This will allow inline assembler code to utilize these features, but no automatic lowering is provided, except for the previously provided @llvm.trap, which lowers to "ta 5".
The change also separates out the different assembly language syntaxes for V8 and V9 Sparc. Previously, only V9 Sparc assembly syntax was provided.
The change also corrects the selection order of trap disassembly, allowing, e.g. "ta %g0 + 15" to be rendered, more readably, as "ta 15", ignoring the %g0 register. This is per the sparc v8 and v9 manuals.
Check-in includes many extra unit tests to check this works correctly on both V8 and V9 Sparc processors.
Code Reviewed at http://reviews.llvm.org/D17960.
llvm-svn: 263044
These are all co-processor registers, with the exception of the floating-point deferred-trap queue register.
Although these will not be lowered automatically by any instructions, it allows the use of co-processor
instructions implemented by inline-assembly.
Code Reviewed at http://reviews.llvm.org/D17133, with the exception of a very small change in brace placement in SparcInstrInfo.td,
which was formerly causing a problem in the disassembly of the %fq register.
llvm-svn: 262133
Change TargetInstrInfo API to take `MachineInstr&` instead of
`MachineInstr*` in the functions related to predicated instructions
(I'll try to come back later and get some of the rest). All of these
functions require non-null parameters already, so references are more
clear. As a bonus, this happens to factor away a host of implicit
iterator => pointer conversions.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 261605
Delete MachineInstr::getIterator(), since the term "iterator" is
overloaded when talking about MachineInstr.
- Downcast to ilist_node in iplist::getNextNode() and getPrevNode() so
that ilist_node::getIterator() is still available.
- Add it back as MachineInstr::getInstrIterator(). This matches the
naming in MachineBasicBlock.
- Add MachineInstr::getBundleIterator(). This is explicitly called
"bundle" (not matching MachineBasicBlock) to disintinguish it clearly
from ilist_node::getIterator().
- Update all calls. Some of these I switched to `auto` to remove
boiler-plate, since the new name is clear about the type.
There was one call I updated that looked fishy, but it wasn't clear what
the right answer was. This was in X86FrameLowering::inlineStackProbe(),
added in r252578 in lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp. I opted to
leave the behaviour unchanged, but I'll reply to the original commit on
the list in a moment.
llvm-svn: 261504
The encodings for floating point conditions A(lways) and N(ever) were
incorrectly specified for the assembly parser, per Sparc manual v8 page
121. This change corrects that mistake.
Also, strangely, all of the branch instructions already had MC test
cases, except for the broken ones. Added the tests.
Patch by Chris Dewhurst
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17074
llvm-svn: 260390
Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"I felt a great disturbance in the [build system], as if millions of [makefiles] suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something [amazing] has happened."
- Obi Wan Kenobi
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, tstellarAMD, echristo, whitequark
Subscribers: chfast, simoncook, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, jfb, danalbert, srhines, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dsanders, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16471
llvm-svn: 258861
AnalyzeBranch on X86 (and, previously, SPARC, which implementation was
copied from X86) tries to modify the branches based on block
layout (e.g. checking isLayoutSuccessor), when AllowModify is true.
The rest of the architectures leave that up to the caller, which can
call InsertBranch, RemoveBranch, and ReverseBranchCondition as
appropriate. That appears to be the preferred way to do it nowadays.
This commit makes SPARC like the rest: replaces AnalyzeBranch with an
implementation cribbed from AArch64, and adds a ReverseBranchCondition
implementation.
Additionally, a test-case has been added (also cribbed from AArch64)
demonstrating that redundant branch sequences no longer get emitted.
E.g., it used to emit code like this:
bne .LBB1_2
nop
ba .LBB1_1
nop
.LBB1_2:
And now emits:
cmp %i0, 42
be .LBB1_1
nop
llvm-svn: 257572
On SparcV8, doubles get passed in two 32-bit integer registers. The call
code was already handling endianness correctly, but the incoming
argument code was not -- it got the two halves in opposite order.
Also remove some dead code in LowerFormalArguments_32 to handle
less-than-32bit values, which can't actually happen.
