-amdgpu-inline-max-bb option could lead to a suboptimal
codegen preventing inlining of really simple functions
including pure wrapper calls. Relax the cutoff by allowing
to call a function with a single block on the grounds
that it will not increase total number of blocks after
inlining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97744
Having a custom inliner doesn't really fit in with the new PM's
pipeline. It's also extra technical debt.
amdgpu-inline only does a couple of custom things compared to the normal
inliner:
1) It disables inlining if the number of BBs in a function would exceed
some limit
2) It increases the threshold if there are pointers to private arrays(?)
These can all be handled as TTI inliner hooks.
There already exists a hook for backends to multiply the inlining
threshold.
This way we can remove the custom amdgpu-inline pass.
This caused inline-hint.ll to fail, and after some investigation, it
looks like getInliningThresholdMultiplier() was previously getting
applied twice in amdgpu-inline (https://reviews.llvm.org/D62707 fixed it
not applying at all, so some later inliner change must have fixed
something), so I had to change the threshold in the test.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94153
This seems to only have overridden cold handling, which we probably
shouldn't do. As far as I can tell the wrapper library functions are
still inlined as appropriate.
Summary:
Most of IR instructions got better code size estimations after commit 47a5c36b.
So default parameters values should be updated to improve inlining and
unrolling for the target.
Reviewers: rampitec, arsenm
Reviewed By: rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70391
Summary:
Since the target has no significant advantage of vectorization,
vector instructions bous threshold bonus should be optional.
amdgpu-inline-arg-alloca-cost parameter default value and the target
InliningThresholdMultiplier value tuned then respectively.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, eraman, hiraditya, haicheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64642
llvm-svn: 366348
Stanislav Mekhanoshin