Commit Graph

606 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Reid Kleckner 96ab8726a3 [IR] De-virtualize ~Value to save a vptr
Summary:
Implements PR889

Removing the virtual table pointer from Value saves 1% of RSS when doing
LTO of llc on Linux. The impact on time was positive, but too noisy to
conclusively say that performance improved. Here is a link to the
spreadsheet with the original data:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F4FHir0qYnV0MEp2sYYp_BuvnJgWlWPhWOwZ6LbW7W4/edit?usp=sharing

This change makes it invalid to directly delete a Value, User, or
Instruction pointer. Instead, such code can be rewritten to a null check
and a call Value::deleteValue(). Value objects tend to have their
lifetimes managed through iplist, so for the most part, this isn't a big
deal.  However, there are some places where LLVM deletes values, and
those places had to be migrated to deleteValue.  I have also created
llvm::unique_value, which has a custom deleter, so it can be used in
place of std::unique_ptr<Value>.

I had to add the "DerivedUser" Deleter escape hatch for MemorySSA, which
derives from User outside of lib/IR. Code in IR cannot include MemorySSA
headers or call the MemoryAccess object destructors without introducing
a circular dependency, so we need some level of indirection.
Unfortunately, no class derived from User may have any virtual methods,
because adding a virtual method would break User::getHungOffOperands(),
which assumes that it can find the use list immediately prior to the
User object. I've added a static_assert to the appropriate OperandTraits
templates to help people avoid this trap.

Reviewers: chandlerc, mehdi_amini, pete, dberlin, george.burgess.iv

Reviewed By: chandlerc

Subscribers: krytarowski, eraman, george.burgess.iv, mzolotukhin, Prazek, nlewycky, hans, inglorion, pcc, tejohnson, dberlin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31261

llvm-svn: 303362
2017-05-18 17:24:10 +00:00
Daniel Berlin 4d0fe64ae3 Kill off the old SimplifyInstruction API by converting remaining users.
llvm-svn: 301673
2017-04-28 19:55:38 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 927d8e610a [IR] Redesign the case iterator in SwitchInst to actually be an iterator
and to expose a handle to represent the actual case rather than having
the iterator return a reference to itself.

All of this allows the iterator to be used with common STL facilities,
standard algorithms, etc.

Doing this exposed some missing facilities in the iterator facade that
I've fixed and required some work to the actual iterator to fully
support the necessary API.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31548

llvm-svn: 300032
2017-04-12 07:27:28 +00:00
Daniel Berlin 12883b1673 Templatize parts of VNCoercion, and add constant-only versions of the functions to be used in NewGVN.
NFCI.

Summary:
This is ground work for the changes to enable coercion in NewGVN.
GVN doesn't care if they end up constant because it eliminates as it goes.
NewGVN cares.

IRBuilder and ConstantFolder deliberately present the same interface,
so we use this to our advantage to templatize our functions to make
them either constant only or not.

Reviewers: davide

Subscribers: llvm-commits, Prazek

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30928

llvm-svn: 298262
2017-03-20 16:08:29 +00:00
Craig Topper d55e153b87 [GVN] Fix accidental double storage of the function BasicBlock list in iterateOnFunction
Summary:
iterateOnFunction creates a ReversePostOrderTraversal object which does a post order traversal in its constructor and stores the results in an internal vector. Iteration over it just reads from the internal vector in reverse order.

The GVN code seems to be unaware of this and iterates over ReversePostOrderTraversal object and makes a copy of the vector into a local vector. (I think at one point in time we used a DFS here instead which would have required the local vector).

The net affect of this is that we have two vectors containing the basic block list. As I didn't want to expose the implementation detail of ReversePostOrderTraversal's constructor to GVN, I've changed the code to do an explicit post order traversal storing into the local vector and then reverse iterate over that.

I've also removed the reserve(256) since the ReversePostOrderTraversal wasn't doing that. I can add it back if we thinks it important. Though it seemed weird that it wasn't based on the size of the function.

