Re-land r321234. It had to be reverted because it broke the shared
library build. The shared library build broke because there was a
missing LLVMBuild dependency from lib/Passes (which calls
TargetMachine::getTargetIRAnalysis) to lib/Target. As far as I can
tell, this problem was always there but was somehow masked
before (perhaps because TargetMachine::getTargetIRAnalysis was a
virtual function).
Original commit message:
This makes the TargetMachine interface a bit simpler. We still need
the std::function in TargetIRAnalysis to avoid having to add a
dependency from Analysis to Target.
See discussion:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119749.html
I avoided adding all of the backend owners to this review since the
change is simple, but let me know if you feel differently about this.
Reviewers: echristo, MatzeB, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: jholewinski, jfb, arsenm, dschuff, mcrosier, sdardis, nemanjai, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41464
llvm-svn: 321375
Summary:
This makes the TargetMachine interface a bit simpler. We still need
the std::function in TargetIRAnalysis to avoid having to add a
dependency from Analysis to Target.
See discussion:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119749.html
I avoided adding all of the backend owners to this review since the
change is simple, but let me know if you feel differently about this.
Reviewers: echristo, MatzeB, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: jholewinski, jfb, arsenm, dschuff, mcrosier, sdardis, nemanjai, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41464
llvm-svn: 321234
Rather than adding more bits to express every
MMO flag you could want, just directly use the
MMO flags. Also fixes using a bunch of bool arguments to
getMemIntrinsicNode.
On AMDGPU, buffer and image intrinsics should always
have MODereferencable set, but currently there is no
way to do that directly during the initial intrinsic
lowering.
llvm-svn: 320746
PTX requires that identifiers consist only of [a-zA-Z0-9_$]. The
existing pass already ensured this for globals and this patch adds
the cleanup for functions with local linkage.
However, there was a different problem in the case of collisions
of the adjusted name: The ValueSymbolTable then automatically
appended ".N" with increasing Ns to get a unique name while helping
the ABI demangling. Special case this behavior to omit the dots and
append N directly. This will always give us legal names according
to the PTX requirements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40573
llvm-svn: 319657
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, avoid
printing "vreg" for virtual registers (which is one of the current MIR
possibilities).
Basically:
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/%vreg([0-9]+)/%\1/g"
* grep -nr '%vreg' . and fix if needed
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/ vreg([0-9]+)/ %\1/g"
* grep -nr 'vreg[0-9]\+' . and fix if needed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40420
llvm-svn: 319427
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
Summary:
Make it possible to feed runtime information back to tablegen to enable
profile-guided tablegen-eration, detection of untested tablegen definitions, etc.
Being a cross-compiler by nature, LLVM will potentially collect data for multiple
architectures (e.g. when running 'ninja check'). We therefore need a way for
TableGen to figure out what data applies to the backend it is generating at the
time. This patch achieves that by including the name of the 'def X : Target ...'
for the backend in the TargetRegistry.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, jyknight, aditya_nandakumar, sdardis, nemanjai, ab, nhaehnle, t.p.northover, javed.absar, qcolombet, llvm-commits, fedor.sergeev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39742
llvm-svn: 318352
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
Summary:
This just seems to have been an oversight. We already supported the f64
atomic add with an explicit scope (e.g. "cta"), but not the scopeless
version.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: jholewinski, sanjoy, cfe-commits, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39638
llvm-svn: 317623
This header already includes a CodeGen header and is implemented in
lib/CodeGen, so move the header there to match.
This fixes a link error with modular codegeneration builds - where a
header and its implementation are circularly dependent and so need to be
in the same library, not split between two like this.
llvm-svn: 317379
If particular target supports volatile memory access operations, we can
avoid AS casting to generic AS. Currently it's only enabled in NVPTX for
loads and stores that access global & shared AS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39026
llvm-svn: 316495
Reverting to investigate layering effects of MCJIT not linking
libCodeGen but using TargetMachine::getNameWithPrefix() breaking the
lldb bots.
This reverts commit r315633.
llvm-svn: 315637
Merge LLVMTargetMachine into TargetMachine.
- There is no in-tree target anymore that just implements TargetMachine
but not LLVMTargetMachine.
- It should still be possible to stub out all the various functions in
case a target does not want to use lib/CodeGen
- This simplifies the code and avoids methods ending up in the wrong
interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489
llvm-svn: 315633
WMMA = "Warp Level Matrix Multiply-Accumulate".
These are the new instructions introduced in PTX6.0 and available
on sm_70 GPUs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38645
llvm-svn: 315601
For now CUDA-9 is not included in the list of CUDA versions clang
searches for, so the path to CUDA-9 must be explicitly passed
via --cuda-path=.
On LLVM side NVPTX added sm_70 GPU type which bumps required
PTX version to 6.0, but otherwise is equivalent to sm_62 at the moment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37576
llvm-svn: 312734
IMHO it is an antipattern to have a enum value that is Default.
At any given piece of code it is not clear if we have to handle
Default or if has already been mapped to a concrete value. In this
case in particular, only the target can do the mapping and it is nice
to make sure it is always done.
