Out::DebugInfo was used only by GdbIndex class to determine if
we need to create a .gdb_index section, but we can do the same
check without it.
Added a test that this patch doesn't change the existing behavior.
llvm-svn: 345058
Summary:
During upgrading of the FreeBSD source tree with lld 7.0.0, I noticed
that it started complaining about `crt1.o` having an "index past the
end of the symbol table".
Such a symbol table looks approximately like this, viewed with `readelf
-s` (note the `Ndx` field being messed up):
```
Symbol table '.symtab' contains 4 entries:
Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name
0: 00000000 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT UND
1: 00000000 0 SECTION LOCAL DEFAULT 1
2: 00000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK HIDDEN RSV[0xffff] __rel_iplt_end
3: 00000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK HIDDEN RSV[0xffff] __rel_iplt_start
```
At first, it seemed that recent ifunc relocation work had caused this:
<https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS339351>, but it turned out that it was
due to incorrect processing of the object files by lld, when using `-r`
(a.k.a. --relocatable).
Bisecting showed that rL324421 ("Convert a use of Config->Static") was
the commit where this new behavior began. Simply reverting it solved
the issue, and the `__rel_iplt` symbols had an index of `UND` again.
Looking at Rafael's commit message, I think he simply missed the
possibility of `--relocatable` being in effect, so I have added an
additional check for it.
I also added a simple regression test case.
Reviewers: grimar, ruiu, emaste, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: arichardson, krytarowski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53515
llvm-svn: 345002
We need this to support 32-bit ARM. Add test cases for emulation
handling for this architecture as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53539
llvm-svn: 344976
Summary:
Before, superfluous warnings were emitted for the following two cases:
1) When from symbol was in a discarded section.
The profile should be thought of as affiliated to the section.
It makes sense to ignore the profile if the section is discarded.
2) When to symbol was in a shared object.
The object file containing the profile may not know about the to
symbol, which can reside in another object file (useful profile) or a
shared object (not useful as symbols in the shared object are fixed
and unorderable). It makes sense to ignore the profile from the object
file.
Note, the warning when to symbol was undefined was suppressed in
D53044, which is still useful for --symbol-ordering-file=
This patch silences the warnings. The check is actually more relaxed (no
warnings if either From or To is not Defined) for simplicity and I don't
see a compelling reason to warn on more cases.
Reviewers: ruiu, davidxl, espindola, Bigcheese
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53470
llvm-svn: 344974
This patch adds a support for OUTPUT_FORMAT linker script directive.
Since I'm not 100% confident with BFD names you can use in the directive
for all architectures, I added only a few in this patch. We can add
other names for other archtiectures later.
We still do not support triple-style OUTPUT_FORMAT directive, namely,
OUTPUT_FORMAT(bfdname, big, little). If you pass -EL (little endian)
or -EB (big endian) to the linker, GNU linkers pick up big or little
as a BFD name, correspondingly, so that you can use a single linker
script for bi-endian processor. I'm not sure if we really need to
support that, so I'll leave it alone for now.
Note that -m takes precedence over OUTPUT_FORAMT, but we always parse
a BFD name given to OUTPUT_FORMAT for error checking. You cannot write
an invalid name in the OUTPUT_FORMAT directive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53495
llvm-svn: 344952
Summary:
SymbolTable::addAbsolute() was removed in rL344305.
To me this is more readable than the lambda named `Add` and in our
out-of-tree CHERI target we use addAbsolute() in another function.
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: kristina, emaste, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53393
llvm-svn: 344842
Adjusted the range check on a call instruction from 24 bits signed to
26 bits signed. While the instruction only encodes 24 bits, the target is
assumed to be 4 byte aligned, and the value that is encoded in the instruction
gets shifted left by 2 to form the offset. Also added a check that the offset is
indeed at least 4 byte aligned.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53401
llvm-svn: 344747
Recommitting https://reviews.llvm.org/rL344544 after fixing undefined behavior
from left-shifting a negative value. Original commit message:
This support is slightly different then the X86_64 implementation in that calls
to __morestack don't need to get rewritten to calls to __moresatck_non_split
when a split-stack caller calls a non-split-stack callee. Instead the size of
the stack frame requested by the caller is adjusted prior to the call to
__morestack. The size the stack-frame will be adjusted by is tune-able through a
new --split-stack-adjust-size option.
llvm-svn: 344622
This reverts commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rL344544, which causes failures on
a undefined behaviour sanitizer bot -->
lld/ELF/Arch/PPC64.cpp:849:35: runtime error: left shift of negative value -1
llvm-svn: 344551
This support is slightly different then the X86_64 implementation in that calls
to __morestack don't need to get rewritten to calls to __moresatck_non_split
when a split-stack caller calls a non-split-stack callee. Instead the size of
the stack frame requested by the caller is adjusted prior to the call to
__morestack. The size the stack-frame will be adjusted by is tune-able through a
new --split-stack-adjust-size option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52099
llvm-svn: 344544
This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39289.