Reviewers: davide, anemet, dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31084

llvm-svn: 298191
2017-03-18 18:24:41 +00:00
Daniel Berlin cd07a0f685 VNCoercion: Make the function signatures all consistent
llvm-svn: 297537
2017-03-11 00:51:01 +00:00
Daniel Berlin 5ac9179f6c Move memory coercion functions from GVN.cpp to VNCoercion.cpp so they can be shared between GVN and NewGVN.
Summary:
These are the functions used to determine when values of loads can be
extracted from stores, etc, and to perform the necessary insertions to
do this.  There are no changes to the functions themselves except
reformatting, and one case where memdep was informed of a removed load
(which was pushed into the caller).

Reviewers: davide

Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, Prazek

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30478

llvm-svn: 297438
2017-03-10 04:54:10 +00:00
Davide Italiano 116464a55d [NewGVN] Preserve TargetLibraryInfo analysis.
We can maybe preserve more but this is a first step.
Ack'ed by Danny on IRC.

llvm-svn: 293694
2017-01-31 21:53:18 +00:00
Taewook Oh 75acec8a14 Do not propagate DebugLoc across basic blocks
Summary:
DebugLoc shouldn't be propagated across basic blocks to prevent incorrect stepping and imprecise sample profile result. rL288903 addressed the wrong DebugLoc propagation issue by limiting the copy of DebugLoc when GVN removes a fully redundant load that is dominated by some other load. However, DebugLoc is still incorrectly propagated in the following example:


```
1:  extern int g;
2: 
3:  void foo(int x, int y, int z) {
4:    if (x)
5:      g = 0;
6:    else
7:      g = 1;
8:
9:    int i = 0;
10:   for ( ; i < y ; i++)
11:     if (i > z)
12:       g++;
13: }

```
Below is LLVM IR representation of the program before GVN:


```
@g = external local_unnamed_addr global i32, align 4

; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable
define void @foo(i32 %x, i32 %y, i32 %z) local_unnamed_addr #0 !dbg !4 {
entry:
  %not.tobool = icmp eq i32 %x, 0, !dbg !8
  %.sink = zext i1 %not.tobool to i32, !dbg !8
  store i32 %.sink, i32* @g, align 4, !tbaa !9
  %cmp8 = icmp sgt i32 %y, 0, !dbg !13
  br i1 %cmp8, label %for.body.preheader, label %for.end, !dbg !17

for.body.preheader:                               ; preds = %entry
  br label %for.body, !dbg !19

for.body:                                         ; preds = %for.body.preheader, %for.inc
  %i.09 = phi i32 [ %inc4, %for.inc ], [ 0, %for.body.preheader ]
  %cmp1 = icmp sgt i32 %i.09, %z, !dbg !19
  br i1 %cmp1, label %if.then2, label %for.inc, !dbg !21

if.then2:                                         ; preds = %for.body
  %0 = load i32, i32* @g, align 4, !dbg !22, !tbaa !9
  %inc = add nsw i32 %0, 1, !dbg !22
  store i32 %inc, i32* @g, align 4, !dbg !22, !tbaa !9
  br label %for.inc, !dbg !23

for.inc:                                          ; preds = %for.body, %if.then2
  %inc4 = add nuw nsw i32 %i.09, 1, !dbg !24
  %exitcond = icmp ne i32 %inc4, %y, !dbg !13
  br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end.loopexit, !dbg !17

for.end.loopexit:                                 ; preds = %for.inc
  br label %for.end, !dbg !26

for.end:                                          ; preds = %for.end.loopexit, %entry
  ret void, !dbg !26
}

```
where 


```
!21 = !DILocation(line: 11, column: 9, scope: !15)
!22 = !DILocation(line: 12, column: 8, scope: !20)
!23 = !DILocation(line: 12, column: 7, scope: !20)
!24 = !DILocation(line: 10, column: 20, scope: !25)
```

