The three bit nf is one less than the number of NFIELDS,
so we manually decrement 1 for VS1/2/4/8R & VL1/2/4/8R.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98185
Change parseVTypeI function to Make the added vset instruction test cases report more concrete error message.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96218
As of the current draft these are no longer being considered
for the bitmanip spec. It wasn't clear what sub extension they
belonged in in the 0.93 spec.
So remove them. They can always be added back if something changes.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96157
In vector v0.10, there are whole vector register load/store
instructions. I suggest to use the whole register load/store
instructions for generic load/store for scalable vector types. It could
save up vset{i}vl{i} for these load/store.
For fractional LMUL, I keep to use vle{eew}.v/vse{eew}.v instructions to
load/store partial vector registers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95853
Remove common instructions from rv64 tests since they are now
covered by the rv64 run lines in the rv32 tests.
Add rv32-only* tests for a few cases that aren't common between
r32 and rv64.
Addresses review feedback from D95150.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95272
This adds support for ".attribute arch" for all extensions that are
currently supported by the compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94931
Add tests to make sure common instructions are accepted in RV64
and not just RV32.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95150
These instructions use a portion of the encodings for grevi and
gorci. The full encodings are only supported with Zbp. Note,
rev8 has a different encoding between rv32 and rv64.
Zbb is closer to being finalized that Zbp which has motivated
some decisions in this patch.
I'm treating rev8 and orc.b as separate instructions when
either Zbb or Zbp is enabled. This allows us to print to suggest
that either feature needs to be enabled to support these mnemonics.
I had tried to put HasStdExtZbbAndNotZbp on the Zbb instructions,
but that caused a diagnostic that said Zbp is required if neither
feature is enabled. We should really mention Zbb since its closer
to final.
This does require extra isel patterns for the different cases so
that bswap will always print as rev8 in assembly listing since
we can't use an InstAlias.
llvm-objdump disassembling should always pick the rev8 or orc.b
instructions. llvm-mc parsing and printing text will not convert
the grevi/gorci spellings to rev8/gorc.b. We could probably fix
this with a special case in processInstruction in the assembly
parser if it its important.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94944
zext.h uses the same encoding as pack rd, rs, x0 in rv32 and
packw rd, rs, x0 in rv64. Encodings without x0 as the second source
are not valid in Zbb.
I've added two new instructions with these specific encodings with
predicates that enable them when either Zbb or Zbp is enabled.
The pack spelling will only be accepted with Zbp. The disassembler
will use the zext.h instruction when either feature is enabled.
Using the pack spelling will print as pack when llvm-mc is
emitting text. We could fix this with some custom code in
processInstruction if this is important, but I'm not sure it is.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94818
Zext.h will need to come back to Zbb, but that only uses specific
encodings of pack.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94742
This didn't make it into the published 0.93 spec, but it was the
intention.
But it is in the tex source as of this commit
d172f029c0
This means zext.w now requires Zba. Not sure if we should still use
pack if Zbp is enabled and Zba isn't. I'll leave that for the future
when pack is closer to being final.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94736
Also renamed Zbe instructions to resolve name conflict even though
that change is in the 0.94 draft.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94653
It's not really clear in the spec that these are in Zbp now, but
that's what I've gather from previous commits to the spec. I've
file an issue to get it documented properly.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94652
This is the first of multiple patches to bring our 0.92
implementation up to 0.93.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94568
This patch sets the default for llvm tests, with the exception of tests
under Reduce, because quite a few of them use 'FileCheck' as parameter
to a tool, and including a flag as that parameter would complicate
matters.
The rest of the patch undo-es the lit.local.cfg changes we progressively
introduced as temporary measure to avoid regressions under various
directories.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95111
Upgrade RISC-V V extension to v1.0-08a0b46.
Indexed load/store have ordered and unordered form.
New whole vector load/store.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93614
There can be muliple patterns that map to the same compressed
instruction. Reversing those leads to multiple ways to uncompress
an instruction, but its not easily controllable which one will
be chosen by the tablegen backend.
This patch adds a flag to mark patterns that should only be used
for compressing. This allows us to leave one canonical pattern
for uncompressing.
The obvious benefit of this is getting c.mv to uncompress to
the addi patern that is aliased to the mv pseudoinstruction. For
the add/and/or/xor/li patterns it just removes some unreachable
code from the generated code.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94894
vmsltu.vi v0, v1, 0 is always false there is no unsigned number
less than 0. vmsleu.vi v0, v1, -1 on the other hand is always true
since -1 will be considered unsigned max and all numbers are <=
unsigned max.
A similar problem exists for vmsgeu.vi v0, v1, 0 which is always true,
but becomes vmsgtu.vi v0, v1, -1 which is always false.
To match the GNU assembler we'll emit vmsne.vv and vmseq.vv with
the same register for these cases instead.
