Fake parentheses (i.e. emulated parentheses used to correctly handle
binary expressions) used to prevent the optimization implemented in
r180264.
llvm-svn: 181692
Otherwise (when indenting from the wrapped -> or .), this looks
like a confusing indent.
Before:
aaaaaaa //
.aaaaaaa( //
aaaaaaa);
After:
aaaaaaa //
.aaaaaaa( //
aaaaaaa);
llvm-svn: 181595
Thereby, the macro is consistently formatted (including the trailing
escaped newlines) even if clang-format is invoked only on single lines
of the macro.
llvm-svn: 181590
Summary:
Adds actual config file reading to the clang-format utility.
Configuration file name is .clang-format. It is looked up for each input file
in its parent directories starting from immediate one. First found .clang-format
file is used. When using standard input, .clang-format is searched starting from
the current directory.
Added -dump-config option to easily create configuration files.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits, jordan_rose, kimgr
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D758
llvm-svn: 181589
If the LHS of a binary expression is broken, clang-format should also
break after the operator as otherwise:
- The RHS can be easy to miss
- It can look as if clang-format doesn't understand operator precedence
Before:
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa !=
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb && ccccccccc == ddddddddddd;
After:
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa != bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb &&
ccccccccc == ddddddddddd;
As an additional note, clang-format would also be ok with the following
formatting, it just has a higher penalty (IMO correctly so).
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa !=
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb &&
ccccccccc == ddddddddddd;
llvm-svn: 181430
Before:
aaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaa();
After:
aaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaa();
The reason for the change is that:
a) we are not sure which is better
b) it is a really rare edge case
c) it simplifies the code
d) it currently causes problems with memoization
llvm-svn: 181421
Summary:
Added parseConfiguration method, which reads FormatStyle from YAML
string. This supports all FormatStyle fields and an additional BasedOnStyle
field, which can be used to specify base style.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D754
llvm-svn: 181326
LLVM/Clang basically don't use such comments and for Google-style,
include-lines are explicitly exempt from the column limit. Also, for
most cases, where the column limit is violated, the "better" solution
would be to move the comment to before the include, which clang-format
cannot do (yet).
llvm-svn: 181191
clang-format did not indent any declarations/definitions when breaking
after the type. With this change, it indents for all declarations but
does not indent for function definitions, i.e.:
Before:
const SomeLongTypeName&
some_long_variable_name;
typedef SomeLongTypeName
SomeLongTypeAlias;
const SomeLongReturnType*
SomeLongFunctionName();
const SomeLongReturnType*
SomeLongFunctionName() { ... }
After:
const SomeLongTypeName&
some_long_variable_name;
typedef SomeLongTypeName
SomeLongTypeAlias;
const SomeLongReturnType*
SomeLongFunctionName();
const SomeLongReturnType*
SomeLongFunctionName() { ... }
While it might seem inconsistent to indent function declarations, but
not definitions, there are two reasons for that:
- Function declarations are very similar to declarations of function
type variables, so there is another side to consistency to consider.
- There can be many function declarations on subsequent lines and not
indenting can make them harder to identify. Function definitions
are already separated by their body and not indenting
makes the function name slighly easier to find.
llvm-svn: 181187
Deeply nested expressions basically break clang-format's memoization.
This patch slightly improves the situations and makes expressions like
aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(
aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(
aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(
aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(
aaaaa(aaaaa())))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))));
work.
llvm-svn: 180264
This enables formattings like:
#define A \
int aaaa; \
int b; \
int ccc; \
int dddddddddd;
Enabling this for Google/Chromium styles only as I don't know whether it
is desired for Clang/LLVM.
llvm-svn: 180253
In the following snippet, clang-format incorrectly aligned the
trailing comment, when only the last line was formatted:
int aaaaaa; // comment
int b;
int c; // Formatting only this line moved this comment.
llvm-svn: 180173
In Google style, constructor initializers need to be all on one line or
one initializer per line if that does not fit. Without this patch, this
non-bin-packing-behavior incorrectly extends to the parameters of the
initializers.