And below is after GVN:


```
@g = external local_unnamed_addr global i32, align 4

define void @foo(i32 %x, i32 %y, i32 %z) local_unnamed_addr !dbg !4 {
entry:
  %not.tobool = icmp eq i32 %x, 0, !dbg !8
  %.sink = zext i1 %not.tobool to i32, !dbg !8
  store i32 %.sink, i32* @g, align 4, !tbaa !9
  %cmp8 = icmp sgt i32 %y, 0, !dbg !13
  br i1 %cmp8, label %for.body.preheader, label %for.end, !dbg !17

for.body.preheader:                               ; preds = %entry
  br label %for.body, !dbg !19

for.body:                                         ; preds = %for.inc, %for.body.preheader
  %0 = phi i32 [ %1, %for.inc ], [ %.sink, %for.body.preheader ], !dbg !21
  %i.09 = phi i32 [ %inc4, %for.inc ], [ 0, %for.body.preheader ]
  %cmp1 = icmp sgt i32 %i.09, %z, !dbg !19
  br i1 %cmp1, label %if.then2, label %for.inc, !dbg !22

if.then2:                                         ; preds = %for.body
  %inc = add nsw i32 %0, 1, !dbg !21
  store i32 %inc, i32* @g, align 4, !dbg !21, !tbaa !9
  br label %for.inc, !dbg !23

for.inc:                                          ; preds = %if.then2, %for.body
  %1 = phi i32 [ %inc, %if.then2 ], [ %0, %for.body ]
  %inc4 = add nuw nsw i32 %i.09, 1, !dbg !24
  %exitcond = icmp ne i32 %inc4, %y, !dbg !13
  br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end.loopexit, !dbg !17

for.end.loopexit:                                 ; preds = %for.inc
  br label %for.end, !dbg !26

for.end:                                          ; preds = %for.end.loopexit, %entry
  ret void, !dbg !26
}

```
As you see, GVN removes the load in if.then2 block and creates a phi instruction in for.body for it. The problem is that DebugLoc of remove load instruction is propagated to the newly created phi instruction, which is wrong. rL288903 cannot handle this case because ValuesPerBlock.size() is not 1 in this example when the load is removed.

Reviewers: aprantl, andreadb, wolfgangp

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29254

llvm-svn: 293688
2017-01-31 20:57:13 +00:00
Matthias Braun 8c209aa877 Cleanup dump() functions.
We had various variants of defining dump() functions in LLVM. Normalize
them (this should just consistently implement the things discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2014-January/034323.html

For reference:
- Public headers should just declare the dump() method but not use
  LLVM_DUMP_METHOD or #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
- The definition of a dump method should look like this:
  #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
  LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void MyClass::dump() {
    // print stuff to dbgs()...
  }
  #endif

llvm-svn: 293359
2017-01-28 02:02:38 +00:00
Wolfgang Pieb ce13e716c5 [DWARF] Null out the debug locs of load instructions that have been moved by GVN
performing partial redundancy elimination (PRE). Not doing so can cause jumpy line
tables and confusing (though correct) source attributions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27857

llvm-svn: 291037
2017-01-04 23:58:26 +00:00
Daniel Jasper aec2fa352f Revert @llvm.assume with operator bundles (r289755-r289757)
This creates non-linear behavior in the inliner (see more details in
r289755's commit thread).

llvm-svn: 290086
2016-12-19 08:22:17 +00:00
Hal Finkel 3ca4a6bcf1 Remove the AssumptionCache
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...

llvm-svn: 289756
2016-12-15 03:02:15 +00:00
Andrea Di Biagio ae5780104f When GVN removes a redundant load, it should not modify the debug location of the dominating load.
In the case of a fully redundant load LI dominated by an equivalent load V, GVN
should always preserve the original debug location of V. Otherwise, we risk to
introduce an incorrect stepping.
If V has debug info, then clearly it should not be modified. If V has a null
debugloc, then it is still potentially incorrect to propagate LI's debugloc
because LI may not post-dominate V.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27468

llvm-svn: 288903
2016-12-07 12:31:36 +00:00
Adam Nemet 4ddb8c01b1 [GVN, OptDiag] Print the interesting instructions involved in missed load-elimination
[recommitting after the fix in r288307]

This includes the intervening store and the load/store that we're trying
to forward from in the optimization remark for the missed load
elimination.

This is hooked up under a new mode in ORE that allows for compile-time
budget for a bit more analysis to print more insightful messages.  This
mode is currently enabled for -fsave-optimization-record (-Rpass is
trickier since it is controlled in the front-end).

With this we can now print the red remark in http://lab.llvm.org:8080/artifacts/opt-view_test-suite/build/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/CMakeFiles/dry.dir/html/_org_test-suite_SingleSource_Benchmarks_Dhrystone_dry.c.html#L446

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26490

llvm-svn: 288381
2016-12-01 17:34:50 +00:00
Adam Nemet 8b5fba8081 [GVN, OptDiag] Include the value that is forwarded in load elimination
[recommitting after the fix in r288307]

This requires some changes to the opt-diag API.  Hal and I have
discussed this at the Dev Meeting and came up with a streaming delimiter
(setExtraArgs) to solve this.