Finally, add some test cases for the 32-bit calling convention, cribbed
from the 64abi.ll test, and run for both big and little-endian.
llvm-svn: 255668
These are redundant pairs of nodes defined for
INSERT_VECTOR_ELEMENT/EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELEMENT.
insertelement/extractelement are slightly closer to the corresponding
C++ node name, and has stricter type checking so prefer it.
Update targets to only use these nodes where it is trivial to do so.
AArch64, ARM, and Mips all have various type errors on simple replacement,
so they will need work to fix.
Example from AArch64:
def : Pat<(sext_inreg (vector_extract (v16i8 V128:$Rn), VectorIndexB:$idx), i8),
(i32 (SMOVvi8to32 V128:$Rn, VectorIndexB:$idx))>;
Which is trying to do sext_inreg i8, i8.
llvm-svn: 255359
Summary:
Many target lowerings copy-paste the code to test SDValues for known constants.
This code can instead be shared in SelectionDAG.cpp, and reused in the targets.
Reviewers: MatzeB, andreadb, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14945
llvm-svn: 254085
MCRelaxableFragment previously kept a copy of MCSubtargetInfo and
MCInst to enable re-encoding the MCInst later during relaxation. A copy
of MCSubtargetInfo (instead of a reference or pointer) was needed
because the feature bits could be modified by the parser.
This commit replaces the MCSubtargetInfo copy in MCRelaxableFragment
with a constant reference to MCSubtargetInfo. The copies of
MCSubtargetInfo are kept in MCContext, and the target parsers are now
responsible for asking MCContext to provide a copy whenever the feature
bits of MCSubtargetInfo have to be toggled.
With this patch, I saw a 4% reduction in peak memory usage when I
compiled verify-uselistorder.lto.bc using llc.
rdar://problem/21736951
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14346
llvm-svn: 253127
MCSubtargetInfo in the subclasses into MCTargetAsmParser and define a
member function getSTI.
This is done in preparation for making changes to shrink the size of
MCRelaxableFragment. (see http://reviews.llvm.org/D14346).
llvm-svn: 253124
Summary:
The CLR's personality routine passes these in rdx/edx, not rax/eax.
Make getExceptionPointerRegister a virtual method parameterized by
personality function to allow making this distinction.
Similarly make getExceptionSelectorRegister a virtual method parameterized
by personality function, for symmetry.
Reviewers: pgavlin, majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14344
llvm-svn: 252383
Summary:
This review is related to another review request http://reviews.llvm.org/D11268, does the same and merely fixes a couple of issues with it.
D11268 is quite old and has merge conflicts against the current trunk.
This request
- rebases D11268 onto the new trunk;
- resolves the merge conflicts;
- fixes the prologue_end tests, which do not pass due to the subprogram definitions not marked as distinct.
Reviewers: echristo, rengolin, kubabrecka
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits, asl
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14338
llvm-svn: 252177
This occurred due to introducing the invalid i64 type after type
legalization had already finished, in an attempt to workaround bitcast
f64 -> v2i32 not doing constant folding.
The *right* thing is to actually fix bitcast, but that has other
complications. So, for now, just get rid of the broken workaround, and
check in a test-case showing that it doesn't crash, with TODOs for
emitting proper code.
llvm-svn: 249908
This extends the work done in r233995 so that now getFragment (in addition to
getSection) also works for variable symbols.
With that the existing logic to decide if a-b can be computed works even if
a or b are variables. Given that, the expression evaluation can avoid expanding
variables as aggressively and that in turn lets the relocation code see the
original variable.
In order for this to work with the asm streamer, there is now a dummy fragment
per section. It is used to assign a section to a symbol when no other fragment
exists.
This patch is a joint work by Maxim Ostapenko andy myself.
llvm-svn: 249303
Summary:
This is the first patch in the series to migrate Triple's (which are ambiguous)
to TargetTuple's (which aren't).
For the moment, TargetTuple simply passes all requests to the Triple object it
holds. Once it has replaced Triple, it will start to implement the interface in
a more suitable way.
This change makes some changes to the public C++ API. In particular,
InitMCSubtargetInfo(), createMCRelocationInfo(), and createMCSymbolizer()
now take TargetTuples instead of Triples. The other public C++ API's have
been left as-is for the moment to reduce patch size.