Before:
Constructor()
: aaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) {}
After:
Constructor()
: aaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) {}
llvm-svn: 180001
Summary:
Added BreakableLineComment, moved common code from
BreakableBlockComment to newly added BreakableComment. As a side-effect of the
rewrite, found another problem with escaped newlines and had to change
code which removes trailing whitespace from line comments not to break after
this patch.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D682
llvm-svn: 179693
We do this in general, but missed a few cases.
Before:
void aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbb bbbb);
After:
void aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
bbbb bbbb);
llvm-svn: 179570
Summary:
Both strings and block comments are broken into lines in
breakProtrudingToken. Logic specific for strings or block comments is abstracted
in implementations of the BreakToken interface. Among other goodness, this
change fixes placement of backslashes after a block comment inside a
preprocessor directive (see removed FIXMEs in unit tests).
The code is far from being polished, and some parts of it will be changed for
line comments support.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D665
llvm-svn: 179526
Previously we'd only detect structural errors on the very first level.
This leads to incorrectly balanced braces not being discovered, and thus
incorrect indentation.
This change fixes the problem by:
- changing the parser to use an error state that can be detected
anywhere inside the productions, for example if we get an eof on
SOME_MACRO({ some block <eof>
- previously we'd never break lines when we discovered a structural
error; now we break even in the case of a structural error if there
are two unwrapped lines within the same line; thus,
void f() { while (true) { g(); y(); } }
will still be re-formatted, even if there's missing braces somewhere
in the file
- still exclude macro definitions from generating structural error;
macro definitions are inbalanced snippets
llvm-svn: 179379
Function declarations are now broken with the following preferences:
1) break amongst arguments.
2) break after return type.
3) break after (.
4) break before after nested name specifiers.
Options #2 or #3 are preferred over #1 only if a substantial number of
lines can be saved by that.
llvm-svn: 179287
Before:
class A {
public : // test
};
After:
class A {
public: // test
};
Also remove duplicate methods calculating properties of AnnotatedTokens
and make them members of AnnotatedTokens so that they are in a common
place.
llvm-svn: 179167
The idea is to indent according to operator precedence and pretty much
identical to how stuff would be indented with parenthesis.
Before:
bool value = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ==
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb +
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa >
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
After:
bool value = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ==
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb +
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa >
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
llvm-svn: 179049
This combines several related changes:
a) Don't break before after the variable types in for loops with a
single variable.
b) Better indent DeclStmts defining multiple variables.
Before:
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa),
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb =
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb);
for (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaa = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
aaaaaaaaaaa != aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa; ++aaaaaaaaaaa) {
}
After:
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa),
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb =
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb);
for (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
aaaaaaaaaaa != aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa; ++aaaaaaaaaaa) {
}
llvm-svn: 178641
Basically we have always special-cased the top-level statement of an
unwrapped line (the one with ParenLevel == 0) and that lead to several
inconsistencies. All added tests were formatted in a strange way, for
example:
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
if (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa()) {
}
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
if (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa()) {
}
llvm-svn: 178542
Before:
int a; // not formatted
// formatting this line only
After:
int a; // not formatted
// formatting this line only
This makes clang-format stable independent of whether the whole
file or single lines are formatted in most cases.
llvm-svn: 177739
Apparently one needs to set LangOptions.LineComment.
Before "//* */" got reformatted to "/ /* */" as the lexer was returning
the token sequence (slash, comment). This could also lead to weird other
stuff, e.g. for people that like to using comments like:
//****************
llvm-svn: 177720
Summary:
1. When splitting one-line block comment, use indentation and *s.
2. Remove trailing whitespace from all lines of a comment, not only the ones being splitted.
3. Add backslashes for all lines if a comment is used insed a preprocessor directive.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D557
llvm-svn: 177635
Before (when only reformatting "int b"):
int a; // comment
// comment
int b;
After:
int a; // comment
// comment
int b;
This also fixes llvm.org/PR15433.
llvm-svn: 177524
This seems to be generally more desired.
