being used for atomic intrinsics, it seems the
access may be volatile. No code was exploiting
the original non-volatile definition, so only
the comment needs changing.
llvm-svn: 64464
Make sure the SCC pass manager initializes any contained
function pass managers. Without this, simplify-libcalls
would add nocapture attributes when run on its own, but
not when run as part of -std-compile-opts or similar.
llvm-svn: 64443
couldn't ever be the return of call instruction. However, it's quite possible
that said local allocation is itself the return of a function call. That's
what malloc and calloc are for, actually.
llvm-svn: 64442
addrec in a different loop to check the value being added to
the accumulated Start value, not the Start value before it has
the new value added to it. This prevents LSR from going crazy
on the included testcase. Dale, please review.
llvm-svn: 64440
Currently only used for 128-bit integers.
Note that we can't use the fixed-width integer types for other integer
modes without other changes because glibc headers redefines (u)int*_t
and friends using the mode attribute. For example, this means that uint64_t
has to be compatible with unsigned __attribute((mode(DI))), and
uint64_t is currently defined to long long. And I have a feeling we'll
run into issues if we try to define uint64_t as something which isn't
either long or long long.
This doesn't get the alignment right in most cases, including
the 128-bit integer case; I'll file a PR shortly. The gist of the issue
is that the targets don't really expose the information necessary to
figure out the alignment outside of the target description, so there's a
non-trivial amount of work involved in getting it working right. That
said, the alignment used is conservative, so the only issue with the
current implementation is ABI compatibility.
This makes it trivial to add some sort of "bitwidth" attribute to make
arbitrary-width integers; I'll do that in a followup.
We could also use this for stuff like the following for compatibility
with gcc, but I have a feeling it would be a better idea for clang to be
consistent between C and C++ modes rather than follow gcc's example for
C mode.
struct {unsigned long long x : 33;} x;
unsigned long long a(void) {return x.x+1;}
llvm-svn: 64434
- Add 'EvalBind', which will be used by 'EvalStore' to pull much of the value binding logic out of GRTransferFuncs.
- Rename many cases of 'St' to 'state'.
llvm-svn: 64426
only insert spaces between tokens if the code had them or if they
are actually required to avoid pasting. This reuses the same
logic as -E mode.
llvm-svn: 64421
Daniel Dunbar