`__builtin_available`
This commit allows us to use the macOS/iOS/tvOS/watchOS platform names in
`@available`/`__builtin_available`.
rdar://32067795
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33000
llvm-svn: 302540
This switches from the prototype syntax in P0273R0 ('module' and 'module
implementation') to the consensus syntax 'export module' and 'module'.
In passing, drop the "module declaration must be first" enforcement, since EWG
seems to have changed its mind on that.
llvm-svn: 301056
This commit teaches Clang to recognize editor placeholders that are produced
when an IDE like Xcode inserts a code-completion result that includes a
placeholder. Now when the lexer sees a placeholder token, it emits an
'editor placeholder in source file' error and creates an identifier token
that represents the placeholder. The parser/sema can now recognize the
placeholders and can suppress the diagnostics related to the placeholders. This
ensures that live issues in an IDE like Xcode won't get spurious diagnostics
related to placeholders.
This commit also adds a new compiler option named '-fallow-editor-placeholders'
that silences the 'editor placeholder in source file' error. This is useful
for an IDE like Xcode as we don't want to display those errors in live issues.
rdar://31581400
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32081
llvm-svn: 300667
This is a recommit of r300539 that was reverted in r300543 due to test failures.
The original commit message is displayed below:
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300556
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300539
as identifiers in Objective-C++
This commit improves the 'expected identifier' errors that are presented when a
C++ keyword is used as an identifier in Objective-C++ by mentioning that this is
a C++ keyword in the diagnostic message. It also improves the error recovery:
the parser will now treat the C++ keywords as identifiers to prevent unrelated
parsing errors.
rdar://20626062
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26503
llvm-svn: 299950
Summary:
I saw the same changes in the following review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D17438
I don't know in that way I could determine that atomic variable was initialized by macro ATOMIC_VAR_INIT. Anyway I added check that atomic variables can be initialize only in global scope.
I think that we can discuss this change.
Reviewers: Anastasia, cfe-commits
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Subscribers: bader, yaxunl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30643
llvm-svn: 299537
This adds the new pragma and the first variant, contract(on/off/fast).
The pragma has the same block scope rules as STDC FP_CONTRACT, i.e. it can be
placed at the beginning of a compound statement or at file scope.
Similarly to STDC FP_CONTRACT there is no need to use attributes. First an
annotate token is inserted with the parsed details of the pragma. Then the
annotate token is parsed in the proper contexts and the Sema is updated with
the corresponding FPOptions using the shared ActOn function with STDC
FP_CONTRACT.
After this the FPOptions from the Sema is propagated into the AST expression
nodes. There is no change here.
I was going to add a 'default' option besides 'on/off/fast' similar to STDC
FP_CONTRACT but then decided against it. I think that we'd have to make option
uppercase then to avoid using 'default' the keyword. Also because of the
scoped activation of pragma I am not sure there is really a need a for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31276
llvm-svn: 299470
The alias was only ever used on darwin and had some issues there,
and isn't used in practice much. Also fixes a problem with -mno-altivec
not turning off -maltivec.
Also add a diagnostic for faltivec/fno-altivec that directs users to use
maltivec options and include the altivec.h file explicitly.
llvm-svn: 298449
and the nature of a declaration
This commit adds an external_source_symbol attribute to Clang. This attribute
specifies that a declaration originates from an external source and describes
the nature of that source. This attribute will be used to improve IDE features
like 'jump-to-definition' for mixed-language projects or project that use
auto-generated code.
rdar://30423368
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29819
llvm-svn: 296649
such guides below explicit ones, and ensure that references to the class's
template parameters are not treated as forwarding references.
We make a few tweaks to the wording in the current standard:
1) The constructor parameter list is copied faithfully to the deduction guide,
without losing default arguments or a varargs ellipsis (which the standard
wording loses by omission).
2) If the class template declares no constructors, we add a T() -> T<...> guide
(which will only ever work if T has default arguments for all non-pack
template parameters).
3) If the class template declares nothing that looks like a copy or move
constructor, we add a T(T<...>) -> T<...> guide.
#2 and #3 follow from the "pretend we had a class type with these constructors"
philosophy for deduction guides.
llvm-svn: 295007
It's actually meaningful and useful to allow such variables to have no
initializer, but we are strictly following the standard here until the C++
committee reaches consensus on allowing this.
llvm-svn: 294785
This change adds a new type node, DeducedTemplateSpecializationType, to
represent a type template name that has been used as a type. This is modeled
around AutoType, and shares a common base class for representing a deduced
placeholder type.
We allow deduced class template types in a few more places than the standard
does: in conditions and for-range-declarators, and in new-type-ids. This is
consistent with GCC and with discussion on the core reflector. This patch
does not yet support deduced class template types being named in typename
specifiers.
llvm-svn: 293207
Under this defect resolution, the injected-class-name of a class or class
template cannot be used except in very limited circumstances (when declaring a
constructor, in a nested-name-specifier, in a base-specifier, or in an
elaborated-type-specifier). This is apparently done to make parsing easier, but
it's a pain for us since we don't know whether a template-id using the
injected-class-name is valid at the point when we annotate it (we don't yet
know whether the template-id will become part of an elaborated-type-specifier).