This deletes the two default enum values of CodeModel and uses an
explicit Optional<CodeModel> when it is possible that it is
unspecified.
llvm-svn: 309911
This patch makes LSR generate better code for SystemZ in the cases of memory
intrinsics, Load->Store pairs or comparison of immediate with memory.
In order to achieve this, the following common code changes were made:
* New TTI hook: LSRWithInstrQueries(), which defaults to false. Controls if
LSR should do instruction-based addressing evaluations by calling
isLegalAddressingMode() with the Instruction pointers.
* In LoopStrengthReduce: handle address operands of memset, memmove and memcpy
as address uses, and call isFoldableMemAccessOffset() for any LSRUse::Address,
not just loads or stores.
SystemZ changes:
* isLSRCostLess() implemented with Insns first, and without ImmCost.
* New function supportedAddressingMode() that is a helper for TTI methods
looking at Instructions passed via pointers.
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Quentin Colombet
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35262https://reviews.llvm.org/D35049
llvm-svn: 308729
The patch adds support of i128 params lowering. The changes are quite trivial to
support i128 as a "special case" of integer type. With this patch, we lower i128
params the same way as aggregates of size 16 bytes: .param .b8 _ [16].
Currently, NVPTX can't deal with the 128 bit integers:
* in some cases because of failed assertions like
ValVTs.size() == OutVals.size() && "Bad return value decomposition"
* in other cases emitting PTX with .i128 or .u128 types (which are not valid [1])
[1] http://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/parallel-thread-execution/index.html#fundamental-types
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34555
Patch by: Denys Zariaiev (denys.zariaiev@gmail.com)
llvm-svn: 308675
Where is is needed (at the end of headers that define it), be
consistent about its use.
Also fix a few header guards that I found in the process.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34916
llvm-svn: 307840
Adds loop expansions for known-size and unknown-sized memcpy calls, allowing the
target to provide the operand types through TTI callbacks. The default values
for the TTI callbacks use int8 operand types and matches the existing behaviour
if they aren't overridden by the target.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32536
llvm-svn: 307346
The patch adds support of i128 params lowering. The changes are quite trivial to
support i128 as a "special case" of integer type. With this patch, we lower i128
params the same way as aggregates of size 16 bytes: .param .b8 _ [16].
Currently, NVPTX can't deal with the 128 bit integers:
* in some cases because of failed assertions like
ValVTs.size() == OutVals.size() && "Bad return value decomposition"
* in other cases emitting PTX with .i128 or .u128 types (which are not valid [1])
[1] http://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/parallel-thread-execution/index.html#fundamental-types
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34555
Patch by: Denys Zariaiev (denys.zariaiev@gmail.com)
llvm-svn: 307326
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
This adds a callback to the LLVMTargetMachine that lets target indicate
that they do not pass the machine verifier checks in all cases yet.
This is intended to be a temporary measure while the targets are fixed
allowing us to enable the machine verifier by default with
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS enabled!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33696
llvm-svn: 304320
TargetPassConfig is not useful for targets that do not use the CodeGen
library, so we may just as well store a pointer to an
LLVMTargetMachine instead of just to a TargetMachine.
While at it, also change the constructor to take a reference instead of a
pointer as the TM must not be nullptr.
llvm-svn: 304247
Follow up to D33147
NVPTXTargetLowering::LowerCall was trusting the default argument values.
Fixes another 17 of the NVPTX '-verify-machineinstrs with EXPENSIVE_CHECKS' errors in PR32146.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33189
llvm-svn: 303082
NFC followup to D33147, this explicitly sets all the arguments (instead of relying on the defaults) to SelectionDAG::getMemIntrinsicNode to help identify -verify-machineinstrs issues.
llvm-svn: 303047
This fixes 47 of the 75 NVPTX '-verify-machineinstrs with EXPENSIVE_CHECKS' errors in PR32146.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33147
llvm-svn: 302942
Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification
of machine representation. This attribute instructs the backend that the
argument is prepared in stack prior to CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END
sequence (see http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.htm for details). Frame size
stored in CALLSEQ_START in this case does not count the size of this
argument. However CALLSEQ_END still keeps total frame size, as caller can
be responsible for cleanup of entire frame. So CALLSEQ_START and
CALLSEQ_END keep different frame size and the difference is treated by
MachineVerifier as stack error. Currently there is no way to distinguish
this case from actual errors.
This patch adds additional argument to CALLSEQ_START and its
target-specific counterparts to keep size of stack that is set up prior to
the call frame sequence. This argument allows MachineVerifier to calculate
actual frame size associated with frame setup instruction and correctly
process the case of inalloca arguments.
The changes made by the patch are:
- Frame setup instructions get the second mandatory argument. It
affects all targets that use frame pseudo instructions and touched many
files although the changes are uniform.
- Access to frame properties are implemented using special instructions
rather than calls getOperand(N).getImm(). For X86 and ARM such
replacement was made previously.
- Changes that reflect appearance of additional argument of frame setup
instruction. These involve proper instruction initialization and
methods that access instruction arguments.
- MachineVerifier retrieves frame size using method, which reports sum of
frame parts initialized inside frame instruction pair and outside it.
The patch implements approach proposed by Quentin Colombet in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27481#c1.
It fixes 9 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed
in PR27481.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32394
llvm-svn: 302527
Benjamin Kramer