Commit Graph

73 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
John McCall f551acaaf5 Access control polish: drop the note on the original declaration and
say 'implicitly' when it was implicit.  Resolves PR 7930 and my peace of mind.

llvm-svn: 116916
2010-10-20 08:15:06 +00:00
John McCall f7cfb2212c Support friend function declarations in local classes correctly.
Fixes a crash and diagnoses the error condition of an unqualified
friend which doesn't resolve to something.  I'm still not certain how
this is useful.

llvm-svn: 116393
2010-10-13 05:45:15 +00:00
Eli Friedman 36ebbec121 PR8325: don't do destructor checking when a pointer is thrown.
llvm-svn: 116336
2010-10-12 20:32:36 +00:00
John McCall 417e74491c Add a quick-and-dirty hack to give a better diagnostic for [class.protected]
restrictions.  The note's not really on the right place given its wording,
but putting a second note on the call site (or muddying the wording) doesn't
appeal.

There are corner cases where this can be wrong, but I'm not concerned.

llvm-svn: 112950
2010-09-03 04:56:05 +00:00
John McCall 1177ff1740 That's not the right direction to compute notional accessibility in at all.
llvm-svn: 112360
2010-08-28 08:47:21 +00:00
John McCall 96329678e4 When checking access control for an instance member access on
an object of type I, if the current access target is protected
when named in a class N, consider the friends of the classes P
where I <= P <= N and where a notional member of N would be
non-forbidden in P.

llvm-svn: 112358
2010-08-28 07:56:00 +00:00
John McCall bd8062dff1 Work around a crash when checking access to injected class names
qua templates.  The current fix suppresses the access check entirely
in this case;  to do better, we'd need to be able to say that a
particular lookup result came from a particular injected class name,
which is not easy to do with the current representation of LookupResult.
This is on my known-problems list.

llvm-svn: 111009
2010-08-13 07:02:08 +00:00
John McCall dcc7140f86 Perform access control when template lookup finds a class template.
This is *really* hacky.

llvm-svn: 110997
2010-08-13 02:23:42 +00:00
John McCall 796c2a52a9 Treat template parameters as part of the declaration-specifiers for the
purpose of access control.  Fixes PR7644.

I can't actually find anything directly justifying this, but it seems obvious.

llvm-svn: 108521
2010-07-16 08:13:16 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 747eb7840a Reinstate the fix for PR7556. A silly use of isTrivial() was
suppressing copies of objects with trivial copy constructors.

llvm-svn: 107857
2010-07-08 06:14:04 +00:00
Douglas Gregor e182370eda Revert r107828 and r107827, the fix for PR7556, which seems to be
breaking bootstrap on Linux.

llvm-svn: 107837
2010-07-07 23:37:33 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 442612c285 Do not use CXXZeroValueInitExpr for class types. Instead, use
CXXConstructExpr/CXXTemporaryObjectExpr/CXXNewExpr as
appropriate. Fixes PR7556, and provides a slide codegen improvement
when copy-initializing a POD class type from a value-initialized
temporary. Previously, we weren't eliding the copy.

llvm-svn: 107827
2010-07-07 22:35:13 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 9aa0d39443 A bug I've introduced in STDIN handling surfaced a few broken tests, fix them.
Lexer/hexfloat.cpp is now XFAIL'd, I'd appreciate if someone could look into it.

llvm-svn: 106840
2010-06-25 12:48:07 +00:00
Eli Friedman 91a3d27ec0 Make sure to check the accessibility of and mark the destructor for the
operand of a throw expression.  Fixes PR7281.

llvm-svn: 105408
2010-06-03 20:39:03 +00:00
Douglas Gregor ed2540d205 When we complain about a member being inaccessible due to a constraint
along an access path, add another note pointing at the member we
actually found.

llvm-svn: 104937
2010-05-28 04:34:55 +00:00
John McCall 4583186b8b When filtering out previous declarations of friend functions, consider the
lookup context, not the direct semantic context.  Fixes PR7230.

llvm-svn: 104917
2010-05-28 01:41:47 +00:00
Douglas Gregor b92ea59481 I hate this commit.
Revert much of the implementation of C++98/03 [temp.friend]p5 in
r103943 and its follow-ons r103948 and r103952. While our
implementation was technically correct, other compilers don't seem to
implement this paragraph (which forces the instantiation of friend
functions defined in a class template when a class template
specialization is instantiated), and doing so broke a bunch of Boost
libraries. 

Since this behavior has changed in C++0x (which instantiates the
friend function definitions when they are used), we're going to skip
the nowhere-implemented C++98/03 semantics and go straight to the
C++0x semantics.