Before:
if (aaaaaaaa &&
bbbbbbbb >
cccccccc) {}
After:
if (aaaaaaaa &&
bbbbbbbb >
cccccccc) {}
Also: Some formatting cleanup on clang-format's files.
llvm-svn: 177514
clang-format already prevented sequences like:
...
SomeParameter).someFunction(
...
as those are quite confusing. This failed on:
...
SomeParameter).someFunction(otherFunction(
...
Fixed in this patch.
llvm-svn: 177157
Summary:
Do this to avoid spoling nicely formatted multi-line comments (e.g.
with code examples or similar stuff).
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D544
llvm-svn: 177153
Summary:
Aligns continuation lines of multi-line comments to the base
indentation level +1:
class A {
/*
* test
*/
void f() {}
};
The first revision is work in progress. The implementation is not yet complete.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D541
llvm-svn: 177080
Before:
A = new SomeType * [Length];
A = new SomeType *[Length]();
After:
A = new SomeType *[Length];
A = new SomeType *[Length]();
Small formatting cleanups with clang-format.
llvm-svn: 176936
1. We now ignore all non-default string literals, including raw
literals.
2. We do not break inside escape sequences any more.
FIXME: We still break in trigraphs.
llvm-svn: 176710
With the cursor located at "I", clang-format would not do anything to:
int a;
I
int b;
With this patch, it reduces the number of empty lines as necessary, and
removes unnecessary whitespace. It does not change/reformat "int a;" or
"int b;".
llvm-svn: 176650
With [] marking the selected range, clang-format invoked on
[ ] int a;
Would so far not reformat anything. With this patch, it formats a
line if its leading whitespace is touched.
llvm-svn: 176435
In builder type call, we indent to the laster function calls.
However, for the last element of such a call, we don't need to do
so, as that normally just wastes space and does not increase
readability.
Before:
aaaaaa->aaaaaa->aaaaaa( // break
aaaaaa);
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
After:
aaaaaa->aaaaaa->aaaaaa( // break
aaaaaa);
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
llvm-svn: 176352
We now break at a slash if we do not find a space to break on.
Also fixes a bug where we would go over the limit when breaking the
second line.
llvm-svn: 176350
If we don't find a natural split point (currently space) in a string
literal protruding over the line, we just split at the last possible
point.
llvm-svn: 176349
Two improvements:
1) Always leave at least one space before "\". Otherwise is can look bad
and there is a risk of unwillingly joining to characters to a different
token.
2) Use the full column limit for single-line #defines.
Fixes llvm.org/PR15148
llvm-svn: 176245
After some discussions, it seems that this is the better path in
the long run. Does not change Chromium style, as there, bin packing
is forbidden by the style guide.
Also fix two minor bugs wrt. formatting:
1. If a call parameter is a function call itself and is split before
the "." or "->", split before the next parameter.
2. If a call parameter is string literal that has to be split onto
two lines, split before the next parameter.
llvm-svn: 176177
Empty lines followed by line comments are often used to highlight the
comment. Empty lines somewhere else are usually left over from manual or
automatic formatting and should probably be removed.
Before (clang-format would keep):
S s = {
a,
b
};
After:
S s = { a, b };
llvm-svn: 176086
We might want to move towards doing this if the formatting can be
significantly improved, but we need to carefully evaluate the different
situations first.
Before (the string literal was split by clang-format here):
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaa("aaa aaaaa aaa aaa aaaaa aaa "
"aaaaa aaa aaa aaaaaa"));
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaa("aaa aaaaa aaa aaa aaaaa aaa aaaaa aaa aaa aaaaaa"));
llvm-svn: 176084
This fixes llvm.org/PR15350.
Before:
Constructor(int Parameter = 0)
: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa),
aaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) {}
After:
Constructor(int Parameter = 0)
: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa),
aaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) {}
I think the correct solution is to put the VariablePos into
ParenState, not LineState. Added FIXME.
llvm-svn: 176027
In conditional expressions, if the condition is split over multiple
lines, also break before both operands.
