It is possible for copies or spills to be inserted in the middle of indirect
addressing sequences which use VGPR indexing. Spills to accvgprs could be
effected by the indexing mode.
Add new pseudo instructions that are expanded after register allocation to avoid
the problematic spill or copy placement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91048
Add a calling convention called amdgpu_gfx for real function calls
within graphics shaders. For the moment, this uses the same calling
convention as other calls in amdgpu, with registers excluded for return
address, stack pointer and stack buffer descriptor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88540
The insertion of waterfall loops splits the current basic block into
three blocks. So the basic block that we iterate over must be updated.
This failed assert(!NodePtr->isKnownSentinel()) in ilist_iterator for
divergent calls in branches before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90596
This reverts r227987 "R600/SI: Determine target-specific encoding of READLANE and WRITELANE early v2".
All the codegen changes are caused by the post-RA scheduler no longer
treating readlane/writelane as scheduling barriers due to having
unmodelled side effects. (The pseudos are hasSideEffects = 0, but the
real instructions are hasSideEffects = ? which TableGen conservatively
treats as 1.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90401
V_DIV_SCALE_F32/F64 are VOP3B encoded so they can't use the ABS src
modifier, but they can still use NEG and the usual output modifiers.
This partially reverts 3b99f12a4e "AMDGPU: Remove modifiers from v_div_scale_*".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90296
This does not change anything at the moment, but needed for
D89170. In that change I am probing a physical SGPR to see if
it is legal. RC is SReg_32, but DRC for scratch instructions
is SReg_32_XEXEC_HI and test fails.
That is sufficient just to check if DRC contains a register
here in case of physreg. Physregs also do not use subregs
so the subreg handling below is irrelevant for these.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90064
I was wrong in thinking that MRI.use_instructions return unique instructions and mislead Jay in his previous patch D64393.
First loop counted more instructions than it was in reality and the second loop went beyond the basic block with that counter.
I used Jay's previous code that relied on MRI.use_operands to constrain the number of instructions to check among.
modifiesRegister is inlined to reduce the number of passes over instruction operands and added assert on BB end boundary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89386
If a target can encode multiple wait-states into a noop allow emitting such
instructions directly.
Reviewed By: rampitec, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89753
This would end up killing part of the result super-register, resulting
in a verifier error on a later use of the overlapping registers. We
could add kills of any non-aliasing registers, but we should be moving
away from relying on kill flags.
Generate the minimal set of s_mov instructions required when
expanding a SGPR copy operation in copyPhysReg.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89187
This can fix an asan failure like below.
==15856==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address ...
READ of size 8 at 0x6210001a3cb0 thread T0
#0 llvm::MachineInstr::getParent()
#1 llvm::LiveVariables::VarInfo::findKill()
#2 TwoAddressInstructionPass::rescheduleMIBelowKill()
#3 TwoAddressInstructionPass::tryInstructionTransform()
#4 TwoAddressInstructionPass::runOnMachineFunction()
We need to update the Kills if we replace instructions. The Kills
may be later accessed within TwoAddressInstruction pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89092
Extend loadSRsrcFromVGPR to allow moving a range of instructions into
the loop. The call instruction is surrounded by copies into physical
registers which should be part of the waterfall loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88291
Fix the verifier so that overlapping SGPR operands are counted
independently. We cannot assume that overlapping SGPR accesses
only count as a single constant bus use.
The exception is implicit uses which do not add to constant bus
usage (only) when overlapping.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87748
Since 6524a7a2b9, this would sometimes
not emit the or to exec at the beginning of the block, where it really
has to be. If there is an instruction that defines one of the source
operands, split the block and turn the si_end_cf into a terminator.
This avoids regressions when regalloc fast is switched to inserting
reloads at the beginning of the block, instead of spills at the end of
the block.
In a future change, this should always split the block.
Pre-gfx10 all MODE-setting instructions were S_SETREG_B32 which is
marked as having unmodeled side effects, which makes the machine
scheduler treat it as a barrier. Now that we have proper implicit $mode
operands we can use a no-side-effects S_SETREG_B32_mode pseudo instead
for setregs that only touch the FP MODE bits, to give the scheduler more
freedom.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87446
- When an operand is changed into an immediate value or like, ensure their
target flags being cleared or set properly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87109
There is no justification for changing vcc_lo to vcc
when shrinking V_CNDMASK, and such a change could
later confuse live variable analysis.
Make sure the original register is preserved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86541
Summary:
When the resource descriptor is of vgpr, we need a waterfall loop
to read into a sgpr. In this patchm we generalized the implementation
to work for any regster class sizes, and extend the work to MIMG
instructions.
Fixes: SWDEV-223405
Reviewers:
arsenm, nhaehnle
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82603
The previous implementation was incorrect, and based off incorrect
instruction definitions. Unfortunately we can't match natural
addressing in a lot of cases due to the shift/scale applied in
getelementptrs. This relies on reducing the 64-bit shift to 32-bits.
Fix 64-bit copy to SCC by restricting the pattern resulting
in such a copy to subtargets supporting 64-bit scalar compare,
and mapping the copy to S_CMP_LG_U64.
Before introducing the S_CSELECT pattern with explicit SCC
(0045786f14), there was no need
for handling 64-bit copy to SCC ($scc = COPY sreg_64).
The proposed handling to read only the low bits was however
based on a false premise that it is only one bit that matters,
while in fact the copy source might be a vector of booleans and
all bits need to be considered.
The practical problem of mapping the 64-bit copy to SCC is that
the natural instruction to use (S_CMP_LG_U64) is not available
on old hardware. Fix it by restricting the problematic pattern
to subtargets supporting the instruction (hasScalarCompareEq64).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85207
Avoid recursively calling copyPhysReg for AGPR handling. This was
dropping the necessary super register implicit defs to avoid liveness
verifier errors.
Get rid of all fixmes and base heuristic on `num-clustered-dwords`. The main intuition behind this is as
follows. The existing heuristic roughly summarizes as below:
* Assume, all the mem ops instructions participating in the clustering process, loads/stores same num bytes
* If num bytes loaded by each mem op is 4 bytes, then cluster at max 5 mem ops, that is at max 20 bytes
* If num bytes loaded by each mem op is 8 bytes, then cluster at max 3 mem ops, that is at max 24 bytes
* If num bytes loaded by each mem op is 16 bytes, then cluster at max 2 mem ops, that is at max 32 bytes
So, we need to make sure that the new heuristic do not completey deviate away from the above one, and it
properly handles both the sub-word loads and the wide loads.
Reviewed By: arsenm, rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84354
Currently GlobalISel doesn't force all VGPR phi operands to VGPRs, so
this hit a case where it was queried with a VGPR and SGPR. This could
arguably be a verifier error, but it's currently not.
This is in preparation for fixing multiple problems with the way AGPR
copies are handled, but this change is NFC itself. First, it's relying
on recursively calling copyPhysReg, which is losing information
necessary to get correct super register handling.
Second, it's constructing a new RegScavenger and doing a O(N^2) walk
on every single sub-spill for every AGPR tuple copy. Third, it's using
the forward form of the scavenger, and not using the preferred
backwards scan.
dfukalov