This patch implements Flow Sensitive Sample FDO (FSAFDO) profile
loader. We have two profile loaders for FS profile,
one before RegAlloc and one before BlockPlacement.
To enable it, when -fprofile-sample-use=<profile> is specified,
add "-enable-fs-discriminator=true \
-disable-ra-fsprofile-loader=false \
-disable-layout-fsprofile-loader=false"
to turn on the FS profile loaders.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107878
There is some discussion on the bitcast for vector and x86_amx at https://reviews.llvm.org/D99152. This patch is to introduce a x86 specific cast for vector and x86_amx, so that it can avoid some unnecessary optimization by middle-end. On the other way, we have to optimize the x86 specific cast by ourselves. This patch also optimize the cast operation to eliminate redundant code.
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107544
Currently isReallyTriviallyReMaterializableGeneric() implementation
prevents rematerialization on any virtual register use on the grounds
that is not a trivial rematerialization and that we do not want to
extend liveranges.
It appears that LRE logic does not attempt to extend a liverange of
a source register for rematerialization so that is not an issue.
That is checked in the LiveRangeEdit::allUsesAvailableAt().
The only non-trivial aspect of it is accounting for tied-defs which
normally represent a read-modify-write operation and not rematerializable.
The test for a tied-def situation already exists in the
/CodeGen/AMDGPU/remat-vop.mir,
test_no_remat_v_cvt_f32_i32_sdwa_dst_unused_preserve.
The change has affected ARM/Thumb, Mips, RISCV, and x86. For the targets
where I more or less understand the asm it seems to reduce spilling
(as expected) or be neutral. However, it needs a review by all targets'
specialists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106408
Follow-up to D107068, attempt to fold nested concat_vectors/undefs, as long as both the vector and inner subvector types are legal.
This exposed the same issue in ARM's MVE LowerCONCAT_VECTORS_i1 (raised as PR51365) and AArch64's performConcatVectorsCombine which both assumed concat_vectors only took 2 subvector operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107597
This allows commuting any immediate value. The previous code only
commuted equality immediates. This was inherited from an earlier
version of VCMPSSZrm/VCMPSDZrm.
They were already added to findCommuteOpIndices, but they also
need to be in X86InstrInfo::commuteInstructionImpl in order
to adjust the immediate control.
memcmp is defined as taking a size_t length arg,
so that differs depending on pointer size of the
target.
We casually matched non-compliant function signatures
as memcmp, but that can cause crashing as seen with
PR50850.
If we fix that bug, these tests would no longer be
testing the expected behavior for a 32-bit target,
so I have duplicated all tests and adjusted them
to match the stricter definition of memcmp/bcmp
by changing the length arg to i32 on a 32-bit target.
This patch adds Pass1 of MIRADDFSDiscriminatorsPass before register
allocation, and Pass2 of MIRAddFSDiscriminatorsPass before
Block-Placement. This is still under --enable-fs-discrmininator
option (default false).
This would reduce the turn-around time for FSAFDO transition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104579
The IR for pmuldq/pmuludq intrinsics uses a sext_inreg/zext_inreg
pattern on the inputs. Ideally we pattern match these away during
isel. It is possible for LICM or other middle end optimizations
to separate the extend from the mul. This prevents SelectionDAG
from removing it or depending on how the extend is lowered, we
may not be able to generate an AssertSExt/AssertZExt in the
mul basic block. This will prevent pmuldq/pmuludq from being
formed at all.
This patch teaches shouldSinkOperands to recognize this so
that CodeGenPrepare will clone the extend into the same basic
block as the mul.
Fixes PR51371.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107689
This isn't optimal, but prevents crashing when the libcall isn't
available. It just calculates the full product and makes sure the high bits
match the sign of the low half. Each of the pieces should go through their own
type legalization.
This can make D107420 unnecessary.
Needs tests, but I wanted to start discussion about D107420.
Reviewed By: FreddyYe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107581
As reported on PR51281, an internal fuzz test encountered an issue when extracting constant bits from a SUBV_BROADCAST node from a constant pool source larger than the broadcasted subvector width.
The getTargetConstantBitsFromNode was assuming that the Constant would the same size as the subvector, resulting in the incorrect packing of the per-element bits data.
This patch attempts to solve this by using the SUBV_BROADCAST node to determine the subvector width, and then ensuring we extract only the lowest bits from Constant of that subvector bitsize.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107158
This is recommit of the patch 16ff91ebcc,
reverted in 0c28a7c990 because it had
an error in call of getFastMathFlags (base type should be FPMathOperator
but not Instruction). The original commit message is duplicated below:
Clang has builtin function '__builtin_isnan', which implements C
library function 'isnan'. This function now is implemented entirely in
clang codegen, which expands the function into set of IR operations.