This commit is a band-aid to get Boost up and running again. It
doesn't really fix PR6952 (which this commit un-fixes), but it does
deal with the way Boost.Units abuses this particular paragraph.

llvm-svn: 104014
2010-05-18 05:45:02 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 1cd6ea0b24 C++98/03 [temp.friend]p4 requires that inline function definitions
within class templates be instantiated along with each class template
specialization, even if the functions are not used. Do so, as a baby
step toward PR6952.

llvm-svn: 103943
2010-05-17 16:38:00 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 54818f0c37 When we emit an error during the implicit definition of a special
member function (default constructor, copy constructor, copy
assignment operator, destructor), emit a note showing where that
implicit definition was required.

llvm-svn: 103619
2010-05-12 16:39:35 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar 0547ad38e3 Speculatively revert r103497, "Do not mark the virtual members of an
implicitly-instantiated class as ...", which seems to have broken bootstrap.

llvm-svn: 103515
2010-05-11 21:32:35 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 0c4aad15c2 Do not mark the virtual members of an implicitly-instantiated class as
referenced unless we see one of them defined (or the key function
defined, if it as one) or if we need the vtable for something. Fixes
PR7114.

llvm-svn: 103497
2010-05-11 20:24:17 +00:00
John McCall 9720514f3b An access is permitted if the current template instantiates to the appropriate
class.  Add some conservative support for the idea.  Fixes PR 7024.

llvm-svn: 102999
2010-05-04 05:11:27 +00:00
Douglas Gregor b139cd5843 Complete reimplementation of the synthesis for implicitly-defined copy
assignment operators. 

Previously, Sema provided type-checking and template instantiation for
copy assignment operators, then CodeGen would synthesize the actual
body of the copy constructor. Unfortunately, the two were not in sync,
and CodeGen might pick a copy-assignment operator that is different
from what Sema chose, leading to strange failures, e.g., link-time
failures when CodeGen called a copy-assignment operator that was not
instantiation, run-time failures when copy-assignment operators were
overloaded for const/non-const references and the wrong one was
picked, and run-time failures when by-value copy-assignment operators
did not have their arguments properly copy-initialized.

This implementation synthesizes the implicitly-defined copy assignment
operator bodies in Sema, so that the resulting ASTs encode exactly
what CodeGen needs to do; there is no longer any special code in
CodeGen to synthesize copy-assignment operators. The synthesis of the
body is relatively simple, and we generate one of three different
kinds of copy statements for each base or member:

  - For a class subobject, call the appropriate copy-assignment
    operator, after overload resolution has determined what that is.
  - For an array of scalar types or an array of class types that have
    trivial copy assignment operators, construct a call to
    __builtin_memcpy.
  - For an array of class types with non-trivial copy assignment
    operators, synthesize a (possibly nested!) for loop whose inner
    statement calls the copy constructor.
  - For a scalar type, use built-in assignment.

This patch fixes at least a few tests cases in Boost.Spirit that were
failing because CodeGen picked the wrong copy-assignment operator
(leading to link-time failures), and I suspect a number of undiagnosed
problems will also go away with this change.

Some of the diagnostics we had previously have gotten worse with this
change, since we're going through generic code for our
type-checking. I will improve this in a subsequent patch.

llvm-svn: 102853
2010-05-01 20:49:11 +00:00
John McCall 17b61785a3 Test case for r102578.
llvm-svn: 102580
2010-04-29 01:20:45 +00:00
John McCall 80e58cd3e9 Properly switch into the declaring scope of a template when performing
template argument deduction or (more importantly) the final substitution
required by such deduction.  Makes access control magically work in these
cases.

Fixes PR6967.

llvm-svn: 102572
2010-04-29 00:35:03 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 9556257252 When we create a temporary of class type that we don't immediately
bind, check accessibility of the destructor and mark the declaration
as referenced. Fixes a bunch of Boost.Regex failures.

llvm-svn: 102287
2010-04-24 23:45:46 +00:00
John McCall e87beb2591 Recommit my change to how C++ does elaborated type lookups, now with
two bugfixes which fix selfhost and (hopefully) the nightly tests.

llvm-svn: 102198
2010-04-23 18:46:30 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar 45b2d8ab42 Revert "C++ doesn't really use "namespaces" for different kinds of names the same", which seems to break most C++ nightly test apps.
llvm-svn: 102174
2010-04-23 13:07:39 +00:00
John McCall a245671ae0 C++ doesn't really use "namespaces" for different kinds of names the same
way that C does.  Among other differences, elaborated type specifiers
are defined to skip "non-types", which, as you might imagine, does not
include typedefs.  Rework our use of IDNS masks to capture the semantics
of different kinds of declarations better, and remove most current lookup
filters.  Removing the last remaining filter is more complicated and will
happen in a separate patch.

