stuff like this:
typedef struct {
int x, y, z;
} foo_t;
foo_t g;
into:
%"struct.<anonymous>" = type { i32, i32, i32 }
we now get:
%struct.foo_t = type { i32, i32, i32 }
This doesn't change the behavior of the compiler, but makes the IR much easier to read.
llvm-svn: 134969
turns out that a field or base needs to be laid out in the tail padding of
the base, CGRecordLayoutBuilder::ResizeLastBaseFieldIfNecessary will convert
it to an array of i8.
I've audited the new test results to make sure that they are still valid. I've
also verified that we pass a self-host with this change.
This (finally) fixes PR5589!
llvm-svn: 129673
a zero constant for a complete class. rdar://problem/8424975
To make this happen, track the field indexes for virtual bases
in the complete object. I'm curious whether we might be better
off making CGRecordLayoutBuilder *much* more reliant on
ASTRecordLayout; we're currently duplicating an awful lot of the ABI
layout logic.
llvm-svn: 125555
more closely parallel the computation of linkage. This gets us to a state
much closer to what gcc emits, modulo bugs, which will undoubtedly arise in
abundance.
llvm-svn: 117147
constructing an LLVM PointerType directly from the "bool"'s LLVM type
(i1), which resulted in unfortunate pointer type i1*. The fix is to
build the LLVM PointerType from the corresponding Clang PointerType,
so that we get i8* in the case of a bool.
John, please review. I also left a FIXME there because we seem to be
dropping "volatile", which would be rather unfortunate.
llvm-svn: 112819
class; they should just be completely opaque throughout IR gen now,
although I haven't really audited that.
Fix a bug apparently inherited from gcc-4.2 where we failed to null-check
member data pointers when performing derived-to-base or base-to-derived
conversions on them.
llvm-svn: 111789
Bill Wendling