On modern cores with lfiw[az]x, we can fold a sign or zero extension from i32
to i64 into the load necessary for an i64 -> fp conversion.
llvm-svn: 225493
MachineLICM uses a callback named hasLowDefLatency to determine if an
instruction def operand has a 'low' latency. If all relevant operands have a
'low' latency, the instruction is considered too cheap to hoist out of loops
even in low-register-pressure situations. On PowerPC cores, both the embedded
cores and the others, there is no reason to believe that this is a good choice:
all instructions have a cost inside a loop, and hoisting them when not limited
by register pressure is a reasonable default.
llvm-svn: 225471
Summary: The PIC additions didn't update the prologue and epilogue code to save and restore r30 (PIC base register). This does that.
Test Plan: Tests updated.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6876
llvm-svn: 225450
int->fp conversions on PPC must be done through memory loads and stores. On a
modern core, this process begins by storing the int value to memory, then
loading it using a (sometimes special) FP load instruction. Unfortunately, we
would do this even when the value to be converted was itself a load, and we can
just use that same memory location instead of copying it to another first.
There is a slight complication when handling int_to_fp(fp_to_int(x)) pairs,
because the fp_to_int operand has not been lowered when the int_to_fp is being
lowered. We handle this specially by invoking fp_to_int's lowering logic
(partially) and getting the necessary memory location (some trivial refactoring
was done to make this possible).
This is all somewhat ugly, and it would be nice if some later CodeGen stage
could just clean this stuff up, but because doing so would involve modifying
target-specific nodes (or instructions), it is not immediately clear how that
would work.
Also, remove a related entry from the README.txt for which we now generate
reasonable code.
llvm-svn: 225301
In r225251, I removed an old entry from the README.txt file. While there are
several contributing factors (including pieces in Clang's ABI code), upon
further reflection, the backend part deserves a regression test.
llvm-svn: 225268
The old target DAG combine that allowed for performing int_to_fp(fp_to_int(x))
without a load/store pair is updated here with support for unsigned integers,
and to support single-precision values without a third rounding step, on newer
cores with the appropriate instructions.
llvm-svn: 225248
We now produce the desired code as noted in the README.txt file (no spurious
or). Remove the README entry and improve the regression test.
llvm-svn: 225214
Consider this function from our README.txt file:
int foo(int a, int b) { return (a < b) << 4; }
We now explicitly track CR bits by default, so the comment in the README.txt
about not really having a SETCC is no longer accurate, but we did generate this
somewhat silly code:
cmpw 0, 3, 4
li 3, 0
li 12, 1
isel 3, 12, 3, 0
sldi 3, 3, 4
blr
which generates the zext as a select between 0 and 1, and then shifts the
result by a constant amount. Here we preprocess the DAG in order to fold the
results of operations on an extension of an i1 value into the SELECT_I[48]
pseudo instruction when the resulting constant can be materialized using one
instruction (just like the 0 and 1). This was not implemented as a DAGCombine
because the resulting code would have been anti-canonical and depends on
replacing chained user nodes, which does not fit well into the lowering
paradigm. Now we generate:
cmpw 0, 3, 4
li 3, 0
li 12, 16
isel 3, 12, 3, 0
blr
which is less silly.
llvm-svn: 225203
The 64-bit semantics of cntlzw are not special, the 32-bit population count is
stored as a 64-bit value in the range [0,32]. As a result, it is always zero
extended, and it can be added to the PPCISelDAGToDAG peephole optimization as a
frontier instruction for the removal of unnecessary zero extensions.
llvm-svn: 225192
lhbrx and lwbrx not only load their data with byte swapping, but also clear the
upper 32 bits (at least). As a result, they can be added to the PPCISelDAGToDAG
peephole optimization as frontier instructions for the removal of unnecessary
zero extensions.