There are three mechanisms by which the expansion can be made.
* The most common mechanism is using an unordered comparison made by
instruction 'fcmp uno'. This simple solution is target-independent
and works well in most cases. It however is not suitable if floating
point exceptions are tracked. Corresponding IEEE 754 operation and C
function must never raise FP exception, even if the argument is a
signaling NaN. Compare instructions usually does not have such
property, they raise 'invalid' exception in such case. So this
mechanism is unsuitable when exception behavior is strict. In
particular it could result in unexpected trapping if argument is SNaN.
* Another solution was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948.
It is used in the cases when raising FP exceptions by 'isnan' is not
allowed. This solution implements 'isnan' using integer operations.
It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one solution for all
targets, however some can do the check in more efficient way.
* Solution implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568 introduced a
hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects target
specific code into IR. Now only SystemZ implements this hook and it
generates a call to target specific intrinsic function.
Although these mechanisms allow to implement 'isnan' with enough
efficiency, expanding 'isnan' in clang has drawbacks:
* The operation 'isnan' is hidden behind generic integer operations or
target-specific intrinsics. It complicates analysis and can prevent
some optimizations.
* IR can be created by tools other than clang, in this case treatment
of 'isnan' has to be duplicated in that tool.
Another issue with the current implementation of 'isnan' comes from the
use of options '-ffast-math' or '-fno-honor-nans'. If such option is
specified, 'fcmp uno' may be optimized to 'false'. It is valid
optimization in general, but it results in 'isnan' always returning
'false'. For example, in some libc++ implementations the following code
returns 'false':
std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())
The options '-ffast-math' and '-fno-honor-nans' imply that FP operation
operands are never NaNs. This assumption however should not be applied
to the functions that check FP number properties, including 'isnan'. If
such function returns expected result instead of actually making
checks, it becomes useless in many cases. The option '-ffast-math' is
often used for performance critical code, as it can speed up execution
by the expense of manual treatment of corner cases. If 'isnan' returns
assumed result, a user cannot use it in the manual treatment of NaNs
and has to invent replacements, like making the check using integer
operations. There is a discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418,
which also expresses the opinion, that limitations imposed by
'-ffast-math' should be applied only to 'math' functions but not to
'tests'.
To overcome these drawbacks, this change introduces a new IR intrinsic
function 'llvm.isnan', which realizes the check as specified by IEEE-754
and C standards in target-agnostic way. During IR transformations it
does not undergo undesirable optimizations. It reaches instruction
selection, where is lowered in target-dependent way. The lowering can
vary depending on options like '-ffast-math' or '-ffp-model' so the
resulting code satisfies requested semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854
IR typically creates INSERT_SUBVECTOR patterns as a widening of the subvector with undefs to pad to the destination size, followed by a shuffle for the actual insertion - SelectionDAGBuilder has to do something similar for shuffles when source/destination vectors are different sizes.
This combine attempts to recognize these patterns by looking for a shuffle of a subvector (from a CONCAT_VECTORS) that starts at a modulo of its size into an otherwise identity shuffle of the base vector.
This uncovered a couple of target-specific issues as we haven't often created INSERT_SUBVECTOR nodes in generic code - aarch64 could only handle insertions into the bottom of undefs (i.e. a vector widening), and x86-avx512 vXi1 insertion wasn't keeping track of undef elements in the base vector.
Fixes PR50053
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107068
to `lib/CodeGen/CommandFlags.cpp`. It can replace
-x86-experimental-pref-loop-alignment=.
The loop alignment is only used by MachineBlockPlacement.
The implementation uses a new `llvm::TargetOptions` for now, as
an IR function attribute/module flags metadata may be overkill.
This is the llvm part of D106701.
Given a shuffle mask, if it is picking from an input that is splat
given the current granularity of the shuffle, then adjust the mask
to pick from the same lane of the input as the mask element is in.
This may result in a shuffle being simplified into a blend.
I believe this is correct given that the splat detection matches the one
just above the new code,
My basic thought is that we might be able to get less regressions
by handling multiple insertions of the same value into a vector
if we form broadcasts+blend here, as opposed to D105390,
but i have not really thought this through,
and did not try implementing it yet.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107009
Clang has builtin function '__builtin_isnan', which implements C
library function 'isnan'. This function now is implemented entirely in
clang codegen, which expands the function into set of IR operations.
There are three mechanisms by which the expansion can be made.