This prevents formattings like:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ==
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ? b : c;
Which are bad, because they suggestion incorrect operator precedence:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ==
(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ? b : c);
This lead to the discovery that the expression parser incorrectly
handled conditional operators and that it could also handle semicolons
(which in turn reduced the amount of special casing for for-loops). As a
side-effect, we can now apply the bin-packing configuration to the
sections of for-loops.
llvm-svn: 175973
This fixes llvm.org/PR15033.
Also: Always break before a parameter, if the previous parameter was
split over multiple lines. This was necessary to make the right
decisions in for-loops, almost always makes the code more readable and
also fixes llvm.org/PR14873.
Before:
for (llvm::ArrayRef<NamedDecl *>::iterator I = FD->getDeclsInPrototypeScope()
.begin(), E = FD->getDeclsInPrototypeScope().end();
I != E; ++I) {
}
foo(bar(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb,
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc), d, bar(e, f));
After:
for (llvm::ArrayRef<NamedDecl *>::iterator
I = FD->getDeclsInPrototypeScope().begin(),
E = FD->getDeclsInPrototypeScope().end();
I != E; ++I) {
}
foo(bar(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb,
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc),
d, bar(e, f));
llvm-svn: 175741
We now indent the following correctly:
1. some + "literal" /* comment */
"literal";
2. breaking string literals after which we have another string literal.
llvm-svn: 175628
If the code author decides to put empty lines anywhere into the code we
should treat them equally, i.e. reduce them to the configured
MaxEmptyLinesToKeep.
With this change, we e.g. keep the newline in:
SomeType ST = {
// First value
a,
// Second value
b
};
llvm-svn: 175620
An alternative strategy to calculating the break on demand when hitting
a token that would need to be broken would be to put all possible breaks
inside the token into the optimizer.
Currently only supports breaking at spaces; more break points to come.
llvm-svn: 175613
The key bug was
if (Other.StartOfLineLevel < StartOfLineLevel) ..
instead of
if (Other.StartOfLineLevel != StartOfLineLevel) ..
Also cleaned up the function to be more consistent in the comparisons.
llvm-svn: 175500
In builder-type calls, it can be very confusing to just indent
parameters from the start of the line. Instead, indent 4 from the
correct function call.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa()->aaaaaa(bbbbb)->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa( // break
aaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *aaaaaaaaa = aaaaaa->aaaaaaaaaaaa()->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa()->aaaaaa(bbbbb)->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa( // break
aaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *aaaaaaaaa = aaaaaa->aaaaaaaaaaaa()
->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
llvm-svn: 175444
An unwrapped line can get moved around if there is no newline before
it and the previous line was formatted.
Example:
template<typename T> // Cursor is on this line when hitting "format"
T *getFETokenInfo() const { return static_cast<T*>(FETokenInfo); }
"return .." is the second unwrapped line in this scenario. I does not
touch any reformatted region. Thus, the result of formatting is:
template <typename T> T *getFETokenInfo() const { return static_cast<T *>(FETokenInfo); }
After second format (and arguably desired end-result):
template <typename T> T *getFETokenInfo() const {
return static_cast<T *>(FETokenInfo);
}
This fixes: llvm.org/PR15060.
llvm-svn: 175440
This got lost and was untested as the same effect is achieved by
avoiding bin packing, which is active in Google style by default.
However, moving forward, we want more control over the bin packing
option(s) and thus, this flag should work as expected.
llvm-svn: 175277
This is almost always more readable.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
? aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa : aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
? aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
llvm-svn: 175262
This gives a clearer separation of the context, e.g. in GMOCK
statements.
Before:
EXPECT_CALL(SomeObject,
SomeFunction(Parameter)).WillRepeatedly(Return(SomeValue));
After:
EXPECT_CALL(SomeObject, SomeFunction(Parameter))
.WillRepeatedly(Return(SomeValue));
Minor format cleanups.
llvm-svn: 175162
So far, clang-format has always assumed the whitespace belonging to the
subsequent token. This has the negative side-effect that when
clang-format formats a line, it does not remove its trailing whitespace,
as it belongs to the next token.
Thus, this patch fixes most of llvm.org/PR15062.