llvm-svn: 225189
PPC has an instruction for ctlz with defined zero behavior, and our lowering of
cttz (provided by DAGCombine) is also efficient and branchless, so speculating
these makes sense.
llvm-svn: 225150
r225135 added the ability to materialize i64 constants using rotations in order
to reduce the instruction count. Sometimes we can use a rotation only with some
extra masking, so that we take advantage of the fact that generating a bunch of
extra higher-order 1 bits is easy using li/lis.
llvm-svn: 225147
Materializing full 64-bit constants on PPC64 can be expensive, requiring up to
5 instructions depending on the locations of the non-zero bits. Sometimes
materializing a rotated constant, and then applying the inverse rotation, requires
fewer instructions than the direct method. If so, do that instead.
In r225132, I added support for forming constants using bit inversion. In
effect, this reverts that commit and replaces it with rotation support. The bit
inversion is useful for turning constants that are mostly ones into ones that
are mostly zeros (thus enabling a more-efficient shift-based materialization),
but the same effect can be obtained by using negative constants and a rotate,
and that is at least as efficient, if not more.
llvm-svn: 225135
Materializing full 64-bit constants on PPC64 can be expensive, requiring up to
5 instructions depending on the locations of the non-zero bits. Sometimes
materializing the bit-reversed constant, and then flipping the bits, requires
fewer instructions than the direct method. If so, do that instead.
llvm-svn: 225132
The existing code provided for specifying a global loop alignment preference.
However, the preferred loop alignment might depend on the loop itself. For
recent POWER cores, loops between 5 and 8 instructions should have 32-byte
alignment (while the others are better with 16-byte alignment) so that the
entire loop will fit in one i-cache line.
To support this, getPrefLoopAlignment has been made virtual, and can be
provided with an optional MachineLoop* so the target can inspect the loop
before answering the query. The default behavior, as before, is to return the
value set with setPrefLoopAlignment. MachineBlockPlacement now queries the
target for each loop instead of only once per function. There should be no
functional change for other targets.
llvm-svn: 225117
Most modern PowerPC cores prefer that functions and loops start on
16-byte-aligned boundaries (*), so instruct block placement, etc. to make this
happen. The branch selector has also been adjusted so account for the extra
nops that might now be inserted before loop headers.
(*) Some cores actually prefer other alignments for small loops, but that will
be addressed in a follow-up commit.
llvm-svn: 225115
Newer POWER cores, and the A2, support the cmpb instruction. This instruction
compares its operands, treating each of the 8 bytes in the GPRs separately,
returning a 'mask' result of 0 (for false) or -1 (for true) in each byte.
Code generation support is added, in the form of a PPCISelDAGToDAG
DAG-preprocessing routine, that recognizes patterns close to what the
instruction computes (either exactly, or related by a constant masking
operation), and generates the cmpb instruction (along with any necessary
constant masking operation). This can be expanded if use cases arise.
llvm-svn: 225106
This is the second installment of improvements to instruction selection for "bit
permutation" instruction sequences. r224318 added logic for instruction
selection for 32-bit bit permutation sequences, and this adds lowering for
64-bit sequences. The 64-bit sequences are more complicated than the 32-bit
ones because:
a) the 64-bit versions of the 32-bit rotate-and-mask instructions
work by replicating the lower 32-bits of the value-to-be-rotated into the
upper 32 bits -- and integrating this into the cost modeling for the various
bit group operations is non-trivial
b) unlike the 32-bit instructions in 32-bit mode, the rotate-and-mask instructions
cannot, in one instruction, specify the
mask starting index, the mask ending index, and the rotation factor. Also,
forming arbitrary 64-bit constants is more complicated than in 32-bit mode
because the number of instructions necessary is value dependent.
Plus, support for 'late masking' was added: it is sometimes more efficient to
treat the overall value as if it had no mandatory zero bits when planning the
bit-group insertions, and then mask them in at the very end. Unfortunately, as
the structure of the bit groups is different in the two cases, the more
feasible implementation technique was to generate both instruction sequences,
and then pick the shorter one.
