Mark LWG2731 as complete. The type alias `mutex_type` is only provided if
`scoped_lock` is given one mutex type and it has been implemented that
way since the beginning of Clang 5 it seems. There already are tests for
verifying existence (and lack thereof) for `mutex_type` type alias
depending on the number of mutex types, so there is nothing to
do for this LWG issue.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112462
Also fix a few places in the `shared_ptr` implementation where
`element_type` was passed to the `__is_compatible` helper. This could
result in `remove_extent` being applied twice to the pointer's template
type (first by the definition of `element_type` and then by the helper),
potentially leading to somewhat less readable error messages for some
incorrect code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112092
This test doesn't fail in mingw mode (which uses the same Itanium
name mangling and ABI as other platforms).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112210
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5
Reverted in f9ad1d1c77 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<vector>`.
I now added tests for the current offending cases. I wonder whether it
would be better to add one addressof test per directory and test all
possible violations. Also to guard against possible future errors?
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111961
According to the standard [vector.capacity]/5, std::vector<T>::reserve
shall throw an exception of type std::length_error when the requested
capacity exceeds max_size().
This behavior is not implemented correctly: the function 'reserve'
simply propagates the exception from allocator<T>::allocate. Before
D110846 that exception used to be of type std::length_error (which is
correct for vector<T>::reserve, but incorrect for
allocator<T>::allocate).
This patch fixes the issue and adds regression tests.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112068
std::vector<bool> rebinds the supplied allocator to construct objects
of type '__storage_type' rather than 'bool'. Allocators are allowed to
use explicit conversion constructors, so care must be taken when
performing conversions.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112150
Those creep up from time to time. We need to use `int main(int, char**)`
because in freestanding mode, `main` doesn't get special treatment and
special mangling, so we setup a symbol alias from the mangled version of
`main(int, char**)` to `extern "C" main`. That only works if all the tests
are consistent about how they define their main function.
Mark LWG3573 as complete. It involves a change in wording around when
`basic_string_view`'s constructor for iterator/sentinel can throw. The
current implementation is not marked conditionally `noexcept`, so there
is nothing to do here. Add a test that binds this behavior to verify the
constructor is not marked `noexcept(true)` when `end - begin` throws.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111925
The only possible kind of a conversion in initialization of a shared
pointer to an array is a qualification conversion (i.e., adding
cv-qualifiers). This patch adds tests for converting from `A[]` to
`const A[]` to the following functions:
```
template<class Y> explicit shared_ptr(Y* p);
template<class Y> shared_ptr(const shared_ptr<Y>& r);
template<class Y> shared_ptr(shared_ptr<Y>&& r);
template<class Y> shared_ptr& operator=(const shared_ptr<Y>& r);
template<class Y> shared_ptr& operator=(shared_ptr<Y>&& r);
template<class Y> void reset(Y* p);
template<class Y, class D> void reset(Y* p, D d);
template<class Y, class D, class A> void reset(Y* p, D d, A a);
```
Similar tests for converting functions that involve a `weak_ptr` should
be added once LWG issue [3001](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3001)
is implemented.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112048
Currently the member functions std::allocator<T>::allocate,
std::experimental::pmr::polymorphic_allocator::allocate and
std::resource_adaptor<T>::do_allocate throw an exception of type
std::length_error when the requested size exceeds the maximum size.
According to the C++ standard ([allocator.members]/4,
[mem.poly.allocator.mem]/1), std::allocator<T>::allocate and
std::pmr::polymorphic_allocator::allocate must throw a
std::bad_array_new_length exception in this case.
The patch fixes the issue with std::allocator<T>::allocate and changes
the type the exception thrown by
std::experimental::pmr::resource_adaptor<T>::do_allocate to
std::bad_array_new_length as well for consistency.
The patch resolves LWG 3237, LWG 3038 and LWG 3190.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110846
This initial change adds the AIX configuration to run-buildbot, an AIX
CMake cache file, and appropriate compiler and linker flags for testing
AIX to the lit "from scratch" configuration files. Either of the 32-bit or 64-bit configurations
can be built by setting `OBJECT_MODE` in the build environment (as is
typical for AIX).
