We were allocating the implicit attribute in the declarator's attribute pool,
but putting into the declaration specifier's ParsedAttributesView. If there are
multiple declarators, then we'll use the attribute from the declaration
specifier after clearing out the declarators attribute pool. Fix this by
allocating the attribute in the declaration specifier's pool.
rdar://48529718
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59327
llvm-svn: 356187
the no-arguments case. Don't expand this to an __attribute__((nonnull(A, B,
C))) attribute, since that does the wrong thing for function templates and
varargs functions.
In passing, fix a grammar error in the diagnostic, a crash if
__attribute__((nonnull(N))) is applied to a varargs function,
a bug where the same null argument could be diagnosed multiple
times if there were multiple nonnull attributes referring to it,
and a bug where nonnull attributes would not be accumulated correctly
across redeclarations.
llvm-svn: 216520
Thanks to r199467, __attribute__((nonnull)) (without arguments) can apply
directly to parameters, instead of being applied to the whole function.
However, the old form of nonnull (with an argument index) could also apply
to the arguments of function and block pointers, and both of these can be
passed as parameters.
Now, if 'nonnull' with an argument is found on a parameter, /and/ the
parameter is a function or block pointer, it is handled the old way.
PR18795
llvm-svn: 201162
This involved making CheckReturnStackAddr into a static function, which
is now called by a top-level return value checking routine called
CheckReturnValExpr.
llvm-svn: 199790
This attribute is supported by GCC. More generally it should
probably be a type attribute, but this behavior matches 'nonnull'.
This patch does not include warning logic for checking if a null
value is returned from a function annotated with this attribute.
That will come in subsequent patches.
llvm-svn: 199626
This allows the following syntax:
void baz(__attribute__((nonnull)) const char *str);
instead of:
void baz(const char *str) __attribute__((nonnull(1)));
This also extends to Objective-C methods.
The checking logic in Sema is not as clean as I would like. Effectively
now we need to check both the FunctionDecl/ObjCMethodDecl and the parameters,
so the point of truth is spread in two places, but the logic isn't that
cumbersome.
Implements <rdar://problem/14691443>.
llvm-svn: 199467
The warning this inhibits, -Wobjc-root-class, is opt-in for now. However, all clang unit tests that would trigger
the warning have been updated to use -Wno-objc-root-class. <rdar://problem/7446698>
llvm-svn: 154187
(on functions with no pointer arguments) but only when
the attribute has not been coming from a macro
instantiation in a header file. Fixes first part
of radar 6857843.
llvm-svn: 114860
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
Objective-C pointers to using ObjCObjectPointerType.
Now the checking for 'attribute ((nonnull))' in Sema doesn't emit an error when
trying to apply that attribute to a parameter that is an Objective-C pointer
(this is a regression).
To prevent this regression from occuring in the future, the 'nonnull.c' test was
moved to test/SemaObjC and renamed 'nonnull.m'. I also enhanced the tests to
show that function calls involved a NULL Objective-C pointer constant does not
trigger a warning. This is consistent with GCC, but should likely be fixed.
llvm-svn: 75856
Erik Pilkington