We are not zapping a file's trailing whitespace so far, as this does not
belong to any token we see during formatting. We need to fix this in a
subsequent patch.
llvm-svn: 175152
The formatter can now format:
void aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(int level,
double *min_x,
double *max_x,
double *min_y,
double *max_y,
double *min_z,
double *max_z, ) {
}
Although this is invalid code, it frequently happens during development and
clang-format should be nicer :-).
llvm-svn: 175151
This fixes llvm.org/PR15179.
Before:
class ColorChooserMac : public content::ColorChooser,
public content::WebContentsObserver {
};
After:
class ColorChooserMac : public content::ColorChooser,
public content::WebContentsObserver {
};
llvm-svn: 175147
This has so far been disabled for Google style, but should be done
before breaking at nested name specifiers or in template parameters.
Before (in Google style):
template <typename T>
aaaaaaaa::aaaaa::aaaaaa<T, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa> aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<
T>::aaaaaaa() {}
After:
template <typename T>
aaaaaaaa::aaaaa::aaaaaa<T, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa>
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>::aaaaaaa() {}
llvm-svn: 175074
- clear ownership: the SpecificBumpPtrAllocator owns all StateNodes
- this allows us to simplify the memoization data structure into a
std::set (FIXME: figure out whether we want to use a hash based
data structure).
- introduces StateNode as recursive data structure, instead of using
Edge and the Seen-map combined to drill through the graph
- using a count to stabilize the penalty instead of relying on the
container
- pulled out a method to forward-apply states in the end
This leads to a ~40% runtime decrease on Nico's benchmark.
Main FiXME is that the parameter lists of some function get too long.
I'd vote for either pulling the Queue etc into the Formatter proper,
or creating an inner class just for the search algorithm.
llvm-svn: 175051
Before:
for (id foo in[self getStuffFor : bla]) {
}
Now:
for (id foo in [self getStuffFor:bla]) {
}
"in" is treated as loop keyword if the line starts with "for", and as a
regular identifier else. To check for "in", its IdentifierInfo is handed
through a few layers.
llvm-svn: 174889
In google style, trailing comments are separated by two spaces. This
patch fixes the counting of these spaces and prevents clang-format from
creating a line with 81 columns.
llvm-svn: 174879
With this patch, the formatter introduces 'fake' parenthesis according
to the operator precedence of binary operators.
Before:
return aaaa & AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA || bbbb &
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB || cccc & CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC ||
dddd & DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD;
f(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa && aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa && aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
After:
return aaaa & AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ||
bbbb & BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB ||
cccc & CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC ||
dddd & DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD;
f(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa && aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa && aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa && aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
Future improvements:
- Get rid of some of the hacky ways to nicely format certain constructs.
- Merge this parser and the AnnotatingParser as we now have several parsers
that analyze (), [], etc.
llvm-svn: 174714
With this patch, clang-format can analyze the input file for two
properties:
1. Is "int *a" or "int* a" more common.
2. Are non-C++03 constructs used, e.g. A<A<A>>.
With Google-style, clang-format will now use the more common style for
(1) and format C++03 compatible, unless it finds C++11 constructs in the
input.
llvm-svn: 174504
We can now format stuff like:
- (void)doSomethingWith:(GTMFoo *)theFoo
rect:(NSRect)theRect
interval:(float)theInterval {
[myObject doFooWith:arg1 //
name:arg2
error:arg3];
}
This seems to fix everything mentioned in llvm.org/PR14939.
llvm-svn: 174364
This combines several changes:
* Calculation token type (e.g. for * and &) in the AnnotatingParser.
* Calculate the scope binding strength in the AnnotatingParser.
* Let <> and [] scopes bind stronger than () and {} scopes.
* Add minimal debugging output.
llvm-svn: 174307
In order to end up with good solutions, clang-format needs to try
"all" combinations of line breaks, evaluate them and select the
best one. Before, we have done this using a DFS with memoization
and cut-off conditions. However, this approach is very limited
as shown by the huge static initializer in the attachment of
llvm.org/PR14959.
Instead, this new implementation uses a variant of Dijkstra's
algorithm to do a prioritized BFS over the solution space.
