number of copies, potentially defining live ranges that appear to have
differing value numbers that become identical when coallsced. Among other
things, this fixes CodeGen/X86/shift-coalesce.ll and PR687.
llvm-svn: 29968
paves the way for future changes, increases coallescing opportunities (in
theory, not witnessed in practice), and eliminates the really expensive
LiveIntervals::overlapsAliases method.
llvm-svn: 29890
instructions which define each value#) to simplify and improve the coallescer.
In particular, this patch:
1. Implements iterative coallescing.
2. Reverts an unsafe hack from handlePhysRegDef, superceeding it with a
better solution.
3. Implements PR865, "coallescing" away the second copy in code like:
A = B
...
B = A
This also includes changes to symbolically print registers in intervals
when possible.
llvm-svn: 29862
But this is incorrect if the spilled value live range extends beyond the
current BB.
It is currently controlled by a temporary option -spiller-check-liveout.
llvm-svn: 28024
For example, we can now join things like [0-30:0)[31-40:1)[52-59:2)
with [40:60:0) if the 52-59 range is defined by a copy from the 40-60 range.
The resultant range ends up being [0-30:0)[31-60:1).
This fires a lot through-out the test suite (e.g. shrinking bc from
19492 -> 18509 machineinstrs) though most gains are smaller (e.g. about
50 copies eliminated from crafty).
llvm-svn: 23866
only add a reload live range once for the instruction. This is one step
towards fixing a regalloc pessimization that Nate notice, but is later undone
by the spiller (so no code is changed).
llvm-svn: 23293
numbering values in live ranges for physical registers.
The alpha backend currently generates code that looks like this:
vreg = preg
...
preg = vreg
use preg
...
preg = vreg
use preg
etc. Because vreg contains the value of preg coming in, each of the
copies back into preg contain that initial value as well.
In the case of the Alpha, this allows this testcase:
void "foo"(int %blah) {
store int 5, int *%MyVar
store int 12, int* %MyVar2
ret void
}
to compile to:
foo:
ldgp $29, 0($27)
ldiq $0,5
stl $0,MyVar
ldiq $0,12
stl $0,MyVar2
ret $31,($26),1
instead of:
foo:
ldgp $29, 0($27)
bis $29,$29,$0
ldiq $1,5
bis $0,$0,$29
stl $1,MyVar
ldiq $1,12
bis $0,$0,$29
stl $1,MyVar2
ret $31,($26),1
This does not seem to have any noticable effect on X86 code.
This fixes PR535.
llvm-svn: 20536
it was a use, def, or both. This allows us to be less pessimistic in our
analysis of them. In practice, this doesn't make a big difference, but it
doesn't hurt either.
llvm-svn: 16632
Chris Lattner