* The most common mechanism is using an unordered comparison made by
instruction 'fcmp uno'. This simple solution is target-independent
and works well in most cases. It however is not suitable if floating
point exceptions are tracked. Corresponding IEEE 754 operation and C
function must never raise FP exception, even if the argument is a
signaling NaN. Compare instructions usually does not have such
property, they raise 'invalid' exception in such case. So this
mechanism is unsuitable when exception behavior is strict. In
particular it could result in unexpected trapping if argument is SNaN.
* Another solution was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948.
It is used in the cases when raising FP exceptions by 'isnan' is not
allowed. This solution implements 'isnan' using integer operations.
It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one solution for all
targets, however some can do the check in more efficient way.
* Solution implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568 introduced a
hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects target
specific code into IR. Now only SystemZ implements this hook and it
generates a call to target specific intrinsic function.
Although these mechanisms allow to implement 'isnan' with enough
efficiency, expanding 'isnan' in clang has drawbacks:
* The operation 'isnan' is hidden behind generic integer operations or
target-specific intrinsics. It complicates analysis and can prevent
some optimizations.
* IR can be created by tools other than clang, in this case treatment
of 'isnan' has to be duplicated in that tool.
Another issue with the current implementation of 'isnan' comes from the
use of options '-ffast-math' or '-fno-honor-nans'. If such option is
specified, 'fcmp uno' may be optimized to 'false'. It is valid
optimization in general, but it results in 'isnan' always returning
'false'. For example, in some libc++ implementations the following code
returns 'false':
std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())
The options '-ffast-math' and '-fno-honor-nans' imply that FP operation
operands are never NaNs. This assumption however should not be applied
to the functions that check FP number properties, including 'isnan'. If
such function returns expected result instead of actually making
checks, it becomes useless in many cases. The option '-ffast-math' is
often used for performance critical code, as it can speed up execution
by the expense of manual treatment of corner cases. If 'isnan' returns
assumed result, a user cannot use it in the manual treatment of NaNs
and has to invent replacements, like making the check using integer
operations. There is a discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418,
which also expresses the opinion, that limitations imposed by
'-ffast-math' should be applied only to 'math' functions but not to
'tests'.
To overcome these drawbacks, this change introduces a new IR intrinsic
function 'llvm.isnan', which realizes the check as specified by IEEE-754
and C standards in target-agnostic way. During IR transformations it
does not undergo undesirable optimizations. It reaches instruction
selection, where is lowered in target-dependent way. The lowering can
vary depending on options like '-ffast-math' or '-ffp-model' so the
resulting code satisfies requested semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854
Currently, the default alignment is much larger than the actual size of
the vector in memory. Fix this to use a sane default.
For SVE, temporarily remove lowering of load/store operations for
predicates with less than 16 elements. The layout the backend was
assuming for SVE predicates with less than 16 elements doesn't agree
with the frontend. More work probably needs to be done here.
This change is, strictly speaking, not backwards-compatible at the
bitcode level. But probably nobody is actually depending on that; i1
vectors in memory are rare, and the code that does use them probably
ends up forcing the alignment to something sane anyway. If we think
this is a concern, I can restrict this to scalable vectors for now
(where it's actually causing issues for me at the moment).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88994
If all demanded elements of the BUILD_VECTOR pass a isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison check, then we can treat this specific demanded use of the BUILD_VECTOR as guaranteed not to be undef or poison either.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107174
This transform was added with D58874, but there were no tests for overflow ops.
We need to change this one way or another because it can crash as shown in:
https://llvm.org/PR51238
Note that if there are no uses of an overflow op's bool overflow result, we
reduce it to a regular math op, so we continue to fold that case either way.
If we have uses of both the math and the overflow bool, then we are likely
not saving anything by creating an independent sub instruction as seen in
the test diffs here.
This patch makes the behavior in SDAG consistent with what we do in
instcombine AFAICT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106983
There's a generic combine for these, but no test coverage.
It's not clear if this is actually a good fold.
The combine was added with D58874, but it has a bug that
can cause crashing ( https://llvm.org/PR51238 ).
In this episode, we are trying to avoid an x86 micro-arch quirk where complex
(3 operand) LEA potentially costs significantly more than simple LEA. So we
simultaneously push and pull the math around the CMOV to balance the operations.
I looked at the debug spew during instruction selection and decided against
trying a later DAGToDAG transform -- it seems very difficult to match if the
trailing memops are already selected and managing the creation of extra
instructions at that level is always tricky.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106918
This patch adds a peephole optimization `SETCC(FREEZE(x),const)` => `FREEZE(SETCC(x,const))`
if the SETCC is only used by BRCOND.
Combined with `BRCOND(FREEZE(X)) => BRCOND(X)`, this leads to a nice improvement in the generated assembly when x is a masked loaded value.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105344
Simon Pilgrim