pipeline=basic-aa -passes='require<targetlibinfo>,cgscc(function-attrs),rpo-functionattrs' -S | FileCheck %s
The `-aa-pipeline=basic-aa` and
`require<targetlibinfo>,cgscc(function-attrs)` are what is needed to run
functionattrs in the new PM (note that in the new PM "functionattrs"
becomes "function-attrs" for some reason). This is just pulled from
`readattrs.ll` which contains the change from when functionattrs was ported
to the new PM.
Adding rpo-functionattrs causes the pass that was just ported to run.
llvm-svn: 272505
This patch introduces a new option -lto-strip-invalid-debug-info, which
drops malformed debug info from the input.
The problem I'm trying to solve with this sequence of patches is that
historically we've done a really bad job at verifying debug info. We want
to be able to make the verifier stricter without having to worry about
breaking bitcode compatibility with existing producers. For example, we
don't necessarily want IR produced by an older version of clang to be
rejected by an LTO link just because of malformed debug info, and rather
provide an option to strip it. Note that merely outdated (but well-formed)
debug info would continue to be auto-upgraded in this scenario.
rdar://problem/25818489
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19987
This reapplies 268936 with a test case fix for Linux (-exported-symbol foo)
llvm-svn: 268965
This patch introduces a new option -lto-strip-invalid-debug-info, which
drops malformed debug info from the input.
The problem I'm trying to solve with this sequence of patches is that
historically we've done a really bad job at verifying debug info. We want
to be able to make the verifier stricter without having to worry about
breaking bitcode compatibility with existing producers. For example, we
don't necessarily want IR produced by an older version of clang to be
rejected by an LTO link just because of malformed debug info, and rather
provide an option to strip it. Note that merely outdated (but well-formed)
debug info would continue to be auto-upgraded in this scenario.
rdar://problem/25818489
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19987
llvm-svn: 268936
This reverts commit r268658.
I incorrectly diagnose this as the source of an assertion during an
LTO bootstrap of clang.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 268680
The assertions were assuming that the linker will not ask to preserve
a global that is internal or available_externally, as it does not
really make sense. In practice this break the bootstrap of clang,
I degrade to a warning for now.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 268671
If the linker requested to preserve a linkonce function, we should
honor this even if we drop all uses.
We explicitely avoid turning them into weak_odr (unlike the first
version of this patch in r267644), because the codegen can be
different on Darwin: because of `llvm::canBeOmittedFromSymbolTable()`
we may emit the symbol as weak_def_can_be_hidden instead of
weak_definition.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 268607
This reverts commit r267644. Turning linkonce_odr into weak_odr is
a sementic change on Darwin: because of
`llvm::canBeOmittedFromSymbolTable()` we may emit the symbol as
weak_def_can_be_hidden instead of weak_definition.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 268606
This reverts commit r267657, r267656, and r267655.
The test does not pass on multiple bots, I'm unsure why yet but let's unbreak them.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 267664
Summary:
If the linker requested to preserve a linkonce function, we should
honor this even if we drop all uses.
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19527
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 267644
Adam Nemet