And finally, we now generate reasonable code for i64 bswap:
rldicl 5, 3, 16, 0
rldicl 4, 3, 8, 0
rldicl 6, 3, 24, 0
rldimi 4, 5, 8, 48
rldicl 5, 3, 32, 0
rldimi 4, 6, 16, 40
rldicl 6, 3, 48, 0
rldimi 4, 5, 24, 32
rldicl 5, 3, 56, 0
rldimi 4, 6, 40, 16
rldimi 4, 5, 48, 8
rldimi 4, 3, 56, 0
vs. what we used to produce:
li 4, 255
rldicl 5, 3, 24, 40
rldicl 6, 3, 40, 24
rldicl 7, 3, 56, 8
sldi 8, 3, 8
sldi 10, 3, 24
sldi 12, 3, 40
rldicl 0, 3, 8, 56
sldi 9, 4, 32
sldi 11, 4, 40
sldi 4, 4, 48
andi. 5, 5, 65280
andis. 6, 6, 255
andis. 7, 7, 65280
sldi 3, 3, 56
and 8, 8, 9
and 4, 12, 4
and 9, 10, 11
or 6, 7, 6
or 5, 5, 0
or 3, 3, 4
or 7, 9, 8
or 4, 6, 5
or 3, 3, 7
or 3, 3, 4
which is 12 instructions, instead of 25, and seems optimal (at least in terms
of code size).
llvm-svn: 225056
Determining the address of a TLS variable results in a function call in
certain TLS models. This means that a simple ICmpInst might actually
result in invalidating the CTR register.
In such cases, do not attempt to rely on the CTR register for loop
optimization purposes.
This fixes PR22034.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6786
llvm-svn: 224890
When materializing constant i1 values, they must be zero extended. We represent
i1 values as [0, 1], not [0, -1], in i32 registers. As it turns out, this code
path was dead for i1 values prior to r216006 (which is why this did not manifest in
miscompiles until recently).
Fixes -O0 self-hosting on PPC64/Linux.
llvm-svn: 224842
On non-Darwin PPC64, the TOC reload needs to come directly after the bctrl
instruction (for indirect calls) because the 'bctrl/ld 2, 40(1)' instruction
sequence is interpreted by the unwinding code in libgcc. To make sure these
occur as a pair, as with other pairings interpreted by the linker, fuse the two
instructions into one instruction (for code generation only).
In the future, we might wish to do this by emitting CFI directives instead,
but this solution is simpler, and mirrors what GCC does. Additional discussion
on this point is contained in the PR.
Fixes PR22015.
llvm-svn: 224788
It is tempting to mark the fixed stack slot used to store the return address as
immutable when lowering @llvm.returnaddress(i32 0). Unfortunately, within the
function, it is not completely immutable: it is written during the function
prologue. When using post-RA instruction scheduling, the prologue instructions
are available for scheduling, and we're not free to interchange the order of a
particular store in the prologue with loads from that stack location.
Fixes PR21976.
llvm-svn: 224761
In r224033, in moving the signed power-of-2 division expansion into
BuildSDIVPow2, I accidentally made it possible to attempt the lowering for a
64-bit division on PPC32. This later asserts.
Fixes PR21928.
llvm-svn: 224758
The PowerPC backend, somewhat embarrassingly, did not generate an
optimal-length sequence of instructions for a 32-bit bswap. While adding a
pattern for the bswap intrinsic to fix this would not have been terribly
difficult, doing so would not have addressed the real problem: we had been
generating poor code for many bit-permuting operations (by which I mean things
like byte-swap that permute the bits of one or more inputs around in various
ways). Here are some initial steps toward solving this deficiency.
