Summary:
Profile count of a block is computed by multiplying its block frequency
by entry count and dividing the result by entry block frequency. Do
rounded division in the last step and update test cases appropriately.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50822
llvm-svn: 339835
This patch fixes PR38125.
Instruction extension types are recorded in PromotedInsts, it can be used later in function canGetThrough. If an instruction has two users with different extension types, it will be inserted into PromotedInsts two times in function promoteOperandForOther. The second one overwrites the first one, and the final extension type is wrong, later causes problem in canGetThrough.
This patch changes the simple bool extension type to 2-bit enum type, add a BothExtension type in addition to zero/sign extension. When an user sees BothExtension for an instruction, it actually knows nothing about how that instruction is extended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49512
llvm-svn: 339822
Handle fmul, fsub and preserve flags.
Also really test minnum/maxnum reductions.
The existing tests were only checking from
minnum/maxnum matched from a fast math compare
and select which is not the same.
llvm-svn: 339820
To lower this we now create a new V1 containing the low half of both sources and a new V2 containing the upper half of both sources. Then we created a repeated lane shuffle of those new sources to create the final result.
This fixes PR35833
Differential Revison: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41794
llvm-svn: 339818
MCJIT::getSymbolAddress was handling a non-fatal error condition of JITSymbol
as fatal. JITSymbol::operator bool returns false if no address is available
but no error is set. This can occur e.g. if the symbol name was not found.
Patch by Jascha Wetzel. Thanks Jascha!
llvm-svn: 339809
Summary:
The C-API supports consuming errors, converting an error to a string error
message, and querying an error's type. Other LLVM C APIs that wish to use
llvm::Error can supply error-type-id checkers and custom
error-to-structured-type converters for any custom errors they provide.
Reviewers: bogner, zturner, labath, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50716
llvm-svn: 339802
Summary:
This CL changes the ExtractLane ISEL multiclass to more closely mirror
the structure of the splat and replace_lane multiclasses.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50794
llvm-svn: 339801
If a relocation group doesn't have the RELOCATION_GROUP_HAS_ADDEND_FLAG set, then this implies the group's addend equals zero.
In this case android packed format won't encode an explicit addend delta, instead we need to set Addend, the "previous addend" variable, to zero by ourself.
Patch by Yi-Yo Chiang!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50601
llvm-svn: 339799
Summary: Expose VerifyMemorySSA as a debug option. If set, passes will call the MSSA->verifyMemorySSA() after calling into the updater's APIs when MemorySSA should be valid.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50749
llvm-svn: 339795
Subregister liveness applies selectively to register classes with certain
properties. Make sure that when it's enabled, it applies to a given virtual
register (in virtual register rewriter).
llvm-svn: 339784
To make ISD::VSELECT available(legal) so long as there are altivec instruction,
otherwise it's default behavior is expanding.
Use xxsel to match vselect if vsx is open, or use vsel.
In order to do not write many patterns in td file, promote (for vector it's
bitcast) all other type into v4i32 and only pattern match vselect of v4i32 into
vsel or xxsel.
Patch by wuzish
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49531
llvm-svn: 339779
Change
subreg_r32 -> subreg_h32
subreg_r64 -> subreg_h64
subreg_hr32 -> subreg_hh32
The subregisters subreg_r32 and subreg_r64 were added to emphasize the
fact that modifying these subregisters may clobber the entire register.
This is not necessarily the case for subreg_h32, et al.
However, the ability to compose subreg_h64 with subreg_r32, and with
subreg_h32 and subreg_l32 at the same time makes the compositions be
treated as non-overlapping (leading to problems when tracking subreg
liveness). See D50468 for more details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50725
llvm-svn: 339778
This option is needed to enable subreg liveness tracking during register
allocation.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50779
llvm-svn: 339776
Summary:
Previously, `eraseFromParent()` calls `delete` which invalidates the value of the pointer. Copying the value of the pointer later is undefined behavior in C++11 and implementation-defined (which may cause a segfault on implementations having strict pointer safety) in C++14.
This patch removes the BasicBlock pointer from related SmallPtrSet before `delete` invalidates it in the SimplifyCFG pass.