Some numbers:
lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp: 1.5s -> 0.15s
Attachment of PR14959: 10min+ (didn't finish) -> 10s
No functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 174166
1. Never avoid bin packing in static initializers as this can
lead to terrible results.
2. If an element has to be broken over multiple lines, break after
the following comma.
This should be a step forward, but there are still many cases
especially with nested static initializers that we handle badly.
More patches will follow.
llvm-svn: 174061
The style guide only forbids this for function declarations. So,
now
someFunction(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaa);
Is allowed in Chromium mode.
llvm-svn: 173806
Before (in good cases):
for (auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) {}
for (auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa : aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaa)) {}
After:
for (auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa :
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) {}
for (auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa :
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaa)) {}
llvm-svn: 173684
Before we did not really systematically format those. Now, we format the
different cases as:
- 1 Line: a ? b : c;
- 2 Lines: short ? loooooooooong
: loooooooooong
- 2 Lines: loooooooooooooooong
? short : short
- 3 Lines: loooooooooooooooong
? loooooooooooooong
: loooooooooooooong
Not sure whether "?" and ":" should go on the new line, but it seems to
be the most consistent approach.
llvm-svn: 173683
1. Use a hanging ident for function calls nested in binary expressions.
E.g.:
int aaaaa = aaaaaaaaa && aaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaa);
2. Slightly improve heuristic for builder type expressions and reduce
penalty for breaking before "." and "->" in those.
3. Remove mostly obsolete metric of decreasing indent level. This
fixes: llvm.org/PR14931.
Changes #1 and #2 were necessary to keep tests passing after #3.
llvm-svn: 173680
These always represent a continuation and we should increase the ident.
Before:
aaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
After:
aaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
llvm-svn: 173675
This combines two small changes:
1) Put a penalty on breaking after "<"
2) Only produce a hanging indent when parameters are separated by
commas.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa>(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
aaaaaa(new Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa));
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa>(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
aaaaaa(new Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa));
This changes one ObjC test, but AFAICT this is not according to any
style guide (neither before nor after). We probably should be aligning
on the ":" there according to:
http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/objcguide.xml?showone=Method_Invocations#Method_Invocations
llvm-svn: 173457
Otherwise, really long nested name specifiers can easily lead to a
violation of the column limit.
Not sure about the rules for indentation in those cases, so input is
appreciated (see tests.).
llvm-svn: 173438
Before:
int aaaa = aaaaa().aaaaa() // force break
.aaaaa();
After:
int aaaa = aaaaa().aaaaa() // force break
.aaaaa();
The other indent is just wrong and confusing.
llvm-svn: 173273
Before:
bool aaaa = aaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
After:
bool aaaa = aaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
The other indentation was a nice attempt but doesn't work in many cases.
Not sure what the right long term solution is as the "After: " is still
not nice. We either need to figure out what to do in the cases where it
"doesn't work" or come up with a third solution, e.g. falling back to:
bool aaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
which should always work and nicely highlight the structure.
llvm-svn: 173268
Layouting would prevent breaking before + in
a[b + c] = d;
Regression detected by code review.
Also fixes an invalid-read found by the valgrind bot.
llvm-svn: 173262
Having seen more cases, this actually was not a good thing to do in the
first place. We can still improve on what we do now, but breaking after
the "=" is good in many cases.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaa = aa->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaa));
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaa =
aa->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaa));
llvm-svn: 173257
Before: if (int * a = &b) ...
After: if (int *a = &b) ...
Also changed all the existing tests to test the expressions in question
both in a declaration and in an expression context.
llvm-svn: 173256
We will need a more principled solution, but we should not leave this
unfixed until we come up with one.
Before: void f() { int * a; }
After: void f() { int *a; }
llvm-svn: 173252
This only affects styles where BinPackParameters is false.
With AllowAllParametersOnNextLine:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaa);
Without it:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaa);
llvm-svn: 173246
This gives us the ability to guess better defaults for whether a *
between identifiers is a pointer dereference or binary operator.
