Summary:
The instructions SeenExprs records may be deleted during rewriting.
FindClosestMatchingDominator should ignore these deleted instructions.
Fixes PR24301.
Reviewers: grosser
Subscribers: grosser, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13315
llvm-svn: 248983
The custom code produces incorrect results if later reassociated.
Since r221657, on x86, vNi32 uitofp is lowered using an optimized
sequence:
movdqa LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm1 ## xmm1 = [65535, ...]
pand %xmm0, %xmm1
por LCPI0_1(%rip), %xmm1 ## [0x4b000000, ...]
psrld $16, %xmm0
por LCPI0_2(%rip), %xmm0 ## [0x53000000, ...]
addps LCPI0_3(%rip), %xmm0 ## [float -5.497642e+11, ...]
addps %xmm1, %xmm0
Since r240361, the machine combiner opportunistically reassociates
2-instruction sequences (with -ffast-math). In the new code sequence,
the ADDPS' are eligible. In isolation, for simple examples (without
reassociable users), this makes no performance difference (the goal
being to enable reassociation of longer chains).
In the trivial example (just one uitofp), the reassociation doesn't
happen, because (I think) it would require the emission of a separate
movaps for a constantpool load (instead of folding it into addps).
However, when we have multiple uitofp sequences, and the constantpool
loads are CSE'd earlier, the machine combiner can do the reassociation.
When the ADDPS' are reassociated, the resulting sequence isn't correct
anymore, as we'd be adding large (2**39) constants with comparatively
smaller values (~2**23). Given that two of the three inputs are powers
of 2 larger than 2**16, and that ulp(2**39) == 2**(39-24) == 2**15,
the reassociated chain will produce 0 for any input in [0, 2**14[.
In my testing, it also produces wrong results for 99.5% of [0, 2**32[.
Avoid this by disabling the new lowering when -ffast-math. It does
mean that we'll get slower code than without it, but at least we
won't get egregiously incorrect code.
One might argue that, considering -ffast-math is all but meaningless,
uitofp producing wrong results isn't a compiler bug. But it really is.
Fixes PR24512.
...though this is really more of a workaround.
Ideally, we'd have some sort of Machine FMF, but that's a problem
that's not worth tackling until we do more with machine IR.
llvm-svn: 248965
The Win64 unwinder disassembles forwards from each PC to try to
determine if this PC is in an epilogue. If so, it skips calling the EH
personality function for that frame. Typically, this means you cannot
catch an exception in the same frame that you threw it, because 'throw'
calls a noreturn runtime function.
Previously we avoided this problem with the TrapUnreachable
TargetOption, but that's a much bigger hammer than we need. All we need
is a 1 byte non-epilogue instruction right after the call. Instead,
what we got was an unconditional branch to a shared block containing the
ud2, potentially 7 bytes instead of 1. So, this reverts r206684, which
added TrapUnreachable, and replaces it with something better.
The new code pattern matches for invoke/call followed by unreachable and
inserts an int3 into the DAG. To be 100% watertight, we would need to
insert SEH_Epilogue instructions into all basic blocks ending in a call
with no terminators or successors, but in practice this is unlikely to
come up.
llvm-svn: 248959
Unscaled load/store combining has been enabled since the initial ARM64 port. No
need for a redundance run. Also, add CHECK-LABEL directives.
llvm-svn: 248945
Summary:
Given an array of i2 elements, 4 consecutive scalar loads will be lowered to
i8-sized loads and thus will access 4 consecutive bytes in memory. If we
vectorize these loads into a single <4 x i2> load, it'll access only 1 byte in
memory. Hence, we should prohibit vectorization in such cases.
PS: Initial patch was proposed by Arnold.
Reviewers: aschwaighofer, nadav, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13277
llvm-svn: 248943
The test requires X86 target support, and checks the actual debug
info contents, including register numbers which would be different on
other platforms.
llvm-svn: 248938
Previously, the index was constrained to the size of the memory operation for
no apparent reason. This change removes that constraint so that we can form
pre-index instructions with any valid offset.
llvm-svn: 248931
As Richard Barton observed at http://reviews.llvm.org/D12937#inline-107121
TargetParser in LLVM has insufficient support for ARMv6Z and ARMv6ZK.
In particular, there were no tests for TrustZone being supported in these
architectures.