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, #libc_abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111244
Implement LWG3480 which enables `directory_iterator` and
`recursive_directory_iterator` to be both a `borrowed_range` and a
`view`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111644
MSVC targets also have a 64 bit long double, as do MinGW targets on ARM.
This hasn't been noticed in CI because the MSVC configurations there run
with _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INT128 defined.
This avoids assuming that either __int128_t or double is equal in size to
long double. i386 MinGW targets have sizeof(long double) == 10, which
doesn't match any of the tested types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111671
Mark LWG3274 as complete. The feature test macro `__cpp_lib_span` was added in
`6d2599e4f776d0cd88438cb82a00c4fc25cc3f67`.
https://wg21.link/p1024 mentions marking `span:::empty()` with
`[[nodiscard]]` which is not done yet. So, do that and add tests.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111516
Fixes the tests added in D110852 for the debug iterators.
Similar issues with hijacking `operator&` still exist, they will be
addressed separately.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111564
While looking at LWG-2988 and P0558 it seems the issues were already
implemented, but the synopsis wasn't updated. Some of the tests didn't
validate the `noexcept` status. A few tests were missing completely:
- `atomic_wait_explicit`
- `atomic_notify_one`
- `atomic_notify_all`
Mark P0558 as complete, didn't investigate which version of libc++ first
includes this. It seems the paper has been retroactively applied. I
couldn't find whether this is correct, but looking at cppreference it
seems intended.
Completes
- LWG-2988 Clause 32 cleanup missed one typename
- P0558 Resolving atomic<T> named base class inconsistencies
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103765
This allows picking up on mingw triples that often use 'w64' instead
of 'pc' as the vendor part.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111297
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for
libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out
of functionality for wchar_t.
Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this
patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide
impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this
configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some
embedded platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265
Implement P2401 which adds a `noexcept` specification to
`std::exchange`. Treated as a defect fix which is the motivation for
applying this change to all standards mode rather than just C++23 or
later as the paper suggests.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111481
Implement P2251 which requires `span` and `basic_string_view` to be
trivially copyable. They already are - this just adds tests to bind that
behavior.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111197
Due to reported failures in a local build.
FAIL: Something is wrong in the test framework.
Converting character sets: Invalid argument.
(was enabled in https://reviews.llvm.org/D111138)
Replace `TEST_NOEXCEPT_FALSE` directly with `noexcept(false)` in
optional hash test which is only run in C++17 or later.
`TEST_NOEXCEPT_FALSE` is only useful in C++03 context where `noexcept`
isn't supported by clang. `TEST_NOEXCEPT_FALSE` now only has one remaining use
in `hash_unique_ptr.pass.cpp`.
Implement parts of P1614, including three-way comparison for tuples, and expand testing.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108250
While looking at the review comments in D103765 there was an oddity in
the tests for the following functions:
- atomic_fetch_add
- atomic_fetch_add_explicit
- atomic_fetch_sub
- atomic_fetch_sub_explicit
Libc++ allows usage of
`atomic_fetch_add<int>(atomic<int*>*, atomic<int*>::difference_type);`
MSVC and GCC reject this code: https://godbolt.org/z/9d8WzohbE
This makes the atomic `fetch(add|sub).*` Standard conforming and removes the non-conforming extensions.
Fixes PR47908
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103983
Vendors take libc++ and ship it in various ways. Some vendors might
ship it differently from what upstream LLVM does, i.e. the install
location might be different, some ABI properties might differ, etc.
In the past few years, I've come across several instances where
having a place to test some of these properties would have been
incredibly useful. I also just got bitten by the lack of tests
of that kind, so I'm adding some now.
The tests added by this commit for Apple platforms have numerous
TODOs that capture discrepancies between the upstream LLVM CMake
and the slightly-modified build we perform internally to produce
Apple's system libc++. In the future, the goal would be to upstream
all those differences so that it's possible to build a faithful
Apple system libc++ with the upstream LLVM sources only.
But this isn't only useful for Apple - this lays out the path for
any vendor being able to add their own checks (either upstream or
downstream) to libc++.