As a tentative resolution to a perceived language defect, mem-initializer-ids
are added to the list of exceptions here (they generally follow the same rules
as base-specifiers).
When the reference to the injected-class-name uses the 'typename' or 'template'
keywords, we permit it to be used to name a type or template as an extension;
other compilers also accept some cases in this area. There are also a couple of
corner cases with dependent template names that we do not yet diagnose, but
which will also get this treatment.
llvm-svn: 292518
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
This is a re-commit of r290080 (reverted in r290092) with a fix for a
use-after-lifetime bug.
llvm-svn: 290203
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
llvm-svn: 290080
Added a map to associate types and declarations with extensions.
Refactored existing diagnostic for disabled types associated with extensions and extended it to declarations for generic situation.
Fixed some bugs for types associated with extensions.
Allow users to use pragma to declare types and functions for supported extensions, e.g.
#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION the_new_extension_name : begin
// declare types and functions associated with the extension here
#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION the_new_extension_name : end
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21698
llvm-svn: 289979
Although not specifically mentioned in the documentation, MSVC accepts
__uuidof(…) and declspec(uuid("…")) attributes on enumeration types in
addition to structs/classes. This is meaningful, as such types *do* have
associated UUIDs in ActiveX typelibs, and such attributes are included
by default in the wrappers generated by their #import construct, so they
are not particularly unusual.
clang currently rejects the declspec with a –Wignored-attributes
warning, and errors on __uuidof() with “cannot call operator __uuidof on
a type with no GUID” (because it rejected the uuid attribute, and
therefore finds no value). This is causing problems for us while trying
to use clang-tidy on a codebase that makes heavy use of ActiveX.
I believe I have found the relevant places to add this functionality,
this patch adds this case to clang’s implementation of these MS
extensions. patch is against r285994 (or actually the git mirror
80464680ce).
Both include an update to test/Parser/MicrosoftExtensions.cpp to
exercise the new functionality.
This is my first time contributing to LLVM, so if I’ve missed anything
else needed to prepare this for review just let me know!
__uuidof: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zaah6a61.aspx
declspec(uuid("…")): https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/3b6wkewa.aspx
#import: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8etzzkb6.aspx
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, majnemer, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26846
llvm-svn: 289567
The code pattern used to implement the token rewriting hack doesn't
interact well with token caching in the pre-processor. As a result,
clang would crash on 'int f(::(id));' while doing a tenative parse of
the contents of the outer parentheses. The original code from PR11852
still doesn't crash the compiler.
This error recovery also often does the wrong thing with member function
pointers. The test case from the original PR doesn't recover the right
way either:
void S::(*pf)() = S::f; // should be 'void (S::*pf)()'
Instead we were recovering as 'void S::*pf()', which is still wrong.
If we still think that users mistakenly parenthesize identifiers in
nested name specifiers, we should change clang to intentionally parse
that form with an error, rather than doing a token rewrite.
Fixes PR26623, but I think there will be many more bugs like this around
token rewriting in the parser.
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25882
llvm-svn: 289273
This patch ensures that the typo fixit for the @try/@finally/@autoreleasepool {}
directive is shown only when we're parsing an actual statement where such
directives can actually be present.
rdar://19669565
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26916
llvm-svn: 288334
Since array parameters decay to pointers, '_Nullable' and friends
should be available for use there as well. This is especially
important for parameters that are typedefs of arrays. The unsugared
syntax for this follows the syntax for 'static'-sized arrays in C:
void test(int values[_Nullable]);
This syntax was previously accepted but the '_Nullable' (and any other
attributes) were silently discarded. However, applying '_Nullable' to
a typedef was previously rejected and is now accepted; therefore, it
may be necessary to test for the presence of this feature:
#if __has_feature(nullability_on_arrays)
One important change here is that DecayedTypes don't always
immediately contain PointerTypes anymore; they may contain an
AttributedType instead. This only affected one place in-tree, so I
would guess it's not likely to cause problems elsewhere.
This commit does not change -Wnullability-completeness just yet. I
want to think about whether it's worth doing something special to
avoid breaking existing clients that compile with -Werror. It also
doesn't change '#pragma clang assume_nonnull' behavior, which
currently treats the following two declarations as equivalent:
#pragma clang assume_nonnull begin
void test(void *pointers[]);
#pragma clang assume_nonnull end
void test(void * _Nonnull pointers[]);
This is not the desired behavior, but changing it would break
backwards-compatibility. Most likely the best answer is going to be
adding a new warning.
Part of rdar://problem/25846421
llvm-svn: 286519
This assert is intended to defend against backtracking into the middle
of a sequence of tokens that is being replaced with an annotation, but
it's OK if we backtrack to the exact position of the start of the
annotation sequence. Use a <= comparison instead of <.
Fixes PR25946
llvm-svn: 284777
Alex Lorenz