Now correctly formats:
void f(a *b);
void f() { f(a * b); }
llvm-svn: 173243
Changing nextToken() in the UnwrappedLineParser to get the next
non-comment token. This allows us to correctly layout a whole class of
snippets, like:
if /* */(/* */ a /* */) /* */
f() /* */; /* */
else /* */
g();
Fixes a bug in the formatter where we would assume there is a previous
non-comment token.
Also adds the indent level of an unwrapped line to the debug output in
the parser.
llvm-svn: 173168
We used to align trailing comments belong to different things.
Before:
void f() { // some function..
}
int a; // some variable..
After:
void f() { // some function..
}
int a; // some variable..
llvm-svn: 173100
We now only put empty blocks into a single line, if all of:
- all tokens of the structural element fit into a single line
- we're not in a control flow statement
Note that we usually don't put record definitions into a single line, as
there's usually at least one more token (the semicolon) after the
closing brace. This doesn't hold when we are in a context where there is
no semicolon, like "enum E {}".
There were some missing tests around joining lines around the corner
cases of the allowed number of columns, so this patch adds some.
llvm-svn: 173055
Before: template <template <typename T>, typename P > class X;
After: template <template <typename T>, typename P> class X;
More importantly, the token annotations for the second ">" are now computed
correctly.
llvm-svn: 173047
').' is likely part of a builder pattern statement.
This is based upon a patch developed by Nico Weber. Thank you!
Before:
int foo() {
return llvm::StringSwitch<Reference::Kind>(name).StartsWith(
".eh_frame_hdr", ORDER_EH_FRAMEHDR).StartsWith(
".eh_frame", ORDER_EH_FRAME).StartsWith(".init", ORDER_INIT).StartsWith(
".fini", ORDER_FINI).StartsWith(".hash", ORDER_HASH).Default(ORDER_TEXT);
}
After:
int foo() {
return llvm::StringSwitch<Reference::Kind>(name)
.StartsWith(".eh_frame_hdr", ORDER_EH_FRAMEHDR)
.StartsWith(".eh_frame", ORDER_EH_FRAME)
.StartsWith(".init", ORDER_INIT).StartsWith(".fini", ORDER_FINI)
.StartsWith(".hash", ORDER_HASH).Default(ORDER_TEXT);
}
Probably not ideal, but makes many cases much more readable.
The changes to overriding-ftemplate-comments.cpp don't seem better or
worse. We should address those soon.
llvm-svn: 172804
It's generally not possible to know if 'a' '*' 'b' is a multiplication
expression or a variable declaration with a purely lexer-based approach. The
formatter currently uses a heuristic that classifies this token sequence as a
multiplication in rhs contexts (after '=' or 'return') and as a declaration
else.
Because of this, it gets bit tests in ifs, such as "if (a & b)" wrong. However,
declarations in ifs always have to be followed by '=', so this patch changes
the formatter to classify '&' as an operator if it's at the start of an if
statement.
Before:
if (a& b)
if (int* b = f())
Now:
if (a & b)
if (int* b = f())
llvm-svn: 172731
Also adding more tests.
We can now keep the formatting of something like:
static SomeType type = { aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, /* comment */
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa /* comment */,
/* comment */ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, // comment
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa };
Note that the comment in the first line is handled like a trailing line comment
as that is likely what the user intended.
llvm-svn: 172711
Before: Constructor() : a(a), // comment a(a) {}
After: Constructor() : a(a), // comment
a(a) {}
Needed this as a quick fix. Will add more tests for this in a future
commit.
llvm-svn: 172624
We used to incorrectly parse
aaaaaa ? aaaaaa(aaaaaa) : aaaaaaaa;
Due to an l_paren being followed by a colon, we assumed it to be part of
a constructor initializer. Thus, we never found the colon belonging to
the conditional expression, marked the line as bing incorrect and did
not format it.
llvm-svn: 172621
"Bin-packing" here means allowing multiple parameters on one line, if a
function call/declaration is spread over multiple lines.
This is required by the Chromium style guide and probably desired for
the Google style guide. Not making changes to LLVM style as I don't have
enough data.