Bit-permuting operations are represented, at the SDAG level, using ISD::ROTL,
SHL, SRL, AND and OR (mostly with constant second operands). Looking back
through these operations, we can build up a description of the bits in the
resulting value in terms of bits of one or more input values (and constant
zeros). For each bit, we compute the rotation amount from the original value,
and then group consecutive (value, rotation factor) bits into groups. Groups
sharing these attributes are then collected and sorted, and we can then
instruction select the entire permutation using a combination of masked
rotations (rlwinm), imm ands (andi/andis), and masked rotation inserts
(rlwimi).
The result is that instead of lowering an i32 bswap as:
rlwinm 5, 3, 24, 16, 23
rlwinm 4, 3, 24, 0, 7
rlwimi 4, 3, 8, 8, 15
rlwimi 5, 3, 8, 24, 31
rlwimi 4, 5, 0, 16, 31
we now produce:
rlwinm 4, 3, 8, 0, 31
rlwimi 4, 3, 24, 16, 23
rlwimi 4, 3, 24, 0, 7
and for the 'test6' example in the PowerPC/README.txt file:
unsigned test6(unsigned x) {
return ((x & 0x00FF0000) >> 16) | ((x & 0x000000FF) << 16);
}
we used to produce:
lis 4, 255
rlwinm 3, 3, 16, 0, 31
ori 4, 4, 255
and 3, 3, 4
and now we produce:
rlwinm 4, 3, 16, 24, 31
rlwimi 4, 3, 16, 8, 15
and, as a nice bonus, this fixes the FIXME in
test/CodeGen/PowerPC/rlwimi-and.ll.
This commit does not include instruction-selection for i64 operations, those
will come later.
llvm-svn: 224318
Now that `Metadata` is typeless, reflect that in the assembly. These
are the matching assembly changes for the metadata/value split in
r223802.
- Only use the `metadata` type when referencing metadata from a call
intrinsic -- i.e., only when it's used as a `Value`.
- Stop pretending that `ValueAsMetadata` is wrapped in an `MDNode`
when referencing it from call intrinsics.
So, assembly like this:
define @foo(i32 %v) {
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 %v}, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 7}, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !1, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{metadata !3}, metadata !0)
ret void, !bar !2
}
!0 = metadata !{metadata !2}
!1 = metadata !{i32* @global}
!2 = metadata !{metadata !3}
!3 = metadata !{}
turns into this:
define @foo(i32 %v) {
call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 %v, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 7, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32* @global, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{!3}, metadata !0)
ret void, !bar !2
}
!0 = !{!2}
!1 = !{i32* @global}
!2 = !{!3}
!3 = !{}
I wrote an upgrade script that handled almost all of the tests in llvm
and many of the tests in cfe (even handling many `CHECK` lines). I've
attached it (or will attach it in a moment if you're speedy) to PR21532
to help everyone update their out-of-tree testcases.
This is part of PR21532.
llvm-svn: 224257
PPCTargetLowering::DAGCombineExtBoolTrunc contains logic to remove unwanted
truncations and extensions when dealing with nodes of the form:
zext(binary-ops(binary-ops(trunc(x), trunc(y)), ...)
There was a FIXME in the implementation (now removed) regarding the fact that
the function would abort the transformations if any of the non-output operands
of a SELECT or SELECT_CC node would need to be promoted (because they were
also output operands, for example). As a result, we continued to generate
unnecessary zero-extends for code such as this:
unsigned foo(unsigned a, unsigned b) {
return (a <= b) ? a : b;
}
which would produce:
cmplw 0, 3, 4
isel 3, 4, 3, 1
rldicl 3, 3, 0, 32
blr
and now we produce:
cmplw 0, 3, 4
isel 3, 4, 3, 1
blr
which is better in the obvious way.
llvm-svn: 224213
On PPC64, we end up with lots of i32 -> i64 zero extensions, not only from all
of the usual places, but also from the ABI, which specifies that values passed
are zero extended. Almost all 32-bit PPC instructions in PPC64 mode are defined
to do *something* to the higher-order bits, and for some instructions, that
action clears those bits (thus providing a zero-extended result). This is
especially common after rotate-and-mask instructions. Adding an additional
instruction to zero-extend the results of these instructions is unnecessary.