Arguments after this delimiter are only included in the optimization
records and not in the remarks printed in the compiler output.  (Note,
how in the test the content of the YAML file changes but the remarks on
the compiler output don't.)

This implements the green GVN message with a bug fix at line
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/artifacts/opt-view_test-suite/build/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/CMakeFiles/dry.dir/html/_org_test-suite_SingleSource_Benchmarks_Dhrystone_dry.c.html#L446

The fix is that now we properly include the constant value in the
message: "load of type i32 eliminated in favor of 7"

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26489

llvm-svn: 288380
2016-12-01 17:34:44 +00:00
Adam Nemet 4d2a6e5998 [GVN] Basic optimization remark support
[recommitting after the fix in r288307]

Follow-on patches will add more interesting cases.

The goal of this patch-set is to get the GVN messages printed in
opt-viewer from Dhrystone as was presented in my Dev Meeting talk.  This
is the optimization view for the function (the last remark in the
function has a bug which is fixed in this series):
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/artifacts/opt-view_test-suite/build/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/CMakeFiles/dry.dir/html/_org_test-suite_SingleSource_Benchmarks_Dhrystone_dry.c.html#L430

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26488

llvm-svn: 288370
2016-12-01 16:40:32 +00:00
Adam Nemet feafcd9688 [GVN] When merging blocks update LoopInfo if it's available
If LoopInfo is available during GVN, BasicAA will use it.  However
MergeBlockIntoPredecessor does not update LI as it merges blocks.

This didn't use to cause problems because LI was freed before
GVN/BasicAA.  Now with OptimizationRemarkEmitter, the lifetime of LI is
extended so LI needs to be kept up-to-date during GVN.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27288

llvm-svn: 288307
2016-12-01 03:56:43 +00:00
Adam Nemet d4717bd8f3 Revert "[GVN] Basic optimization remark support"
This reverts commit r288210.

The failure on the stage2 LTO build is back.

llvm-svn: 288226
2016-11-30 01:14:35 +00:00
Adam Nemet d5747be721 [GVN] Basic optimization remark support
[recommiting patches one-by-one to see which breaks the stage2 LTO bot]

Follow-on patches will add more interesting cases.

The goal of this patch-set is to get the GVN messages printed in
opt-viewer from Dhrystone as was presented in my Dev Meeting talk.  This
is the optimization view for the function (the last remark in the
function has a bug which is fixed in this series):
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/artifacts/opt-view_test-suite/build/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/CMakeFiles/dry.dir/html/_org_test-suite_SingleSource_Benchmarks_Dhrystone_dry.c.html#L430

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26488

llvm-svn: 288210
2016-11-29 22:37:01 +00:00
Adam Nemet c2ed4b35b4 Revert "[GVN] Basic optimization remark support"
This reverts commit r288046.

Trying to see if the revert fixes a compiler crash during a stage2 LTO
build with a GVN backtrace.

llvm-svn: 288179
2016-11-29 18:32:04 +00:00
Adam Nemet 91d4d93f94 Revert "[GVN, OptDiag] Include the value that is forwarded in load elimination"
This reverts commit r288047.

Trying to see if the revert fixes a compiler crash during a stage2 LTO
build with a GVN backtrace.

llvm-svn: 288178
2016-11-29 18:32:00 +00:00
Adam Nemet a4d3d44ec2 Revert "[GVN, OptDiag] Print the interesting instructions involved in missed load-elimination"
This reverts commit r288090.

Trying to see if the revert fixes a compiler crash during a stage2 LTO
build with a GVN backtrace.

llvm-svn: 288177
2016-11-29 18:31:53 +00:00
Adam Nemet b9e53c9056 [GVN, OptDiag] Print the interesting instructions involved in missed load-elimination
This includes the intervening store and the load/store that we're trying
to forward from in the optimization remark for the missed load
elimination.

This is hooked up under a new mode in ORE that allows for compile-time
budget for a bit more analysis to print more insightful messages.  This
mode is currently enabled for -fsave-optimization-record (-Rpass is
trickier since it is controlled in the front-end).

