Unmerges have the same fundamental problem as G_TRUNC, and G_TRUNC
could be implemented in terms of G_UNMERGE_VALUES. Reducing the number
of elements in unmerge results ends up producing the original unmerge
type profile, so the artifact combiner needs to eliminate the
intermediate illegal registers. This avoids infinite looping in the
legalizer in a future change.
Assuming an unmerge has each result unmerged the same way, this ends
up producing a new unmerge of the source for every definition. I'm not
sure if the artifact combiner should either insert temporary merges
here and erase the original merge, or if the combiner should look at
uses from defs rather than defs from uses for unmerges.
In a few cases this regresses from using 16-bit shifts for 8-bit
values to using 32-bit shifts, but I think these can be legalized
later (the other legalization rules don't try very hard to use 16-bit
shifts either).
Most notably, we were incorrectly reporting <3 x s16> as a legal type
for these. Make sure these aren't legal to help make progress on
fixing the artifact combiner and vector legalizer
rules. Unfortunately, this means spreading the -global-isel-abort=0
hack, although this doesn't change the legalizer result in any
situation.
Implicit uses of non-register value types places impossible to satisfy
constraints on the legalizer / artifact combiner. These prevent
writing sensible legalize rules for the artifacts without triggering
infinite loops in the legalizer.
The verifier really needs to enforce this, but I'm not sure what the
exact conditions would look like yet.
The artifact combiner searches for the uses of G_MERGE_VALUES for
unmerge/trunc that need further combining. This also needs to handle
the vector merge opcodes the same way. This fixes leaving behind some
pairs I expected to be removed, that were if the legalizer is run a
second time.
Summary:
Combine unmerge(trunc) to enable other merge combines.
Without this combine, the scalar unmerge(trunc(merge))
pattern cannot be combined and easily lead to
hard-to-legalize merge/unmerge artifacts.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79567
G_BITCAST can be lowered with a pair of G_UNMERGE_VALUES and
G_MERGE_VALUES with different types, but G_UNMERGE_VALUES of a vector
can also be implemented with a bitcast to a scalar, which introduces
the possibility for infinite loops. Try to eliminate an illegal source
register type in the artifact combiner to avoid this from happening.
Avoids infinite looping in the legalizer in a future patch which
allows lowering G_UNMERGE_VALUES of a vector source with a G_BITCAST.
Summary:
The combine for unmerge(cast(merge)) is only valid for vectors, but was
missing a corresponding check. Add a check that the operands are vectors
to avoid an invalid combine.
Without this check, the combiner would emit incorrect code for scalars
and pointers because the artifact cast (trunc/ext) only affects bits at
the end of the type, while this combine assumes that the casted bits
appear between meaningful bits.
This also uncovered a segmentation fault in the AMDGPU
InstructionSelector. The tests triggering this bug have been moved to
their own file and a check for the segmentation fault has been added.
Reviewers: arsenm, dsanders, aemerson, paquette, aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: tpr, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78191
The combine G_UNMERGE_VALUES with G_CONCAT_VECTORS used to only be performed
when the result type of the G_UNMERGE_VALUES was a vector type.
In other words, we were expecting that the G_UNMERGE_VALUES was effectively
the exact opposite of the G_CONCAT_VECTORS.
Lift that constraint by allowing any G_UNMERGE_VALUES to be combined
with any G_CONCAT_VECTORS (as long as the size of the different pieces
that we merge/unmerge match).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69288
Summary:
Targets often have instructions that can sign-extend certain cases faster
than the equivalent shift-left/arithmetic-shift-right. Such cases can be
identified by matching a shift-left/shift-right pair but there are some
issues with this in the context of combines. For example, suppose you can
sign-extend 8-bit up to 32-bit with a target extend instruction.
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24 # (I've inlined the G_CONSTANT for brevity)
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
would reasonably combine to:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 25
which no longer matches the special case. If your shifts and extend are
equal cost, this would break even as a pair of shifts but if your shift is
more expensive than the extend then it's cheaper as:
%2:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG %0:_(s32), i32 8
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
It's possible to match the shift-pair in ISel and emit an extend and ashr.
However, this is far from the only way to break this shift pair and make
it hard to match the extends. Another example is that with the right
known-zeros, this:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_MUL %2:_(s32), i32 2
can become:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 23
All upstream targets have been configured to lower it to the current
G_SHL,G_ASHR pair but will likely want to make it legal in some cases to
handle their faster cases.
To follow-up: Provide a way to legalize based on the constant. At the
moment, I'm thinking that the best way to achieve this is to provide the
MI in LegalityQuery but that opens the door to breaking core principles
of the legalizer (legality is not context sensitive). That said, it's
worth noting that looking at other instructions and acting on that
information doesn't violate this principle in itself. It's only a
violation if, at the end of legalization, a pass that checks legality
without being able to see the context would say an instruction might not be
legal. That's a fairly subtle distinction so to give a concrete example,
saying %2 in:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, %1
is legal is in violation of that principle if the legality of %2 depends
on %1 being constant and/or being 16. However, legalizing to either:
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, 16
or:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2:_(s32) = G_SHL %0, %1
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2, %1
depending on whether %1 is constant and 16 does not violate that principle
since both outputs are genuinely legal.
Reviewers: bogner, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, aemerson, paquette, arsenm
Subscribers: sdardis, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61289
llvm-svn: 368487
AMDGPU sometimes has legal s16 and <2 x s16> operations, but all
registers are really 32-bit. An unmerge destination really should ben
widened to a 32-bit register. If widening a scalarizing vector with a
target size that matches the vector size, bitcast to integer and
extract the relevant bits with shifts.
I'm not sure if this is the right place for this. This could arguably
be part of widenScalar for the result. I also have a growing feeling
that we're missing a bitcast legalize action.
llvm-svn: 367604
Matt Arsenault