Reviewers: kuhar, dmgreen, davide, trentxintong
Reviewed By: kuhar, dmgreen
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50717
llvm-svn: 339773
We only try to promote types with are smaller than 16-bits, but we
also need to check that the type is not less than 8-bits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50769
llvm-svn: 339770
When trying to combine a DAG that builds a vector out of sign-extensions of
vector extracts, the code assumes legal input types. Due to that, we have to
disable this combine prior to legalization.
In some cases, the DAG will look slightly different after legalization so
account for that in the matching code.
This is a fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38087
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49080
llvm-svn: 339769
This patch refactors the existing BuildExactSDIV implementation to support non-uniform constant vector denominators.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50392
llvm-svn: 339756
Treat signed icmps as 'sinks', allowing them to be in the use-def
tree, enabling more promotions to be performed. As a sink, any
promoted incoming values need to be truncated before being used by
the signed icmp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50067
llvm-svn: 339755
Add pointers to the list of allowed types, but don't try to promote
them. Also fixed a bug with the promotion of undef values, so a new
value is now created instead of mutating in place. We also now only
promote if there's an instruction in the use-def chains other than
the icmp, sinks and sources.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50054
llvm-svn: 339754
The `experimental_guard` intrinsic has memory write semantics to model the thread-exiting
logic, but does not do any actual writes to memory. Currently, `AliasSetTracker` treats it as a
normal memory write. As result, a loop-invariant load cannot be hoisted out of loop because
the guard may possibly alias with it.
This patch makes `AliasSetTracker` so that it doesn't treat guards as memory writes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50497
Reviewed By: reames
llvm-svn: 339753
AVX512 added new versions of these intrinsics that take a rounding mode. If the rounding mode is 4 the new intrinsics are equivalent to the old intrinsics.
The AVX512 intrinsics were being lowered to ISD opcodes, but the legacy SSE intrinsics were left as intrinsics. This resulted in the AVX512 instructions needing separate patterns for the ISD opcodes and the legacy SSE intrinsics.
Now we convert SSE intrinsics and AVX512 intrinsics with rounding mode 4 to the same ISD opcode so we can share the isel patterns.
llvm-svn: 339749
`MachineMemOperand` pointers attached to `MachineSDNodes` and instead
have the `SelectionDAG` fully manage the memory for this array.
Prior to this change, the memory management was deeply confusing here --
The way the MI was built relied on the `SelectionDAG` allocating memory
for these arrays of pointers using the `MachineFunction`'s allocator so
that the raw pointer to the array could be blindly copied into an
eventual `MachineInstr`. This creates a hard coupling between how
`MachineInstr`s allocate their array of `MachineMemOperand` pointers and
how the `MachineSDNode` does.
This change is motivated in large part by a change I am making to how
`MachineFunction` allocates these pointers, but it seems like a layering
improvement as well.
This would run the risk of increasing allocations overall, but I've
implemented an optimization that should avoid that by storing a single
`MachineMemOperand` pointer directly instead of allocating anything.
This is expected to be a net win because the vast majority of uses of
these only need a single pointer.
As a side-effect, this makes the API for updating a `MachineSDNode` and
a `MachineInstr` reasonably different which seems nice to avoid
unexpected coupling of these two layers. We can map between them, but we
shouldn't be *surprised* at where that occurs. =]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50680
llvm-svn: 339740
Intentionally excluding nodes from the DAGCombine worklist is likely to
lead to weird optimizations and infinite loops, so it's generally a bad
idea.
To avoid the infinite loops, fix DAGCombine to use the
isDesirableToCommuteWithShift target hook before performing the
transforms in question, and implement the target hook in the ARM backend
disable the transforms in question.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38530 . (I don't have a
reduced testcase for that bug. But we should have sufficient test
coverage for PerformSHLSimplify given that we're not playing weird
tricks with the worklist. I can try to bugpoint it if necessary,
though.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50667
llvm-svn: 339734
Summary:
Without this metadata LLD strips unused PC table entries
but won't strip unused guards. This metadata also seems
to influence the linker to change the ordering in the PC
guard section to match that of the PC table section.
The libFuzzer runtime library depends on the ordering
of the PC table and PC guard sections being the same. This
is not generally guaranteed, so we may need to redesign
PC tables/guards/counters in the future.
Reviewers: eugenis
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: kcc, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50483
llvm-svn: 339733
Easwaran Raman