With this we can now print the red remark in http://lab.llvm.org:8080/artifacts/opt-view_test-suite/build/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/CMakeFiles/dry.dir/html/_org_test-suite_SingleSource_Benchmarks_Dhrystone_dry.c.html#L446

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26490

llvm-svn: 288090
2016-11-29 00:09:22 +00:00
Adam Nemet a415a9bde6 [GVN, OptDiag] Include the value that is forwarded in load elimination
This requires some changes to the opt-diag API.  Hal and I have
discussed this at the Dev Meeting and came up with a streaming delimiter
(setExtraArgs) to solve this.

Arguments after this delimiter are only included in the optimization
records and not in the remarks printed in the compiler output.  (Note,
how in the test the content of the YAML file changes but the remarks on
the compiler output don't.)

This implements the green GVN message with a bug fix at line
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/artifacts/opt-view_test-suite/build/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/CMakeFiles/dry.dir/html/_org_test-suite_SingleSource_Benchmarks_Dhrystone_dry.c.html#L446

The fix is that now we properly include the constant value in the
message: "load of type i32 eliminated in favor of 7"

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26489

llvm-svn: 288047
2016-11-28 17:45:34 +00:00
Adam Nemet e5112b14b9 [GVN] Basic optimization remark support
Follow-on patches will add more interesting cases.

The goal of this patch-set is to get the GVN messages printed in
opt-viewer from Dhrystone as was presented in my Dev Meeting talk.  This
is the optimization view for the function (the last remark in the
function has a bug which is fixed in this series):
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/artifacts/opt-view_test-suite/build/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/CMakeFiles/dry.dir/html/_org_test-suite_SingleSource_Benchmarks_Dhrystone_dry.c.html#L430

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26488

llvm-svn: 288046
2016-11-28 17:45:28 +00:00
Vyacheslav Klochkov 9a630dfb57 Fixed the lost FastMathFlags in GVN(Global Value Numbering).
Reviewer: Hal Finkel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26952

llvm-svn: 287700
2016-11-22 20:52:53 +00:00
Davide Italiano d15477b09d Revert "[GVN/PRE] Hoist global values outside of loops."
There's no agreement about this patch. I personally find the
PRE machinery of the current GVN hard enough to reason about
that I'm not sure I'll try to land this again, instead of working
on the rewrite).

llvm-svn: 284796
2016-10-21 01:37:02 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 26b2593b24 [GVN] Use defaulted members. No functional change.
llvm-svn: 284726
2016-10-20 13:09:12 +00:00
Davide Italiano 36efa68463 [GVN] Consistently use division instead of shift. NFCI.
This is in line with other places of GVN (e.g. load coercion
logic).

llvm-svn: 284535
2016-10-18 21:02:27 +00:00
Davide Italiano 64cd985e44 [GVN] Remove dead code. NFC.
llvm-svn: 284534
2016-10-18 21:00:26 +00:00
Davide Italiano 590ad7037e [GVN/PRE] Hoist global values outside of loops.
In theory this could be generalized to move anything where
we prove the operands are available, but that would require
rewriting PRE. As NewGVN will hopefully come soon, and we're
trying to rewrite PRE in terms of NewGVN+MemorySSA, it's probably
not worth spending too much time on it. Fix provided by
Daniel Berlin!

llvm-svn: 284311
2016-10-15 21:35:23 +00:00
Dehao Chen db3810771e revert r280427
Refactor replaceDominatedUsesWith to have a flag to control whether to replace uses in BB itself.

Summary: This is in preparation for LoopSink pass which calls replaceDominatedUsesWith to update after sinking.
llvm-svn: 280949
2016-09-08 15:25:12 +00:00
Dehao Chen ddd0c125e3 Refactor replaceDominatedUsesWith to have a flag to control whether to replace uses in BB itself.
Summary: This is in preparation for LoopSink pass which calls replaceDominatedUsesWith to update after sinking.

Reviewers: chandlerc, davidxl, danielcdh

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24170

llvm-svn: 280427
2016-09-01 23:26:48 +00:00
Sean Silva 36e0d01e13 Consistently use FunctionAnalysisManager
Besides a general consistently benefit, the extra layer of indirection
allows the mechanical part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23256 that
requires touching every transformation and analysis to be factored out
cleanly.

