Summary:
Add support for vcadd_* family of intrinsics. This set of intrinsics is
available in Armv8.3-A.
The fp16 versions require the FP16 extension, which has been available
(opt-in) since Armv8.2-A.
Reviewers: t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: t.p.northover, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70862
Clang was creating a DerivedToBase ImplicitCastExpr that was also
casting between address spaces as part of the second step in the
standard conversion sequence. Defer the address space conversion to
the third step in the sequence instead, such that we get a separate
ImplicitCastExpr for the address space conversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70605
Summary:
As a followup to D69144, this diff fixes the coroutine keyword spacing
for co_yield / co_returning negative numbers.
Reviewers: modocache, sammccall, Quuxplusone
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69180
Patch by Jonathan Thomas (jonathoma)!
Summary:
The exclusive-claim model is successful at resolving conflicts over tokens
between parent/child or siblings. However claims at the spelled-token
level do the wrong thing for macro expansions, where siblings can be
equally associated with the macro invocation.
Moreover, any model that only uses the endpoints in a range can fail when
a macro invocation occurs inside the node.
To address this, we use the existing TokenBuffer in more depth.
Claims are expressed in terms of expanded tokens, so there is no need to worry
about macros, includes etc.
Once we know which expanded tokens were claimed, they are mapped onto
spelled tokens for hit-testing.
This mapping is fairly flexible, currently the handling of macros is
pretty simple (map macro args onto spellings, other macro expansions onto the
macro name token).
This mapping is in principle token-by-token for correctness (though
there's some batching for performance).
The aggregation of the selection enum is now more principled as we need to be
able to aggregate several hit-test results together.
For simplicity i removed the ability to determine selectedness of TUDecl.
(That was originally implemented in 90a5bf92ff97b1, but doesn't seem to be very
important or worth the complexity any longer).
The expandedTokens(SourceLocation) helper could be added locally, but seems to
make sense on TokenBuffer.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/202
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/126
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70512
Summary:
Also remove the temporary TopLevelDeclaration node and add
UnknownDeclaration to represent other unknown nodes.
See the follow-up change for building more top-level declarations.
Adding declarators is also pretty involved and will be done in another
follow-up patch.
Reviewers: gribozavr2
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70787
Skip distro detection when we're not running on Linux, or when the target triple is not Linux. This saves a few OS calls for each invocation of clang.exe.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70467
Now Clang does not check that features required by built-in functions
are enabled. That causes errors in the backend reported in PR44018.
This patch fixes this bug by checking that required features
are enabled.
This should fix PR44018.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70808
Summary: Fix PR43700
The ConstantEmitter in AggExprEmitter::EmitArrayInit was initialized
with the CodeGenFunction set to null, which caused the crash.
Also simplify another call, and make the CGF member a const pointer
since it is public but only assigned in the constructor.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70302
Summary:
Removed the ```-fforce-experimental-new-constant-interpreter flag```, leaving
only the ```-fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter``` one. The interpreter
now always emits an error on an unsupported feature.
Allowing the interpreter to bail out would require a mapping from APValue to
interpreter memory, which will not be necessary in the final version. It is
more sensible to always emit an error if the interpreter fails.
Reviewers: jfb, Bigcheese, rsmith, dexonsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70071
Summary:
Implicit Conversion Sanitizer is *almost* feature complete.
There aren't *that* much unsanitized things left,
two major ones are increment/decrement (this patch) and bit fields.
As it was discussed in
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39519 | PR39519 ]],
unlike `CompoundAssignOperator` (which is promoted internally),
or `BinaryOperator` (for which we always have promotion/demotion in AST)
or parts of `UnaryOperator` (we have promotion/demotion but only for
certain operations), for inc/dec, clang omits promotion/demotion
altogether, under as-if rule.
This is technically correct: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/zPgD
As it can be seen in `InstCombineCasts.cpp` `canEvaluateTruncated()`,
`add`/`sub`/`mul`/`and`/`or`/`xor` operators can all arbitrarily
be extended or truncated:
901cd3b3f6/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp (L1320-L1334)
But that has serious implications:
1. Since we no longer model implicit casts, do we pessimise
their AST representation and everything that uses it?
2. There is no demotion, so lossy demotion sanitizer does not trigger :]
Now, i'm not going to argue about the first problem here,
but the second one **needs** to be addressed. As it was stated
in the report, this is done intentionally, so changing
this in all modes would be considered a penalization/regression.
Which means, the sanitization-less codegen must not be altered.