The patch clears a FIXME: left by Saleem Abdulrasool in r201471, and fixes
his test case which hadn't really been testing what it was claiming to test.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13236
llvm-svn: 248921
Usually large blocks are not a problem. But if a large block (> 10k instructions)
contains many (potential) chains of vector instructions, and those chains are
spread over a wide range of instructions, then scheduling becomes a compile time problem.
This change introduces a limit for the accumulate scheduling region size of a block.
For real-world functions this limit will never be exceeded (it's about 10x larger than
the maximum value seen in the test-suite and external test suite).
llvm-svn: 248917
This patch teaches InstCombiner how to convert a SSSE3/AVX2 byte shuffle to a
builtin shuffle if the mask is constant.
Converting byte shuffle intrinsic calls to builtin shuffles can help finding
more opportunities for combining shuffles later on in selection dag.
We may end up with byte shuffles with constant masks as the result of inlining.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13252
llvm-svn: 248913
This commit changes the interface of the vld[1234], vld[234]lane, and vst[1234],
vst[234]lane ARM neon intrinsics and associates an address space with the
pointer that these intrinsics take. This changes, e.g.,
<2 x i32> @llvm.arm.neon.vld1.v2i32(i8*, i32)
to
<2 x i32> @llvm.arm.neon.vld1.v2i32.p0i8(i8*, i32)
This change ensures that address spaces are fully taken into account in the ARM
target during lowering of interleaved loads and stores.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12985
llvm-svn: 248887
The XOP shifts just have logical/arithmetic versions and the left/right shifts are controlled by whether the value is positive/negative. Because of this I've added new X86ISD nodes instead of trying to force them to use the existing shift nodes.
Additionally Excavator cores (bdver4) support XOP and AVX2 - meaning that it should use the AVX2 shifts when it can and fall back to XOP in other cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8690
llvm-svn: 248878
The x64 ABI requires that epilogues do not contain code other than stack
adjustments and some limited control flow. However, we'd insert code to
initialize the return address after stack adjustments. Instead, insert
EAX/RAX with the current value before we create the stack adjustments in
the epilogue.
llvm-svn: 248839
HHVM calling convention, hhvmcc, is used by HHVM JIT for
functions in translated cache. We currently support LLVM back end to
generate code for X86-64 and may support other architectures in the
future.
In HHVM calling convention any GP register could be used to pass and
return values, with the exception of R12 which is reserved for
thread-local area and is callee-saved. Other than R12, we always
pass RBX and RBP as args, which are our virtual machine's stack pointer
and frame pointer respectively.
When we enter translation cache via hhvmcc function, we expect
the stack to be aligned at 16 bytes, i.e. skewed by 8 bytes as opposed
to standard ABI alignment. This affects stack object alignment and stack
adjustments for function calls.
One extra calling convention, hhvm_ccc, is used to call C++ helpers from
HHVM's translation cache. It is almost identical to standard C calling
convention with an exception of first argument which is passed in RBP
(before we use RDI, RSI, etc.)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12681
llvm-svn: 248832
Summary:
Funclets have been turned into functions by the time they hit the object
file. Make sure that they have decent names for the symbol table and
CFI directives explaining how to reason about their prologues.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13261
llvm-svn: 248824
PDB files have a lot of noise in them, with hundreds (or thousands)
of symbols from system libraries and compiler generated types. If
you're only looking for a specific type, this can be problematic.
This CL allows you to display *only* types, variables, or compilands
matching a particular pattern. These filters can even be combined
with exclude filters. Include-only filters are given priority, so
that first the set of items to display is limited only to those that
match the include filters, and then the set of exclude filters is
applied to those. If there are no include filters specified, then
it means "display everything".
llvm-svn: 248822
If a PHI starts at a non-negative constant, monotonically increases
(only adds of a constant are supported at the moment) and that add
does not wrap, then the PHI is known never to be zero.
llvm-svn: 248796
alignment requirements, for example in the case of vectors.
These requirements are exploited by the code generator by using
move instructions that have similar alignment requirements, e.g.,
movaps on x86.