Thanks to David for the suggestion.

llvm-svn: 278077
2016-08-09 00:28:15 +00:00
David Majnemer d536f2328e [ConstnatFolding] Teach the folder how to fold ConstantVector
A ConstantVector can have ConstantExpr operands and vice versa.
However, the folder had no ability to fold ConstantVectors which, in
some cases, was an optimization barrier.

Instead, rephrase the folder in terms of Constants instead of
ConstantExprs and teach callers how to deal with failure.

llvm-svn: 277099
2016-07-29 03:27:26 +00:00
Ekaterina Romanova 7aea5906c0 [GVN] Fold constant expression in GVN.
Fix for PR 28418.

opt never finishes compiling a test when -gvn option is passed.
The problem is caused by the fact that GVN fails to fold a constant expression.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22185

llvm-svn: 275483
2016-07-14 22:02:25 +00:00
David Majnemer b8da3a2bb2 Reinstate r273711
r273711 was reverted by r273743.  The inliner needs to know about any
call sites in the inlined function.  These were obscured if we replaced
a call to undef with an undef but kept the call around.

This fixes PR28298.

llvm-svn: 273753
2016-06-25 00:04:10 +00:00
Nico Weber ae2ef4ccd4 Revert r273711, it caused PR28298.
llvm-svn: 273743
2016-06-24 22:52:39 +00:00
David Majnemer 3b3e954ea2 SimplifyInstruction does not imply DCE
We cannot remove an instruction with no uses just because
SimplifyInstruction succeeds.  It may have side effects.

llvm-svn: 273711
2016-06-24 19:34:46 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 1afc1de406 Apply another batch of fixes from clang-tidy's performance-unnecessary-value-param.
Contains some manual fixes. No functionality change intended.

llvm-svn: 273047
2016-06-17 20:41:14 +00:00
Davide Italiano fea0a4c5b2 [PM] Preserve the correct set of analyses for GVN.
llvm-svn: 271934
2016-06-06 20:01:50 +00:00
Davide Italiano 82c447823b [GVN] Switch dump() definition over to LLVM_DUMP_METHOD.
llvm-svn: 271932
2016-06-06 19:24:27 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 6fff9dc932 [GVN] Preserve !range metadata when PRE'ing loads
Reviewers: dberlin, reames, george.burgess.iv

Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20743

llvm-svn: 271034
2016-05-27 19:03:10 +00:00
Philip Reames 4a3c3b66d7 [GVN] PRE of unordered loads
Again, fairly simple.  Only change is ensuring that we actually copy the property of the load correctly.  The aliasing legality constraints were already handled by the FRE patches.  There's nothing special about unorder atomics from the perspective of the PRE algorithm itself.

llvm-svn: 268804
2016-05-06 21:43:51 +00:00
Philip Reames 1fdce639d2 [GVN] Handle unordered atomics in cross block FRE
You'll note there are essentially no code changes here.  Cross block FRE heavily reuses code from the block local FRE.  All of the tricky parts were done as part of the previous patch and the refactoring that removed the original code duplication.  

llvm-svn: 268775
2016-05-06 18:46:45 +00:00
Philip Reames ae8997f496 [GVN] Do local FRE for unordered atomic loads
This patch is the first in a small series teaching GVN to optimize unordered loads aggressively. This change just handles block local FRE because that's the simplest thing which lets me test MDA, and the AvailableValue pieces. Somewhat suprisingly, MDA appears fine and only a couple of small changes are needed in GVN.

Once this is in, I'll tackle non-local FRE and PRE. The former looks like a natural extension of this, the later will require a couple of minor changes.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19440

llvm-svn: 268770
2016-05-06 18:17:13 +00:00
Chad Rosier 712b7d7630 [GVN] Minor code cleanup. NFC.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18828
Patch by Aditya Kumar!

llvm-svn: 267898
2016-04-28 16:00:15 +00:00
Andrew Kaylor aa641a5171 Re-commit optimization bisect support (r267022) without new pass manager support.
The original commit was reverted because of a buildbot problem with LazyCallGraph::SCC handling (not related to the OptBisect handling).

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172

llvm-svn: 267231
2016-04-22 22:06:11 +00:00
Vedant Kumar 6013f45f92 Revert "Initial implementation of optimization bisect support."
This reverts commit r267022, due to an ASan failure:

  http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage2-cmake-RgSan_check/1549

llvm-svn: 267115
2016-04-22 06:51:37 +00:00