This PPCISelDAGToDAG peephole optimization examines these zero-extensions, and
looks back through their operands to see if all instructions will implicitly
zero extend their results. If so, we convert these instructions to their 64-bit
variants (which is an internal change only, the actual encoding of these
instructions is the same as the original 32-bit ones) and remove the
unnecessary zero-extension (changing where the INSERT_SUBREG instructions are
to make everything internally consistent).
llvm-svn: 224169
If we have an add (or an or that is really an add), where one operand is a
FrameIndex and the other operand is a small constant, we can combine the
lowering of the FrameIndex (which is lowered as an add of the FI and a zero
offset) with the constant operand.
Amusingly, this is an old potential improvement entry from
lib/Target/PowerPC/README.txt which had never been resolved. In short, we used
to lower:
%X = alloca { i32, i32 }
%Y = getelementptr {i32,i32}* %X, i32 0, i32 1
ret i32* %Y
as:
addi 3, 1, -8
ori 3, 3, 4
blr
and now we produce:
addi 3, 1, -4
blr
which is much more sensible.
llvm-svn: 224071
PPCISelDAGToDAG contained existing code to lower i32 sdiv by a power-of-2 using
srawi/addze, but did not implement the i64 case. DAGCombine now contains a
callback specifically designed for this purpose (BuildSDIVPow2), and part of
the logic has been moved to an implementation of that callback. Doing this
lowering using BuildSDIVPow2 likely does not matter, compared to handling
everything in PPCISelDAGToDAG, for the positive divisor case, but the negative
divisor case, which generates an additional negation, can potentially benefit
from additional folding from DAGCombine. Now, both the i32 and the i64 cases
have been implemented.
Fixes PR20732.
llvm-svn: 224033
With the foregoing three patches, VSX instructions can be used for
little endian. This patch removes the restriction that prevented
this, and re-enables the test cases from the first three patches.
llvm-svn: 223792
When performing instruction selection for ISD::VECTOR_SHUFFLE, there
is special code for handling v2f64 and v2i64 using VSX instructions.
This code must be adjusted for little-endian. Because the two inputs
are treated as a double-wide register, we must swap their order for
little endian. To get the appropriate mask elements to use with the
big-endian biased XXPERMDI instruction, we must reverse their order
and invert the bits.
A new test is added to test the 16 possible values of the shuffle
mask. It is initially disabled for reasons specified in the test. It
is re-enabled by patch 4/4.
llvm-svn: 223791
This patch addresses the inherent big-endian bias in the lxvd2x,
lxvw4x, stxvd2x, and stxvw4x instructions. These instructions load
vector elements into registers left-to-right (with the first element
loaded into the high-order bits of the register), regardless of the
endian setting of the processor. However, these are the only
vector memory instructions that permit unaligned storage accesses, so
we want to use them for little-endian.
To make this work, a lxvd2x or lxvw4x is replaced with an lxvd2x
followed by an xxswapd, which swaps the doublewords. This works for
lxvw4x as well as lxvd2x, because for lxvw4x on an LE system the
vector elements are in LE order (right-to-left) within each
doubleword. (Thus after lxvw2x of a <4 x float> the elements will
appear as 1, 0, 3, 2. Following the swap, they will appear as 3, 2,
0, 1, as desired.) For stores, an stxvd2x or stxvw4x is replaced
with an stxvd2x preceded by an xxswapd.
Introduction of extra swap instructions provides correctness, but
obviously is not ideal from a performance perspective. Future patches
will address this with optimizations to remove most of the introduced
swaps, which have proven effective in other implementations.