It was also suggested to not change the sanitized codegen
to the one with demotion, but i quite strongly believe
that will not be the wise choice here:
1. One will need to re-engineer the check that the inc/dec was lossy
in terms of `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins
2. We will still need to compute the result we would lossily demote.
(i.e. the result of wide `add`ition/`sub`traction)
3. I suspect it would need to be done right here, in sanitization.
Which kinda defeats the point of
using `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins:
we'd have two `add`s with basically the same arguments,
one of which is used for check+error-less codepath and other one
for the error reporting. That seems worse than a single wide op+check.
4. OR, we would need to do that in the compiler-rt handler.
Which means we'll need a whole new handler.
But then what about the `CompoundAssignOperator`,
it would also be applicable for it.
So this also doesn't really seem like the right path to me.
5. At least X86 (but likely others) pessimizes all sub-`i32` operations
(due to partial register stalls), so even if we avoid promotion+demotion,
the computations will //likely// be performed in `i32` anyways.
So i'm not really seeing much benefit of
not doing the straight-forward thing.
While looking into this, i have noticed a few more LLVM middle-end
missed canonicalizations, and filed
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44100 | PR44100 ]],
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44102 | PR44102 ]].
Those are not specific to inc/dec, we also have them for
`CompoundAssignOperator`, and it can happen for normal arithmetics, too.
But if we take some other path in the patch, it will not be applicable
here, and we will have most likely played ourselves.
TLDR: front-end should emit canonical, easy-to-optimize yet
un-optimized code. It is middle-end's job to make it optimal.
I'm really hoping reviewers agree with my personal assessment
of the path this patch should take..
This originally landed in 9872ea4ed1
but got immediately reverted in cbfa237892
because the assertion was faulty. That fault ended up being caused
by the enum - while there will be promotion, both types are unsigned,
with same width. So we still don't need to sanitize non-signed cases.
So far. Maybe the assert will tell us this isn't so.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 | PR44054 ]].
Refs. https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, rsmith, vsk
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, aaron.ballman, t.p.northover, efriedma, regehr
Tags: #llvm, #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70539
References need somewhat special treatment. While copying a gsl::Pointer
will propagate the points-to set, creating an object from a reference
often behaves more like a dereference operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70755
According to OpenMP 5.0, if clause can be used in parallel for simd directive. If condition in the if clause if false, the non-vectorized version of the
loop must be executed.
The asssertion that was added does not hold,
breaks on test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/analyze.c
Will reduce the testcase and revisit.
This reverts commit 9872ea4ed1, 870f3542d3.
This replaces the A32 NEON vqadds, vqaddu, vqsubs and vqsubu intrinsics
with the target independent sadd_sat, uadd_sat, ssub_sat and usub_sat.
This helps generate vqadds from standard IR nodes, which might be
produced from the vectoriser. The old variants are removed in the
process.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69350
In order to simplify implementation we are moving add space
deduction into Sema while constructing variable declaration
and on template instantiation. Pointee are deduced to generic
addr space during creation of types.
This commit also
- fixed addr space dedution for auto type;
- factors out in a separate helper function OpenCL specific
logic from type diagnostics in var decl.
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65744
Summary:
Implicit Conversion Sanitizer is *almost* feature complete.
There aren't *that* much unsanitized things left,
two major ones are increment/decrement (this patch) and bit fields.
As it was discussed in
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39519 | PR39519 ]],
unlike `CompoundAssignOperator` (which is promoted internally),
or `BinaryOperator` (for which we always have promotion/demotion in AST)
or parts of `UnaryOperator` (we have promotion/demotion but only for
certain operations), for inc/dec, clang omits promotion/demotion
altogether, under as-if rule.
This is technically correct: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/zPgD
As it can be seen in `InstCombineCasts.cpp` `canEvaluateTruncated()`,
`add`/`sub`/`mul`/`and`/`or`/`xor` operators can all arbitrarily
be extended or truncated:
901cd3b3f6/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp (L1320-L1334)
But that has serious implications:
1. Since we no longer model implicit casts, do we pessimise
their AST representation and everything that uses it?
2. There is no demotion, so lossy demotion sanitizer does not trigger :]
Now, i'm not going to argue about the first problem here,
but the second one **needs** to be addressed. As it was stated
in the report, this is done intentionally, so changing
this in all modes would be considered a penalization/regression.
Which means, the sanitization-less codegen must not be altered.
It was also suggested to not change the sanitized codegen
to the one with demotion, but i quite strongly believe
that will not be the wise choice here:
1. One will need to re-engineer the check that the inc/dec was lossy
in terms of `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins
2. We will still need to compute the result we would lossily demote.
(i.e. the result of wide `add`ition/`sub`traction)
3. I suspect it would need to be done right here, in sanitization.
Which kinda defeats the point of
using `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins:
we'd have two `add`s with basically the same arguments,
one of which is used for check+error-less codepath and other one
for the error reporting. That seems worse than a single wide op+check.