With this enabled, we format stuff like:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa).aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
llvm-svn: 172617
This makes the tedious fitsIntoLimit() method unnecessary and I can
replace one hack (constructor initializers) by a slightly better hack.
Furthermore, this will enable calculating whether a certain part of a
line fits into the limit for future modifications.
llvm-svn: 172604
It was quite convoluted leading to us accidentally introducing O(N^2)
complexity while copying from UnwrappedLine to AnnotatedLine. We might
still want to improve the datastructure in AnnotatedLine (most
importantly not put them in a vector where they need to be copied on
vector resizing but that will be done as a follow-up.
This fixes most of the regression in llvm.org/PR14959.
No formatting changes intended.
llvm-svn: 172602
This is an optimization that djasper spottet. For now, we do not format
anything after the first token that belongs to such an implicit string
literal. All our state is not made for handling that anyway, so we'll
revisit this if we find a problem.
llvm-svn: 172537
Treat tokens inside <> for includes and everything from the second token
of a warning / error on as an implicit string literal, e.g. do not
change its whitespace at all.
Now correctly formats:
#include < path with space >
#error Leave all white!!!!! space* alone!
Note that for #error and #warning we still format the space up to the
first token of the text, so:
# error Text
will become
#error Text
llvm-svn: 172536
We used to incorrectly identify some operators (*, &, +, -, etc.) if
there were comments around them.
Example:
Before: int a = /**/ - 1;
After: int a = /**/ -1;
llvm-svn: 172533
We now format this correctly:
Status::Rep Status::global_reps[3] = {
{ kGlobalRef, OK_CODE, NULL, NULL, NULL },
{ kGlobalRef, CANCELLED_CODE, NULL, NULL, NULL },
{ kGlobalRef, UNKNOWN_CODE, NULL, NULL, NULL }
};
- fixed a bug where BreakBeforeClosingBrace would be set on the wrong
state
- added penalties for breaking between = and {, and between { and any
other non-{ token
llvm-svn: 172433
Now, "if (a) return;" is only allowed, if this option is set.
Also add a Chromium style which is currently identical to Google style
except for this option.
llvm-svn: 172431
Before: if (a)
return;
After: if (a) return;
Not yet sure, whether this is always desired, but we can add options and
make this a style parameter as we go along.
llvm-svn: 172413
Main difference, add an AnnotatedLine class to hold information about a
line while formatting. At the same time degrade the UnwrappedLine class
to a class solely used for communicating between the UnwrappedLineParser
and the Formatter.
No functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 172403
clang-format should not change whether or not there is a line break
before a line comment as this strongly influences the percieved binding.
User input: void f(int a,
// b is awesome
int b);
void g(int a, // a is awesome
int b);
Before: void f(int a, // b is awesome
int b);
void g(int a, // a is awesome
int b);
After: <unchanged from input>
llvm-svn: 172361
I am not aware of a case where that would be wrong. The specific case I
am fixing are function parameters wrapped in parenthesis (e.g. in
macros).
Before: function(a,(b));
After: function(a, (b));
llvm-svn: 172351
A ")" before any of "=", "{" or ";" won't be a cast. This fixes issues
with the formatting of unnamed parameters.
Before: void f(int *){}
After: void f(int *) {}
llvm-svn: 172349
canBreakBefore() does not allow breaking after ':' for LT_ObjCMethodDecl lines,
so if Newline is true in addTokenToState() for ':' then LT_ObjCMethodDecl
cannot be set. No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 172307
This follows the approach suggested by djasper in PR14911: When a '[' is
seen that's at the start of a line, follows a binary operator, or follows one
of : [ ( return throw, that '[' and its closing ']' are marked as
TT_ObjCMethodExpr and every ':' in that range that isn't part of a ternary
?: is marked as TT_ObjCMethodExpr as well.
Update the layout routines to not output spaces around ':' tokens that are
marked TT_ObjCMethodExpr, and only allow breaking after such tokens, not
before.
Before:
[self adjustButton : closeButton_ ofKind : NSWindowCloseButton];
Now:
[self adjustButton:closeButton_ ofKind:NSWindowCloseButton];
llvm-svn: 172304
Daniel Jasper