The introduction of the swaps is performed during lowering of LOAD,
STORE, INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN, and INTRINSIC_VOID operations. The latter
are used to translate intrinsics that specify the VSX loads and stores
directly into equivalent sequences for little endian. Thus code that
uses vec_vsx_ld and vec_vsx_st does not have to be modified to be
ported from BE to LE.
We introduce new PPCISD opcodes for LXVD2X, STXVD2X, and XXSWAPD for
use during this lowering step. In PPCInstrVSX.td, we add new SDType
and SDNode definitions for these (PPClxvd2x, PPCstxvd2x, PPCxxswapd).
These are recognized during instruction selection and mapped to the
correct instructions.
Several tests that were written to use -mcpu=pwr7 or pwr8 are modified
to disable VSX on LE variants because code generation changes with
this and subsequent patches in this set. I chose to include all of
these in the first patch than try to rigorously sort out which tests
were broken by one or another of the patches. Sorry about that.
The new test vsx-ldst-builtin-le.ll, and the changes to vsx-ldst.ll,
are disabled until LE support is enabled because of breakages that
occur as noted in those tests. They are re-enabled in patch 4/4.
llvm-svn: 223783
The aggressive anti-dep breaker, used by the PowerPC backend during post-RA
scheduling (but is available to all targets), did not handle early-clobber MI
operands (at all). When constructing the list of available registers for the
replacement of some def operand, check the using instructions, and remove
registers assigned to early-clobbered defs from the set.
Fixes PR21452.
llvm-svn: 223727
GCC accepts 'cc' as an alias for 'cr0', and we need to do the same when
processing inline asm constraints. This had previously been implemented using a
non-allocatable register, named 'cc', that was listed as an alias of 'cr0', but
the infrastructure does not seem to support this properly (neither the register
allocator nor the scheduler properly accounts for the alias). Instead, we can
just process this as a naming alias inside of the inline asm
constraint-processing code, so we'll do that instead.
There are two regression tests, one where the post-RA scheduler did the wrong
thing with the non-allocatable alias, and one where the register allocator did
the wrong thing. Fixes PR21742.
llvm-svn: 223708
Update of some of the VSX test cases for Power to check fast-isel codegen as well as the regular codegen.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6357
llvm-svn: 223509
Reverting this because, while it fixes the problem in the reduced test case, it
does not fix the problem in the full test case from the bug report.
llvm-svn: 223442
The scheduling dependency graph is built bottom-up within each scheduling
region, and ScheduleDAGInstrs::addPhysRegDeps is called to add output/anti
dependencies, based on physical registers, to the SUs for instructions
based on those that come before them.
In the test case, we start before post-RA scheduling with a block that looks
like this:
...
INLINEASM <...
andc $0,$0,$2
stdcx. $0,0,$3
bne- 1b
> [sideeffect] [mayload] [maystore] [attdialect], $0:[regdef-ec:G8RC], %X6<earlyclobber,def,dead>, $1:[mem], %X3<kill>, $2:[reguse:G8RC], %X5<kill>, $3:[reguse:G8RC], %X3, $4:[mem], %X3, $5:[clobber], %CC<earlyclobber,imp-def,dead>, <<badref>>
...
%X4<def,dead> = ANDIo8 %X4<kill>, 1, %CR0<imp-def,dead>, %CR0GT<imp-def>
...
%R29<def> = ISEL %R3<undef>, %R4<kill>, %CR0GT<kill>
where it is relevant that %CC is an alias to %CR0, and that %CR0GT is a
subregister of %CR0. However, for post-RA scheduling, no dependency was added
to prevent the INLINEASM from being scheduled in between the ANDIo8 and the
ISEL (which communicate via the %CR0GT register).
In ScheduleDAGInstrs::addPhysRegDeps, when called for the %CC operand, we'd
iterate over all of its aliases (which include %CC itself and also %CR0), and
look for previously-encountered defs of those registers. We'd find the ANDIo8,
but decide not to add a dependency between the INLINEASM and the ANDIo8 because
both the INLINEASM's def of %CC is dead, and also the ANDIo8 def of %CR0 is
dead. This ignores, however, that ANDIo8 has a non-dead def of %CR0GT, a
subregister of %CR0, and thus a dependency still must exist.
