Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexandros Lamprineas eda554a9b4 The Driver does not set the +strict-align flag when targeting
[ARM] armv6m + netbsd. Tests are misssing for armv6m + darwin as well.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13217

llvm-svn: 249308
2015-10-05 12:45:10 +00:00
Akira Hatanaka 085da7ecae [AArch64] Pass subtarget feature "+strict-align".
This commit changes the driver to save subtarget feature "+strict-align"
to the IR instead of using backend option "aarch64-strict-align". This is
needed for LTO.

rdar://problem/21529937

llvm-svn: 243518
2015-07-29 14:25:58 +00:00
Akira Hatanaka 7651dd8359 [ARM] Pass subtarget feature "+strict-align".
This commit changes the driver to save subtarget feature "+strict-align" to the
IR instead of using backend option "arm-strict-align". This is needed for LTO.

Also, move the logic in ARM backend that was deciding whether strict alignment
should be forced to the front-end.

rdar://problem/21529937

http://reviews.llvm.org/D11472

llvm-svn: 243489
2015-07-28 22:26:45 +00:00
Jonathan Roelofs 2b00d54676 Emit diagnostic for -munaligned-access on v6m
Patch by: Charlie Turner <charlie.turner@arm.com>

llvm-svn: 219211
2014-10-07 15:11:32 +00:00
Bob Wilson 0874e538aa Fix up handling of ARM options for controlling strict alignment.
The -mstrict-align option was originally added in r167619 as a target-
independent option. It was then changed in r167623 to be implemented with an
ARM-specific backend option, even though the code remained in the
target-independent Clang::ConstructJob function. This means that if you used
the -mstrict-align option with a non-ARM target, you would still get the
-arm-strict-align option getting passed to the backend, which was harmless
but gross. The driver option was then replaced by the GCC-compatible
-m[no-]unaligned-access option (r189175) and modified to work with AArch64
(r208075). However, in the process, the help text for -mstrict-align was
incorrectly changed to show it as only being supported for AArch64. Even worse,
the logic for handling these options together with -mkernel was wrong for
AArch64, where -mkernel does not currently imply strict alignment.

This patch fixes up all of those things. Besides the obvious change to the
option help text, it moves the logic into the ARM and AArch64-specific parts
of the driver, so that the option will be correctly ignored for non-ARM
targets. <rdar://problem/17823697>

llvm-svn: 214148
2014-07-29 00:23:18 +00:00
Tim Northover 573cbee543 AArch64/ARM64: rename ARM64 components to AArch64
This keeps Clang consistent with backend naming conventions.

llvm-svn: 209579
2014-05-24 12:52:07 +00:00
Kevin Qin e5cee260ce [PATCH] [ARM64] Enable alignment control option in front-end for ARM64.
This patch is to get "-mno-unaligned-access" and "-munaligned-access"
work in front-end for ARM64 target.

llvm-svn: 208075
2014-05-06 09:51:32 +00:00
Renato Golin 47aeab5cbe Fix gnueeabi typo in tests
llvm-svn: 189759
2013-09-02 14:11:33 +00:00
Renato Golin 8d5f31432e use the last passed -munaligned-access / -mno-unaligned-access
Passing inconsistent munaligned-access / mno-unaligned-access
flags, intentionally resulted in a warning and the flag
no-unaligned-access being used.

Gcc does, at least in practice, use the last flag in such a
case. This patch updates clang behaviour accordingly; use the
last flag or base alignment behaviour on the target (which
llvm will do if no flag is explicitly passed)

Patch by Jeroen Hofstee.

llvm-svn: 189542
2013-08-28 23:56:07 +00:00
Renato Golin 171b6b19f1 Tests for ARM aligned access + reserved R9
Patch by Jeroen Hofstee.

llvm-svn: 189190
2013-08-25 13:01:50 +00:00