Contributed by dmikis (Kirill Dmitrenko)!
Otherwise problems like trying to format readonly file in-place led to crashes.
I've added reviewers by looking at `git blame` and other reviews to the changed file, so may have missed someone.
Reviewed By: krasimir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90121
This reverts commit ec66603ac7. It was
causing ubsan failures like the following on the ubsan bot:
llvm/lib/Support/SourceMgr.cpp:440:48: runtime error: pointer index expression with base 0x000000000000 overflowed to 0xfffffffffffffffa
Summary:
Address review comments from {D68554} by trying to drop the dependency again on Frontend whilst keeping the same format diagnostic messages
Not completely happy with having to do a split in order to get the StringRef for the Line the error occurred on, but could see a way to use SourceManager and SourceLocation to give me a single line?
But this removes the dependency on frontend which should keep the binary size down.
Reviewers: thakis, klimek, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68969
Summary:
Related somewhat to {D29039}
On seeing a quote on twitter by @invalidop
> If it's not formatted with clang-format it's a build error.
This made me want to change the way I use clang-format into a tool that could optionally show me where my source code violates clang-format syle.
When I'm making a change to clang-format itself, one thing I like to do to test the change is to ensure I didn't cause a huge wave of changes, what I want to do is simply run this on a known formatted directory and see if any new differences arrive in a manner I'm used to.
This started me thinking that we should allow build systems to run clang-format on a whole tree and emit compiler style warnings about files that fail clang-format in a form that would make them as a warning in most build systems and because those build systems range in their construction I don't think its unreasonable to NOT expect them to have to do the directory searching or parsing the output replacements themselves, but simply transform that into an error code when there are changes required.
I am starting this by suggesing adding a -n or -dry-run command line argument which would emit a warning/error of the form
Support for various common compiler command line argumuments like '-Werror' and '-ferror-limit' could make this very flexible to be integrated into build systems and CI systems.
```
> $ /usr/bin/clang-format --dry-run ClangFormat.cpp -ferror-limit=3 -fcolor-diagnostics
> ClangFormat.cpp:54:29: warning: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
> static cl::list<std::string>
> ^
> ClangFormat.cpp:55:20: warning: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
> LineRanges("lines", cl::desc("<start line>:<end line> - format a range of\n"
> ^
> ClangFormat.cpp:55:77: warning: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
> LineRanges("lines", cl::desc("<start line>:<end line> - format a range of\n"
> ^
```
Reviewers: mitchell-stellar, klimek, owenpan
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68554
llvm-svn: 374663
We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.
Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.
Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).
Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823
llvm-svn: 319840
This change migrates clang-format to add_clang_tool which makes a component-based install target. To support component-based installation the extra installed scripts all need to have the "clang-format" component too.
llvm-svn: 261680
To implement this nicely, add a function that merges two sets of
replacements that are meant to be done in sequence. This functionality
will also be useful for other applications, e.g. formatting the result
of clang-tidy fixes.
llvm-svn: 248367
Summary:
This adds clang-format-fuzzer binary,
which depends on the Fuzzer lib,
see http://reviews.llvm.org/D7184
This fuzer has found ~15 bugs so far, and I hope to set up a bot for it.
Test Plan: run on a bot.
Reviewers: samsonov, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: curdeius, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7202
llvm-svn: 227354
This moves classes for storing and applying replacements to separate
files. These classes specifically are used by clang-format which doesn't
have any other dependencies on clangAST. Thereby, the size of
clang-format's binary can be cut roughly in half and its build time sped
up.
llvm-svn: 220867
The rewrite facility's footprint is small so it's not worth going to these
lengths to support disabling at configure time, particularly since key compiler
features now depend on it.
Meanwhile the Objective-C rewriters have been moved under the
ENABLE_CLANG_ARCMT umbrella for now as they're comparatively heavy and still
potentially worth excluding from lightweight builds.
Tests are now passing with any combination of feature flags. The flags
historically haven't been tested by LLVM's build servers so caveat emptor.
llvm-svn: 213171
Nico Weber