The validity of a branch condition must be verified at the location of the
branch (the branch instruction), not the location of the icmp that is
used in the branch instruction. When verifying at the wrong location, we
may accept an icmp that is defined within a loop which itself dominates, but
does not contain the branch instruction. Such loops cannot be modeled as
we only introduce domain dimensions for surrounding loops. To address this
problem we change the scop detection to evaluate and verify SCEV expressions at
the right location.
This issue has been around since at least r179148 "scop detection: properly
instantiate SCEVs to the place where they are used", where we explicitly
set the scope to the wrong location. Before this commit the scope
was not explicitly set, which probably also resulted in the scope around the
ICmp to be choosen.
This resolves http://llvm.org/PR30989
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286769
nThis avoids the nasty problems caused by using
memory instructions that read the exec mask while
spilling / restoring registers used for control flow
masking, but only for VI when these were added.
This always uses the scalar stores when enabled currently,
but it may be better to still try to spill to a VGPR
and use this on the fallback memory path.
The cache also needs to be flushed before wave termination
if a scalar store is used.
llvm-svn: 286766
GCC 4.7 or newer emits 0x90 (indirect | pcrel) as the ttype encoding.
This would hit an assertion in cxa_personality.cpp. This commit fixes
the problem by relaxing the assertion.
llvm-svn: 286760
This commit fixes libc++abi build when LLVM unwinder (libunwind_llvm) is
not enabled.
This commit fixes the problem by removing "LLVM_NATIVE_ARCH MATCHES ARM"
from CMakeLists.txt so that LIBCXXABI_USE_LLVM_UNWINDER will only be
defined when LLVM unwinder is enabled.
We need LIBCXXABI_USE_LLVM_UNWINDER becase there is a subtle difference
between the unwinder from libgcc and the one from libunwind_llvm. For
the unwinder from libgcc, we have to initialize register r12 with the
address of _Unwind_Control_Block; otherwise,
_Unwind_GetLanguageSpecificData() and _Unwind_GetRegionStart() won't
work properly. Consequently, there is an extra _Unwind_SetGR() when
LLVM unwinder is disabled. Check cxa_personality.cpp for details.
llvm-svn: 286759
This is part of a set of changes to allow InstCombine in the backend to optimize variable shifts without having to know about masking.
llvm-svn: 286757
These will be used to replace the masked intrinsics so that InstCombineCalls can optimize the AVX-512 variable shifts the same way it does for AVX2.
llvm-svn: 286754
All existing callers were manually extracting information out of an existing
GEP instruction and passing it to getGEPExpr(). Simplify the interface by
changing it to take a GEPOperator instead.
llvm-svn: 286751
Only look for a variable's value in the constant expression evaluation activation frame, if the variable was indeed declared in that frame, otherwise it might be a constant expression and be usable within a nested local scope or emit an error.
void f(char c) {
struct X {
static constexpr char f() {
return c; // error gracefully here as opposed to crashing.
}
};
int I = X::f();
}
llvm-svn: 286748
Summary: Inverting the mask argument does not reflect the intended semantics of the intrinsic.
Reviewers: igorb, delena
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26019
llvm-svn: 286733
Until we have handling for ignoring unloaded sections, simplify the logic to
the point of triviality. This fixes the scanning of archives, particularly when
embedded in archives.
llvm-svn: 286727
After this I'll add the unmasked intrinsics to InstCombineCalls to finish making our handling of these types of shuffles consistent between AVX-512 and the legacy intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 286725
If initializer contains parentheses around braced list where it is not allowed,
as in construct int({0}), clang issued message like `functional-style cast
from 'void' to 'int' is not allowed`, which does not help much. Both gcc and
msvc issue message `list-initializer for non-class type must not be
parenthesized`, which is more descriptive. This change implements similar
message for clang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25816
llvm-svn: 286721
Tobias Grosser