to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Summary:
This change allows usage of store instruction for implicit null check.
Memory Aliasing Analisys is not used and change conservatively supposes
that any store and load may access the same memory. As a result
re-ordering of store-store, store-load and load-store is prohibited.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: atrick, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29400
llvm-svn: 294338
Summary:
That way llvm-objdump can rely on it without adding an extra dependency
on CodeGen.
This change duplicates the FaultKind enum and the code that serializes
it to a string. I could not figure out a way to get around this without
adding a new dependency to Object
Reviewers: rafael, ab
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10619
llvm-svn: 240364
I had some unnecessary `typename`s left in after addressing review.
This compiled successfully with clang++ but MSVC reported an error. Fix
the build error by removing the redundant `typename`s.
llvm-svn: 240307
Summary:
The parser is exercised by llvm-objdump using -print-fault-maps. As is
probably obvious, the code itself was "heavily inspired" by
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10434.
Reviewers: reames, atrick, JosephTremoulet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10491
llvm-svn: 240304
Summary:
This instruction encodes a loading operation that may fault, and a label
to branch to if the load page-faults. The locations of potentially
faulting loads and their "handler" destinations are recorded in a
FaultMap section, meant to be consumed by LLVM's clients.
Nothing generates FAULTING_LOAD_OP instructions yet, but they will be
used in a future change.
The documentation (FaultMaps.rst) needs improvement and I will update
this diff with a more expanded version shortly.
Depends on D10196
Reviewers: rnk, reames, AndyAyers, ab, atrick, pgavlin
Reviewed By: atrick, pgavlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10197
llvm-svn: 239740
Chandler Carruth