4. OR, we would need to do that in the compiler-rt handler.
Which means we'll need a whole new handler.
But then what about the `CompoundAssignOperator`,
it would also be applicable for it.
So this also doesn't really seem like the right path to me.
5. At least X86 (but likely others) pessimizes all sub-`i32` operations
(due to partial register stalls), so even if we avoid promotion+demotion,
the computations will //likely// be performed in `i32` anyways.
So i'm not really seeing much benefit of
not doing the straight-forward thing.
While looking into this, i have noticed a few more LLVM middle-end
missed canonicalizations, and filed
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44100 | PR44100 ]],
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44102 | PR44102 ]].
Those are not specific to inc/dec, we also have them for
`CompoundAssignOperator`, and it can happen for normal arithmetics, too.
But if we take some other path in the patch, it will not be applicable
here, and we will have most likely played ourselves.
TLDR: front-end should emit canonical, easy-to-optimize yet
un-optimized code. It is middle-end's job to make it optimal.
I'm really hoping reviewers agree with my personal assessment
of the path this patch should take..
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 | PR44054 ]].
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, rsmith, vsk
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, aaron.ballman, t.p.northover, efriedma, regehr
Tags: #llvm, #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70539
When selecting the set of default sanitizers, don't fail for unknown
architectures. This may be the case e.g. with x86_64-unknown-fuchsia
-m32 target that's used to build the bootloader.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70747
Current EvalInfo ctor causes EnableNewConstInterp to be true even though
it is supposed to be false on MSVC 2017. This is because a virtual function
getLangOpts() is called in member initializer lists, whereas on MSVC
member ctors are called before function virtual function pointers are
initialized.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70729
It is tricky to use replace_path_prefix correctly on Windows which uses
backslashes as native path separators. Switch back to the old approach
(startswith is not ideal) to appease build bots for now.
GCC 8 implements -fmacro-prefix-map. Like -fdebug-prefix-map, it replaces a string prefix for the __FILE__ macro.
-ffile-prefix-map is the union of -fdebug-prefix-map and -fmacro-prefix-map
Reviewed By: rnk, Lekensteyn, maskray
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49466
Need to perform the instantiation of the combiner/initializer even if
the resulting type is not dependent, if the construct is defined in
templates in some cases.
When generating ctor, FieldMemcpyizer wrongly treated zero-sized class members
as what should be copied, and generated wrong memcpy size under some special
circumstances. This patch tries to fix it.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70671
The forward declaration had a cdecl calling convention, but the
inline version did not. This leads to a conflict if the default
calling convention is not cdecl. Fix this by just removing the
forward declaration.
Fixes PR41503
This has the main effect of causing target-cpu and target-features to be set
on __cfi_check_fail, causing the function to become ABI-compatible with other
functions in the case where these attributes affect ABI (e.g. reserve-x18).
Technically we only need to call SetLLVMFunctionAttributes to get the target-*
attributes set, but since we're creating a definition we probably ought to
call the ForDefinition function as well.
Fixes PR44094.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70692
__has_cpp_attribute is not available in C mode, and __has_c_attribute
should not be available in C++ mode. This also adds a test to
demonstrate that we properly handle scoped attribute tokens even in C
mode.
Summary:
Currently, we ignore all locality attributes/info when building for
the device and thus all symblos are externally visible and can be
preemted at the runtime. It may lead to incorrect results. We need to
follow the same logic, compiler uses for static/pie builds. But in some
cases changing of dso locality may lead to problems with codegen, so
instead mark external symbols as hidden instead in the device code.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: guansong, caomhin, kkwli0, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70549
Using the version instead of the VCS revision, which isn't available
when LLVM_APPEND_VC_REV is set. The bitcode format should be
backwards-compatible at least within a minor version, so the version
string should be sufficient.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70677
Summary:
As noted in PR, we have a poor test coverage for this warning. I think macro support was just overlooked. GCC warns in these cases.
Clang missed a real bug in the code I am working with, GCC caught it.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70624
This patch is the last of the series of patches which allow the user to
annotate their functions with taint propagation rules.
I implemented the use of the configured filtering functions. These
functions can remove taintedness from the symbols which are passed at
the specified arguments to the filters.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59516
Summary:
On SUSE distributions for 32-bit PowerPC, gcc is configured
as a 64-bit compiler using the GNU triplet "powerpc64-suse-linux",
but invoked with "-m32" by default. Thus, the correct GNU triplet
for 32-bit PowerPC SUSE distributions is "powerpc64-suse-linux"
and not "powerpc-suse-linux".
Reviewers: jrtc27, nemanjai, glaubitz
Reviewed By: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55326
Victor Campos