This commit also contains a trivial patch to clang to account for the C++ API
change. Thanks go to Pavel Labath for fixing LLDB for me.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: jyknight, dschuff, arsenm, rampitec, danalbert, srhines, javed.absar, dsanders, echristo, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10969
llvm-svn: 247692
Summary:
This is the first patch in the series to migrate Triple's (which are ambiguous)
to TargetTuple's (which aren't).
For the moment, TargetTuple simply passes all requests to the Triple object it
holds. Once it has replaced Triple, it will start to implement the interface in
a more suitable way.
This change makes some changes to the public C++ API. In particular,
InitMCSubtargetInfo(), createMCRelocationInfo(), and createMCSymbolizer()
now take TargetTuples instead of Triples. The other public C++ API's have
been left as-is for the moment to reduce patch size.
This commit also contains a trivial patch to clang to account for the C++ API
change.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: jyknight, dschuff, arsenm, rampitec, danalbert, srhines, javed.absar, dsanders, echristo, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10969
llvm-svn: 247683
The (mostly-deprecated) SelectionDAG-based ILPListDAGScheduler scheduler
was making poor scheduling decisions, causing high register pressure and
extraneous register spills.
Switching to the newer machine scheduler generates better code -- even
without there being a machine model defined for SPARC yet.
(Actually committing the test changes too, this time, unlike r247315)
llvm-svn: 247343
The (mostly-deprecated) SelectionDAG-based ILPListDAGScheduler scheduler
was making poor scheduling decisions, causing high register pressure and
extraneous register spills.
Switching to the newer machine scheduler generates better code -- even
without there being a machine model defined for SPARC yet.
llvm-svn: 247315
If you're going to realign %sp to get object alignment properly (which
the code does), and stack offsets and alignments are calculated going
down from %fp (which they are), then the total stack size had better
be a multiple of the alignment. LLVM did indeed ensure that.
And then, after aligning, the sparc frame code added 96 (for sparcv8)
to the frame size, making any requested alignment of 64-bytes or
higher *guaranteed* to be misaligned. The test case added with r245668
even tests this exact scenario, and asserted the incorrect behavior,
which I somehow failed to notice. D'oh.
This change fixes the frame lowering code to align the stack size
*after* adding the spill area, instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12349
llvm-svn: 246042
Note: I do not implement a base pointer, so it's still impossible to
have dynamic realignment AND dynamic alloca in the same function.
This also moves the code for determining the frame index reference
into getFrameIndexReference, where it belongs, instead of inline in
eliminateFrameIndex.
[Begin long-winded screed]
Now, stack realignment for Sparc is actually a silly thing to support,
because the Sparc ABI has no need for it -- unlike the situation on
x86, the stack is ALWAYS aligned to the required alignment for the CPU
instructions: 8 bytes on sparcv8, and 16 bytes on sparcv9.
However, LLVM unfortunately implements user-specified overalignment
using stack realignment support, so for now, I'm going to go along
with that tradition. GCC instead treats objects which have alignment
specification greater than the maximum CPU-required alignment for the
target as a separate block of stack memory, with their own virtual
base pointer (which gets aligned). Doing it that way avoids needing to
implement per-target support for stack realignment, except for the
targets which *actually* have an ABI-specified stack alignment which
is too small for the CPU's requirements.
Further unfortunately in LLVM, the default canRealignStack for all
targets effectively returns true, despite that implementing that is
something a target needs to do specifically. So, the previous behavior
on Sparc was to silently ignore the user's specified stack
alignment. Ugh.
Yet MORE unfortunate, if a target actually does return false from
canRealignStack, that also causes the user-specified alignment to be
*silently ignored*, rather than emitting an error.
(I started looking into fixing that last, but it broke a bunch of
tests, because LLVM actually *depends* on having it silently ignored:
some architectures (e.g. non-linux i386) have smaller stack alignment
than spilled-register alignment. But, the fact that a register needs
spilling is not known until within the register allocator. And by that
point, the decision to not reserve the frame pointer has been frozen
in place. And without a frame pointer, stack realignment is not
possible. So, canRealignStack() returns false, and
needsStackRealignment() then returns false, assuming everyone can just
go on their merry way assuming the alignment requirements were
probably just suggestions after-all. Sigh...)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12208
llvm-svn: 245668
Chris Dewhurst