Currently both gold and bfd report errors about invalid options values
even with -v/-versions. But LLD does not.
This makes complicated to check the options available when LLD is used.
Patch makes LLD behavior to be consistent with GNU linkers.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53278
llvm-svn: 344514
`Type` parameter was used only to check for TLS attribute mismatch,
but we can do that when we actually replace symbols, so we don't need
to type as an argument. This change should simplify the interface of
the symbol table a bit.
llvm-svn: 344394
Android uses a compressed relocation format, which means the size of the
relocation section isn't predictable based on the number of relocations,
and can vary if the layout changes in any way. To deal with this, the
linker normally runs multiple passes until the layout converges.
The layout should converge if the size of the compressed
relocation section increases monotonically: if the size of an encoded
offset increases by one byte, the larget value which can be encoded is
multiplied by 128, so the representable offsets grow much faster than
the size of the section itself.
The problem here is that there is no code to ensure the size of the
section doesn't decrease. If the size of the relocation section
decreases, the relative offsets can increase due to alignment
restrictions, so that can force the size of the relocation section to
increase again. The end result is an infinite loop; the loop gets cut
off after 10 iterations with the message "thunk creation not
converged".
To avoid this issue, this patch adds padding to the end of the
relocation section if its size would decrease. The extra
padding is harmless because of the way the format is defined:
decoding stops after it reaches the number of relocations specified
in the section's header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53003
llvm-svn: 344300
This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37538,
Currently, LLD may set both sh_link and sh_info for
.rela.plt section to zero when we have only .rela.iplt section part used.
ELF spec (https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19683-01/816-1386/chapter6-94076/index.html)
says that for SHT_REL and SHT_RELA, sh_link references the associated symbol table
and sh_info the "section to which the relocation applies."
When we set the sh_link field, for the regular case we use the .dynsym index.
For .rela.iplt sections, it is unclear what is the associated symbol table,
because R_*_RELATIVE relocations do not use symbol names and we might have no
.dynsym section at all so this patch uses .symtab section index.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52830
llvm-svn: 344226
Summary:
Add a condition UnresolvedPolicy::Ignore to elf::warnUnorderedSymbol to suppress Sym->isUndefined() warnings from both
1) --symbol-ordering-file=
2) .llvm.call-graph-profile
If --unresolved-symbols=ignore-all is used,
no "undefined symbol" error/warning is emitted. It makes sense to not warn unorderable symbols.
Otherwise,
If an executable is linked, the default policy UnresolvedPolicy::ErrorOrWarn will issue a "undefined symbol" error. The unorderable symbol warning is redundant.
If a shared object is linked, it is possible that only part of object files are used and some symbols are left undefined. The warning is not very necessary.
In particular for .llvm.call-graph-profile, when linking a shared object, a call graph profile may contain undefined symbols. This case generated a warning before but it will be suppressed by this patch.
Reviewers: ruiu, davidxl, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: grimar, emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53044
llvm-svn: 344195
Summary: Before, OptTable::PrintHelp append "[options] <inputs>" to its parameter `Help`. It is more flexible to change its semantic to `Usage` and let user customize the usage line.
Reviewers: rupprecht, ruiu, espindola
Reviewed By: rupprecht
Subscribers: emaste, sbc100, arichardson, aheejin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53054
llvm-svn: 344099
Previously, we cast a pointer to Elf{32,64}_Chdr like this
auto *Hdr = reinterpret_cast<const ELF64_Chdr>(Ptr);
and read from its members like this
read32(&Hdr->ch_size);
I was thinking that this does not violate alignment requirement,
since &Hdr->ch_size doesn't really access memory, but seems like
it is a violation in terms of C++ spec (?)
In this patch, I use a different struct that allows unaligned access.
llvm-svn: 344083
Rui Ueyama