Although the code generator properly aligns the arguments with
respect to the displacement of the stack pointer it computes,
the displacement itself may cause misalignment. For example if
we have
%3 = load <16 x float>, <16 x float>* %1, align 64
call void @bar(<16 x float> %3, i32 0)
the x86 back-end emits:
movaps 32(%ecx), %xmm2
movaps (%ecx), %xmm0
movaps 16(%ecx), %xmm1
movaps 48(%ecx), %xmm3
subl $20, %esp <-- if %esp was 16-byte aligned before this instruction, it no longer will be afterwards
movaps %xmm3, (%esp) <-- movaps requires 16-byte alignment, while %esp is not aligned as such.
movl $0, 16(%esp)
calll __bar
To solve this, we need to make sure that the computed value with which
the stack pointer is changed is a multiple af the maximal alignment seen
during its computation. With this change we get proper alignment:
subl $32, %esp
movaps %xmm3, (%esp)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12337
llvm-svn: 248786
Currently SimplifyDemandedVectorElts can only peek through bitcasts if the vectors have the same number of elements.
This patch fixes and enables some existing (disabled) code to support bitcasting to vectors with more/fewer elements. It currently only accepts cases when vectors alias cleanly (i.e. number of elements are an exact multiple of the other vector).
This was added to improve the demanded vector elements support for SSE vector shifts which require the __m128i (<2 x i64>) argument type to be bitcast to the vector type for the builtin shift. I've added extra tests for various additional bitcasts.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12935
llvm-svn: 248784
Summary: This patch adds block frequency analysis to LoopUnswitch pass to recognize hot/cold regions. For cold regions the pass only performs trivial unswitches since they do not increase code size, and for hot regions everything works as before. This helps to minimize code growth in cold regions and be more aggressive in hot regions. Currently the default cold regions are blocks with frequencies below 20% of function entry frequency, and it can be adjusted via -loop-unswitch-cold-block-frequency flag. The entire feature is controlled via -loop-unswitch-with-block-frequency flag and it is off by default.
Reviewers: broune, silvas, dnovillo, reames
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11605
llvm-svn: 248777
Place new and update dbg.declare calls immediately after the
corresponding alloca.
Current code in replaceDbgDeclareForAlloca puts the new dbg.declare
at the end of the basic block. LLVM codegen has problems emitting
debug info in a situation when dbg.declare appears after all uses of
the variable. This usually kinda works for inlining and ASan (two
users of this function) but not for SafeStack (see the pending change
in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13178).
llvm-svn: 248769
`ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCondOperandsViaNoOverflow` tries to cast the
operand type of the comparison it is given to an `IntegerType`. This is
incorrect because it could actually be simplifying a comparison between
two pointers. Switch it to using `getTypeSizeInBits` instead, which
does the right thing for both pointers and integers.
Fixed PR24956.
llvm-svn: 248743
Patch by Jake VanAdrighem!
Summary:
Fix the way we sort the llvm.used and llvm.compiler.used members.
This bug seems to have been introduced in rL183756 through a set of improper casts to GlobalValue*. In subsequent patches this problem was missed and transformed into a getName call on a ConstantExpr.
Reviewers: silvas
Subscribers: silvas, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12851
llvm-svn: 248728
This was split off of http://reviews.llvm.org/D13040 to make it easier to test the correctness of the implication logic. For the moment, this only handles a single easy case which shows up when eliminating and combining range checks. In the (near) future, I plan to extend this for other cases which show up in range checks, but I wanted to make those changes incrementally once the framework was in place.
At the moment, the implication logic will be used by three places. One in InstSimplify (this review) and two in SimplifyCFG (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13040 & http://reviews.llvm.org/D13070). Can anyone think of other locations this style of reasoning would make sense?
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13074
llvm-svn: 248719
Originally, debug intrinsics and annotation intrinsics may prevent
the loop to be rerolled, now they are ignored.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13150
llvm-svn: 248718
When AA is being used, non-aliasing stores are canonicalized to use the same
chain, and DAGCombiner::getStoreMergeAndAliasCandidates can take advantage of
this by looking only as users of a store's chain operand. However, user
iteration is not result-number specific, we need to check that the use is as a
chain operand, and not via some other operand. It is certainly possible to have
another potentially-aliasing store, which shares the first's base pointer, and
uses the first's chain's node via some other operand.
Failure to catch this situation caused, at least in the included test case, an
assert later because the relative sequence-number ordering caused later
replacement to create a cycle in the DAG.
llvm-svn: 248698
Before this change `HasSameValue` would return true for distinct
`alloca` instructions if they happened to be allocating the same
type (`alloca` instructions are not specified as reading memory). This
change adds an explicit whitelist of instruction types for which
"identical" instructions compute the same value.
Fixes PR24952.
llvm-svn: 248690
Jingyue Wu