This is a re-application of 9892d1644f, which was reverted in 138dc27186
because it broke the build. The issue was that we didn't apply the required
changes to libunwind and our CI didn't notice it because we were not
running the libunwind tests. This has been fixed now, and we're running
the libunwind tests in CI now too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110736
Replace `&__rhs` with `_VSTD::addressof(__rhs)` to guard against ADL hijacking
of `operator&` in `operator=`. Thanks to @CaseyCarter for bringing it to our
attention.
Similar issues with hijacking `operator&` still exist, they will be
addressed separately.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110852
Implements the formatter for Boolean types.
[format.formatter.spec]/2.3
For each charT, for each cv-unqualified arithmetic type ArithmeticT other
than char, wchar_t, char8_t, char16_t, or char32_t, a specialization
```
template<> struct formatter<ArithmeticT, charT>;
```
This removes the stub implemented in D96664.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
- P1652 Printf corner cases in std::format
Completes:
- P1868 width: clarifying units of width and precision in std::format
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103670
Implements the formatter for all fundamental integer types.
[format.formatter.spec]/2.1
The specializations
```
template<> struct formatter<char, char>;
template<> struct formatter<char, wchar_t>;
template<> struct formatter<wchar_t, wchar_t>;
```
This removes the stub implemented in D96664.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103466
Implements the formatter for all fundamental integer types
(except `char`, `wchar_t`, and `bool`).
[format.formatter.spec]/2.3
For each charT, for each cv-unqualified arithmetic type ArithmeticT other
than char, wchar_t, char8_t, char16_t, or char32_t, a specialization
```
template<> struct formatter<ArithmeticT, charT>;
```
This removes the stub implemented in D96664.
As an extension it adds partial support for 128-bit integer types.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
- P1652 Printf corner cases in std::format
Completes:
- LWG-3248 #b, #B, #o, #x, and #X presentation types misformat negative numbers
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103433
Implements the formatter for all string types.
[format.formatter.spec]/2.2
For each charT, the string type specializations
```
template<> struct formatter<charT*, charT>;
template<> struct formatter<const charT*, charT>;
template<size_t N> struct formatter<const charT[N], charT>;
template<class traits, class Allocator>
struct formatter<basic_string<charT, traits, Allocator>, charT>;
template<class traits>
struct formatter<basic_string_view<charT, traits>, charT>;
```
This removes the stub implemented in D96664.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
- P1868 width: clarifying units of width and precision in std::format
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103425
If you don't have ptrace permissions this test will fail to run
silently, this adds a check for that and anything else that
might do similar things.
The output will now be:
```
FAILED test program did not run correctly, check gdb warnings
/usr/bin/gdb: warning: Couldn't determine a path for the index cache
directory.
No symbol table is loaded. Use the "file" command.
warning: Error disabling address space randomization: Operation not
permitted
warning: Could not trace the inferior process.
warning: ptrace: Operation not permitted
error: command failed with exit status: 255
```
We already have a feature to check for a compatible python enabled
gdb, so I think it's reasonable to check for this at test runtime.
Note that this is different to the catch all at the end of the test
script. That would be a case where you can trace but something else
made it stop mid way that wasn't our test breakpoints.
Reviewed By: saugustine
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110936
When the locale is not some UTF-8 these tests fail.
(different results for python2 linked gdbs vs. python3
but same issue)
Setting the locale just for the test works around this.
By default Ubuntu comes with just C.UTF-8. I've chosen
to use en_US.UTF-8 instead given that my Mac doesn't have
the former and there's a slim chance this test might run there.
This also enables the u16string tests which are now passing.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, saugustine
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111138
The unique (ha!) thing about this range type is that it's move-only.
Its contiguity is unsurprising (most of our test ranges are contiguous).
Discussed in D111231 but committed separately for clarity.
If you have a `begin() const` member, you don't need a `begin()` member
unless you want it to do something different (e.g. have a different return
type). So in general, //view// types don't need `begin()` non-const members.
Also, static_assert some things about the types in "types.h", so that we
don't accidentally break those properties under refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111231
Reduce code duplication by sharing most of the test suite setup across
the different from-scratch configs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111196
Joe Loser