To fix this problem, when calling registerDefIsDead on the SU with the def, we
also check all subregisters for possible non-dead defs, and add the dependency
if any are found.
Fixes PR21742.
llvm-svn: 223440
We had mistakenly believed that GCC's 'cc' referred to the entire
condition-code register (cr0 through cr7) -- and implemented this in r205630 to
fix PR19326, but 'cc' is actually an alias only to 'cr0'. This is causing LLVM
to clobber too much with legacy code with inline asm using the 'cc' clobber.
Fixes PR21451.
llvm-svn: 223328
On PowerPC, inline asm memory operands might be expanded as 0($r), where $r is
a register containing the address. As a result, this register cannot be r0, and
we need to enforce this register subclass constraint to prevent miscompiling
the code (we'd get this constraint for free with the usual instruction
definitions, but that scheme has no knowledge of how we end up printing inline
asm memory operands, and so here we need to do it 'by hand'). We can accomplish
this within the current address-mode selection framework by introducing an
explicit COPY_TO_REGCLASS node.
Fixes PR21443.
llvm-svn: 223318
Almost all immediates in PowerPC assembly (both 32-bit and 64-bit) are signed
numbers, and it is important that we print them as such. To make sure that
happens, we change PPCTargetLowering::LowerAsmOperandForConstraint so that it
does all intermediate checks on a signed-extended int64_t value, and then
creates the resulting target constant using MVT::i64. This will ensure that all
negative values are printed as negative values (mirroring what is done in other
backends to achieve the same sign-extension effect).
This came up in the context of inline assembly like this:
"add%I2 %0,%0,%2", ..., "Ir"(-1ll)
where we used to print:
addi 3,3,4294967295
and gcc would print:
addi 3,3,-1
and gas accepts both forms, but our builtin assembler (correctly) does not. Now
we print -1 like gcc does.
While here, I replaced a bunch of custom integer checks with isInt<16> and
friends from MathExtras.h.
Thanks to Paul Hargrove for the bug report.
llvm-svn: 223220
We need to use the custom expansion of readcyclecounter on all 32-bit targets
(even those with 64-bit registers). This should fix the ppc64 buildbot.
llvm-svn: 223182
We've long supported readcyclecounter on PPC64, but it is easier there (the
read of the 64-bit time-base register can be accomplished via a single
instruction). This now provides an implementation for PPC32 as well. On PPC32,
the time-base register is still 64 bits, but can only be read 32 bits at a time
via two separate SPRs. The ISA manual explains how to do this properly (it
involves re-reading the upper bits and looping if the counter has wrapped while
being read).
This requires PPC to implement a custom integer splitting legalization for the
READCYCLECOUNTER node, turning it into a target-specific SDAG node, which then
gets turned into a pseudo-instruction, which is then expanded to the necessary
sequence (which has three SPR reads, the comparison and the branch).
Thanks to Paul Hargrove for pointing out to me that this was still unimplemented.
llvm-svn: 223161
Summary:
PowerPC DWARF unwind info defined CFA as SP + offset even in a function
where the stack had been dynamically realigned. This clearly doesn't
work because the offset from SP to CFA is not a constant. Fix it by
defining CFA as BP instead.
This was causing the AddressSanitizer null_deref test to fail 50% of
the time, depending on whether SP happened to be 32-byte aligned on
entry to a particular function or not.
Reviewers: willschm, uweigand, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6410
llvm-svn: 222996
This does not matter on newer cores (where we can use reciprocal estimates in
fast-math mode anyway), but for older cores this allows us to generate better
fast-math code where we have multiple FDIVs with a common divisor.
llvm-svn: 222710
Hal Finkel