Also:
* Fix header line in all status tables.
* Use C++20 instead of C++2a.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, miscco
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92306
Also, add notes about exporting ABI symbols.
Later, we can add notes about using git-clang-format before sending a patch for review.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92300
The static_assert in "libcxx/include/memory" was the main offender here,
but then I figured I might as well `git grep -i instantat` and fix all
the instances I found. One was in user-facing HTML documentation;
the rest were in comments or tests.
I used a lot of `git grep` to find places where `std::` was being used
outside of comments and assert-messages. There were three outcomes:
- Qualified function calls, e.g. `std::move` becomes `_VSTD::move`.
This is the most common case.
- Typenames that don't need qualification, e.g. `std::allocator` becomes `allocator`.
Leaving these as `_VSTD::allocator` would also be fine, but I decided
that removing the qualification is more consistent with existing practice.
- Names that specifically need un-versioned `std::` qualification,
or that I wasn't sure about. For example, I didn't touch any code in
<atomic>, <math.h>, <new>, or any ext/ or experimental/ headers;
and I didn't touch any instances of `std::type_info`.
In some deduction guides, we were accidentally using `class Alloc = typename std::allocator<T>`,
despite `std::allocator<T>`'s type-ness not being template-dependent.
Because `std::allocator` is a qualified name, this did parse as we intended;
but what we meant was simply `class Alloc = allocator<T>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92250
Since we know exactly which identifiers we expect to find in `chrono`,
a using-directive seems like massive overkill. Remove the directives
and qualify the names as needed.
One subtle trick here: In two places I replaced `*__p` with `*__p.get()`.
The former is an unqualified call to `operator*` on a class type, which
triggers ADL and breaks the new test. The latter is a call to the
built-in `operator*` on pointers, which specifically
does NOT trigger ADL thanks to [over.match.oper]/1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92243
x86-64 ILP32 mode (x32) uses 32-bit size_t, so share the code with ix86 to zero out padding bits, not with x86-64 LP64 mode.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91349
The 5f12f4ff90 commit suppress printing of
inline namespace names in diagnostics by default that breaks the libc++
iterator test, which expects __1 in the namespace.
This patch fixes the test by supporting a test case without __1 in the
namespace.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92142
I think people were sometimes parenthesizing `(foo::max)()` out of
misplaced concern that an unparenthesized `foo::max()` would trip up
Windows' `max(a,b)` macro. However, this is not the case: `max(a,b)`
should be tripped up only by an unparenthesized call to `foo::max(a,b)`,
and in fact we already do `_VSTD::max(a,b)` all over the place anyway
without any guards.
However, in order to do it without guards, we must also
wrap the header in _LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS, which <span> was not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92240
This patch updates algorithms in <numeric> to use std::move
based on p0616r0. Moving values instead of copying them
creates huge speed improvements (see the paper for details).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61170
We create threads using std::thread in various places in the test suite.
However, the usual std::thread constructor may not work on all platforms,
e.g. on platforms where passing a stack size is required to create a thread.
This commit introduces a simple indirection that makes it easier to tweak
how threads are created inside the test suite on various platforms. Note
that tests that are purposefully calling std::thread's constructor directly
(e.g. because that is what they're testing) were not modified.
By encoding ABI-affecting properties in the name of the ABI list, it
makes it clear when an ABI list test should or should not be available,
and what results we should expect.
Note that we clearly don't encode all ABI-affecting parameters in the
name right now -- I just ported over what we supported in the code that
was there previously. As we encounter configurations that we wish to
support but produce different ABI lists, we can add those to the ABI
identifier and start supporting them.
This commit also starts checking the ABI list in the CI jobs that run
a supported configuration. Eventually, all configurations should have
a generated ABI list and the test should even run implicitly as part of
the Lit test suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92194
We don't actually update the ABI lists at every release -- it's too much
work, since we'd technically have to do it even for minor releases.
Furthermore, I don't think anybody uses those (I certainly don't rely
on them for anything).
Instead, it is better to rely on the ABI list changelog and the canonical
ABI list that we always keep up to date. If one wants to know what symbols
were shipped in a specific release, that can be discovered easily using
Git, which is a superior tool than keeping textual copies of old versions.
Using sysctl requires including headers that are considered internal on
Linux, like <sys/sysctl.h> & friends. Instead, sysconf is defined by POSIX
(and we have a fallback for Windows), so all the systems we support should
be happy with just sysconf.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92135
I'm not 100% sure what the issue actually is since I can't reproduce it
locally, however what I explain in the comment is my best attempt to
explain what's going on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92131
FreeBSD's locale data uses the same U+2027 separator as Glibc 2.27 and newer.
Reviewed By: #libc, emaste, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91165
This will fix remaining failures on gcc-9 buildbot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/101.
gcc-8 and gcc-9 do not support constexpr destructors nor constexpr allocation.
Fix gcc warnings: -Wconversion, -Wpragmas.
Currently, papers and issues are in separate .csv files (that is easier to update), but I can put them inline.Transforming current html tables into rst are done by the script (attached to the patch FYI but I'll remove it before committing).
I'll of course update RST files before committing to match any modifications that may happen in master branch.
This patch moves the status pages in www/ to RST format in docs/.
It also does some other minor changes: fix copyright year and broken comment end, adds substitutions for coherence (and add colors, but that can be removed easily).
It adds as well redirects from old to new status pages.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92076
This should make the builder http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/101/ happy.
It uses gcc-9 and not Tip-Of-Trunk as its name indicates BTW.
GCC-10 passes all these tests.
Fix gcc warnings: -Wsign-compare, -Wparentheses, -Wpragmas.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, #libc_abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92099
There were a couple of places where we needed to call the underlying
platform's aligned allocation/deallocation function. Instead of having
the same logic all over the place, extract the logic into a pair of
helper functions __libcpp_aligned_alloc and __libcpp_aligned_free.
The code in libcxxabi/src/fallback_malloc.cpp looks like it could be
simplified after this change -- I purposefully did not simplify it
further to keep this change as straightforward as possible, since it
is touching very important parts of the library.
Also, the changes in libcxx/src/new.cpp and libcxxabi/src/stdlib_new_delete.cpp
are basically the same -- I just kept both source files in sync.
The underlying reason for this refactoring is to make it easier to support
platforms that provide aligned allocation through C11's aligned_alloc
function instead of posix_memalign. After this change, we'll only have
to add support for that in a single place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91379
Implements P1956: On the names of low-level bit manipulation functions.
Users may use older versions of libc++ or other standard libraries with the old names. In order to keep compatibility the old functions are kept, but marked as deprecated.
The patch also adds a new config macro `_LIBCPP_DEPRECATED_MSG`. Do you prefer a this is a separate patch?
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90551
Zoe Carver says: "We decided that libc++ only supports C++20 constexpr algorithms
when `is_constant_evaluated` is also supported. Here's a link to the discussion."
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65721#inline-735682
Remove _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_BUILTIN_IS_CONSTANT_EVALUATED from tests, too.
See Louis's 5911e6a885 if needed to fix bots.
I've applied `UNSUPPORTED: clang-8` preemptively to the altered tests;
I don't know for sure that this was needed, because no clang-8 buildbots
are triggered on pull requests.
Fixes LWG issue 2724: "The protected virtual member functions of memory_resource should be private."
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66615
Marek Kurdej