I'm using AsmParserOnly pseudo instructions here because we can't
match an explicit immediate in an InstAlias. And we can't use a
AsmOperand for the zero because the output we want doesn't use an
immediate so there's nowhere to name the AsmOperand we want to use.
To keep the implementations similar I'm also handling signed with
pseudo instructions even though they don't have this issue. This
way we can avoid the special renderMethod that decremented by 1 so
the immediate we see for the pseudo instruction in processInstruction
is 0 and not -1. Another option might have been to have a different
simm5_plus1 operand for the unsigned case or just live with the
immediate being pre-decremented. I felt this way was clearer, but I'm
open to other opinions.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94035
This alias for andi x, 255 was recently added to the spec. If we
print it, code we output can't be compiled with -fno-integrated-as
unless the GNU assembler is also a version that supports alias.
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93826
We could expand vmsge{u}.vx pseudo instructions in RISCVAsmParser.
It is more appropriate to expand it before encoding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93968
We weren't consistently marking unary instructions as OneInput
and vid.v is really ZeroInput but we had no way to mark that.
This patch improves this by removing the error prone OneInput constraint.
Instead we just always look for the mask in the last operand.
It appears that the "CheckReg" variable used for the check on the broken
instruction was unitialized or garbage because it was also used for
VS1/VS2 constraints. I've scoped the variable locally to each check now.
I've gone through and set NoConstraint on instructions that don't have
a real VMConstraint and don't have a mask as the last operand.
I've also removed the unused enum values in RISCVBaseInfo.h. We
never use them in C++ and we have separate versions in a td file.
Reviewed By: HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93784
If users want to use vector floating point instructions, they need to
specify 'F' extension additionally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93282
There is an in-progress proposal for the following pseudo-instructions
in the assembler, to complement the existing `sext.w` rv64i instruction:
- sext.b
- sext.h
- zext.b
- zext.h
- zext.w
The `.b` and `.h` variants are available with rv32i and rv64i, and `zext.w` is
only available with `rv64i`.
These are implemented primarily as pseudo-instructions, as these instructions
expand to multiple real instructions. In the case of `zext.b`, this expands to a
single rv32/64i instruction, so it is implemented with an InstAlias (like
`sext.w` is on rv64i).
The proposal is available here: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-asm-manual/pull/61
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92793
-Reject an "mf1" lmul
-Make sure tail agnostic is exactly "tu" or "ta" not just that it starts with "tu" or "ta"
-Make sure mask agnostic is exactly "mu" or "ma" not just that it starts with "mu" or "ma"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92805
APInt's string constructor asserts on error. Since this is the parser and we don't yet know if the string is a valid integer we shouldn't use that.
Instead use StringRef::getAsInteger which returns a bool to indicate success or failure.
Since we no longer need APInt, use 'unsigned' instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92801
This makes the llvm-objdump output much more readable and closer to binutils objdump. This builds on D76591
It requires changing the OperandType for certain immediates to "OPERAND_PCREL" so tablegen will generate code to pass the instruction's address. This means we can't do the generic check on these instructions in verifyInstruction any more. Should I add it back with explicit opcode checks? Or should we add a new operand flag to control the passing of address instead of matching the name?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92147
So that instructions like `lla a5, (0xFF + end) - 4` (supported by GNU as) can
be parsed.
Add a missing test that an operand like `foo + foo` is not allowed.
Reviewed By: jrtc27
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92293
@tangxingxin1008 found a bug that regard vadd.vv v1, v3, a0 as a valid V
instruction. We should remove the VRegAsmOperand operand class and use
VR register class directly.
Patched by: tangxingxin1008, Hsiangkai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91712
Implement vmsge{u}.vx pseudo instruction.
According to RISC-V V specification, there are different scenarios for this
pseudo instruction. I list them below.
unmasked va >= x
pseudoinstruction: vmsge{u}.vx vd, va, x
expansion: vmslt{u}.vx vd, va, x; vmnand.mm vd, vd, vd
masked va >= x, vd != v0
pseudoinstruction: vmsge{u}.vx vd, va, x, v0.t
expansion: vmslt{u}.vx vd, va, x, v0.t; vmxor.mm vd, vd, v0
masked va >= x, vd == v0
pseudoinstruction: vmsge{u}.vx vd, va, x, v0.t, vt
expansion: vmslt{u}.vx vt, va, x; vmandnot.mm vd, vd, vt
Use pseudo instruction to model vmsge{u}.vx. The pseudo instruction will convert
to different expansion according to the condition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84732
Implements the assemble and disassemble support of RISCV Vector
extension zvamo instructions, base on the 0.9 spec version.
Reviewed by HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85069
This implements the assemble and disassemble support of RISCV Vector
extension Zvlsseg instructions, base on the 0.9 spec version.
Reviewed by HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84416
ShihPo Hung