C11 standard refers to the unsigned counterpart of the type ptrdiff_t
in the paragraph 7.21.6.1p7 where it defines the format specifier %tu.
In Clang (in PrintfFormatString.cpp, lines 508-510) there is a FIXME for this case,
in particular, Clang didn't diagnose %tu issues at all, i.e.
it didn't emit any warnings on the code printf("%tu", 3.14).
In this diff we add a method getUnsignedPointerDiffType for getting the corresponding type
similarly to how it's already done in the other analogous cases (size_t, ssize_t, ptrdiff_t etc)
and fix -Wformat diagnostics for %tu plus the emitted fix-it as well.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38270
llvm-svn: 314470
This diff makes the test FixIt/format.m more robust.
The issue was caught by the build bot clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15.
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 308073
This diff addresses FIXME in lib/Analysis/PrintfFormatString.cpp
and makes PrintfSpecifier::getArgType return the correct type.
In particular, this change enables Clang to emit a warning on
incorrect using of "%zd"/"%zn" format specifiers.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35427
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 308067
These test updates almost exclusively around the change in behavior
around enum: enums without a definition are considered incomplete except
when targeting MSVC ABIs. Since these tests are interested in the
'incomplete-enum' behavior, restrict them to %itanium_abi_triple.
llvm-svn: 249660
This allows us to be more careful when dealing with enums whose fixed
underlying type requires special handling in a format string, like
NSInteger.
A refinement of r163266 from a year and a half ago, which added the
special handling for NSInteger and friends in the first place.
<rdar://problem/16616623>
llvm-svn: 209966
Presumably, if the printf format has the sign explicitly requested, the user
wants to treat the data as signed.
This is a fix-up for r172739, and also includes several test changes that
didn't make it into that commit.
llvm-svn: 172762
For most cases where a conversion specifier doesn't match an argument,
we usually guess that the conversion specifier is wrong. However, if
the argument is an integer type and the specifier is %C, it's likely
the user really did mean to print the integer as a character.
(This is more common than %c because there is no way to specify a unichar
literal -- you have to write an integer literal, such as '0x2603',
and then cast it to unichar.)
This does not change the behavior of %S, since there are fewer cases
where printing a literal Unicode *string* is necessary, but this could
easily be changed in the future.
<rdar://problem/11982013>
llvm-svn: 169400
The type of a character literal is 'int' in C, but if the user writes a
character /as/ a literal, we should assume they meant it to be a
character and not a numeric value, and thus offer %c as a correction
rather than %d.
There's a special case for multi-character literals (like 'MooV'), which
have implementation-defined value and usually cannot be printed with %c.
These still use %d as the suggestion.
In C++, the type of a character literal is 'char', and so this problem
doesn't exist.
<rdar://problem/12282316>
llvm-svn: 169398
We tried to account for 'uint8_t' by saying that /typedefs/ of 'char'
should be corrected as %hhd rather than %c, but the condition was wrong.
llvm-svn: 169397
Nathan Huckleberry