Fixes PR 6885 as well some spectrum of unfiled bugs.

llvm-svn: 102164
2010-04-23 02:41:41 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 43c64af5f0 Keep tack of whether a base in an InitializedEntity is an inherited virtual base or not. Use this in CheckConstructorAccess.
llvm-svn: 102020
2010-04-21 19:52:01 +00:00
Anders Carlsson a01874bf44 Pass the InitializedEntity to Sema::CheckConstructorAccess and use it to report different diagnostics depending on which entity is being initialized.
llvm-svn: 102010
2010-04-21 18:47:17 +00:00
Chandler Carruth aad3007fe5 Fix the access checking of function and function template argument types,
return types, and default arguments. This fixes PR6855 along with several
similar cases where we rejected valid code.

llvm-svn: 101706
2010-04-18 08:23:21 +00:00
John McCall e820e5e006 Support befriending members of class template specializations.
llvm-svn: 101173
2010-04-13 20:37:33 +00:00
John McCall 43314ab3ae Allow classes to befriend implicitly-declared members. Fixes PR6207 for
members of non-templated classes.

llvm-svn: 101122
2010-04-13 07:45:41 +00:00
John McCall 77e41c1cc6 Don't try to find a scope corresponding to the search DC for an unfound
friend declaration;  this used to be important but is now just a waste of time
plus an unreasonable assertion.  Fixes PR6174.

llvm-svn: 101112
2010-04-13 01:44:10 +00:00
John McCall 3155f573f5 Turn access control on by default in -cc1.
Remove -faccess-control from -cc1; add -fno-access-control.
Make the driver pass -fno-access-control by default.
Update a bunch of tests to be correct under access control.

llvm-svn: 100880
2010-04-09 19:03:51 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 3b4abb6792 Improve handling of friend types in several ways:
- When instantiating a friend type template, perform semantic
  analysis on the resulting type.
  - Downgrade the errors concerning friend type declarations that do
  not refer to classes to ExtWarns in C++98/03. C++0x allows
  practically any type to be befriended, and ignores the friend
  declaration if the type is not a class.

llvm-svn: 100635
2010-04-07 17:57:12 +00:00
John McCall 8e36d53e34 Check access for the implicit calls to destructors that occur when we
have a temporary object in C++.

Also fix a tag mismatch that Doug noticed.

llvm-svn: 100593
2010-04-07 00:41:46 +00:00
John McCall a8ae222d0e Implement the protected access restriction ([class.protected]), which requires
that protected members be used on objects of types which derive from the
naming class of the lookup.  My first N attempts at this were poorly-founded,
largely because the standard is very badly worded here.

llvm-svn: 100562
2010-04-06 21:38:20 +00:00
John McCall cdf40bed1b Check in a motivating test for the revised access semantics.
llvm-svn: 100159
2010-04-02 00:11:49 +00:00
John McCall d79b4d8173 Correct the calculation of access to more closely model the wording in
the standard.

llvm-svn: 100155
2010-04-02 00:03:43 +00:00
John McCall 16df1e59f2 Propagate the "found declaration" (i.e. the using declaration instead of
the underlying/instantiated decl) through a lot of API, including "intermediate"
MemberExprs required for (e.g.) template instantiation.  This is necessary
because of the access semantics of member accesses to using declarations:
only the base class *containing the using decl* need be accessible from the
naming class.

This allows us to complete an access-controlled selfhost, if there are no
recent regressions.

llvm-svn: 99936
2010-03-30 21:47:33 +00:00
John McCall 3dc81f77f6 Accumulate all functions and classes that the effective context is
nested within, and suddenly local classes start working.  Wouldn't be
necessary if I hadn't used local classes in Clang in the first place.
Or, well, wouldn't be necessary yet. :)

llvm-svn: 99709
2010-03-27 06:55:49 +00:00
Gabor Greif 7da63a36f1 add a slight variation of test3, where
argument list seems to be different, but in fact
is semantically equivalent; check that we do not error here

llvm-svn: 99617
2010-03-26 08:26:30 +00:00
Douglas Gregor f956b35f98 Do not mark the destructor of a function parameter's type. Fixes PR6709.
llvm-svn: 99615
2010-03-26 06:57:13 +00:00
John McCall e0b2ddb492 Reapply r99596 with a fix: link an instantiated friend function to its
pattern if it has a body.

llvm-svn: 99610
2010-03-26 04:53:08 +00:00
John McCall e99d5f3044 When finishing a function definition, leave the function definition *after*
doing all the cleanup tasks and checks.  This gives us the proper context for
checking access to base and member destructors.

llvm-svn: 99559
2010-03-25 22:08:03 +00:00
John McCall 27e70baa55 Fix a very minor oversight in privileges-elevation: we were only considering
friendship for a derived class if the base class specifier was non-public,
and thus not considering friendship for non-public members of public bases.

llvm-svn: 99554
2010-03-25 21:39:55 +00:00
John McCall 69f7586c5b Walk out of enums when determining effective context.
llvm-svn: 99391
2010-03-24 09:04:37 +00:00
John McCall a332b953e8 When elevating access along an inheritance path, initialize the computed
access to the (elevated) access of the accessed declaration, if applicable,
rather than plunking that access onto the end after we've calculated the
inheritance access.

Also, being a friend of a derived class gives you public access to its
members (subject to later modification by further inheritance);  it does
not simply ignore a single location of restricted inheritance.

Also, when computing the best unprivileged path to a subobject, preserve
the information that the worst path might be AS_none (forbidden) rather
than a minimum of AS_private.

llvm-svn: 98899
2010-03-18 23:49:19 +00:00